It was excellent thinking on the part of Yvonne Mason for pointing out these “many silly mistakes” of a letter from the White House. It only reinforces that the educational system and their lack of teaching have left many of our children behind.
Also, Mason should have sent a copy of that letter to the head of the teacher’s union.
Many of us have called this out to the teachers’ union that our educational system is not teaching reading, writing, and arithmetic. They are too busy brain-washing the children in socialism and Islam.
How is someone elevated to a college status if they can’t read or write and that is what is happening. It is called social promotion. This question was posed many time to the Superintendent of our local schools and his answer was – It is a “government mandate” which was PASS OR FAIL – move them up.
The biggest mistake during the past administrations is not teaching cursive writing. Their reason was that computers print and don’t use cursive writing. So? This tells you the mentality of the Obama administration.
Those who survived this brain-dead mentality are not attending public schools but private schools and have survived this dreadful era.
As we all know, this was the Democrats’ big plan to reduce knowledge and induce arrogance, hate, and stupidity. Knowledge brings power and positive thinking.
It is not too late for Mason to send a copy to the teacher’s union and urge them to do more by teaching the skills of reading, writing, and arithmetic and spend less time in the political arena.
Teacher corrects White House letter with ‘many silly mistakes,’ sends it back to Trump
By: Paul Hyde
GREENVILLE, S.C. — In 17 years of teaching English composition in South Carolina public schools, Yvonne Mason had seen these blunders many times before.
Redundancies. Faulty capitalization. Lack of clarity and specificity.
But Mason wasn’t grading a student paper. She was reading a letter she received from President Donald Trump.
“I have never, ever, received a letter with this many silly mistakes,” Mason said.
The former Mauldin High School teacher promptly did what she had done thousands of times before: She corrected the writing and returned it, this one going back to the White House.
Mason recognizes, of course, that the form letter she received from the president was very likely written by a staff member, not Trump, though the letter does include Trump’s signature. It came in reply to a letter she’d written about the Feb. 14 school shooting in Florida.
A photo of Mason’s corrections has been widely shared on social media.
“When you get letters from the highest level of government, you expect them to be at least mechanically correct,” Mason said.
© Yvonne Mason via Facebook
She dinged the Trump letter particularly for repeatedly capitalizing “nation,” “federal,” “president” and “state,” turning these common nouns into proper nouns.
Using her signature purple ink — since harsh red ink is discouraged by some educators these days — Mason identified 11 instances of faulty capitalization in Trump’s letter.
“‘Federal’ is capitalized only when used as part of a proper noun, e.g. the name of an agency,” Mason wrote.
She resisted the idea of attaching a grade to the letter.
“If it had been written in middle school, I’d give it a C or C-plus,” she said. “If it had been written in high school, I’d give it a D.”
The Greenville News reached out to the White House Office of Presidential Correspondence, but officials were unavailable for comment.
Rhetorical activist writes often to officials Mason, who taught English at middle and high schools for 17 years before retiring last year, is a devoted rhetorical activist, writing letters, emails and faxes to state, local and federal officials.
A recent project had Mason, currently an Atlanta resident, penning a postcard every day for a year to Trump.
“You can choose to be an active part of this democracy in myriad ways,” said Mason, who is also a former actress at Greenville’s Cafe and Then Some and an author of a book of criticism about Southern writer Clyde Edgerton. “I choose to write because I’m a good writer, and I’m funny.
“When I taught school for 17 years, I taught my kids in English that the way you present yourself in writing says a lot about who you are, about what you care about, about whether or not you care to get it right.”
Trump’s letter doesn’t respond specifically to Mason’s earlier letter to the president. In her letter, Mason asked Trump to meet individually with the family members of the victims of the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Trump’s return letter talks in general terms about school safety.
“It didn’t address the letter I wrote,” Mason said.
Mason’s comments also draw attention to redundant expressions and overuse of the pronoun “I” in Trump’s letter. And there’s a dangling modifier to boot.
“It’s stylistically appalling,” she said.
Mason, an advocate of “clear, precise writing,” directs Trump to the government website plainlanguage.gov, dedicated to encouraging federal officials to write with clarity and specificity.
“Part of the idea of clear, precise writing is abiding by grammatical and mechanical standards so everyone can be on the same page,” Mason said. “Otherwise, you’re going to be misunderstood.”
Mason said she always emphasized to her students that they needed strong communication skills to be full participants in American democracy.
“Language is the currency of power,” she said.
Not all elected officials are poor correspondents, Mason said.
“Lindsey Graham, or his people, writes exquisite letters,” Mason said of the state’s Republican senator. “I give him credit for that. They are far more on-topic. I understand the nature of form letters, but Graham’s are written as if they’re addressing your particular concern.”
Mason has to realize that Graham came from the “old school of teaching” and probably proof reads his letter upon signing them. Can you image the President proof reading every letter he signs? A good way to proof read a letter is to check the words forward for content and then by each word/letter backwards for correct lettering.)
We also have to recognize due to the lawlessness in the last administration – the Constitution was not upheld as the Supreme Court has proven; and, therefore, the White House governing was not upheld to the standards of past administrations. Also, we still have many employees left over from that administration who are not Americans and are not trained in English.