Kamala Harris committed a major blunder in the final days of the 2024 election.
That’s because Kamala went over the edge.
And a Holocaust survivor was mad as hell over Kamala Harris calling Trump one name.
Kamala Harris compares Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler
Kamala Harris is down in the polls and losing momentum.
But the race is too close and anything can happen.
To try and arrest the slide, Kamala Harris decided to make her closing argument, calling Donald Trump literally Adolf Hitler.
“Donald Trump vowed to be a dictator on day one. He vowed to use the military to carry out personal and political vendettas. His former chief of staff said he wanted generals like Hitler’s,” Kamala Harris wrote on X.
Kamala’s message thrilled leftists in the media.
But it angered those who suffered under the evil of the actual Adolf Hitler.
Jerry Wartski was nine years old and living in Poland when Hitler invaded.
Hitler’s Nazi forces rounded up Wartski and his fellow Jews and shipped them off the concentration camps where the unspeakable horror of Hitler attempting to exterminate the Jewish people took place.
Kamala Harris’ attack backfires
Wartski recorded a video in support of Trump shortly after meeting Donald Trump in person.
Needless to say, Wartski was beyond outraged at Kamala Harris minimizing the suffering he endured to try and score cheap political points.
“Adolf Hitler invaded Poland when I was 9 years old. He murdered my parents and most of my family,” Wartski began.
“I know more about Hitler than Kamala will ever know in a thousand lifetimes,” Wartski added.
Wartski actually called Kamala’s invoking Hitler’s name with reference to Trump the “worst thing” he’s heard since he came to the United States seeking sanctuary after surviving the Holocaust.
“For her to accuse President Trump of being like Hitler is the worst thing I ever heard in my 75 years living in the United States,” Wartski stated, adding that Kamala “owes my parents and everybody else who was murdered by Hitler an apology for repeating this lie.”
Wartski also explained why he supported Donald Trump, saying “because he’s a mensch.”
“I believe that President Trump is definitely going to be good for Israel because everything that he’s done up until now was in [its] favor,” Wartski added, saying Trump “never double-crossed anyone and he never showed any weakness.”
“Why should President Trump pray for the hostages at the Ohel and . . . spend time with so many?” Wartski asked: “He has always stood with the Jewish people and the state of Israel.”
Kamala Harris doesn’t have anything good to say about her record on the issues voters say matter most.
To distract from that, Kamala is stooping to the lowest of lows in a smear campaign against Donald Trump.
When these men give that much money to Kamala Harris – there is a reason behind it. They are paying for something in advance to influence her and expect payback.
Is Khosla trying to help Harris destroy the U.S. since he is a Native American and the settlers took his ancestors land away from them and put them on reservations? He knows what Harris plans to do to the U.S. which is take away their ownership and money.
Former President Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, called out how one of Kamala Harris’ “biggest donors is doubling down on calling half the country ‘garbage.'”
Vinod Khosla, co-founder of the giant tech company Sun Microsystems, wrote on X “Garbage is an understatement for MAGA extremists.” He responded to a story by the Associated Press titled, “Biden suggests Trump supporters are ‘garbage’ after comic’s insult of Puerto Rico.”
“Will Kamala and her campaign return his contributions?” Vance wrote Wednesday. “Or will they continue to insult half of the country for the sin of thinking Kamala Harris isn’t good at her job?”
Khosla is a billionaire and Democratic megadonor. In June, he gave $413,000 to the Harris Action Fund, a political action committee that supports the vice president. He previously donated $100,000 to the PAC in June 2023 and made two separate $3,300 donations to the Biden for President campaign, which Harris took over after President Biden withdrew from the election.
The Harris campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Harris addressed Biden’s controversial remark Wednesday, telling reporters that the president “clarified his comments.”
“I strongly disagree with any criticism of people based on who they vote for,” she said, adding that Biden called her the night before but his remarks didn’t come up.
Biden sparked controversy during a Zoom call on Tuesday with Voto Latino, one of the largest Latino voter and civic outreach organizations in the U.S. On the call, Biden was asked about a comment made Sunday during a Trump rally at Madison Square Garden in which comedian Tony Hinchcliffe called Puerto Rico a “floating island of garbage.”
“The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters,” Biden said.
Amid backlash, Biden claimed he was referring to only Hinchcliffe, and the White House released a transcript of the call that said “supporter’s,” in the possessive.
“Earlier today I referred to the hateful rhetoric about Puerto Rico spewed by Trump’s supporter at his Madison Square Garden rally as garbage—which is the only word I can think of to describe it. His demonization of Latinos is unconscionable. That’s all I meant to say. The comments at that rally don’t reflect who we are as a nation,” Biden posted on X.
Though Harris has not commented on Biden’s remark, her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, discussed it on “Good Morning America” on Wednesday.
