KOMMONSENTSJANE – POLITICAL DIVISION IN THE U.S. – Statistics and Facts

10/12/2024

Political division in the U.S. – statistics & facts | Statista

https://www.statista.com/topics/5701/political-division-in-the-united-states/#topicOverview

ttps://www.statista.com/topics/5701/political-division-in-the-united-states/#statisticChapter

Political division in the U.S. – statistics & facts

Throughout history, the United States has witnessed periods of political discord, yet the current level of polarization has reached unprecedented heights, leading more than half of Americans to consider the occurrence of a civil war in the U.S. a possibility within the next few years. At the root of this divide are deeply entrenched ideological differences which shape policy positions and public attitudes, thus contributing to the growing chasm between the two major political parties in the U.S.Show more- Description

Published by Statista Research Department, Jul 3, 2024

Editor’s PicksCurrent statistics on this topic

Identification with the Republican and Democratic parties in the United States from 2000 to 2023

Politics & Government

U.S. major political party identification 2000-2023

Share of people who trust the government always or most of the time in the United States from 1972 to 2024, by political ideology

Politics & Government

U.S. trust in government by political ideology 1972-2024

Share of people who trust major institutions in the United States in 2022, by institution and political party

Politics & Government

Level of trust in major U.S. institutions 2022, by institution and political party

Further recommended statistics

Overview

Debated Topics

Public Trust

Media Influence

Subscribe

Key insights

Share of U.S. adults who identify as political independents

43%

Identification with political parties in the United States between 2000 and 2023

Number of U.S. states who do not lean towards either the Democratic or the Republican Party

10

Aggregated political composition of all states in the United States between 2008 and 2018, by party affiliation

Share of U.S. adults who believe the government is doing too much to solve the country’s problems

54%

Share of people who believe the government should be doing more or less to solve problems in the United States from 2000 to 2023

Get more insights

Report on the topic

Top SellerExplore this report

Related topics

Key figures

Voting and elections

  • Share of U.S. presidential elections since 1900 where Ohio voted for the winner90.32%Share of presidential elections in the United States where states voted for the winning candidate from 1900 to 2020, by state
  • Share of U.S. presidential elections since 1960 where Ohio and Wisconsin voted for a different party than the previous election46.67%Share of presidential elections in the United States where states voted for a different party to the previous election between 1960 and 2016, by state

Political affiliation

  • More U.S. adults lean towards the Democratic Party than the Republican Party43%Identification with the Republican and Democratic parties in the United States from 2000 to 2023
  • Share of U.S. adults who identify with the Republican Party and have a positive view of capitalism72%Share of adults in the United States who have a positive view of capitalism from 2010 to 2021, by party affiliation
  • Share of U.S. adults who identify with the Democratic Party and have a positive view of socialism65%Share of adults in the United States who have a positive view of socialism from 2010 to 2021, by party affiliation

Public trust

  • Share of adults in the U.S. who are liberal Democrats and trust the government always or most of the time33%Share of people who trust the government always or most of the time in the United States from 1972 to 2024, by political ideology
  • More U.S. adults trust the Republican Party to protect the country from external threats57%Public confidence in political parties to protect the country from external threats in the United States from 2005 to 2023, by political party

Social issues

  • Share of U.S. adults who identify as political independents and favor “Medicare-for-all”58%Share of adults in the United States who support a single-payer, "Medicare-for-all" national health service in 2020, by political party
  • Share of Democrats in the U.S. who worry they or a member of their family will be a victim of a mass shooting62%Share of adults in the United States worried they or a member of their family will be a victim of a mass shooting in 2015 and 2019, by political party
  • Share of Democrats who believe increasing diversity is a good thing71%Share of adults who believe increasing diversity makes the United States a better place to live in 2022, by political affiliation
  • Share of Republicans who favor building a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border86%Do you favor or oppose building a wall along the US-Mexico border to try to stop illegal immigration?
  • Share of U.S. adults who identify with the Republican Party, have a high degree of scientific knowledge and believe global warming is caused by human activity17%

******

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – DEEP STATE AND UNIPARTY TRYING TO DEFEAT TRUMP’S AMERICAN CASTE SYSTEM – DEMOCRATS NEED A REALIGNMENT.

10/12/2024

Too late Democrats – the dye has been cast.

