KOMMONSENTSJANE – Ukraine agrees to minerals deal with US – Putin also proposes deal: Report.

Is the war in Ukraine a proxy conflict? | Feature from King’s College London

Whatever it is – innocent people are being killed! For what? The world/President Trump/U.S. want PEACE.

03/01/2025

“President Trump is making it clear the international community must do their fair share instead of solely relying on American taxpayers to foot the bill,” Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., posted on X. 

****

ttps://san.com/cc/ukraine-agrees-to-minerals-deal-with-us-putin-also-proposes-deal-report/

The New York Times reports that Ukrainian officials have agreed to turn some of the country’s mineral rights, as well as revenue from mineral sales, over to the U.S. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has long pressed Trump for security assurances. However, the U.S. president has been skeptical of sending more aid overseas to assist Ukraine in its ongoing war against Russia

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office Tuesday, Feb. 25, Trump said that “[former President Joe Biden] was throwing money around like it was cotton candy,” adding, “It could be a trillion-dollar deal.”

The Times reports Zelenskyy rejected an initial deal from the Trump administration that would have seen them give up mineral rights worth $500 billion.

A U.S. official told the Times that the Ukrainian president eventually agreed to create a fund and dedicate half of its revenues from the future monetization of natural resources, to which the U.S. would have “maximum financial interest” in the account and also pledge to fund Ukraine and its future economic development.

Meanwhile, NBC New reports that Russian President Vladimir Putin has proposed to Trump officials a similar deal that would grant the U.S. mineral rights in parts of Russian-controlled territories of Ukraine. The news outlet cites two U.S. officials who said Russia would give the Trump administration mineral rights in Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia –– two regions that Russia declared annexed in 2022.

Trump also expressed interest in a deal with Russia Tuesday, saying the country has “a lot of things we want.” 

Putin told a Russian state news outlet that he’s open to offering the U.S. access to rare earth minerals. 

Related Stories

****

02/28/2025

https://www.windstream.net/news/read/article/straight_arrow_news-the_free_world_needs_a_new_leader_trumpzelenskyy_m-sanews/vendor/Straight%20Arrow%20News

h=ttps://www.windstream.net/news/read/article/straight_arrow_news-the_free_world_needs_a_new_leader_trumpzelenskyy_m-sanews/vendor/Straight%20Arrow%20News

Straight Arrow NewsRay BoganFeb 28, 2025, 11:15 PM

  • The Trump-Zelenskyy Oval Office meeting on Friday severely damaged the relationship between the U.S. and Ukraine. While European leaders are expressing support for Ukraine, Republicans say President Trump is standing up for America.
  • President Zelenskyy expressed his gratitude after he left the meeting without signing a minerals or security agreement.
  • Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Zelenskyy needs to resign or change his stance.

Full Story

From proud to pugnacious, Americans and the world are reacting to the now-viral Trump-Zelenskyy Oval Office meeting on Friday, Feb. 28. The meeting ended as the Ukrainian president left the White House without a mineral or defense agreement, as well as a severely damaged relationship with the Trump administration. 

Here are two examples of the polarized response: 

The European Union high representative for foreign affairs, Kaja Kallas, posted on X, “We will step up our support to Ukraine so that they can continue to fight back the aggressor.”“Today, it became clear that the free world needs a new leader. It’s up to us, Europeans, to take this challenge,” Kallas continued.

(It is about time.)

Another example is Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who said President Donald Trump stood up for America. 

“Somebody asked me, am I embarrassed about Trump,” Graham said. “I have never been more proud of the president.” 

Graham has been to Ukraine approximately eight times since the war began and has been a steadfast supporter of both the country and its president. However, after the meeting, Graham said Zelenskyy should resign or change his stance. 

“What I saw in the Oval Office was disrespectful and I don’t know if we can ever do business with Zelenskyy again,” Graham said.  

