Many years ago, we had two party’s who worked together to make our country a place where people were knocking on our door begging to be a part of our system. Now, we have only one party who follows the Constitution and the second one, called THE DEMOCRATS, have been hijacked by the terrorists (Obama/Biden) and causing havoc, internally.
The Democrats can’t seem to shake these people (Somali/Ilhan Omar, who has turned Minnesota into a haven of thieves and who are being investigated at this time). Why is the left media talking about our President instead of the real news? Are the left news a part of this Omar group? It seems they continue to try to distract from the real news by splitting hairs about our President? Gee whiz, they have been spreading this kind of cheese whiz since 2013 when Obama appeared on the scene and brought these people into this picture show called fake news.
The rest of the Democrats need to stand up for REAL DEMOCRACY or be left holding Omar’s dirty bag of tricks. They have a decision to make.
The left continues the drum beat of doom and gloom for President Trump; but, never warned our people beginning with Obama for eight years and Biden for one year on how the Democrats were scamming our country with debt – day after day as DOGE proved.
They never would admit that Biden had dementia; but, seem to know what it is now that they claim the President has it.
Does the left realize their statements are false/fake/sabotage? They keep backing the left Democrats who have been infiltrated with terrorists and can’t seem to change their path due to the depth of the wrongs they have committed against the Constitution.
And, we have to laugh and laugh at how stupid they come across.
****
Trump’s erratic moves spark national alarm
President Donald Trump’s recent actions and rhetoric have fueled mounting concern in Washington and abroad, as his behavior grows more unpredictable. From a racist social media post that drew bipartisan condemnation to threats against election integrity and volatile immigration enforcement, his second term’s stability is in question. The turbulence is compounded by economic claims that clash with public perception and foreign policy tensions with allies
Erratic behavior fuels instability concerns
Observers note a stark shift from the disciplined execution of Trump’s early second-term agenda to increasingly impulsive, extreme moves. His volatile mood, racist social media reposts, and fixation on personal legacy have raised alarms in Washington and among foreign leaders. The prime minister of Slovakia reportedly expressed concern about Trump’s “psychological state” after a recent meeting. 12
Trump faced bipartisan condemnation after a Truth Social video depicted Barack and Michelle Obama as apes. While he refused to apologize, dismissing the offense, the backlash included criticism from Republican Senator Tim Scott and Representative Mike Lawler. The White House deleted the post and blamed a staffer, but critics argue such extremism is now a hallmark of his presidency. 1
State election officials expressed ‘deep skepticism’ after the FBI, under Trump’s direction, summoned them to a meeting about the 2026 midterms. Concerns intensified when Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard joined an FBI raid in Georgia that seized 700 boxes of 2020 election materials. Critics fear these moves signal an attempt to undermine upcoming election results. 1
A looming Department of Homeland Security budget clash could trigger a government shutdown, as Democrats push to rein in ICE following the killing of two U.S. citizens by federal agents. While Trump has called for a ‘softer touch’ and pulled back agents from Minneapolis, Republicans resist limits on enforcement. The standoff will test whether public backlash can curb his immigration policies. 12
CNN·
Trump’s erratic moves spark national alarm
President Donald Trump’s recent actions and rhetoric have fueled mounting concern in Washington and abroad, as his behavior grows more unpredictable. From a racist social media post that drew bipartisan condemnation to threats against election integrity and volatile immigration enforcement, his second term’s stability is in question. The turbulence is compounded by economic claims that clash with public perception and foreign policy tensions with allies.
Erratic behavior fuels instability concerns
Observers note a stark shift from the disciplined xecution of Trump’s early second-term agenda to increasingly impulsive, extreme moves. His volatile mood, racist social media reposts, and fixation on personal legacy have raised alarms in Washington and among foreign leaders. The prime minister of Slovakia reportedly expressed concern about Trump’s “psychological state” after a recent meeting. 12
Trump faced bipartisan condemnation after a Truth Social video depicted Barack and Michelle Obama as apes. While he refused to apologize, dismissing the offense, the backlash included criticism from Republican Senator Tim Scott and Representative Mike Lawler. The White House deleted the post and blamed a staffer, but critics argue such extremism is now a hallmark of his presidency. 1
(That statement has been around the block many times even with head/body structure photos when I was a child – and seems to be returning to the scene by the left to generate some back lash to help them past their absenteeism in the world of ideas. What has the left leaders done for our country?)
State election officials expressed ‘deep skepticism’ after the FBI, under Trump’s direction, summoned them to a meeting about the 2026 midterms. Concerns intensified when Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard joined an FBI raid in Georgia that seized 700 boxes of 2020 election materials. Critics fear these moves signal an attempt to undermine upcoming election results. 1
A looming Department of Homeland Security budget clash could trigger a government shutdown, as Democrats push to rein in ICE following the killing of two U.S. citizens by federal agents. While Trump has called for a ‘softer touch’ and pulled back agents from Minneapolis, Republicans resist limits on enforcement. The standoff will test whether public backlash can curb his immigration policies. 12
Trump has touted economic successes, including record stock market highs and inflated GDP growth claims, but polls show most Americans disapprove of his handling of the economy. Critics note that benefits have not reached low and middle-income families, and that his credit-taking often relies on projections rather than actual data. His rhetoric contrasts sharply with ongoing affordability and housing crises.
Trump has touted economic successes, including record stock market highs and inflated GDP growth claims, but polls show most Americans disapprove of his handling of the economy. Critics note that benefits have not reached low and middle-income families, and that his credit-taking often relies on projections rather than actual data. His rhetoric contrasts sharply with ongoing affordability and housing crises.
President Donald Trump’s recent actions and rhetoric have fueled mounting concern in Washington and abroad, as his behavior grows more unpredictable. From a racist social media post that drew bipartisan condemnation to threats against election integrity and volatile immigration enforcement, his second term’s stability is in question. The turbulence is compounded by economic claims that clash with public perception and foreign policy tensions with allies.
Erratic behavior fuels instability concerns
(The media can’t seem to recognize progress – they call it erratic behavior.)
Observers note a stark shift from the disciplined execution of Trump’s early second-term agenda to increasingly impulsive, extreme moves. His volatile mood, racist social media reposts, and fixation on personal legacy have raised alarms in Washington and among foreign leaders. The prime minister of Slovakia reportedly expressed concern about Trump’s “psychological state” after a recent meeting.
Trump faced bipartisan condemnation after a Truth Social video depicted Barack and Michelle Obama as apes. While he refused to apologize, dismissing the offense, the backlash included criticism from Republican Senator Tim Scott and Representative Mike Lawler. The White House deleted the post and blamed a staffer, but critics argue such extremism is now a hallmark of his presidency. 1
(The media seems to inject racism when their words are non-existence..)
State election officials expressed ‘deep skepticism’ after the FBI, under Trump’s direction, summoned them to a meeting about the 2026 midterms. Concerns intensified when Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard joined an FBI raid in Georgia that seized 700 boxes of 2020 election materials. Critics fear these moves signal an attempt to undermine upcoming election results. 1
A looming Department of Homeland Security budget clash could trigger a government shutdown, as Democrats push to rein in ICE following the killing of two U.S. citizens by federal agents. While Trump has called for a ‘softer touch’ and pulled back agents from Minneapolis, Republicans resist limits on enforcement. The standoff will test whether public backlash can curb his immigration policies. 12
Trump has touted economic successes, including record stock market highs and inflated GDP growth claims, but polls show most Americans disapprove of his handling of the economy. Critics note that benefits have not reached low and middle-income families, and that his credit-taking often relies on projections rather than actual data. His rhetoric contrasts sharply with ongoing affordability and housing crises.
****
Instead of all of these jaw-breaker comments by the left as shown above – where are your ideas on how to remove the damage done by Biden/Obama. It seems these people like CNN/etc., can criticize but can’t seem to come up with any concrete steps to help President Trump in the Democrat/Senate/House. The left seems to continue to swim against the current – just like the comments from CNN.
The people are looking for both sides to join together and fix the problem which was cultivated by Biden/Obama – those who committed crimes need to be taken care of, quickly.
Happiness is a state of well-being and contentment : joy!
Mr. Musk has been a joy to watch and has given so much to our country by his vision and vitality. I place him in the category of “a disrupter” for the good of our country. Something our country needed.
Very simply – HAPPINESS is an INSIDE JOB. It is all up to you. It is your choice every day when you wake up – your attitude. You can choose to be in a good mood or a bad mood.
Mr. Musk has chosen the world he lives in by sharing in his own way.
But – that needle in the haystack when it is threaded states:
Legally –
Polygamy, or having more than one wife, is illegal in all states in the United States, and individuals can face legal consequences for attempting to enter into multiple marriages simultaneously.
Even with $850 billion to his name, Elon Musk admits money can’t buy happiness. But billionaire Mark Cuban says it’s not so simple
Story by Preston Fore
Feb 06 • 4 min read • Updated 2d ago
Key takeaways:
Money vs Happiness: Despite a net worth of $852 billion, Musk admits money can’t buy happiness, echoing the sentiment that wealth amplifies existing emotions rather than creating joy.
Advice from Peers: Billionaires like Bill Ackman suggest focusing on philanthropy and long-term relationships, while Mark Cuban emphasizes that money magnifies pre-existing happiness or misery.
Research Insights: Studies show income increases happiness up to a point ($75k–$100k), but for the already unhappy, more money doesn’t guarantee fulfillment, highlighting that wealth eases stress but can’t solve deeper personal issues.
Elon Musk’s net worth surged to $852 billion this week—a record high set into motion by the merger of two of his companies, SpaceX and xAI, ahead of a highly anticipated IPO later this year. But even with more wealth to his name than anyone in history, Musk doesn’t seem convinced that the number in his bank account translates into personal fulfillment.
“Whoever said, ‘Money can’t buy happiness’ really knew what they were talking about,” Musk wrote this week on X, a post that’s garnered over 96 million views.
The remark sparked reaction across his social platform, including from members of the ultrawealthy who have grappled with the same dilemma. Hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman offered Musk some pointed advice—urging him to focus more on philanthropy and perspective.
“A lot of happiness comes from helping others. You have helped millions, and someday it will likely be billions. You just need to appreciate what you have accomplished for so many,” he wrote.
Ackman also suggested it might be time for Musk to settle down with a long-term partner. Musk has 14 children with four different women.
“Happiness can also be found in a long-term relationship with someone really special. It is time for you to find that someone for the long term. Just my two cents.”
Mark Cuban, the billionaire investor and former Shark Tank star, agreed with Musk to an extent, but said linking wealth to happiness isn’t cut and dry. Essentially, money doesn’t fundamentally change happiness so much as magnify what’s already there.
“If you were happy when you were poor, you will be insanely happy if you get rich,” Cuban hit back on X. “If you were miserable, you will stay miserable, just with a lot less financial stress.”
What the experts say
Researchers have long tried to answer the age-old question of whether money can buy happiness—and the answer is more nuanced than a simple yes or no.
A widely cited 2010 Princeton University study found that day-to-day emotional well-being increased with income but plateaued beyond roughly $75,000. More recent research from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School complicates that finding. It shows that happiness rises with income, but people who are already unhappy tend to see happiness gains level off once their income reaches around $100,000 annually.
“In the simplest terms, this suggests that for most people larger incomes are associated with greater happiness,” Matthew Killingsworth, a senior fellow at Wharton and the lead author, said.
“The exception is people who are financially well-off but unhappy. For instance, if you’re rich and miserable, more money won’t help. For everyone else, more money was associated with higher happiness to somewhat varying degrees.”
These findings align with the message Cuban appeared to send Musk: Money often acts as an amplifier, but not a cure. While it can ease stress and expand choices, it can’t automatically resolve things like strained personal relationships or underlying feelings about life.
Elon Musk says it’s ‘very hard’ to do good with philanthropy
(Very true, because a lot of the money never gets to the intended people due to the corruption factor.)
While much of Musk’s wealth is tied up in company valuations rather than cash, the sheer scale of his fortune still affords extraordinary flexibility. Even accounting for illiquid assets, Musk has access to resources few people in history have ever had—enough to acquire virtually any home or technology or even make an unprecedented impact through philanthropy.
But despite Ackman’s suggestion that Musk would be happier if he gave more of his money away, the world’s richest man has insisted even that’s not as simple as it seems.
“I agree with love of humanity, and I think we should try to do things that help our fellow human beings,” Musk said on the WTF podcast late last year. “But it’s very hard.
“The biggest challenge I find with my foundation is trying to give money away in a way that is truly beneficial to people,” Musk added. “It’s very easy to give money away to get the appearance of goodness. It is very difficult to give money away for the reality of goodness. Very difficult.”
Musk is far from alone in grappling with that tension. Many tech leaders, including Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, and Musk himself—have signed the Giving Pledge, an initiative launched by Bill Gates, Melinda French Gates, and Warren Buffett to give the majority of their wealth to charitable causes. But critics note that many signatories have moved slowly in fulfilling those commitments. Billionaire investor Peter Thielreportedly urged Musk to abandon the pledge, arguing that Gates would otherwise direct the money to “left-wing nonprofits.”
Gates, for his part, has been more candid about what extreme wealth can—and can’t—deliver. Asked in 2019 during a Reddit Q&A session if being a billionaire made him happier than if he were middle-class, the Microsoft cofounder said yes.
“I don’t have to think about health costs or college costs,” Gates said. “Being free from worry about financial things is a real blessing.”
However, he added: “Of course, you don’t need a billion to get to that point. We do need to reduce the cost growth in these areas.”
CNN
The New Republic·
Raw Story·
kommonsentsjane 