You have shown your marbles and they aren’t RED/WHITE/BLUE.

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/deep-state-and-uniparty-to-defeat-trump-s-american-caste-system-democrats-need-a-realignment/ar-AA1s8Iam?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=06ca24dac2ba4eb38db6c07f3a280d4b&ei=54

Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images

Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images

Since at least 2017, a series of high-quality polls show that a majority of Americans believe that a so-called deep state of unelected elites wields dominant power in the U.S. The term “deep state” is covered by the media as a phrase invented by Donald Trump, who uses it frequently to denounce unelected liberals and “Marxists” in government. But the idea of a deep state has a long history on the left as well as the right — with two very different meanings. The outcome of this year’s presidential election may depend on whether the public comes to see the real deep state as the one Trump is attacking, or the one that the left has long challenged. 

Trump’s deep state includes the civil servants in the federal regulatory and social welfare bureaucracy as well as in the national security apparatus of the CIA, FBI and Pentagon. He denounces them as the real threat to democracy, aligning with Project 2025’s proposal to purge more than 50,000 civil servants and replace them with his political appointees. He has promised to prosecute the leaders of this deep state elite and their coastal allies in the Democratic Party, the media and universities who work in concert to promote open borders and the ideology of DEI (diversity, equity and equality) that is stealing the jobs of hard-working “true” Americans who are white Christian patriots. 

But there is a more authentic and real deep state, identified by scholars and the Left. In “The Power Elite,” one of the most important sociological books of the 20th century, C. Wright Mills wrote that America was ruled by a triangle of unelected elites: wealthy corporate elites allied with top civilian government leaders and the military. This is a true deep state largely organized around corporate class interests both at home and abroad, sacrificing the jobs of ordinary working Americans of all races for the profits of “the 1%.

Related video: ‘The Five’: Democrats and the media didn’t get the memo to stop demonizing Trump (FOX News)

*****

kommonsentsjane

about:blank

Despite nationwide pleas to cool things down after the second

FOX News

‘The Five’: Democrats and the media didn’t get the memo to stop demonizing Trump

Interestingly, there is an overlap between Trump’s and Mills’ notions. Both agree that unelected groups exercise great power and that the national security apparatus is part of the real deep state. But the power elite, as understood by Mills and the left, also includes and highlights the corporate rich. They constitute a ruling class, people whose power stems from controlling the vast majority of America’s wealth. To win support, they have been appealing to white Christian nationalism, a caste-based identity.    

Sociologists distinguish between class and caste. Class is a status stemming from wealth, where you theoretically can rise or fall, although few people do. Trump was born in the upper tier of the ruling class, with whom he continues to schmooze in Mar-A-Lago to make mutually profitable deals for his second term. A caste is a biological state you are born in and can’t change; race and gender are typically considered castes. 

The power elite identified by Mills and that Trump would restore to unfettered control melds class and caste—and has an important history. In our work, we show that the U.S. was founded as an uneasy marriage between two deep states, a Northern proto-capitalist one and a Southern slave-based one that was proto-fascist. One was based on class power of early merchant capitalists and the other based on the caste power of the Southern white gentry. While they came together to secure independence from the British over taxes, trade and continental expansion, they would later divorce in the Civil War. They had very different visions, one of an agrarian caste nation and the other an industrial power based on class, theoretically open to all races or castes.

In 1980, Reagan proved the modern electoral power of a right-wing politics relying on corporate class power allied with caste-based white Christian nationalism. But Trump’s approach has far earlier roots, as he marries his corporate deep state with elements of a caste-based white proto-fascist deep state., It’s what happened in the original founding. This storied historical legacy helps explain the attraction of so many Americans to Trump, who claims to be bringing back the greatness of an early American system governed by wealthy white men in the name of all the true American patriots. It purges the “criminal” immigrants and inner-city Black Americans who he blames for the problems of ordinary white Americans today. 

Trump could win a second term, unless the Harris-Walz campaign makes clear that Trump’s resurrected power elite uniting caste and class power will worsen the problems of ordinary working voters, especially blue-collar workers in the Blue Wall states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. It was the unification of Democrats and Republicans under George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton that ushered in a new era of bipartisanship, or a “uniparty” of sorts, in support of nearly unfettered free trade which saw the devastating loss of well-paying blue collar jobs that allowed Trump to become the first Republican in three decades to win the Rust Belt. This uniparty built on Reagan’s neoliberal revolution embraced by both Republicans and Democrats. The Democrats need to show that Trump is actually resurrecting the real deep state that is endangering their jobs and democratic voice.

Democrats appear to be attacking caste-based race and gender power and, in their embrace of labor and unions, they are also starting to attack corporate class power. But in the way they are recruiting conservative Republicans like Dick and Liz Cheney, Democrats are highlighting, as Harris explicitly says, that she is proudly “a capitalist” and are hesitant to challenge forcefully the corporations and the military-industrial complex that continue to endanger the wages and jobs of workers while supporting American militarism.

Harris needs to show that she will deliver for working people the good wages, affordable necessities and democratic voice they need to ensure their future. Since Bill Clinton, Democratic identity politics has challenged racial and gender caste power while focusing far less on class power. Harris needs to recapture the spirit of the New Deal, when Democrats had landslide victories among working-class voters who have been migrating in droves to the GOP since the end of the New Deal era. Her future—and the nation’s—will depend on her making clear that she takes class as seriously as she does caste and will fight for all working people against the corporate deep state.

****

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – LAURA INGRAHAM – Barack Obama is Making a Racially Insulting Appeal to Black Voters…

Google has edited this blog and removed a portion of it. Where is the original page?

Google has edited this blog and removed portions of it. This is not all of my original article.

What rights do I have to make them give me my original copy?

10/12/2024

“Alright, let’s be very clear here: In the history books, Obama’s administration will go down as a failure because when it was over in 2016, the voters rejected his chosen candidate, Hillary Clinton, and they elected someone who had never run for political office before — a businessman, Donald Trump. “

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/laura-ingraham-barack-obama-is-making-a-racially-insulting-appeal-to-black-voters/ar-AA1s7LLj?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=2454707b02774330ad15dee6a2a7f856&ei=11

Why does Obama feel he is endowed to blame anyone for the State of the election.

Obama questioned how voters, and Black voters specifically, could be on the fence about whether to support Harris or former president Donald Trump, the Republican nominee.

“On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you, went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy that comes from those experiences,” Obama said, ticking off a list of Harris’s policy proposals. In Trump, he added, “you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not just for the communities, but for you as a person … And you are thinking about sitting out?”

Obama is lying at that point:

For starters – Biden/Harris hasn’t done one damn thing to help the Blacks or the country during their four years. Take a look at the state of the country’s affairs – border/Bidenomics/taxes/economy/illegals and used our FEMA MONEY FOR THE ILLEGALS and now do not have enough money for the hurricane victims (so they say). Biden told us we come LAST AND ILLEGALS COME FIRST.

Why would anyone vote for ANY DEMOCRAT? Look at all of the blue states and their debt and our debt for the country. Harris said she wouldn’t do anything different than what they have done with Biden for the last four years. Treat us as slaves and what we own would be her’s.

That is why she won’t tell you what she is going to do to us. Harris was an Asian Americans when she started into politics and now she wants your votes so she has turned to being A BLACK PERSON.

Obama said Harris was just like all Black people which is a lie – she was raised in an affluent background her whole life. Just like Obama saying he was BLACK. They are both called malaterl race (mixed) and neither of them experienced what Black people experience when they were raised.

Obama has an agenda for the U.S. which is part of the One World Order/U.N./Soros game of horrors. Don’t listen to him.

What Biden/Obama/Pelosi/Harris did was to stab Biden in the back after using Biden as the front person – they put Biden in as the candidate in the primary election and then stole his CA money/millions and his primary votes and then Pelosi brow beat him into submission to with draw and gave the whole ball of wax to Kamala/Walz who are not qualified for either position.

Again, wasn’t Obama and Pelosi responsible for Harris being injected on to the ticket with out following the Constitution when they brow beat Biden into folding up his tent?

Who made them the Aliʻi (CHIEF) to butt into this election as he/they have?

All presidents when they retire – do their own thing; but, Obama continues to interfere with the government, just like what he is doing now.

He knows if Kamala loses he will not have any influence.

Time for him to ride off into the sunset.

****

Laura: Obama is making a ‘racially insulting’ appeal to Black voters

Laura: Obama is making a ‘racially insulting’ appeal to Black voters

FOX News

Laura: Obama is making a racially ‘insulting’ appeal to Black voters

Fox News host Laura Ingraham highlights how former President Obama is trying to persuade Black voters using shame to back Vice President Kamala Harris on “The Ingraham Angle.”

LAURA INGRAHAM: With Kamala’s mounting challenges in battleground states, Obama jetted in and he held court. You saw him there. But rather than addressing concerns about Harris’ record on the economy and on the border, people’s standards of living — he tried to shame Black men into supporting her…

OBAMA CALLS OUT ‘BROTHERS’ APPREHENSIVE TO VOTE FOR HARRIS: ‘YOU’RE THINKING OF SITTING OUT?’

His message to Black men is clear: You’re a stupid sexist if you don’t vote for Kamala. Is this what all that hope and change was all about all those years ago? 

Alright, let’s be very clear here: In the history books, Obama’s administration will go down as a failure because when it was over in 2016, the voters rejected his chosen candidate, Hillary Clinton, and they elected someone who had never run for political office before — a businessman, Donald Trump. 

Original article source: LAURA INGRAHAM: Barack Obama is making a racially ‘insulting’ appeal to Black voters

****

Obama is using intimidation and that is not lawful.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – THE BULL IN THE CHINA CLOSET – Harris Campaign Distances Itself From Controversial Comments Made By Walz at Fundraiser..

10/12/2024

The lefties are not on the same page?

It is hard to believe what has happened in Minnesota. The governor, Walz, a lefty progressive, even further left than Bernie Sanders, and ended up on the ticket to the Executive Branch. How did this happen?. One heart beat away from the President – if elected and

IS THE BULL IN THE CHINA CLOSET.

Harris is an extreme progressive throughout her career.

The governor’s state is run by an AG, Ellison, who is a Muslim and a rep in Congress, Talib, who does not support Israel. And, Pelosi hands the gavel to Jeffries and Biden/Harris support Iran/Hamas.

What is going on? Was this planned by Obama?

The purpose of the Electoral College is fairness for every vote to count.

Electoral College votes are based on the Census, with 270 needed to win. The system helps balance the impact of voters in less populated states with those in more densely populated areas. It’s also seen as a safeguard against thin margins and excessive recounts.

What a KLUTZ!

News Wire

tim walz harris campaign

Harris Campaign Distances Itself From Controversial Comments Made By Walz at Fundraiser

 Mike

 News Wire

 October 10, 2024

Vice President Kamala Harris’ running mate, Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, stayed quiet Thursday about whether he still backs eliminating the Electoral College. This comes after the Harris campaign said Walz’s stance doesn’t reflect the campaign’s official position.

“I think all of us know, the Electoral College needs to go. We need a national popular vote,” Walz said Tuesday at a fundraiser at California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s home. He made similar comments at a Seattle event earlier.

Harris, while running for president in 2019, said she was “open” to the idea of getting rid of the Electoral College.

However, campaign officials clarified that this is not the position of her current campaign after Walz’s comments.

Fox News Digital reached out to Walz’s representatives to see if he still supports replacing the Electoral College, but no response was given. The Harris-Walz campaign did send a statement to select outlets suggesting Walz’s remarks were about supporting the Electoral College.

“Governor Walz believes every vote matters in the Electoral College,” a spokesperson said to outlets like CNN and USA Today. “He was thanking supporters for helping the campaign’s goal of winning 270 electoral votes.”

The debate over replacing the Electoral College surged in 2016 when Donald Trump won despite losing the popular vote to Hillary Clinton. “I think it needs to be eliminated,” Clinton told CNN after her loss. She had voiced similar opinions before.

Last month, Democratic Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin warned there could be deadly consequences if the Electoral College isn’t abolished. He said the national popular vote is better than the “obsolete system” from the 18th century.

Both Republicans and Democrats have pushed to eliminate the Electoral College in the past. After Clinton’s loss, Democrats have been more vocal about it. The Electoral College was created by the Founding Fathers as a compromise between Congress voting for president and a national popular vote.

Electoral College votes are based on the Census, with 270 needed to win. The system helps balance the impact of voters in less populated states with those in more densely populated areas. It’s also seen as a safeguard against thin margins and excessive recounts.

The bull in the China closet.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment