Just add an ‘h to the above to view since Google is censoring it.
Democrats were for new border barriers before they were against it!
For record purposes – Google interfered in my preparing this blog by blocking my photo.
The DHS data show 6.5 million encounters at the U.S.-Mexico border in that time frame, a figure that includes both the 5.8 million apprehensions between legal ports of entry – the number typically used for illegal immigration – and a little more than 700,000 migrants who arrived at ports of entry without authorization to enter the U.S.
Vice President Kamala Harris made a trip to the border like she did to Detroit to make promises that will never happen. Four years as the Czar of the border and now is trying to photo-op her trip to garner some votes.
Why wouldn’t she perform her job which Biden assigned to her which is a dereliction of duty. Why wasn’t she impeached?
AGAIN; The DHS data show 6.5 million encounters at the U.S.-Mexico border in that time frame, a figure that includes both the 5.8 million apprehensions between legal ports of entry – the number typically used for illegal immigration – and a little more than 700,000 migrants who arrived at ports of entry without authorization to enter the U.S.
Why does it matter now when she shows up at the border? She hasn’t done anything and has no record to claim in her present job. Was this a superficial act to fool the people into thinking she cares?
Does her visit make any difference in that she stole Trump’s border bill and Biden put it into effect so that she could be safe. Has her whole career been stolen to get ahead?
The border has been in crisis mode since Biden/Harris were elected and they removed Trump’s laws at the border which caused crisis after crisis with criminals streaming into our country and are causing many killings in the cities where they are taken.
So Biden/Harris have blood on their hands due to both of their lack of duty to the American people.
Both of these people are a disgrace to our founding fathers. Walz has retro-fitted into a “China wannabe” and Harris has retro-fitted into her father’s brain-washing as a SOCIALIST which is communism.
The anti-Second Amendment rhetoric espoused by Kamala Harris and Tim Walz represents a significant threat to the constitutional rights of American citizens. Their positions reflect a broader agenda to undermine individual freedoms and expand government control, a trend that must be resisted by those who value liberty and the rule of law.
ttps://finishtherace.com/eric/harris-and-walzs-assault-on-the-second-amendment-sparks-conservative-backlash/#google_vignette Harris and Walz’s Assault on the Second Amendment Sparks Conservative Backlash
Love America and want to connect with other MAGA supporters? Join MAGABOOK today!
As America navigates a deeply polarized political landscape, the Second Amendment continues to serve as a critical fault line. The latest challenge to this foundational right comes from Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, both of whom have openly expressed their disdain for this constitutional guarantee.
Their stance on gun control reflects a broader, more troubling trend among progressive leaders to undermine individual liberties in favor of government overreach.
The Bill of Rights, which includes the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, was crafted to enshrine and protect the fundamental rights of individuals against government encroachment. Among these is the Second Amendment, which explicitly states, “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This clear and unambiguous language has been a cornerstone of American liberty since the founding of the Republic. However, the interpretations and challenges posed by political figures like Harris and Walz suggest a departure from these constitutional principles.
Kamala Harris, the current Vice President and the Democratic Party’s nominee for President in 2024, has a long history of advocating for restrictive gun control measures. Her position on the Second Amendment has been characterized by a belief that the right to bear arms does not extend to individuals in the way the framers of the Constitution intended. Harris has repeatedly voiced support for bans on so-called “assault weapons,” including AR-15s, which she labels as “weapons of war.” This rhetoric not only mischaracterizes the function and purpose of these firearms but also reveals a fundamental misunderstanding—or willful disregard—of the rights enshrined in the Constitution.
Similarly, Governor Tim Walz of Minnesota has aligned himself with this anti-Second Amendment stance. Walz has supported legislation that seeks to impose stringent restrictions on firearm ownership, including background checks, red flag laws, and the outright ban of certain types of firearms. His actions reflect a broader strategy among progressive leaders to incrementally chip away at gun rights, under the guise of public safety.
Such measures represent a direct assault on individual freedoms and an unconstitutional expansion of government power. The Second Amendment was designed not just as a protection for hunters or sportsmen, but as a safeguard against tyranny. By advocating for restrictive gun control, Harris and Walz are not only challenging the Second Amendment itself but are also undermining the very principles of self-defense and individual sovereignty that the amendment was intended to protect.
From a constitutional standpoint, the positions taken by Harris and Walz reveal a broader ignorance or rejection of the historical context in which the Bill of Rights was established. The framers of the Constitution were acutely aware of the dangers posed by a powerful, centralized government, and the Second Amendment was included as a critical check against such overreach. The idea that this right could be curtailed or redefined by modern political leaders is not only dangerous but also deeply unconstitutional.
Moreover, the argument that restricting gun rights will lead to increased public safety is highly contested. Numerous studies have shown that areas with strict gun control laws often experience higher rates of violent crime, as law-abiding citizens are left defenseless against criminals who do not adhere to the same restrictions. The conservative position holds that responsible gun ownership is not the problem; rather, it is the erosion of moral values and the breakdown of law and order that contribute to violence. In this context, the policies advocated by Harris and Walz do little more than disarm the law-abiding population, leaving them vulnerable to those who would do them harm.
The rhetoric used by Harris and Walz also reflects a broader, more insidious attempt to reshape the narrative around the Second Amendment. By labeling certain firearms as “weapons of war” and suggesting that they have no place in civilian hands, they seek to stigmatize gun ownership and marginalize those who advocate for their rights. This tactic is not only disingenuous but also ignores the fact that millions of Americans lawfully and responsibly own firearms for self-defense, sport, and other lawful purposes.
In framing the Second Amendment as a relic of a bygone era, Harris and Walz are attempting to shift public perception in a way that could pave the way for more aggressive gun control measures in the future. This strategy is deeply concerning to conservatives, who view the right to bear arms as an essential component of American identity and a crucial defense against government tyranny.
The positions of Kamala Harris and Tim Walz on the Second Amendment should be a wake-up call for all Americans who value their constitutional rights. Their disregard for the clear and unequivocal language of the Second Amendment, coupled with their support for policies that would infringe upon individual liberties, underscores the importance of vigilance in defending these rights. As the 2024 election approaches, it is imperative that voters remain informed and engaged on this critical issue, as the future of the Second Amendment—and the liberties it protects—hangs in the balance.
The anti-Second Amendment rhetoric espoused by Kamala Harris and Tim Walz represents a significant threat to the constitutional rights of American citizens. Their positions reflect a broader agenda to undermine individual freedoms and expand government control, a trend that must be resisted by those who value liberty and the rule of law.
The real Harris from podunk city called San Francisco. California is a good example how Democrats/she can change something to nothing.
The left continues to throw out the word DICTATOR on Trump; but, FOLKS – this woman is the true DICTATOR.
This woman keeps “whistling DIXIE” with her idiomatic expressions and unrealistic expectations about the future of our country. She is pulling a Hitler scene on the country while utilizing her empty shell of a brain. When will the trains arrive to pick up these people to take them to these prisons?
Are people listening to her rhetoric while SHE always has her motor running and mouth wide open.
It’s no secret that the Democrats are on a warpath to enforce their radical, woke agenda at any cost. They talk about “tolerance” and “equity,” but their real goal is to crush anyone who dares to stand in their way, especially law-abiding conservatives.
Under this administration, it’s as if the basic rights of pro-life advocates, gun owners, and anyone who holds traditional American values have become a target for persecution.
The Democrats are so obsessed with pushing their progressive ideals that they will do anything to silence those who disagree. They scream about “protecting rights,” but it’s only the rights they care about.
If you’re a Christian standing up for the unborn, they’ll drag you through the mud, prosecute you, and throw you in jail. It’s becoming clearer every day that the Biden administration’s Justice Department is nothing more than a weapon to attack conservatives while turning a blind eye to their own side’s offenses.
From Daily Wire: The Justice Department is seeking prison time for two pro-life Christians convicted of violating federal law for their roles in a peaceful protest at a Tennessee abortion facility.
Pro-life activists Chester Gallagher, Heather Idoni, and Eva Edl are all set to be sentenced this week for their participation in a sit-in protest at a Mt. Juliet, Tennessee, abortion facility in March 2021. The Justice Department has asked for federal judges to impose a prison sentence on both Gallagher and Idoni, while asking for Edl to be given probation.
Persecuting Peaceful Pro-Lifers: The Latest Outrage
In yet another shocking abuse of power, the Justice Department is seeking prison time for two pro-life Christians convicted for their peaceful protest at an abortion facility in Tennessee. Chester Gallagher, Heather Idoni, and Eva Edl are being punished for one simple reason: they stood up for the unborn.
Their crime? Participating in a peaceful sit-in where they prayed, sang hymns, and tried to persuade women not to go through with the horror of abortion. For this, the Biden administration wants to lock them up.
Gallagher, 75 years old, is facing a potential 20-month prison sentence, while Idoni could serve eight months. The fact that an 89-year-old survivor of a communist concentration camp, Eva Edl, is also being prosecuted shows just how far this administration is willing to go.
Edl has already been convicted and could face prison for simply protesting the killing of innocent children. Let that sink in: someone who survived true tyranny is now being persecuted by her own government for standing up for life. Is this the America we know and love?
The FACE Act: A Tool of the Left
The charges against these peaceful protesters are based on the FACE Act, a law originally designed to protect access to abortion clinics. But under Biden and Harris, this law has been weaponized to go after pro-lifers like never before.
According to attorney Steve Crampton of the Thomas More Society, a staggering 97% of prosecutions under this law have targeted pro-lifers. Yes, you read that correctly—nearly every single case brought under the FACE Act has been aimed at those defending life.
And it gets worse. The Biden-Harris administration is resurrecting conspiracy laws from the Reconstruction era to slap even harsher penalties on these peaceful activists. These laws were originally designed to combat violent groups like the Ku Klux Klan, but now they’re being twisted to silence Christians peacefully praying outside abortion clinics.
Gallagher, Idoni, and Edl have been charged with “conspiracy against rights” as if they were some dangerous threat, all for sitting in a hallway and urging women to choose life over death.
Selective Prosecution and the Assault on Pro-Lifers
The Biden administration is not content with simply enforcing the law; they’re selectively targeting those who oppose their radical abortion agenda. As Crampton pointed out, a whopping 25% of all FACE Act cases since its inception in 1994 have been brought in the last two years alone, and nearly all of them against pro-lifers.
Meanwhile, pregnancy centers and churches, which are supposed to be protected under this law, are being attacked with little to no action from the DOJ. The administration’s bias couldn’t be clearer.
Crampton is optimistic that these cases can be overturned on appeal. After all, with the overturning of Roe v. Wade in the Dobbs decision, abortion is no longer a federally protected right. The FACE Act, therefore, has lost its purpose and should be rendered unconstitutional.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court’s decision in the Fischer case, which limits the Justice Department’s ability to prosecute January 6 protesters, could also apply here. In both cases, the DOJ is dredging up old laws to persecute protesters in ways those laws were never meant to be used.
A Call to Action
This isn’t just about a few peaceful protesters. This is about the future of our country and the values we hold dear. The Biden administration is using its power to criminalize conservative beliefs, targeting Christians who stand up for the most vulnerable in our society: the unborn. If we allow this persecution to continue unchecked, who will be next?
It’s time for conservatives to rally together and push back against this outrageous overreach. We must defend the rights of all Americans, including the pro-life activists who peacefully protest the barbaric practice of abortion. If we don’t fight for our values now, we risk losing them forever.
Let’s stand up, speak out, and remind the world that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are rights that belong to everyone—even those who dare to challenge the left’s radical agenda.
Key Takeaways:
The Biden administration’s DOJ is targeting peaceful pro-life protesters with harsh prison sentences, including elderly activists like 89-year-old Eva Edl.
The FACE Act, designed to protect access to abortion clinics, has been weaponized against conservatives, with 97% of cases targeting pro-lifers.
The Thomas More Society is fighting these unjust prosecutions, arguing that the FACE Act is now unconstitutional after Roe v. Wade’s overturn.
It was inevitable. Poor Joe Biden, shuffled out of the race by his own party, the very people who once cheered him on, now whispering behind his back. How must it feel to be abandoned like that? After all, Biden probably thought he had more left in the tank. Democrats, on the other hand, had a different view: they couldn’t wait to push him out the door.
And how did they do it? By using poll numbers and public “concerns” as the perfect excuse to sweep him aside for the shiny new toy that is Kamala Harris.
Imagine being Joe Biden, waking up one day to find out that not only have the Democrats decided he’s no longer fit for office, but they’re practically begging for someone—anyone—else to step in. The whispers of doubt were everywhere: “He’s too old.” “His approval ratings are tanking.”
“He’s embarrassing on the debate stage.” These are the very people who used to praise him. Talk about a slap in the face. And in true Washington fashion, they let him believe that he was the one making the decision. “It’s for unity,” they said while elbowing him out of the spotlight. Ouch.
From Daily Caller: President Joe Biden told ABC News’ “The View” that he is still in complete denial about why he was forced off the presidential ticket as he touted poll numbers and his chances at beating former President Donald Trump…
The president said that he believes he could have beat Trump if he stayed in the race, adding that his polling numbers showed he was within striking distance of the former president.
Biden Denies the Obvious
And yet, in classic Biden fashion, he doesn’t seem to see it. During his appearance on The View, he sat in a cozy chair, spinning the narrative that he could’ve beaten Trump. “I was within range,” he confidently told the hosts, as if that means anything when your poll numbers are plummeting faster than a lead balloon.
Biden was adamant that there wasn’t an “overwhelming reluctance” within the party to his running again. Sure, Joe. That’s why Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer practically shoved you out of the door.
Biden then made a half-hearted attempt to say his relationship with Pelosi was “fine.” What else was he going to say? The woman just helped orchestrate his political downfall. But let’s be real, the Democrats didn’t just kindly ask Biden to step aside—they nudged him toward the exit and firmly locked the door behind him.
His campaign wasn’t so much dropped as it was torpedoed from within. When your own party’s leaders like Pelosi and Schumer start telling you that staying in the race would hurt the whole ticket, it’s game over.
Pelosi and Schumer Push Biden Out
Behind closed doors, the real drama unfolded. It wasn’t a graceful exit. Pelosi allegedly had a private meeting with Biden where she flat-out told him that his poll numbers were a disaster.
Schumer followed up, delivering the cold, hard truth: staying in the race could tank not just Biden but the whole party’s chances down the ballot. Democrats were scared, and rightfully so. Biden was trailing Trump in key swing states with no sign of recovery. The writing was on the wall, and the party panicked.
Biden’s last attempt to put a spin on things came when he endorsed Kamala Harris for president. In a tweet, no less. The woman who once called him out during the Democratic debates was now being handed the keys to the castle. What a humiliating twist.
Harris, of course, wasted no time launching her campaign, eager to take the reins. But the reality is, the Democrats know they’re in trouble. Biden may be out, but whether Harris can fill the void remains to be seen.
A Fumbled Farewell
Biden’s official reason for stepping down? Unity, of course. That’s the standard line when you want to avoid the truth. “I need to unite my party,” he said in his farewell address. It was a far cry from the confidence he showed on The View, where he insisted he could’ve beaten Trump.
The truth is, Biden’s fitness for office had been a major concern for months, and everyone knew it. Democrats just didn’t have the courage to admit it until they had no other choice.
Even on The View, Biden was still trying to convince himself—and the rest of us—that his exit wasn’t the result of party pressure. He was a “transition president,” he claimed. Right.
****
Sure, that last statement by the View was called lieing.
They just sold “old Joe” some “water front property in Arizona.”
Pelosi/Schumer/Obama used/abused OLD JOE until they didn’t need him.
Personalize
