The Democrat Senators Lost Site of the 2024 Voters Selection and the Rejection of Their Progressive Ideology in Their Vote for Bondi.
They are still swimming in the Biden contamination and rejection of the Constitution.
Voters in their areas need to reject the Senators’ progressive mindset and send some replacements who want FREEDOM/DEMOCRACY. Their lack of dignity/humility in the interviewing process and rejection of Bondi spoke of sexism.
Why are these Senators so afraid of being called out for their rejection of the Constitution during the Biden administration and allowing the reckless spending by the Democrats. One point in particular is their sponsorship and sending money to terrorists organizations.
Bondi has to sort that out – why did these Democrat Senators support terrorists?
The DODGE report is showing how much money was spent recklessly by this Biden Democrat admin.
These Senators still don’t understand how they are still failing the country with their progressive ideology and backing terrorists.
How did this happen and who hired him and agreed to that amount of money? Why was he worth so much? Are there others who are in this category?. Is this normal in the government?
Government Official Paid $10 MILLION Of YOUR Money!
Jeff Lyash’s unexpected retirement from TVA has sparked questions amid political and salary scrutiny.
He knows DOGE is coming for him.
At a Glance
TVA CEO Jeff Lyash announces retirement from his $10.5M annual role.
Lyash was the highest-paid federal employee, drawing criticism from Trump.
Trump demanded Lyash be fired due to his salary scale during his first term.
TVA insists the retirement decision was independent of Trump’s criticisms.
Jeff Lyash Announces Departure
Jeff Lyash, CEO of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), is retiring from his position amidst controversy regarding his $10.5 million annual salary. This announcement comes during renewed criticism from President Donald Trump, who had previously labeled federal salaries like Lyash’s as “ridiculous,” vowing during his first term to either have him fired or impose pay cuts.
Despite the political backdrop, TVA officials maintain that Lyash’s decision is part of a long-planned retirement process. “The answer is no,” Spokeswoman Melissa Greene said, emphasizing that the decision was unrelated to Trump’s pressure.
During his last presidency, Trump had criticized Lyash’s compensation, arguing it was excessive for a federal employee.
“We’re getting rid of him in one form or another. Either the board’s gonna do it, or we’re gonna do it, but he’s gone,” Trump declared, reflecting his frustration over public sector salary structures. The controversy around Lyash’s pay highlights broader bipartisan concerns about the appropriateness of such high earnings within public agencies like the TVA.
Additional TVA Executives also receive substantial compensation, fueling further debate and ongoing criticism from various quarters. Both Democrat and Republican Representatives have raised questions about federal salary arrangements, especially in light of TVA’s role serving economically-challenged regions.
The TVA oversees critical infrastructure projects, such as hydroelectric dams and nuclear power establishments, stemming from New Deal initiatives. As questions around Lyash’s retirement and compensation grow, discussions about the public sector’s pay scales remain at the forefront.
Well, this is one job Elon Musk doesn’t need to handle. He’ll just need to make sure this guy’s replacement is paid less.
J.D. Vance put the media on notice with one scary fact that left them with a sinking feeling
February 3, 2025
The media is settling in for another four years of fighting the Trump administration.
But they might get more than they bargained for this term.
And J.D. Vance put the media on notice with one scary fact that left them with a sinking feeling.
J.D. Vance warns media outlets acting as partisan Democrat outfits
The mask came completely off for the legacy media during the 2024 Election.
President Donald Trump was relentlessly attacked by media outlets who behaved like unregistered Democratic Super PACs.
The media became the second biggest loser of the election after their attacks couldn’t put a dent in Trump.
Vice President J.D. Vance talked about the Trump administration’s plan for handling the media during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity.
He warned the reporters acting like hacks for the Democrat Party would be treated as such.
“I actually think we are looking very seriously at which reporters show up,” Vance said. “If you’re a reporter, even if you’re biased toward the left, absolutely we want to answer your questions. If you’re a propagandist for the Democratic Party, then we’re going to treat you like a propagandist for the Democratic Party.”
The Trump administration recognizes the changing face of the media
Trump and Vance successfully navigated the new media environment in the 2024 Election by appearing on popular podcasts like comedian Joe Rogan’s and giving interviews to outlets like Breitbart.
Rogan’s audience for his podcast dwarfs cable news networks in size.
His interview with Trump last October received 26 million views on YouTube in the first 24 hours after it was posted.
Vance said that White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was welcoming podcasters and other media outlets into the briefing room.
“One of the things we’ve already done only eight days into this thing is, it is not just who is not there, it is also who is present,” Vance explained. “Karoline had a lot of new media folks, a lot of young people who represent the vanguard of news media in this country. She gave Matt Boyle from Breitbart a question yesterday. These are actually some of the people who are driving news in 2025 in America.”
Vance argued the rise in popularity of new media like podcasts should serve as a warning to the legacy media.
“I think frankly, the MSNBCs and CNNs of the world should take the hint,” Vance stated. “Your viewership is way down, your ratings are abysmal. Why is it that especially young people are tuning into new media? Maybe it is because instead of engaging in propaganda, the new media is asking real questions.”
The new media is driving the conversation because they have an intellectual curiosity that’s absent in the legacy media.
“Joe Rogan, one of the biggest voices in American media now, was a Bernie Bro eight years ago,” Vance said. “This is not some crazy right-wing guy, this is just a person who was asking questions. Unfortunately, most of the old media are just not interested in that.”
The Trump administration is going to treat journalists acting like Democrat hacks as fake news.
Google made changes in the wording which had to be changed back to the original. I am concerned that some of the people working for them are also the enemy within. He/she/or it need to be fired. They did not want this published.
02/04/2025
It was reported in the news this was occurring. Time to clean the swamp.
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has made some bold accusations against career officials at the Treasury Department. He claims that these officials are instructing employees to make “fraudulent” payments to people who aren’t supposed to receive them. Various news sources, like The New York Times, have reported on this issue, highlighting that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has given the Department of Government Efficiency access to the federal payment system.
Musk, who also chairs the Department of Government Efficiency, has been vocal about his concerns. He took to social media platform X to share that payment approval officers at the Treasury Department were directed to approve payments to known fraudulent or even terrorist groups. According to Musk, these officers have never denied a payment during their entire careers, which he finds deeply concerning.
In another post, Musk emphasized that these career Treasury officials are allegedly breaking the law repeatedly. He argues that by approving these payments, which he views as fraudulent or not in line with funding laws passed by Congress, they are engaging in illegal activities. Musk’s statements have sparked considerable debate and scrutiny from various quarters.
Supporters of Musk’s views see this as a necessary step to expose what they believe is rampant inefficiency and corruption. They argue that such actions undermine the integrity of the federal payment system and misuse taxpayer money. Critics, however, are cautious about accepting these claims without further evidence and investigation.
The Treasury Department, under Bessent’s leadership, has not yet issued a comprehensive response to these accusations. The allegations have, however, triggered discussions within political and financial circles about the need for transparency and accountability. Many are calling for a thorough investigation to determine the validity of Musk’s claims.
Historically, similar allegations have surfaced, but few have resulted in substantial reforms or changes within the department. Some believe that this pattern of behavior can be traced back to a lack of stringent oversight and accountability measures. Musk’s claims might be the catalyst needed to push for significant changes.
Conservative voices have long championed the need for smaller, more efficient government operations. They argue that cutting down on wasteful spending and fraud is essential to maintaining public trust. Musk’s allegations, if proven true, could bolster these calls for reform.
The debate has also reached Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are divided on how best to address these concerns. Some are advocating for immediate hearings and investigations, while others urge caution and due process. The outcome of this debate may shape the future of federal financial oversight.
Public opinion is also split, with some citizens expressing outrage at the alleged misuse of funds. Others remain skeptical, waiting for more concrete evidence before forming an opinion. Regardless, the controversy has drawn significant attention to the inner workings of the Treasury Department.
Musk’s high-profile status adds weight to his accusations, bringing them to the forefront of national conversation. His involvement in the Department of Government Efficiency further complicates the situation, as it raises questions about potential conflicts of interest. Nonetheless, Musk’s statements have undeniably sparked a nationwide debate.
As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how the Treasury Department will navigate these allegations. Pressure from the public and political figures may prompt a reevaluation of current practices. The outcome could have lasting implications for how federal payments are managed.
In the meantime, some are calling for increased transparency and checks within the Treasury to prevent similar issues in the future. They believe that a robust system of checks and balances is crucial to safeguarding taxpayer money. This incident might serve as a catalyst for implementing such measures.
Moreover, the role of technology in monitoring and approving payments has come under scrutiny. Some argue that technological improvements could help identify and prevent fraudulent transactions more effectively. Others worry about the potential for abuse or errors in automated systems.
As discussions continue, it is clear that the allegations have resonated with many Americans. The issue of government efficiency and spending is a perennial concern, and Musk’s accusations have reignited this debate. Whether these claims will lead to tangible change remains an open question.
While Musk’s allegations are serious, they also highlight the complexities of managing a vast federal payment system. Balancing efficiency with oversight is a challenge that has persisted over the years. Finding a solution may require collaboration across political and institutional lines.
The controversy also underscores the importance of leadership in government departments. Effective leadership can inspire trust and ensure that operations align with legal and ethical standards. The current situation at the Treasury Department may prompt a reevaluation of leadership practices. Ultimately, how the Treasury Department addresses these allegations will reflect its commitment to transparency and accountability. As public scrutiny intensifies, the department’s actions will be closely watched. The outcome will likely influence public perception of government efficiency for years to come.
kommonsentsjane 