“The president’s clarified his remarks, but let’s be very clear. The vice president and I have made it absolutely clear that we want everyone as a part of this. Donald Trump’s divisive rhetoric is what needs to end. He called this a garbage country and continues on from ‘the enemy within.’ What you heard Vice President Harris say and what I say is, there’s a place for all of us here, and I think that’s the one. She’s running for president. She’s making the message and she delivered that speech on the Ellipse that showed what we can be as a country,” said Walz.
“So, I think America knows the direction we’re going. She’s laid out a new way forward, and that’s what we’re going to do for the next six days and then the next eight years after that.”
Fox News Digital’s Scott McDonald contributed to this report.
These people are giving her all of this money and she can’t even give a coherent answer about her policies? What are we missing here? Were these people born in the USA? Are they part of Soros’ One World Order?
(Google is not allowing the above photo to be printed.)More than 800 powerful venture capitalists organized to pledge support for Kamala Harris.
(If they are backing her why are they ashamed to show their photo?)
(What are they hiding? I would have thought Cuban was smart enough to spot a FAKE. Didn’t he come from Cuba a dictatorship island? He played the capitalist system until he got rich and now he wants the country to be like Cuba.)
Current and former CEOs separately worked together to sign a letter endorsing Harris.
Here are the biggest signatories and their history with the historic election cycle.
Vice President Kamala Harris hasn’t had any trouble raising money — in fact, she has raked in $1 billion in fewer than three months. And though some of her money comes from grassroots donors, billionaires and private sector leaders have dumped eye-popping sums into her campaign.
Venture capitalists were among some of the earliest tech moguls to organize behind Harris, even as the once decidedly liberal Silicon Valley splinters this election. As figures like Elon Musk, Marc Andreessen, and David Sacks publicly backed former President Donald Trump, a group of powerful venture capitalists combined forces to declare their support for Harris through an effort dubbed “VCsForKamala.”
By late August, more than 800 venture capitalists pledged to vote and solicit donations for Harris through the group’s website. According to one of the organizers, the original signatories represent a combined $150 billion in assets under management. The current signatories represent a combined $276 billion, according to the group’s founders.
“We are pro-business, pro-American dream, pro-entrepreneurship, and pro-technological progress,” reads a statement on the VCsForKamala’s website. “We also believe in democracy as the backbone of our nation.”
Harris, who was born in Oakland, has garnered support from dozens of leaders in her backyard supportive of her pro-business policies. In September, the effort by business and tech leaders stretched from coast to coast. A group of 88 prominent Wall Street and tech executives jointly signed a letter endorsing Harris, writing that she is “the best way to support continued strength, security, and reliability of our democracy and economy.” The leaders also celebrated her support for small businesses. And in October, private sector titans banned together to launch “Business Leaders for Harris,” an effort to woo more conservative-leaning voters by emphasizing Harris’ economic strengths.
Here are some of the biggest names on the VCsForKamala list and recent letter of corporate leaders.
Michael Bloomberg donated $50 million to a nonprofit supporting Harris’ campaign, per the NYT.
Other billionaires and Democratic donors pressured Bloomberg to make a donation for months.
It remains unclear why Bloomberg, known for public donations, wanted the gift to remain private.
Michael Bloomberg, the former New York City mayor and presidential candidate, recently donated around $50 million to a nonprofit organization supporting Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign, according to the New York Times. The check, however, reportedly only came after months of pressure from other billionaires and Democratic donors.
Though Bloomberg typically makes public campaign donations, he intended for this contribution to remain secret, the Times reported. He funneled the money to Future Forward USA Action, the arm of Harris’ primary super PAC that deals in dark money. Worth an approximate $105 billion according to Forbes, the 82-year-old has a pattern of making donations late in the election cycle.
Harris has demonstrated remarkable fundraising capabilities, from grassroots donors and the mega-wealthy alike. Some of her most prominent supporters include business titans from either coast, including prominent Wall Street executives and Silicon Valley leaders. Bloomberg refrained from shelling out big bucks even as figures like LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman and Microsoft founder Bill Gates urged him to do so.
The former mayor recently sat down with Harris’ economic team to discuss her agenda, the Times reported, as part of an attempt to make him feel respected. Harris herself hopped on a call with the billionaire, and he donated the money soon after, according to the Times. It remains unclear why he wanted the contribution to remain private.
Despite only becoming a registered Democrat in 2018, Bloomberg is the second largest known individual donor to Democrats this cycle, behind George Soros. Apart from his secretive $50 million gift, he has doled out $47 million in federally disclosed contributions. Yet the sum pales in comparison to his 2020 donations, when he spent $173 million, not including the $1.1 billion he directed toward his own campaign.
The Kamala/media has watered-down “Trump is a Fascist” claim to such a point – it makes them look like FOOLS. These fools have been given a new tool which are word salads and now have been dumbed down to a parrot’s level. Maher is proving the point with his speech impediment by parroting Trump is a Fascist and that he missed all of his history classes.
I loved this segment, we just witnessed a perfect example of why the left’s grasp of history is about as solid as Biden’s cognitive abilities. On Bill Maher’s latest show, he tried to push his tired “Trump is Hitler” narrative, only to get absolutely schooled by none other than Megyn Kelly, who reminded us why she’s one of the sharpest legal minds in conservative media.
Maher’s Historical Ignorance on Full Display
In what might be one of the most ridiculous statements ever uttered on HBO (and that’s saying something), Maher actually claimed, “We had Hitler in the 30s and things were okay.” Seriously, Bill? For someone who loves to lecture conservatives about fascism, you might want to crack open a history book first.
Let’s break down just how wrong Maher is, shall we?
1933 alone saw Hitler:
Passing the Enabling Act, crushing civil liberties
Banning opposition parties
Establishing the Gestapo
Opening the first concentration camps
And that was just the appetizer. By 1935, he’d stripped Jews of citizenship with the Nuremberg Laws. By 1938, we had Kristallnacht and the annexation of Austria. But sure, Bill, things were “okay.”
Kelly’s Masterful Takedown
This is where Megyn Kelly, with her trademark precision, cut through Maher’s nonsense. While he was busy making ridiculous historical comparisons, Kelly laid out actual facts about Trump’s presidency:
Zero new wars started
Putin contained during Trump’s term
No Ukraine invasion until Biden’s weakness was on full display in Afghanistan
The Real Fascist Playbook
Here’s what’s truly ironic – while Maher was busy throwing around Nazi comparisons, Kelly expertly pointed out who’s really using authoritarian tactics:
Biden openly defying Supreme Court decisions on student loans
The DOJ being weaponized against political opponents
The administration’s attempts to circumvent legal restrictions
The Truth About Global Alliances
Maher’s panic about BRICS nations shows just how disconnected he is from reality. Under Trump, America projected strength. Under Biden, we’ve got:
A catastrophic Afghanistan withdrawal
Putin feeling emboldened to invade Ukraine
China flexing its muscles globally
Why This Matters
This exchange perfectly illustrates the intellectual bankruptcy of the Trump-deranged left. While Maher fumbles with false historical parallels, Kelly demonstrates what real political analysis looks like – fact-based, measured, and devastating to liberal narratives.
The left can’t handle the truth: Trump’s presidency saw peace through strength, while Biden’s weakness has invited global chaos. Megyn Kelly just proved it on Maher’s own show, and his only response was to mutter about how “history won’t be kind” to her view. Spoiler alert, Bill: History is already unkind to those who ignore its actual lessons.
Final Thoughts
When you put a seasoned attorney and political commentator like Megyn Kelly up against Maher’s shallow talking points, the result isn’t just a victory – it’s a complete intellectual demolition. It’s time for the left to stop with the Hitler comparisons and face reality: their policies, not Trump’s, are what’s truly threatening American democracy.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals just handed down a decision that could shake up mail-in ballot policies across the South—and potentially the rest of the country. On Friday, three Trump-appointed judges—Andrew Oldham, James Ho, and Kyle Duncan—ruled that all mail-in ballots must be received by Election Day in order to count. This decision specifically struck down Mississippi’s practice of counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day, a policy the judges argued was out of line with federal law.
The court’s ruling focused on the “singular ‘day for the election’” outlined in federal law, a day the panel argued was intended to serve as the clear cut-off for both casting and receiving ballots. In their decision, the judges emphasized the importance of Election Day as a definitive deadline, something that watchdogs like the RNC and Judicial Watch have pushed for. The RNC, along with Judicial Watch, launched this lawsuit in Mississippi to close what they see as a loophole allowing Democrats to “extend” voting by accepting late-arriving ballots.
The Fifth Circuit’s decision is huge for Republicans aiming to boost election integrity. RNC Chairman Michael Whatley called it a “massive victory,” one that could set a precedent for similar challenges in other states. But before this ruling affects current elections, the case will return to a lower court for further action, making the next steps uncertain.
Democrats and voting rights groups are sounding the alarm, fearing this ruling could fuel a wave of legal challenges to post-Election Day ballot acceptance in other states. States like Nevada, Ohio, Virginia, Maryland, California, and New York currently allow late-arriving ballots, and any change to these policies could be a game-changer in tight races. Nevada, for instance, is already facing a Republican challenge to its late-arrival ballot policy, which courts have thus far upheld. But with this Fifth Circuit ruling, Republicans may see fresh momentum in these efforts.
Election integrity advocates argue that allowing ballots to arrive after Election Day just opens the door to irregularities and undermines voter confidence. Democrats, however, argue that with mail delays and other voting challenges, such flexibility is critical to ensure every vote is counted.
Ultimately, the Fifth Circuit ruling puts the “Election Day means Election Day” rule firmly in place for Mississippi and potentially sets the stage for similar battles across the country. For voters, candidates, and election officials, the implications could be massive as states assess whether to stick to their rules or prepare for more legal challenges.
