Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.
For your information to review these prosecutors. Mueller’s fraud investigation is no different than what Ryan is talking about – the fraud voting. The politicians are not doing their jobs – just drawing their pay. The Democratic Party is committing crimes all around us and they just closed their eyes. They bailed out on the American people after they let Obama really screw it up.
Reasonable Doubt – A standard of proof that must be surpassed to convict an accused in a criminal proceeding. Reasonable doubt is a standard of proof used in criminal trials. When a criminal defendant is prosecuted, the prosecutor must prove the defendant’s guilt Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. If the jury—or the judge in a bench trial—has a reasonable doubt as to the defendant’s guilt, the jury or judge should pronounce the defendant not guilty. Conversely, if the jurors or judge have no doubt as to the defendant’s guilt, or if their only doubts are unreasonable doubts, then the prosecutor has proven the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and the defendant should be pronounced guilty.
FoxNews.com reports that
The jury in the federal trial of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort ended the first day of deliberations Thursday without a verdict, but did ask the judge a series of questions…
View original post 1,402 more words