Now let’s show them what it should have sounded like.
The CHICKS are now just a bunch of TURKEYS.
Foolish or inept.
When someone is called a “turkey,” it is often used as a slang term to describe someone who is foolish or inept. This term is commonly used in a lighthearted or humorous context, and is not typically meant to be taken literally. Calling someone a turkey is often a way to poke fun at their behavior or actions in a playful manner.
We will correct their foolishness with the way this song is suppose to be sung:
Have to change – Google interfered and ADDED THE RUSSIAN ANTHEM to play after the U.S. anthem finished.
That tells you who they are following? Remember the Democrats/past – RUSSIA/RUSSIA – the Durham Report?
“Our farmers and our ranchers have been reflecting their price increases that they’ve had, which has elevated food prices over the last two, three years now,” he noted.
“We’re seeing increases, you know, like everybody who has a house or a condo or an apartment, you’re seeing costs go up on fuel and energy or gas used to be around 2 or 3 bucks a gallon, it’s a little higher than that now,” he continued.
“They’re not calling me up and trying to artificially increase their prices, they’re calling me because their prices are going up.
****
FOX News
Leonard Jr. also mentioned how he speaks and deals with his suppliers who inform him their prices are rising.
Kamala Harris’ energy policies punish the meat industry: Chris Young
The Harris’ campaign released a document last week saying that if she’s elected, her administration would work with Congress to “advance the first-ever federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries; set clear rules of the road to make clear that big corporations can’t unfairly exploit consumers to run up excessive profits on food and groceries.”
When it comes to the vice president’s plan to fight price gouging, Leonard Jr. said, “I’m sure” there was a “small percentage” of companies who saw a “little window during COVID.”
“Most of the people out there right now had to increase their prices due to their costs going up,” and added that overall regulation for his business is “good” to “protect the consumer.”
“One thing I’ve learned in my 50 years of retailing in our family business, if you raise prices, guess what happens to sales, they go down, you know, unless you’re Gucci or Prada or something like that.”
FOX Business’ Eric Revell contributed to this report.
According to a comprehensive analysis by the Measuring Worth project, inflation rates have fluctuated dramatically across presidential terms. Some leaders presided over periods of relative price stability while others grappled with double-digit increases.¹
As Americans feel the pinch of rising costs, a look back at how different administrations have fared in taming the inflation beast reveals some surprising insights. But which commander-in-chief truly deserves the title of inflation-fighter-in-chief?
The Results Are In: Bidenomics Is a Complete Failure | Opinion
Published Sep 20, 2023 at 7:00 AM EDT
Joe Biden Faces Economic Pressure On At Least Five Fronts
By Tom Emmer and Randy Feenstra
Over the last several months, President Joe Biden has desperately traversed the country trying to resuscitate his plummeting poll numbers and reassure American families that his economic agenda is working. He claims that multi-trillion-dollar investments in green energy and excessive government spending will propel our economy into unprecedented heights of American prosperity.
In other words, he is intentionally misleading Americans with the message that his fiscal policies—which he has coined “Bidenomics”—are beneficial. Fortunately, in poll after poll, the American people resoundingly reject Bidenomics because they see everywhere—from the gas station to the grocery store to their credit-card statements—that the Biden administration’s economic agenda has failed. Injecting trillions of dollars into our economy didn’t deliver financial relief; it fueled the worst inflation crisis in more than 40 years.
Naturally, President Biden ignores the reality of his economic policies. Thanks to Bidenomics, American families’ credit card debt has reached a record $1 trillion as people struggle to pay their bills and feed their families under the weight of inflation. The dream of home ownership has slipped out of reach for countless Americans as mortgage rates approach 8 percent and banks tighten their lending requirements. Sixty-one percent of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, gas prices are once again spiking nationwide due to the Biden administration’s anti-American energy policies, and American households have lost, on average, $33,000 in real wealth this year alone. No wonder almost two-thirds of Americans disapprove of the president’s economic initiatives.
To make matters worse, the federal deficit—which was originally projected to return to pre-COVID levels—is now expected to double this year to $2 trillion, accelerating the catastrophic consequences of our $33 trillion national debt on our economic vitality and national security. This is one of many reasons why Fitch Ratings—one of the largest credit rating agencies in the country—recently downgraded our creditworthiness, pointing to our deteriorating fiscal stability and ballooning national debt.
While House Republicans didn’t create this mess, we are working hard to clean it up. Since the beginning of the 118th Congress, we have passed strong legislation to rebuild our economy, rein in the power of the executive branch, restore the congressional power of the purse, end wasteful spending, and reduce costs for American families.
WASHINGTON, DC – SEPTEMBER 17: U.S. President Joe Biden walks out of the White House as he prepares to board Marine One on the south lawn on September 17, 2023 in Washington, DC. President Biden… More Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images
To date, President Biden’s overreaching regulations and burdensome red tape have cost American workers nearly $10,000 per household. His 122 executive orders have saddled our families, farmers, and businesses with $1.5 trillion in additional and unforeseen expenses.
Republicans passed both the REIN IN Inflation Act and the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act to curb record-high inflation sparked by President Biden’s wasteful spending policies and costly executive orders. These two pieces of legislation would require federal bureaucrats to report to Congress the estimated inflationary impact of any executive order before an official vote and ensure that every new “major rule”—that is, any rule with an annual effect on the American economy of $100 million or more—be approved by both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate before taking effect.
We also took aim at President Biden’s attempts, through the Federal Housing Finance Agency, to increase mortgage payments for homeowners with higher credit scores and redistribute those funds to individuals with low credit scores at a time when home mortgages are increasingly unaffordable. It is estimated that this policy could swell mortgage payments for responsible taxpayers from anywhere between $400 to $1,200 per year. Our Free Market Mortgage Act—which passed the House—repeals this unfair rule. On top of higher costs and unrelenting inflation, we should never stick our families with more taxes and more fees.
****
What a way to run a business called the government. Politicians should have to run a business before they attempt to be a politician. The government is a business and needs to be treated as such. How many years have the Democrats been running it and still have not been successful. Look at us now.
The problem is the Democrats (Pelosi/Obama/One World Order) have been trying to fool the public with Biden. They knew he had dementia before the last election and why he stayed in the basement. And now, we have too many fingers running/handling the money and taking their share that they don’t have time to take care of the real government business.
Obama is not an elected official and should not have any involvement in the working of government. If he was involved in Pelosi’s Jan6 – he worked to over throw the government which they did.
It is time for the Supreme Court to get involved with Obama monkeying around in our government.
In a move that shocked no one paying attention, former President Barack Obama delivered a speech at the Democratic National Convention (DNC) that was as superficial as it was self-serving. Just weeks after reportedly playing a key role in pushing Joe Biden out of the 2024 presidential race, Obama took the stage to heap praise on the man he effectively sidelined. The praise, however, felt more like a victory lap for Obama, who got exactly what he wanted: Biden out of the way, Kamala Harris stepping into the spotlight, and his influence over the Democratic Party solidified for what could be seen as his unofficial fourth term.
Biden’s Quick Exit: A Telling Sign
Joe Biden, the man who Obama once picked as his vice president, didn’t stick around long after his speech at the DNC. In what many saw as a clear indication of his displeasure, Biden left the convention almost immediately after addressing the crowd. The message was clear: Biden had been pushed out, and he knew it. And behind the scenes, Obama was pulling the strings, ensuring that Biden’s departure would pave the way for a candidate who could be more easily controlled.
Obama’s speech was filled with the kind of hollow platitudes that have come to define his brand of politics. “History will remember Joe Biden as an outstanding president who defended democracy at a moment of great danger,” Obama declared. But for those watching closely, it was obvious that these words rang hollow. This was not a heartfelt endorsement but rather a carefully crafted piece of political theater designed to make Obama look gracious while masking the reality of what had transpired.
The Real Story Behind Biden’s Exit
Let’s not forget how we got here. Biden’s disastrous debate performance against Donald Trump in June, where he stumbled over his words and appeared more subdued than ever, opened the floodgates. Suddenly, the media, which had been covering for Biden’s obvious cognitive decline, turned on him. And who was leading the charge? None other than Obama’s own allies, who wasted no time in calling for Biden to step down.
David Axelrod, Obama’s former chief strategist, was among the first to say it out loud: Biden was “not winning this race.” George Clooney, a longtime friend of the Obamas, penned a bombshell op-ed that practically shoved Biden out the door. Even Jon Favreau, Obama’s former speechwriter, joined in, attending a fundraiser in Los Angeles and reportedly leaving convinced that Biden was not up to the task.
Kamala Harris: The Puppet President
With Biden out of the race, the Democratic nomination fell to Kamala Harris, a figure deeply connected to Obama, yet not someone the Obamas particularly like or respect. However, in their view, this isn’t about liking Harris—it’s about controlling her. By orchestrating this coup, the Obamas have positioned themselves to effectively run a fourth term through Harris, who they now believe they own. Harris’s ties to Obama go back to the early 2000s, and she was one of the first major Democrats to endorse him in 2008. Now, she’s Obama’s chosen successor, but make no mistake, this isn’t about handing over the reins—it’s about keeping a tight grip on them.
Harris’s ascension isn’t just about her political acumen. It’s about Obama consolidating power within the Democratic Party. By pushing Biden out and elevating Harris, Obama ensured that his influence over the party would remain strong. And in his speech at the DNC, he made sure to remind everyone of that fact, praising Harris as someone who “won’t be focused on her problems. She’ll be focused on yours.” But in reality, she’ll be focused on doing exactly what Obama wants.
Obama’s Slime Ball Move
Let’s call Obama’s speech what it was: a slime ball move. It was the ultimate act of political theater, designed to make Obama look magnanimous while he was, in reality, rubbing salt in Biden’s wounds. Obama got what he wanted—Biden out of the race—and then he had the audacity to stand in front of the nation and act like he was Biden’s biggest supporter.
But the truth is, Biden’s departure was not voluntary. He was pushed out by a Democratic establishment that saw him as a liability, and Obama was leading the charge. Now, as Kamala Harris prepares to take the reins, Obama is making sure that everyone knows who’s really in control. Harris might be the nominee, but it’s clear that Obama intends to pull her strings, turning this into his de facto fourth term.
Final Thoughts
Barack Obama may have delivered a slick speech at the DNC, but don’t be fooled. Behind the polished words and smiling face is a man who got what he wanted by any means necessary. Joe Biden’s exit from the race was not a moment of unity but a calculated move by a former president who knew exactly how to get what he wanted—and who didn’t care who he had to push aside to get it. Now, with Harris as his puppet, Obama is setting himself up to continue running the show, ensuring that his influence over the Democratic Party remains unchallenged. Obama is a slime ball, plain and simple, and his hollow praise for Biden is just the latest example of his ruthless brand of politics.
James Carville dismisses critics upset by ‘preachy females’ comment: ‘I don’t care’
Story by Hanna Panreck
• 21h • 3 min read
BUT, IT IS TRUE!
Did all of their elected low testosterone folks stay at home due to the upcoming election and not want to be associated with the PANT SUIT LADIES? When the Billary’s left the White House, there was a radical change in testosterones in the White House. A lot of them were flying around in the White house – remember that “blue dress.”
The Dem’s didn’t take the Billary’s to trial like they did President Trump about the blue dress/testosterones?
*****
But James, you really t lambasted when you said there WHEN YOUSATED that critics upset by “preachy females” comment: “I don’t care.”
FOX News
James Carville responds to criticism of his belief that ‘preachy females’ hurt Dem messaging
Democratic Strategist James Carville responded to criticism of his comment about “preachy females” dominating the Democratic Party’s messaging on Thursday during an interview on CNN.
“You really got lambasted when you said there were too many preachy females. And now we have been watching, we have been watching some very strong, I‘m not using the word preachy, but some very strong females take the stage, like Hillary Clinton, like Michelle Obama, and like Kamala Harris, so what do you say to people that were, were annoyed, if not mad at you for using that kind of language?”
CNN’s Sara Sidner asked, noting the Democratic Party’s problem with male voters
“I view my role as somewhat of a provocator, and we have a male problem” Carville began. “How do I do that? Do I tell Maureen Dowd of the New York Times that a close analysis of the regression group indicates that we had insufficient support among American males? No one is going to remember that. So if I say something like our culture has too many preachy females in it, you know what, everybody remembers it.”
Carville was criticized by some Democrats after telling New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd in March that “preachy females” were to blame for the Democratic Party’s focus on “wokeness,” as well as the party’s issues with male voters.
“And the thing about me, I don’t care,” Carville added.
He also praised Gov. Tim Walz and suggested the Democratic Party was catering to his concerns at the DNC.
“I think that the vice president’s campaign was listening to what people like me were saying, that the party‘s messaging needed to have a little more male language and male contrast and examples,” Carville said. “That’s one of the things that I’m really about, that in this convention, I think we’re getting it.”
Carville spoke to Dowd about the Democratic Party’s messaging and its focus on “wokeness” during the Times interview.
“A suspicion of mine is that there are too many preachy females,” Carville told Dowd. “’Don’t drink beer. Don’t watch football. Don’t eat hamburgers. This is not good for you.’”
He added, “The message is too feminine: ‘Everything you’re doing is destroying the planet. You’ve got to eat your peas.’”
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., was upset by Carville’s comments in March and wrote on X at the time, “Maybe he should start a podcast about it.”
“I hear men are really underrepresented in that space,” she said.
(As we know that AOC is keeping company/riding their train carrying Hamas and is against/criticizes our country.)
Carville has consistently sounded the alarm on the Democratic Party’s problem with attracting male voters. He doubled down on his concern about the party’s messaging being “too feminine” in July.
“‘We know what’s best for you, don’t eat hamburgers, don’t watch football, don’t drink beer.’ Guess where our young male number is going? In the toilet, alright? Because Democratic messaging, I’m sorry, is too feminine, it just is,” he said.
“If you think about Democratic messaging, listen to NPR, read what comes out of there, alright? And you can see it, and I’m sorry, there are too many preachy females in Democratic campaign culture, and we come across to people as judgmental,” Carville added.
Fox News’ Gabriel Hays contributed to this report.
Google is interfering with this blog by inserting items that I did not select. They are also the problem.
FOX News
KOMMONSENTSJANE – James Carville dismisses critics upset by ‘preachy females’ comment: ‘I don’t care’.
8/23/2024
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/james-carville-dismisses-critics-upset-by-preachy-females-comment-i-dont-care/ar-AA1pgmP6?ocid=BingNewsSerp
ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/james-carville-dismisses-critics-upset-by-preachy-females-comment-i-dont-care/ar-AA1pgmP6?ocid=BingNewsSerp
James Carville dismisses critics upset by ‘preachy females’ comment: ‘I don’t care’
Story by Hanna Panreck
• 21h • 3 min read
BUT, IT IS TRUE!
Did all of their elected low testosterone folks stay at home due to the upcoming election and not want to be associated with the PANT SUIT LADIES? When the Billary’s left the White House, there was a radical change in testosterones in the White House. A lot of them were flying around in the White house – remember that “blue dress.”
The Dem’s didn’t take the Billary’s to trial like they did President Trump about the blue dress/testosterones?
*****
But James, you really t lambasted when you said there WHEN YOUSATED that critics upset by “preachy females” comment: “I don’t care.”
James Carville responds to criticism of his belief that ‘preachy females’ hurt Dem messaging
Democratic Strategist James Carville responded to criticism of his comment about “preachy females” dominating the Democratic Party’s messaging on Thursday during an interview on CNN.
“You really got lambasted when you said there were too many preachy females. And now we have been watching, we have been watching some very strong, I‘m not using the word preachy, but some very strong females take the stage, like Hillary Clinton, like Michelle Obama, and like Kamala Harris, so what do you say to people that were, were annoyed, if not mad at you for using that kind of language?”
CNN’s Sara Sidner asked, noting the Democratic Party’s problem with male voters
“I view my role as somewhat of a provocator, and we have a male problem” Carville began. “How do I do that? Do I tell Maureen Dowd of the New York Times that a close analysis of the regression group indicates that we had insufficient support among American males? No one is going to remember that. So if I say something like our culture has too many preachy females in it, you know what, everybody remembers it.”
Carville was criticized by some Democrats after telling New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd in March that “preachy females” were to blame for the Democratic Party’s focus on “wokeness,” as well as the party’s issues with male voters.
JAMES CARVILLE’S COMMENT ABOUT ‘PREACHY FEMALES’ REFLECTS HOW DEMOCRATIC PARTY DOESN’T STAND FOR ‘MASCULINITY’
James Carville responded to criticism of his “preachy females” comment during an appearance on CNN. Fox News© Fox News
“And the thing about me, I don’t care,” Carville added.
He also praised Gov. Tim Walz and suggested the Democratic Party was catering to his concerns at the DNC.
“I think that the vice president’s campaign was listening to what people like me were saying, that the party‘s messaging needed to have a little more male language and male contrast and examples,” Carville said. “That’s one of the things that I’m really about, that in this convention, I think we’re getting it.”
Carville spoke to Dowd about the Democratic Party’s messaging and its focus on “wokeness” during the Times interview.
“A suspicion of mine is that there are too many preachy females,” Carville told Dowd. “’Don’t drink beer. Don’t watch football. Don’t eat hamburgers. This is not good for you.’”
He added, “The message is too feminine: ‘Everything you’re doing is destroying the planet. You’ve got to eat your peas.’”
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., was upset by Carville’s comments in March and wrote on X at the time, “Maybe he should start a podcast about it.”
“I hear men are really underrepresented in that space,” she said.
U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) gestures before speaking at the Democratic National Convention (DNC) in Chicago, Illinois, U.S., August 19, 2024. Reuters© Reuters
(As we know that AOC is keeping company/riding their train carrying Hamas and is against/criticizes our country.)
Carville has consistently sounded the alarm on the Democratic Party’s problem with attracting male voters. He doubled down on his concern about the party’s messaging being “too feminine” in July.
“‘We know what’s best for you, don’t eat hamburgers, don’t watch football, don’t drink beer.’ Guess where our young male number is going? In the toilet, alright? Because Democratic messaging, I’m sorry, is too feminine, it just is,” he said.
“If you think about Democratic messaging, listen to NPR, read what comes out of there, alright? And you can see it, and I’m sorry, there are too many preachy females in Democratic campaign culture, and we come across to people as judgmental,” Carville added.
Fox News’ Gabriel Hays contributed to this report.
Original article source: James Carville dismisses critics upset by ‘preachy females’ comment: ‘I don’t care’
kommonsentsjane
Share this: