KOMMONSENTSJANE – AOC’s Bizarre Comments About Kamala’s Husband Spark Massive Backlash!

11/01/2024

Didn’t she mean to say – give his girls shiners! Smacking around a woman is not masculine, it is toxic!

ttps://patriotclash.com/aocs-bizarre-comments-about-kamalas-husband-spark-massive-backlash/

AOC’s Bizarre Comments About Kamala’s Husband Spark Massive Backlash!

 October 31, 2024

Amazon’s Worst Nightmare: Millions Canceling Prime for This Clever Hack

Online Shopping Tools

Memory Loss? These 4 Foods Could Be Making It Worse

Primal Health

Just days earlier, Emhoff had faced public accusations of assault from an unnamed ex-girlfriend, who alleged he slapped her after a celebrity event in New York. Two witnesses confirmed her account, stating she had called them following the incident. Emhoff, who is also alleged to have had an affair with his children’s former nanny, has seen these personal issues become unexpected campaign fodder. The Harris campaign denied the assault allegations, while Emhoff’s ex-wife issued supportive comments amid the claims of infidelity. Despite these controversies, Ocasio-Cortez continued with her praise.

Ocasio-Cortez told the audience Emhoff’s approach was “a real contrast” to the “toxic examples of masculinity” seen in today’s political and cultural arenas, stating he wasn’t afraid to “lift up women.” She criticized traditional masculinity as embodying “weakness” and “insecurity,” saying, “Doug is a strong counter to that.” She emphasized that his ability to support Harris’s high-profile role makes him a role model for men and young boys alike. Emhoff, who joined the rally alongside his son Cole, encouraged the crowd with an optimistic tone about Harris’s campaign, referring to his wife as “the president starting in six days.”

*****

Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) made waves this week with an unexpected endorsement of Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff’s “masculinity” at a Nevada campaign rally for Kamala Harris. Speaking to a room full of young voters at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Ocasio-Cortez praised Emhoff, describing him as a model of “tolerant” masculinity who “embodies security” and “lets his girl shine,” according to The Daily Mail. These remarks, however, struck many as curious, given recent tabloid headlines involving Emhoff.
Just days earlier, Emhoff had faced public accusations of assault from an unnamed ex-girlfriend, who alleged he slapped her after a celebrity event in New York. Two witnesses confirmed her account, stating she had called them following the incident. Emhoff, who is also alleged to have had an affair with his children’s former nanny, has seen these personal issues become unexpected campaign fodder. The Harris campaign denied the assault allegations, while Emhoff’s ex-wife issued supportive comments amid the claims of infidelity. Despite these controversies, Ocasio-Cortez continued with her praise.
Ocasio-Cortez told the audience Emhoff’s approach was “a real contrast” to the “toxic examples of masculinity” seen in today’s political and cultural arenas, stating he wasn’t afraid to “lift up women.” She criticized traditional masculinity as embodying “weakness” and “insecurity,” saying, “Doug is a strong counter to that.” She emphasized that his ability to support Harris’s high-profile role makes him a role model for men and young boys alike. Emhoff, who joined the rally alongside his son Cole, encouraged the crowd with an optimistic tone about Harris’s campaign, referring to his wife as “the president starting in six days.”
Some found Ocasio-Cortez’s comments about Emhoff’s character and alleged tolerance tone-deaf given the recent accusations, suggesting that her remarks seem at odds with her advocacy for women’s rights and accountability. This rally took place at the Marjorie Barrick Museum of Art, where some speakers reportedly used language that seemed to target traditional gender roles, drawing mixed reactions from the audience.

As the 2024 election reaches its final stretch, Harris’s campaign will need to navigate these stories carefully, especially given the intense scrutiny of public figures’ personal conduct. For Ocasio-Cortez, her comments raise questions about her judgment on the campaign trail, as she champions figures like Emhoff while dismissing the potential impact of recent accusations.

****

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Opinion | A Harris Victory Means a Fourth Obama Term GARBAGE CAN – Do We Want More Division/We Can’t Afford 4 More Years of Bidenomics….

10/31/2024

We need a clean break with Obama/Biden and put the Constitution/Bill of Rights back on the table. Biden/Harris/Obama put the Constitution in that GARBAGE CAN that Biden is referencing.

Obama/Biden are working with SOROS/ONE WORLD ORDER. Soros’ son has an office in the White House – a few offices down from Biden called OPEN SOCIETY.

It is time to shut down the OPEN SOCIETY ORGANIZATION which means OPEN BORDERS and the continuation of more immigrants streaming into the country.

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/opinion-a-harris-victory-means-a-fourth-obama-term/ar-AA1te75s?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=5fa129e8d32340938c6ba34b3dad591d&ei=58

10/31/2024

Opinion | A Harris Victory Means a Fourth Obama Term
© Michael Brochstein/Zuma Press


Editor’s note: The Wall Street Journal hasn’t endorsed a presidential candidate since 1928. Our tradition is to sum up the candidacies of the major party candidates in separate editorials. We’ll start with Kamala Harris.

You have to admire Democrats for their audacity. They claimed for more than a year that the clearly declining Joe Biden was mentally fit enough to serve another four years. When the June debate made that untenable, they did a 180-degree turn and anointed his Vice President as their nominee while claiming, without so much as a nod of embarrassment, that she somehow represents “a new way forward.”

Republicans could never pull off that one. And in the end neither has Ms. Harris, if you take her at her word. Asked on “The View” on Oct. 8 what she might do differently from the last four years, Mr. Biden’s loyal number two said, “There is not a thing that comes to mind.” That was the truest line spoken in what has been a notably dishonest and dispiriting election campaign on both sides.

Ms. Harris has presented herself as new based largely on her biography. But as far as policies and coalition go, she represents more of the same, and not merely of the last four years. Her candidacy is best understood as an attempt to continue the progressive political wave that began in 2006 with the GOP defeat in Congress and rolled ashore as a tsunami amid the financial panic of 2008. She is running for what essentially would be Barack Obama’s fourth progressive term.

Related video: Trump has a message of unity for ‘great divider’ Obama (FOX News)
We are done with their hoaxing, lying, cheating, scheming, plundering

FOX News
Trump has a message of unity for ‘great divider’ Obama
View on Watch

Trump has a message of unity for ‘great divider’ Obama | Watch


This doesn’t mean she lacks political appeal. She has run a capable enough campaign on short notice, and she routed Donald Trump in their lone debate. If elected, she would bring more energy to the Presidency than Mr. Biden. She also sounds optimistic, even patriotic, notes about America.

But we have been searching in vain for signs that she would break from, or even temper, the progressive excess that defines the current Democratic Party. Her endorsement by anti-Trump Republicans isn’t that sign because it’s based solely on loathing for Mr. Trump. A token GOP appointment to her cabinet would mean little unless it’s a major post.

On domestic policy, she is offering more Bidenomics without the label. She wants to expand the entitlement state beyond even what Mr. Biden has—for elder and child care, housing, a larger Affordable Care Act, and more. Her proposed tax increases are nearly as extensive as Mr. Biden’s, running past $4 trillion over 10 years. She shows every sign of wanting to expand and accelerate the climate corporate welfare and mandates that distort investment at enormous taxpayer cost but no benefit to global temperatures.


This might be tolerable if Ms. Harris showed evidence on foreign affairs that she understands the world’s current dangerous moment. Yet she defends the last four years as a security success, despite two wars, adversaries on the march, and the U.S. Navy playing whack-a-missile in the Red Sea.

She talks about having a strong military but has failed to propose anything to rebuild it as threats proliferate. If she nurtures an inner Harry Truman that would explain to the public the need for better defenses, we haven’t seen the evidence. If she does win, Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping will quickly test her mettle. She seems unprepared for those tests.

All of this reflects the progressive advisers and the coalition she’d bring to the Oval Office. We wrote last week about her climate adviser’s desire to eliminate all fossil fuels, and her foreign policy aides are on board for appeasing Iran and putting restraints on Israel.


There are no Scoop Jacksons or Joe Liebermans in today’s Democratic Party. Ms. Harris would have to reach out to GOP hawks the way FDR made Republicans Henry Stimson and Frank Knox his Secretary of War and the Navy, respectively, in 1940. She has shown no such historical memory or the political courage to do it.

A Harris Presidency with a GOP Senate would check some of her worst policy instincts, at least until 2026 when the Senate map favors Democrats. But most Democrats would read her victory as a political vindication of the last four years. The Sanders-Warren wing of the party would pressure her for more.

The worst result would be a Harris victory with a Democratic sweep of Congress. Then it’s Kamala bar the door. She is on record as wanting to break the 60-vote Senate filibuster rule and to restructure the Supreme Court. This would make for an unbridled progressive agenda that would rig voting rules, augment union power, control more of the private economy, and add D.C. and Puerto Rico as states.


Many Americans see all this and will still vote for Ms. Harris because they think four more years of Mr. Trump is a bigger risk. We have no illusions about Mr. Trump’s flaws and the risk they pose. But voters also have cause to fear the bloody-mindedness of the modern left, with its regulatory coercion, cultural imperialism, economic statism, and desire to strip judicial independence. If Ms. Harris loses, this will be the reason.

Opinion | A Harris Victory Means a Fourth Obama Term

The effects will be no freedom/more money spending/no ownership/properties/cash.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Laura Ingraham was shocked at this awful mistake Democrats made with Donald Trump.

10/31/2024

The law professor stated that the Biden-Harris administration was the most anti-free speech administration since President John Adams.

“The citizens have watched the weaponization of the court system in New York and all of that is having an impact,” Turley noted. “The American citizens are not chumps. It doesn’t mean that this is an easy decision for voters to make. But to say that life will end it as we know it unless you elect Harris is obviously not resonating.”

From the writing I see on the wall about Harris – with her background and past working history – she is an empty vessel which has been “pimped” up the ladder or why else would people like a group of powerful venture capitalists combined forces to declare their support for Harris through an effort dubbed “VCsForKamala” which isn’t “chump change” to get her elected. It is because they are trying to use her to destroy the U.S. and its Constitution into the One World Order/Soros. Why – name me a country that is Marxists that is in good shape with FREEDOM? Don’t these rich folks realize Soros worked under Hitler/Nazi regime during WWII and is still trying to win that war?

We are the only nation who has a capitalistic system/freedom. These donors used our system to become rich and want to be the top pony and look down at the poor people once Harris performs her Obama/Pelosi/Harris/Biden/Clooney dog and pony show to take down our country.

Harris is an evil person.

General Kelly is hired by President Trump. Just think a GENERAL – and we find out he was WOKE and now with the results of his book trying to use his book to make money on a fake story about Nazi’s in a conversation with President Trump to belittle him. Was he working with the Democrats to spy on the President and now uses that as a wedge in the 2024 election?

Wouldn’t you call that a SPY within our government and the top of it? Is that why Kelly accepted the job? And, now trying to make money being a spy? This is serious!

ttps://renewedright.com/laura-ingraham-was-shocked-at-this-awful-mistake-democrats-made-with-donald-trump/?utm_source=decide&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=rr_2432938750&utm_term=&utm_content=240175

Laura Ingraham was shocked at this awful mistake Democrats made with Donald Trump
Posted on October 30, 2024

Democrats are getting desperate to make something happen in the final days of the election.

They’re pushing their envelope with their latest batch of lies and hoaxes.

And Laura Ingraham was shocked at this awful mistake Democrats made with Donald Trump.

Democrats try to create an October surprise against Donald Trump
The fear is setting among Democrats and their public relations arm in the media that former President Donald Trump could win the election.

Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign peaked too early after the September debate.

She’s slowly been losing ground to Trump in the polls and she’s lost all the momentum she had over the summer.

The media jumped at the chance to launch to create an October surprise to hurt the former President with another hoax.

Former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly claimed, without evidence, that Trump made comments praising Adolf Hitler to The New York Times.

Kelly resigned from his position in the Trump administration in 2019.

He waited four years to make this claim right before an election.

Former Trump administration officials, including his Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, all disputed that the claim was ever made.

The Atlantic magazine released another hoax that Trump raged over the price of a funeral he agreed to pay for a Mexican American soldier that was disputed by the family.

Kamala is losing and the media is desperate to do something to change this fact.

So they went back to anonymous sources in the case of The Atlantic or an outright lie from Kelly to hurt Trump.

The media’s smear campaigns against Donald Trump are failing
George Washington University law professor Johnathan Turley told Fox News host Laura Ingraham that the media’s scare tactics about Trump have lost their effectiveness during an appearance on The Ingraham Angle.

“The rhetoric is getting more and more extreme,” Turley explained. “You have people saying Trump is going to round up homosexuals, journalists there is going to be ever lengthening list of enemies that would be rounded up.”

Eventually the public tunes out the boy who cried wolf.

“That’s the problem with jump scares,” Turley continued. “If you keep on doing jump scares eventually people begin to tune them out. You have to ratchet them up to try to get that pulse rate up.”

Turley pointed to the evidence that the media’s scare tactics against Trump are fizzling out.

“The results are not promising for the Democrats,” Turley said. “Just a poll in The Washington Post and they said who do you trust to protect democracy and Trump won. They trusted Harris less with that. And part of it may be what the public can see.”

The law professor stated that the Biden-Harris administration was the most anti-free speech administration since President John Adams.

“The citizens have watched the weaponization of the court system in New York and all of that is having an impact,” Turley noted. “The American citizens are not chumps. It doesn’t mean that this is an easy decision for voters to make. But to say that life will end it as we know it unless you elect Harris is obviously not resonating.”

After nearly a decade, the lies and hoaxes against Donald Trump are running out of steam.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – I REGRET TO INFORM YOU – Some early voters have spoken.

10/30/2024

Michelle Obama just hit Trump supporters with a jaw-dropping accusation.

Michelle Obama made her return to the campaign trail.

The former First Lady reacted to the state of the race with rage.

I regret to inform you some early voters have spoken.

Kamala Harris’s campaign is stumbling right as she reaches the finish line. Voters are taking a hard look at her record, and many don’t like what they see. From her controversial time as a prosecutor to her lackluster tenure as vice president, Harris’s political journey is riddled with question marks—and swing voters in battleground states seem to be noticing.

In her role as VP, Harris has faced criticism over her speaking ability, her vague policy positions, and her shaky handling of top national issues. When she talks, it often feels like she’s skirting around the point, leaving voters unclear on her stance. For voters, especially undecided ones, Harris’s lack of clarity and lackluster delivery are starting to raise serious concerns.

From Fox News:
Undecided voters in the key battleground state of Pennsylvania gave sharp criticisms of Vice President Kamala Harris in a focus group this week, calling her “unqualified” to be president and “insincere” in her policy positions…

When asked by Halperin to give “one or two words” they “most associate with Vice President Harris,” the voters said these words: “unqualified, “unexceptional,” “graceful and positive,” “loyal,” “insincere,” “totally unqualified,” “unqualified,” and “unprincipled.”

Thank you for your recommendation – Former First Lady.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment