Our children have received eight years/Obama and four years/Biden of dumbing down. Now we are back to the age of the three R’s. Please teach the children after the ABC’s to write. Twelve years of making our children illiterate where they couldn’t sign their names in writing for legal purposes and teaching them how to be lazy.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Department of Education has announced a slate of senior-level political appointees tasked with implementing President Donald Trump’s bold vision for American education. Among them are high-profile figures with deep ties to policy reform, conservative advocacy, and legal expertise. Barely a week into their appointments, these leaders have already moved to dismantle Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, signaling a seismic ideological shift in the nation’s approach to education policy.
“This is about restoring merit and meaningful learning in America’s schools,” explained Rachel Oglesby, the newly named Chief of Staff. “We’re placing education back into the hands of parents and communities, unburdening them from divisive agendas that have eroded trust and excellence in our school systems.”
This sweeping reform effort, directly aligned with Trump’s executive orders striking down DEI programs across federal agencies, has sparked immediate debate. Supporters hail the move as a long overdue correction to perceived overreach by prior administrations. Critics, however, argue it risks leaving historically marginalized students without vital support structures.Meet the Appointees Steering the DOE’s New Course
The political appointees reflect a deliberate strategy to realign the Department of Education with the administration’s America First principles:
Rachel Oglesby, Chief of Staff, brings experience from the America First Policy Institute, where she championed worker freedoms and skills development. Her leadership is expected to prioritize common-sense education reforms rooted in local control.
Jonathan Pidluzny, Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Programs, and Chase Forrester, Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, are seasoned professionals aligned with conservative values, with backgrounds spanning higher education reform and political strategy.
Tom Wheeler, Principal Deputy General Counsel, and Craig Trainor, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Office for Civil Rights, are poised to oversee legal adjustments that align departmental policy with constitutional principles, moving away from divisive DEI mandates.
This powerhouse team is complemented by figures like Steve Warzoha, Virginia “Chase” Forrester, and Candice Jackson, each bringing expertise in governance and law to advance Trump’s educational priorities. These appointees come from diverse—but firmly conservative—backgrounds, united by a commitment to turning back the clock on what they view as partisan overreach in education.
My administration has taken action to abolish all discriminatory diversity,
Trump’s federal DEI ban eches Pres. Woodrow Wilson’s racist segregation of the federal government in 1913Unmute
The Department’s actions have been swift and unmistakable. DEI initiatives, which prioritize racial and gender diversity in decision-making and policy, have been labeled as “pernicious” by new leadership. The department’s reforms include:
Eliminating DEI Oversight Bodies: Effective immediately, the Diversity and Inclusion Council and Employee Engagement Diversity Equity Inclusion Accessibility Council (EEDIAC) have been disbanded.
Removing DEI Resources: Over 200 webpages promoting DEI programs have been archived, along with guidance documents and training materials advocating the ideology.
Redistributing Resources: More than $2.6 million allocated to DEI training contracts has been cut, with those funds now directed toward advancing academic performance and safety programs.
The department has also placed employees tied to DEI efforts on administrative leave to ensure compliance with Trump’s executive orders. Additionally, it announced a review of agency practices to weed out “coded language” that might camouflage non-compliant DEI activities under new terms.
Why Does This Matter?
The elimination of DEI programs marks a significant turning point for education reform. Conservatives argue that such initiatives have long prioritized ideology over merit-based learning, sowing division in schools and diminishing rigor in the name of equity. By uprooting these programs, the Trump administration aims to level the playing field by focusing on individual ability rather than group identity.
For parents, this means a renewed focus on transparency in curricula, local decision-making, and defending the rights of families to shape their children’s educational environment. The administration contends that DEI has eroded parental roles by prioritizing federal dictates over community choice.
Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor put it bluntly, “The department is beginning the process of restoring the fundamental rights of parents to direct their children’s education.”
However, opponents of the move warn it could have far-reaching consequences for equity in education. DEI initiatives, they argue, were designed to address systemic disparities in access and opportunity. Critics contend that eliminating these programs might widen achievement gaps, particularly for historically underrepresented groups.The Political Context and Implications
These actions are emblematic of Trump’s broader push to strip away what he deems as excessive federal control, a hallmark of his second term. The Biden administration’s establishment of positions like a “book ban coordinator” and measures aimed at enforcing DEI compliance in schools set the stage for this ideological battle. Trump’s executive orders serve as a direct rebuke of those policies, reframing the discussion around constitutional values and merit-based systems.
The dismissal of book ban complaints further underscores this shift. Under President Biden, the narrative of “book banning” often centered around school districts reviewing and removing age-inappropriate materials from libraries. Trump’s administration sees this practice not as censorship, but as parental discretion. The elimination of these complaints signals a federal retreat from dictating local educational decisions.
For many, these changes offer hope for reversing years of what they perceive as bureaucratic overreach. Communities and lawmakers aligned with Trump’s vision see this as the beginning of a long-awaited cultural shift in education—one that prioritizes academic achievement over ideological conformity.Looking Ahead
With its leadership firmly in place, the Department of Education is setting the stage for an education system grounded in traditional values and local control. Whether these moves succeed in catalyzing meaningful reform or exacerbate cultural divisions remains to be seen.
One thing is clear—with Trump’s appointees steering the department’s course, the battle over the future of American education is far from over. Opponents and allies alike will be watching as the next chapter in this ideological war unfolds.
AOC PLUS FOUR stepped out of line by backing Hamas terrorists at the colleges and still are.
****
January 24, 2025
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez believes she’s the future of the Democrat Party.
She made a massive unforced error.
And Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was blindsided when Democrats turned on her for this shocking reason.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s support for woke agenda backfires on her
Voters sent a clear message in the 2024 Election that Democrats had gone too far in pushing the transgender agenda.
House Democrats refused to learn this lesson.
The House narrowly passed the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act with the support of only two Democrats.
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) used it as an opportunity to do some grandstanding.
The bill simply banned biological males from competing in girls’ sports.
Ocasio-Cortez went on a fact-free tirade that Republicans were empowering child predators to conduct genital examinations to see if kids were allowed to participate in sports.
Of course, the bill does no such thing because gender would simply be determined with a birth certificate.
Nevertheless, Democrats began calling the bill the “House GOP Child Predator Empowerment Act.”
This was too much for one left-wing college professor.
Rutgers University law professor Gary Francione had been a Democrat since the 1970s and proudly voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris.
He is a vegan and animal rights activist who supports abortion and LGBTQ rights.
But Ocasio-Cortez’s lunatic characterization of the bill as empowering child predators was too much for him.
Francione switched from a registered Democrat to an independent because he was so upset that Democrats painted protecting girls’ sports as supporting child predators.
Ocasio-Cortez drives Democrats away from the party
He told Fox News in an interview that he’s noticed other Democrats leaving the party because of the party’s insanity over issues like this.
“I can say confidently of the people I know who are Democrats who I’ve spoken to, the vast majority of them are very unhappy about all of this stuff and feel that the party has lost its way,” Francione stated. “I know a couple who said they are going to [unregister].”
Francione was outraged at the dishonest tactics that Democrats employed in the fight over the bill.
“That just made me very upset because it screamed out lack of integrity, lack of honesty,” Francione explained. “This is the way you fight battles? By trying to insult other people who oppose you and disagree with you and insinuate that they’re child molesters or pedophiles? It seems to me you’ve lost the game. … I don’t know how they’re ever going to come back from this.”
He called the idea of letting men compete against women in sports “discriminatory” and dismissed the arguments against the bill as “irresponsible.”
“I thought it was very unfair to the large number of very decent people who are concerned about fairness and safety in women’s sports,” Francione said. “These young girls, they train hard, they work hard, and then they get things taken away from them by men!”
A New York Times/Ipsos poll found that 79% of Americans oppose letting biological males compete in women’s sports.
Ocasio-Cortez called supporters of the bill, the vast majority of Americans, “bigots.”
She and Democrats are way out of step with public opinion on this issue.
That doesn’t bode well for Democrats finding their way out of the political wilderness.
