7/20/2024
ttps://thebeltwayreport.com/2024/07/eyewitness-police-are-lying-they-saw-assassin-on-roof-did-nothing-video/?utm_source=Beltway%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:93355093&utm_campaign=EYEWITNESS:%20Police%20Are%20LYING!%20They%20Saw%20ASSASSIN%20on%20Roof%20&%20DID%20NOTHING!%20[VIDEO]
Is this a joke by the Police? It was displayed on TV for at least 30 minutes or so – jockeying between showing the shooter on the roof and the people telling the Police about the shooter – even after President Trump was on the stage.
In each instance – the Police didn’t seem to be excited as much as the people trying to display their concern to the Police.
Is this called deliberate negligence?
Watching on TV – it made you feel helpless. Everyone saw the shooter on the roof.
*****
COVER UPS
EYEWITNESS: Police Are LYING! They Saw ASSASSIN On Roof & DID NOTHING! [VIDEO]
Published10 hrs ago.
OPINION| In the wake of the shocking assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, a startling eyewitness account has emerged, challenging the official narrative put forth by law enforcement officials. According to a witness, police officers stationed on the second floor of a nearby building observed the alleged sniper but failed to take decisive action. This revelation casts doubt on the authorities’ handling of the incident and raises questions about the security measures in place to protect public figures.
The eyewitness, who wishes to remain anonymous, claims to have been present at the scene when the shooting occurred. According to the witness, the police officers stationed on the second floor of the building were aware of the alleged sniper’s presence and had a clear view of the individual. However, they did not intervene or take any action to neutralize the threat.
“The guys on the second floor were watching, but they didn’t do anything!” the witness exclaimed, expressing frustration and disbelief at the apparent inaction of the police officers.
If the eyewitness’s account is accurate, it raises serious concerns about the effectiveness of the security measures in place to protect high-profile individuals like former President Trump. It also calls into question the response time and decision-making of the law enforcement officers on the scene.
According to the official account provided by law enforcement officials, the Secret Service acted swiftly and decisively to neutralize the threat posed by the alleged sniper. They claim that the officers on the second floor were unaware of the sniper’s presence until after the shooting had occurred.
Here is the transcript:
‘Butler County Sheriff Michael Slupe confirmed to KDKA-TV that an armed municipal officer with Butler Township encountered shooter Thomas Crooks before he fired shots from a rooftop building outside the perimeter of former President Trump’s rally.
The sheriff said he was not made aware of any potential threats, but confirmed an officer encountered the shooter on the roof, and didn’t fire his weapon.
“All I know is the officer had both hands on the roof to get up on the roof, never made it because the shooter had turned towards the officer, and rightfully and smartly, the officer let go,” Sheriff Slupe said.
Sheriff Slupe says before the shooting, the officer and others were previously alerted to a suspicious person and began searching for him right away.
Sheriff Slupe said this officer was hoisted by another officer to the roof of a building where the shooter had taken a position.
The shooter, Crooks, focused his rifle on the officer who let go and fell off the roof. Then, the 20-year-old began firing into the crowd.’
The stark contrast between the eyewitness account and the official narrative raises questions about the veracity of the information being provided by law enforcement officials. It is crucial to consider the possibility that the authorities may be attempting to downplay their own shortcomings or failures in the handling of the incident.
Key witness Greg Smith exclusively told the Gateway Pundit:
“I saw him [the sniper] right before he shots happened, and I didn’t see him turn around and confront anyone. I never saw that and it didn’t happen. We asked all the people around us and in our group and we didn’t see that. I heard the story about the officer falling and hurting his foot, no one saw that. I’ve heard the stories, but I have no idea what they’re talking about.”
“I was looking all around to get law enforcement’s attention before the shots, and I could tell it was coming, because as I was standing there for several minutes I kept thinking ‘why is Trump still talking?’ You expect someone to be on the radio or whatever the protocol is, to get Trump off the stage. I knew this isn’t good. I expected the shots to start, and then they did. It was mass chaos. I was looking at the guys on the second story, my eyes were jumping three or four different places, I could see that they saw him and were looking at him and watching what he was doing, but they didn’t do anything.“
In the aftermath of a high-profile assassination attempt, it is essential that the authorities provide a transparent and accurate account of the events that transpired. The public deserves to know the truth about what happened and whether there were any lapses in security that allowed the alleged sniper to carry out the attack.
The eyewitness account of the alleged police inaction during the rooftop confrontation with the supposed sniper casts doubt on the official narrative provided by law enforcement officials. It is imperative that a thorough investigation be conducted to uncover the truth about the events leading up to the assassination attempt on former President Trump. Only through transparency and accountability can we hope to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
kommonsentsjane
