It is time for President Trump to declare a martial law and settle this.
WASHINGTON) The Supreme Court chose Friday to refuse to hear Texas’ case to challenge the election results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, clearing the way for electors to gather on Monday and confirm that President-elect Joe Biden will take office on Jan. 20, 2020, according to USAToday.
The case was made by the State of Texas by Attorney General Ken Paxton, and endorsed by President Donald Trump. It alleged that the four states used the coronavirus pandemic as a pretext to change election rules and expend mail-in voting in violation of the constitution.
The Supreme court undoubtedly does not comprehend the definition of “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.”
This is a federal election and should be held whereby all states’ election are “fair and honest” in their elections. When other states hold dishonest elections by using dishonest means such as Scoreboard and Hammer and the Supreme Court approves the dishonesty then it effects other states who use honest means.
Does this mean that the Supreme okays dishonesty in its elections and doesn’t protect the Constitution?
The Supreme Court’s Friday ruling was the latest blow in Trump’s legal campaign to subvert the election results. A total of 18 GOP state attorneys general and 126 House Republicans were in support of the lawsuit.
“Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections,” the ruling states. “All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.”
In Congress, July 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
–That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.
The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.
To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.