KOMMONSENTSJANE – Chuck Schumer Poured Millions Into an Election Scheme That Got Democrats Criminal Charges

Reblogged on kommonsentsjane

How to solve this problem is very simple:

KOMMONSENTSJANE – WAKING UP: WALKING AWAY FROM THE DNC.

Posted on January 1, 2020 by kommonsentsjane

06/07/2026

Question: Why is it the voters keep electing these same crooks over and over?

If criminal charges are in play – when will justice be served on the guilty?

ttps://unmuzzlednews.com/chuck-schumer-poured-millions-into-an-election-scheme-that-got-democrats-criminal-charges/?utm_source=decide&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=umn_3382996155&utm_term=&utm_content=240175

Chuck Schumer Poured Millions Into an Election Scheme That Got Democrats Criminal Charges

May 30, 2026

4 minute read

Seth Pickett via Shutterstock

Chuck Schumer has spent his entire career buying Senate seats in states that don’t want him.

Nebraska just caught him doing it in a way nobody has ever tried before.

And the Democrat he bankrolled was dumb enough to post the whole plan on her campaign website.

Why Democrats Ran a Fake Independent in the Nebraska Senate 2026 Race

Nebraska has not elected a Democrat to the Senate since 2006.

Democrats know it.

So instead of running a real candidate against Republican Sen. Pete Ricketts, they built a workaround.

Dan Osborn is a steamfitter and former union organizer who runs as an independent – no party label, working-class image, populist message.

He nearly pulled it off in 2024, losing to Republican Sen. Deb Fischer by just 7 points in a state Trump carried by 20.

Democrats decided to run him again in 2026 against Ricketts.

The problem is the math.

A Democrat on the general election ballot alongside Osborn splits the anti-Ricketts vote and hands the Republican an easy win.

The solution was Cindy Burbank.

Run a Democrat in the primary to satisfy the ballot requirement, win the nomination, then quit – clearing the field so Osborn gets Ricketts one-on-one.

The Nebraska Democratic Party endorsed the plan, funded it, and called it smart politics.

Cindy Burbank Signed a Legal Oath She Had Already Decided to Break

Every Senate candidate in Nebraska signs the same four-word filing oath: “I will serve if elected.”

Former Democrat Senate Candidate Cindy Burbank signed it – then posted on her own campaign website that she would quit if she won and hand her support to Osborn.

She confirmed the plan to the New York Times after the primary was over.

Burbank won the Democrat Senate primary over a candidate who pledged to stay in the race and then kept her word to drop out.

Former Republican state Sen. Lydia Brasch filed a criminal complaint with Nebraska AG Mike Hilgers alleging Burbank violated state law through election falsification, perjury, and making false sworn statements.

A second complaint targets Legal Marijuana NOW nominee Mike Marvin on the same theory – that he ran as a placeholder to drain votes, then exit for Osborn.

Both face up to 7 years in prison if convicted.

The Party Spent $136,000 on a Candidate Whose Only Job Was to Quit

The Nebraska Democratic Party did not just tolerate Burbank’s plan.

They funded it.

The party spent at least $136,000 boosting a campaign whose only purpose was to manufacture an endorsement for somebody else.

When the Nebraska Secretary of State briefly removed Burbank from the primary ballot – citing the good-faith candidate requirement – Democrats brought in election lawyer Marc Elias.

Elias sued Nebraska and got Burbank restored to the ballot.

A candidate signs an oath she plans to break, a party bankrolls the deception, and one of the most powerful election lawyers in the country flies in to make sure the mechanics hold up.

Dan Osborn Is Chuck Schumer’s Candidate Whether He Admits It or Not

Osborn markets himself as a Nebraska working-class independent.

Schumer’s Senate Majority PAC spent $3.85 million supporting Osborn’s 2024 campaign.

Schumer’s own leadership PAC sent Osborn a $5,000 personal donation.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee gave Osborn a maxed-out $57,800 contribution.

Elizabeth Warren, Dick Durbin, Jamie Raskin, and members of the Soros family have all written checks.

Osborn raises money through ActBlue – the Democrat Party’s fundraising platform – thanks to a rule change designed to benefit candidates who want Democrat money without the Democrat label.

His digital operation, the Fight Agency, was founded by Sanders 2016 campaign consultants and is currently running the campaign of socialist New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani.

That is not an independent candidate.

That is a Democrat in a union t-shirt.

Marc Elias Flew In to Protect It and Nebraska’s AG Now Has the Complaints

AG Mike Hilgers has not yet commented on the complaints.

Democrats are betting this dies quietly – that legal complexity provides enough cover to run out the clock.

They are counting on Nebraskans not noticing that a candidate who publicly promised to quit still got $136,000 in party money, still had Marc Elias in her corner, and still got certified onto the ballot.

Democrats have run this field-clearing operation before – find a sympathetic face, strip the party label, and funnel millions through outside groups while the candidate pretends to be something he is not.

The difference in Nebraska is that somebody got greedy and left a paper trail.

A candidate signed a sworn oath she never intended to keep and posted her exit plan on her own website before a single vote was counted.

Chuck Schumer’s PAC dropped $3.85 million to make sure it worked.

Nebraska’s Attorney General now has all of it on his desk.

The only question is whether he does something about it – or whether Schumer gets away with it again.


Sources:

  • Rusty Weiss, “Dem Sen Candidate Hit With Criminal Complaint for Election Falsification Scam to Boost Fake Independent,” RedState, May 29, 2026.
  • Staff, “Complaints About U.S. Senate Candidates Who Hinted at Helping Osborn Sent to Nebraska AG,” Nebraska Examiner, May 29, 2026.
  • Staff, “Nebraska Senate Hopeful Running ‘Independent’ Bid Continues Getting Bankrolled by Left,” Fox News, May 2026.
  • Staff, “Fake Independent Dan Osborn Is Funded by Chuck Schumer, Claims to Not Know Schumer,” KCSR/KBPY, February 12, 2026.
  • Staff, “NRSC Launches Digital Ad Targeting Dan Osborn’s Senate Campaign,” Nebraska TV, July 2025.
  • Staff, “Dan Osborn Endorsed by NE Democratic Party for 2026 Senate Race,” Nebraska TV, August 2025.
  • ****
  • When does justice for the citizens come into play?.

It is time to balance the scales of justice, isn’t it?

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Fraudsters Bragged Online About Stealing Your Tax Dollars and the Feds Just Caught Up

06/07/2026

Another crook:

ttps://unmuzzlednews.com/fraudsters-bragged-online-about-stealing-your-tax-dollars-and-the-feds-just-caught-up/

Fraudsters Bragged Online About Stealing Your Tax Dollars and the Feds Just Caught Up

June 6, 2026

Vladimir Gudvin via Shutterstock

Stupidity in action:

A Memphis rapper stole $1.2 million in unemployment benefits and turned the crime into a music video.

Half a million people watched it before the feds showed up.

What Congress just promised to do to the fraudsters still posting their step-by-step guides online will end their careers.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Laura Ingraham: This is TOTALLY unacceptable – YouTube

06/06/2026

For your information:

ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwubPXzs_DU

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – What Do These Republicans Not Like About HONEST Elections?

06/08/2026

tps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hawley-blasts-4-republicans-who-voted-to-reject-adding-voter-id-bill-to-reconciliation-package/ar-AA256Wee?ocid=winp2fptaskbar&cvid=6a26bf859e6347d6a36aa16433a0c922&ei=23

****

06/05/2026

Collins promised me she would do better when voting against her own party? Did she lie to me? What is the reasoning for their votes? Is Trump dislike the problem? These people work for the country/taxpayers and decisions made should be for the good of the country – not to garner attention.

Shame on the four is my vote. Can we try a revote – soon? These four have been in office too long. They are rolling stones who have gathered a lot of dust and dollars.

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/insight/senate-republicans-join-democrats-to-block-save-america-act/gm-GM2BE38E02?gemSnapshotKey=GM2BE38E02-snapshot-1&uxmode=ruby&ctsrc=dgst&ocid=edgdhpruby&pc=DCTS&cvid=6a22d555e8fb4e4fa1c6951b7ccef416&ei=12

•Curated by Copilot•2h ago

Senate Republicans join Democrats to block SAVE America Act

Key vote failure:Four Republican senators joined Democrats to reject the SAVE America Act, a major Trump-backed election reform bill, in a 48-50 vote.

Bill’s main provisions:The measure would have required proof of citizenship and photo ID for voting, sharply limited mail-in ballots, and imposed federal election standards.

Political implications:The defeat highlights GOP divisions, weakens Trump’s grip on his party, and raises doubts about the bill’s future amid universal Democratic opposition.

Senate deals second blow to Trump’s SAVE America Act

The Senate voted 48-50 against attaching the SAVE America Act to a $70 billion immigration enforcement package, marking the second failed attempt to advance the bill this year. Republican Senators Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Mitch McConnell, and Thom Tillis joined all Democrats in opposition, preventing the measure from reaching the 60-vote threshold needed under Senate rules. The bill had previously passed the House in February but has stalled in the upper chamber despite being labeled Trump’s top legislative priority.Newsweek + 3

Newsweek

Do you not have any shame?

WordPress removed the rest of the above paragraph.

Again – WordPress removed the following statement from the above.

The first lady on the left looks smug and the second looks very happy and then you have the two men – one on the left looks confused and the one on the right looks like he is rethinking his vote.

https://lawshun.com/article/do-most-countries-have-voter-id-laws

ttps://lawshun.com/article/do-most-countries-have-voter-id-laws

A setback for Trump’s legislative agenda

The defeat of the SAVE America Act adds to a growing list of legislative setbacks for President Trump, who has faced recent GOP rebellions on issues ranging from war powers to controversial funding proposals. Despite holding a Senate majority, Republican leaders have been unable to unify their caucus behind the bill, with some members citing constitutional concerns and opposition to federalizing election rules. The failure underscores the limits of Trump’s influence over Senate Republicans as midterm elections approach.AFP + 2

Trump blasts opposition, senators defend votes.

Trump has repeatedly framed the SAVE America Act as essential for election integrity, vowing it should supersede all other legislation. His Truth Social posts and Oval Office remarks emphasized voter ID, proof of citizenship, and restrictions on mail-in ballots, while also including unrelated cultural provisions. Opposing Republicans like Murkowski, McConnell, Collins, and Tillis defended their votes by warning against unconstitutional overreach, burdens on voters, and sweeping federal control of elections. Newsweek.

Atlanta Black Star News

‘They’re Trump deranged’: Trump lashes out at critics of the ‘Save America Act’ in White House remarks

And we just don’t want cheating in our elections.

From House passage to Senate roadblocks

After passing the House on a near party-line vote, the SAVE America Act faced procedural and political obstacles in the Senate, including the filibuster’s 60-vote requirement. Efforts to attach it to budget reconciliation packages failed twice, and alternative proposals—such as funding incentives for states to adopt voter ID—have emerged. Critics argue the bill would disenfranchise eligible voters lacking specific documents, while supporters see it as a national standard to prevent fraud, despite studies showing noncitizen voting is extremely rare. 

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment