Here is a good example: Whose cheating who?

ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owAkxteoVHQ

Question: Re the trial between Fox News and Dominion? What is the trial about if this is true that the machines manipulate – than why is Fox News worried about their people who told the truth that the machines cheated in the 2020 election. Case closed.

ttps://roccistuccishow.com/cybersecurity-expert-confirms-sql-software-on-voting-machines-and-manipulation-of-votes-on-dominion-machines/

Just add an “h” if you want to read the reference.

4/13/2023

CYBERSECURITY EXPERT CONFIRMS SQL SOFTWARE ON VOTING MACHINES AND MANIPULATION OF VOTES ON DOMINION MACHINES
April 12, 2023
Steven Ahle

In 2020 Democrats warned of the ability to cheat using the voting machines offered by Dominion and machines that are equipped with SQL software.

After President Trump set a new record for votes for a sitting president there were multiple late-night vote drops in swing states and in the end, they claimed Joe Biden received 81 million votes.

They must have used the same counting method used in the Million Man March and the announcement of Biden’s tally should have begun with, “Once upon a time.”

Last week, cybersecurity expert Mark Cook proved how machines with SQL and Dominion voting machines could be manipulated to switch votes and add votes in order to undermine an election.

Moreover, he proved how this could be done without leaving a trace of the manipulation. On the Conservative Daily Podcast, Cook used an exact copy of the Dominion Voting software that was used in Mesa County, Colorado. He used that demonstration to prove two ways the election could be “fixed” in favor of Democrats.

The first issue demonstrated is that there is software that can manipulate the database used in elections using the SQL system which is not certified to be used in elections.

From The Gateway Pundit

THE REPORT:

After the forensic examination of 16 Dominion Voting machines in Antrim, Co. MI, Allied Security Operations Group has concluded that the Dominion Voting machines were assigned a 68.05% error rate.

DePerno explained that when ballots are put through the machine, a whopping 68.05% error rate means that 68.05% of the ballots are sent for bulk adjudication, which means they collect the ballots in a folder. “The ballots are sent somewhere where people in another location can change the vote,” DePerno explained.

From The Gateway Pundit

This software allows back-end access that bypasses any security and logging/tracking features that would and should exist in the application software itself.

In last week’s demonstration, Cook only had to click on the software from the Start Menu of the Windows operating system, click the Connect button, then was allowed access to the voting system database without having to enter any special password. After a few more clicks and four key presses on the keyboard, Cook was able to flip the results of an election.

The second critical issue demonstrated is the existence of a second back-door program, a single file hidden among the over 416,000 files on the server. This program allows direct manipulation of the voting system database also in an un-traceable manner. Further, it allows anyone to execute SQL statements, stored procedures, and script files of their choosing. To demonstrate another critical issue, Cook shows how simply just plugging in a pre-programmed USB stick could leverage this utility to alter the results in the SQL database contained on the Election Management System. This software was also not on the listed among the software that was tested and certified.

According to Cook, neither piece of software has any business on any election system.

Below are two demonstrations Cook performed on the Conservative Daily Podcast. In the first example, Cook is able to insert the USB stick. You then seen a command prompt appear and run the script to manipulate the database. Cook said that he deliberately made this visible and slowed it down so we could see first hand how it works. Easy as that. Plug and play:

In the second demonstration below, Cook uses a smartphone to manipulate the database with relative ease. He states that he didn’t even put a password in to access the management software.

“Every part of this process, I’m expecting it to stop me. I’m shocked every time I’m able to get further and further into this thinking ‘how on earth did someone set up a system that is this insecure? That the citizens think it’s actually secure. And the election officials are sitting there telling their friends and family and their citizens that they represent that the systems are secure when they are lying without even knowing it.”

And Democrats insist this was the most secure election in history. Russian history perhaps but not in American history.