Is Obama blaming President Trump for the crimes?
Grenell reeled in the big fish – Obama ends up with the “fish hook” in his mouth by being exposed. Doesn’t the buck start and stop at the top – Obama? Is Obama trying to “pass the buck?”
It was quite comical. Last night, after the airing of the coup on live TV – it seems Obama leaked a message – of course, to protect himself by using the social justice agenda functions by throwing-out emotional hooks contextually social (sexual identity, sexual preference, racism, sexual harassment, etc.) and trying to lure “useful idiots” (people) in with heartfelt angles.
It was out of Alinsky’s/Obama play book called social justice turned upside down. Obama in cahoots with Soros/Eric Holder paid off all Democrat AG’s in the U.S. to get elected into their state as an AG. Now you have these same AG’s turning the “rule of law” upside down by releasing citizens/illegals out of prison who are harden criminals and are roaming the streets of our country. And yet, a Democrat judge in Dallas puts a salon owner in prison for opening her business one day early and later his ruling was over turned by the state’s Supreme Court. This is what the Holder Democrats are good at – they call it social justice.
(Obama uses Sharia law not the Constitution which states a person is innocent until proven guilty. The Democrats for eight years used the stance: You are guilty until proven innocent with is a Muslim rule.)
One prominent manifestation of Alinsky’s work, in terms of it interfacing with the American public in tangible ways, is the ‘social justice’ agenda whereby the disaffected ascribe to a victim status of choice and then engage in infighting to determine the biggest victim, the largest extension of entitlement and the greatest degree of off-set from contemporary society and traditional norms. That last point is the haymaker and it’s a simple concept.
The social justice agenda functions by throwing-out emotional hooks contextually social (sexual identity, sexual preference, racism, sexual harassment, etc.) and luring people in with heartfelt angles. Once people are on board, those sentiments are then leveraged to move people towards unrelated politically desirable positions. These people are often called “useful idiots” because they only see (or at least advance) their political position through one lens – social justice.
Social justice functions to drive the narrative as far left as possible and upon societal reconciliation, when things subsequently center-up on the back end of a social stimulus as they always do, the middle ground fulcrum point – or center position – will have been nudged left by means of the American public reconciling their own individual sentiments and emotions. This often results in small shifts in personal positions and the net effect over time is a slow but steady change in America’s societal fabric rendering leftward movement.
Again, the big fish, Obama, has the “fish hook” in his mouth by being exposed. It is time to reel it in.
Fox News’ Brooke Singman and Gregg Re contributed to this report.
Adam Shaw is a reporter covering U.S. and European politics for Fox News..
May 9, 2020
Obama says ‘rule of law is at risk’ after DOJ dropped Michael Flynn case
(Can you believe this – Obama makes a statement “rule of law is at risk?” Here is the biggest crook in history who tried to conduct a coup as President and now states the the rule of law is at risk. It is so ridiculous that I am about “to bust a gut” laughing at this idiot called ‘Bama.)
Report: Obama says in private call that ‘rule of law is at risk’ in Michael Flynn case
Former President Barack Obama on Friday reacted to the Justice Department’s move to end its case against Michael Flynn by declaring that the “rule of law is at risk” — as new details emerge about what the former president knew about the case against Flynn in the last days of his administration.
“The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed — about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn,” Obama said, according to Yahoo News, in a web talk with members of the Obama Alumni Association
OBAMA KNEW DETAILS OF WIRETAPPED FLYNN PHONE CALLS, SURPRISING TOP DOJ OFFICIAL IN MEETING WITH BIDEN, DECLASSIFIED DOCS SHOW
“And the fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free,” he reportedly said. “That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic — not just institutional norms — but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk. And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places.”
Yahoo News, in reporting the tape, noted that Obama incorrectly states the charges against Flynn, who was not charged with perjury. Instead, Flynn pleaded guilty in 2017 to lying to the FBI about his conversations with the Russian ambassador in the transition period between the Obama and Trump administrations. But Flynn’s supporters have long argued that the FBI set a perjury trap for Flynn.
Documents reveal Obama knew of Flynn’s wiretapped calls
The move this week by the DOJ came after the release of memos showing bureau officials debating at the time whether their purpose in interviewing Flynn was to get him to lie and prosecute him or get him to “admit to breaking the Logan Act” — an obscure law that bars non-government officials from pretending to represent the U.S.
DOJ DROPS CASE AGAINST MICHAEL FLYNN
New details emerged also this week about what Obama himself knew at the time of the Flynn case. Obama warned the Trump administration against hiring Flynn and said he was “not a fan” of the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
According to declassified interview transcripts, Obama told then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and then-FBI Director James Comey in early 2017 that he had “learned of the information about Flynn” and his conversation with the Russian ambassador about sanctions
Obama “specified that he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information.”
At that point, the documents showed, “Yates had no idea what the president was talking about, but figured it out based on the conversation. Yates recalled Comey mentioning the Logan Act, but can’t recall if he specified there was an ‘investigation.’ Comey did not talk about prosecution in the meeting.”
COMEY SOUNDS OFF AFTER DOJ MOVES TO DROP FLYNN CASE
The exhibit continues: “It was not clear to Yates from where the President first received the information. Yates did not recall Comey’s response to the President’s question about how to treat Flynn. She was so surprised by the information she was hearing that she was having a hard time processing it and listening to the conversation at the same time.”
On Friday, Obama cited the Flynn case as a reason for why former officials needed to help his former Vice President Joe Biden beat Trump in November.
“So I am hoping that all of you feel the same sense of urgency that I do,” he said. “Whenever I campaign, I’ve always said, ‘Ah, this is the most important election.’ Especially obviously when I was on the ballot, that always feels like it’s the most important election. This one — I’m not on the ballot — but I am pretty darn invested. We got to make this happen.”
Obama also reportedly cited the coronavirus pandemic as a reason to fight harder for Biden, blaming what he saw as a poor response on “tribal” trends stoked by Trump and his allies.
(Was the coronavirus the next step in Pelosi’s trap after the Russia, Russia investigation failed, then the impeachment failed, and lo and behold the coronavirus popped out a day after the impeachment failed. We need to give a “truth serum” to these people because they are continuing to lie.)
“What we’re fighting against is these long-term trends in which being selfish, being tribal, being divided, and seeing others as an enemy — that has become a stronger impulse in American life,” he said.
(Sorry, Mr. sorry trash/scum bag Obama – you are the selfish one – Hawaii house, D.C. house, Martha Vineyard house, and a house in a Muslim country – all on the taxpayer’s dime. How does someone making ~450,000 dollars for eights years end up being a billionaire? The IRS should be on your a$$ instead of toting your fishin’ line.)
“And by the way, we’re seeing that internationally as well. It’s part of the reason why the response to this global crisis has been so anemic and spotty. It would have been bad even with the best of governments. It has been an absolute chaotic disaster when that mindset — of ‘what’s in it for me’ and ‘to heck with everybody else’ — when that mindset is operationalized in our government.”
(And that my friends, is a big fat lie. Bama’s statement “what’s in it for me” is his party line and why he uses it so frequently.)