The White House, Trump’s cabinet and Republicans in Congress all contend that the president was standing up for American interests. 

“President Trump is making it clear the international community must do their fair share instead of solely relying on American taxpayers to foot the bill,” Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., posted on X. 

Democrats counter that Trump is aligning himself with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

“The winner is not United States and the winner isn’t Ukraine…the winner is just, very clearly, it’s Vladimir Putin, a criminal,” Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., said.  During the Oval Office meeting, VicePresident JD Vance asked Zelenskyy why he isn’t more thankful for American support. 

(Senator Kelly is a Democrat – which explains his comment.)

After Zelenskyy left the White House, he put out a statement thanking the president, Congress and the American people for their support throughout the war.

Dozens of European leaders are stating their support for Ukraine, and Zelenskyy is making a point to thank each one individually.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – DIFF-Winning Documentary Plunges Into a West Texas Water Conflict.

03/01/2025

By Todd Jorgenson | November 1, 2024|11:19 am

ttps://www.dmagazine.com/arts-entertainment/2024/11/diff-winning-documentary-plunges-into-a-west-texas-water-conflict/

Film DIFF-Winning Documentary Plunges Into a West Texas Water Conflic Drawing from personal experience, Fort Worth’s Philip Guitar said producing Water Wars, was both cathartic and illuminating.

By Todd Jorgenson | November 1, 2024|11:19 am

Image
Dell City might not look like much on the surface, but its mountain-fed aquifers tell another story.Jacob Hamilton

Philip Guitar was brainstorming far and wide for a documentary project for his upstart Fort Worth production company. Then his family reminded him that his best idea was much closer to home.

That led Guitar to Water Wars, a documentary about a battle over precious water rights that he calls a “West Texas Chinatown.” The film recently won the Grand Jury Prize for Best Texas Feature at the Dallas International Film Festival.

It chronicles the political wrangling over irrigation rights to water located beneath ranches in Dell City, about 90 miles east of El Paso, involving landowners, municipal governments, big-money investors, and precious natural resources.

“I had access to this story,” Guitar said. “We had a lot of the data and the connections, and it blossomed from there.”

The contentious battle, which began in the 1990s when the city of El Paso attempted to make a deal with Dell Valley ranchers to pump groundwater, led to the landmark 2007 Texas Supreme Court case Guitar Holdings v. Hudspeth. However, since his family had owned hundreds of acres in the area for multiple generations and emotions still ran high, Guitar needed a neutral voice.

“We were just one group of people who were going through this or leading the charge,” Guitar said. “You’ve got people who you would normally think would get along under most circumstances, but they went to war over this issue.”

So he reached out to Austin filmmaker Mario Mattei (The Gentleman Driver), who stressed the need for even-handed storytelling, and making it more than just a David vs. Goliath tale of fighting government and corporate greed.

“Philip was so down-to-earth and friendly and excited. I got good vibes. Plus, this sounded like a good story. It felt like a really big challenge,” Mattei said. “But I didn’t want to make a family legacy doc. I wanted to dig and find as much opposition as I can.”

The driving force behind the film became the late Laura Lynch, a founding member of the country-music band the Chicks who lived in Dell City and became a prominent voice in the dispute before she died in a car crash in late 2023, when the film was in post-production.

“I would not have this movie without Laura,” Mattei said. “She was really the heart and gave me a whole map. The characters and the town and the dynamics of the relationships — there was so much there.”

The Dell City issue has resolved itself in recent years with regard to compensation, and the tension has eased. Yet Guitar still found the project cathartic.

“We wanted to tell this story from all sides and let viewers decide what you think is right. We wanted it to be told openly and honestly,” Guitar said, “I knew what our position was and knew how we had been mistreated, but I also knew there was another side. It opened my eyes.”

Water Wars will screen this weekend as part of the Lone Star Film Festival in Fort Worth, with Guitar on hand for a Q&A. After that, negotiations are ongoing with potential distributors for a general release.Mattei said reaction at screenings thus far shows the film’s broader issues resonate beyond its corner of West Texas.“We have a court system and a justice system, and we’re living in an era where we feel disillusioned with a lot of our institutions, for good reason. But this was one instance where the courts got it right,” Mattei said. “It’s kind of a cautionary tale, where if you’re a property owner and you have something of value, pay attention.”

****

See More:

https://www.dallasobserver.com/arts/texas-documentary-water-wars-exposes-a-towns-legal-fight-for-water-19775553

ttps://www.dallasobserver.com/arts/texas-documentary-water-wars-exposes-a-towns-legal-fight-for-water-19775553

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Congress needs to update the Nixon-era law on how the Postal Service operates.

03/01/2025

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/congress-needs-to-update-the-nixon-era-law-on-how-the-postal-service-operates/ar-AA1zYzij

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/congress-needs-to-update-the-nixon-era-law-on-how-the-postal-service-operates/ar-AA1zYzij

Congress needs to update the Nixon-era law on how the Postal Service operates

Congress needs to update the Nixon-era law on how the Postal Service operates

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy recently announced his intention to step down after five years on the job. “As you know, I have worked tirelessly to lead the 640,000 men and women of the Postal Service in accomplishing an extraordinary transformation,” he wrote to the agency’s governing board.13 Mistakes Investors With $1 Million Make—and Ways to Avoid Them

DeJoy offered no reason for his departure. He cast a bit of shade at Congress, some of whose members have castigated his performance in hearings. Being postmaster general, he noted, “is a demanding role made more difficult by the devastating condition I found the Postal Service in when I arrived and the almost unceasing resistance to change — without offering any viable solutions — from stakeholders motivated by both parochial and political purposes. The simplest and most obvious ideas and solutions receive illogical and irrational scrutiny.” President Donald Trump is reportedly planning to fold the Postal Service, an independent agency throughout U.S. history, into his second, nonconsecutive administration. Trump would issue an executive order to fire the Postal Service’s governing board and then place the mail agency under the Commerce Department.

Related video: Changes coming to the United States Postal Service in 2025 (WHTM Harrisburg)

WHTM HarrisburgChanges coming to the United States Postal Service in 2025A former logistics executive, DeJoy had a tumultuous term. He arrived at the Postal Service during COVID-19 with the agency running desperately low on cash. DeJoy, a longtime fundraiser for Republicans including Trump, faced a barrage of partisan criticisms. Democrats and leftists peddled the conspiracy theory in 2020 that DeJoy would slow the mail to stop mail-in ballots for future President Joe Biden from being counted, and falsely alleged that he wanted to break the agency so it could be sold off to the private sector.The famously gruff DeJoy waved off all the carping and plunged forth to remake the Postal Service. The centerpiece of his efforts was the Delivering for America plan. This 10-year strategy commenced in 2021 and aims to transform the Postal Service from “an organization in financial and operational crisis to one that is self-sustaining and high performing.”

Cost control is central to the strategy, and DeJoy is trying to achieve that by shuttering and consolidating many mail-sorting facilities and replacing them with larger, state-of-the-art facilities that require less manpower to operate. The plan intends to drive down transportation costs by replacing the USPS’s aging gas-guzzling fleet with new, efficient vehicles that travel fewer miles.

Earlier this month, the Postal Service reported a $144 million profit in its most recent quarter. These results look all the better compared to the same quarter the previous year when the agency lost more than $2 billion.

DeJoy was delighted. “We did more with less this quarter,” he exclaimed during a recent meeting of the USPS’s governing board. “We hired fewer seasonal employees, relied on fewer annexes, flew fewer planes, ran fewer trucks to fewer places, and processed more mail and packages.” He also said the USPS was right-sizing its workforce by offering early retirements to some employees.The Best Walking Sneakers For Women To Wear All Day Without Discomfort.

For all DeJoy’s efforts, he leaves the Postal Service with a future that is very much in doubt.

The agency predicts it will lose $6.9 billion in 2025. That is less than last year’s deficit of $9.6 billion, but it is a staggering sum. Revamping its legacy network is enormously expensive. The agency already has spent $17 billion and it estimates finishing the job will cost another $23 billion. How the agency can pay for these upgrades is anything but clear. The USPS has $9.5 billion in cash and liquid assets and has hit its $15 billion limit for borrowing from the Treasury. The agency has been skipping payments into its pension fund to preserve cash.

DeJoy hopes his successor will continue rolling out the DFA plan, but the Postal Service’s regulator and some of its customers do not believe it will work. The Postal Regulatory Commission recently issued a lengthy analysis that faulted the DFA strategy for faulty business modeling and overly optimistic financial projections and said it might degrade rural delivery service.

Reworking the USPS network also has produced some spectacular mistakes and inefficiencies. Last spring, hundreds of mail trucks idled for hours outside a USPS facility in Georgia and mail delivery slowed to a crawl. “Every time they open a new, large plant,” one mailing industry expert complained to the Washington Examiner, “the area’s service declines dramatically. It has happened in Richmond, Atlanta, and now Indianapolis.” USPS data show its success at delivering mail on time slid last year.

Two other mail industry veterans told the Washington Examiner that the DFA plan was inherently flawed. It has made “massive investment in middle-mile activities like sortation and distribution that the Post Office has not been particularly good at,” observed Michael Plunkett, a former USPS executive and president of the Association for Postal Commerce. The better strategy, they suggest, would have been for the Postal Service to partner with the private sector to outsource more of the shunting and sorting of mail and to invest mostly in making delivery as efficient and dependable as possible.

But even if DeJoy had pursued that strategy, it is not clear whether the USPS could stop running the deficits that have plagued it for two decades. Congress designed the USPS to fund itself by granting it a monopoly over the delivery of letters. Since 2008, however, mail volume has plunged to 112 billion mail pieces per year from 213 billion. First-class mail, the agency’s cash cow, has nearly vanished.

DeJoy hoped to keep the Postal Service afloat by transforming it into a premier parcel delivery company. Moving boxes, however, is not the same as moving mail. It necessitates replacing nearly much of USPS’s infrastructure, from mail carriers’ letter bags to mail-sorting machines and trucks. Becoming a packaging company also means the USPS would have to out-hustle the many private-sector package delivery companies.

TRUMP IS CUTTING SPENDING THROUGH DOGE. HERE’S HOW TO MAKE THOSE CUTS PERMANENT

Regardless of what person or entity succeeds DeJoy, they will need to ask Congress for some help. The Postal Service is governed by a statute written when Richard Nixon was president and demand for mail was booming. Those days are long gone, and legislators need to rethink what the agency should be in the 21st century.

Things that cannot go on forever don’t, and unless something drastic is done soon, the two-century-old Postal Service will run out of cash and shut down, and taxpayers could be left footing a bailout.

Kevin R. Kosar (@kevinrkosar) is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and edits UnderstandingCongress.org.

Following is Congress’ work:

ttps://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/special-message-the-congress-proposing-federal-pay-and-revenue-increases-and-urging-reform

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – House Repeals Biden-Era Methane Tax on Natural Gas in 221-205 Vote.

03/01/2025

ttps://istandforfreedom.com/house-biden-methane-tax/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=main

House Repeals Biden-Era Methane Tax on Natural Gas in 221-205 Vote

Good decision for the American taxpayers/voters. The politicians who voted against it should be voted out of office. They don’t want to help the people get back on their feet.

By Noah Stanton

House Repeals Biden-Era Methane Tax on Natural Gas in 221-205 Vote

Share

Americans have been feeling the squeeze at the pump and on their utility bills for years. Hardworking families across the country continue to struggle with the economic aftermath of the oe Biden administration’s policies.

Indeed, seniors on fixed incomes have been forced to make difficult choices between heating their homes and buying groceries. And honestly, haven’t we all had enough of watching our paychecks evaporate before our eyes?

In a decisive move that signals a new direction for American energy policy, the House of Representatives voted Wednesday to repeal a Biden administration regulation that imposed a tax on methane emissions from natural gas operators. The vote of 221-205 represents a significant step toward fulfilling Republican promises to lower energy costs for everyday Americans.

Biden’s Energy Crackdown Faces Reversal

The Natural Gas Repeal Act, introduced by Republican Texas Rep. August Pfluger, chairman of the Republican Study Committee, aims to rescind one of the Biden administration’s final regulatory actions. The legislation utilizes the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which gives Congress authority to repeal regulations issued in the final months of a previous administration.

Only seven Democrats supported rolling back the regulation. Meanwhile, Republican Pennsylvania Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick joined Democrats in voting to preserve it. No surprise there – when have Democrats ever met a tax they didn’t like?

“People don’t want to do business when you regulate them out of business…. I think Biden’s stated goal was to cancel fossil fuels and try to regulate people out of business,” said Pfluger.

The methane emissions tax would have imposed significant financial burdens on American natural gas producers. These costs would inevitably be passed down to consumers through higher energy prices. I’ve seen firsthand how these regulations crush small energy producers while the political elites lecture us about climate change from their private jets.

The regulation, first proposed in January 2024, represented one of the Biden administration’s last attempts to restrict domestic energy production. The tax would have discouraged investment in American energy infrastructure and made the U.S. more dependent on foreign energy sources. Industry experts warned that it would lead to job losses in energy-producing states.

Fulfilling Promises to American Voters

House Republicans view this vote as delivering on their campaign pledges to reduce energy costs and regulatory burdens.

“In November, the American people overwhelmingly voted for lower energy prices, and today, House Republicans took another step towards fulfilling that mandate,” Pfluger told reporters. “In the latest effort to reverse Biden’s disastrous energy policies, the House passed my bill to nullify the EPA’s rule implementing the ill-conceived natural gas tax.”

Republican North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven has introduced companion legislation in the Senate. A procedural vote is scheduled for Thursday evening, with the measure expected to pass along party lines.

President Donald Trump is poised to sign the repeal into law once it reaches his desk. This action aligns perfectly with his campaign promises to restore American energy dominance and reduce unnecessary regulations that harm economic growth.

Remember when gas prices were reasonable under Trump’s first term? We’re heading back in that direction.

Lower Energy Costs for American Families

The repeal of this regulation represents more than just a policy change. It also directly impacts household budgets across America. When energy companies face fewer regulatory burdens, they can produce more affordable energy for consumers. Anne Bradbury, CEO of the American Exploration & Production Council, emphasized the importance of this action.

“While American oil and gas producers are laser focused on continuing to reduce emissions, it’s critical to undo these punitive implementing rules while we will continue to work with Congress to repeal the underlying statute for the tax that risks driving up energy costs,” she said.

Industry leaders have consistently maintained that they can balance environmental responsibility with affordable energy production without heavy-handed government regulations. American energy companies have already made significant strides in reducing emissions through innovation and technology.

The repeal also sends a clear message that America is recommitting to energy independence. When the United States produces more of its own energy, it becomes less vulnerable to foreign supply disruptions and price manipulation. In the end, it’s time we stopped begging other countries for resources that we have in abundance right here at home.

Key Takeaways:

  • House Republicans fulfilled their promise to voters by repealing Biden’s punitive methane tax on natural gas.
  • The repeal will help lower energy costs for American families struggling with high utility bills.
  • President Trump is expected to sign the legislation, marking a return to American energy dominance.
  • This vote demonstrates that elections have real consequences for kitchen-table issues like energy prices.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment