7/6/2023
ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-administration-seeks-stay-of-judge-s-social-media-order-saying-it-could-cause-grave-harm/ar-AA1dxo42?ocid=iehp&cvid=2daf85d22eea42948cc9595031072786&ei=20
ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-admin-seeks-emergency-order-halting-ban-on-social-media-company-contacts/ar-AA1dxtMK?ocid=iehp&cvid=5345b40146bd4fc88b37db7b4b632ea2&ei=14
Just add an ‘h’ to view the above.
Sure could – it stops the Democrats/tech media from breaking the constitutional law of “freedom of speech” which they are guilty of every day.
Good decision by the judge.
Biden’s bull and Durham’s report go hand in hand.
“The world is made for people who aren’t cursed with self-awareness.”
Watching some of the presidential politics, you can see how true this is. You watch these candidates butcher complex issues into ridiculous little soundbites. “Can’t you hear yourself?” you scream. And that is just it—they can’t. But what would happen if on stage instead was someone thoughtful, careful, and measured? They would be viciously attached for being boring, too intellectual, and “wishy washy.”
Maybe we just can’t have both.
****
Biden administration seeks stay of judge’s social media order, saying it could cause ‘grave harm’
WASHINGTON (AP) — A Louisiana-based federal judge’s order broadly limiting executive branch communications with social media companies could cause “grave harm” by preventing the government from “engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct,” Biden administration attorneys said in a motion filed Thursday with a federal appeals court.
The request to stay the order was the administration’s first substantive response to a July 4 ruling by U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty in Monroe.
Doughty, a conservative nominated to the federal bench by former President Donald Trump, issued an injunction Tuesday blocking multiple government agencies and administration officials from meeting with or contacting social media companies for the purpose of “encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech.”
The order also prohibits the agencies and officials from pressuring social media companies “in any manner” to try to suppress posts, raising questions about what officials could even say in public forums.
Again – just in case they remove it at the top.
These are the tech media who are covered in Durham’s report as colluding with the Democrats.
FILE – Republican U.S. Sen.-elect and Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt delivers a victory speech, Nov. 8, 2022, in Maryland Heights, Mo. On Tuesday, July 4, 2023, a judge prohibited several federal agencies and officials of the Biden administration from working with social media companies about “protected speech.” Schmitt, who was the Missouri attorney general when the lawsuit was filed, said on Twitter that the ruling was “a huge win for the First Amendment and a blow to censorship.” (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson, File)© Provided by The Associated Press
They said, “These immediate and ongoing harms to the Government outweigh any risk of injury to Plaintiffs if a stay is granted.”
kommonsentsjane
kommonsentsjane 