~ Conservative Zone

Second Judge Rules Against Trump on Illegal DACA Immigration

2-21-2018

Isn’t it time for the Supreme Court Justice Roberts to speak out about these Democrat liberal judges who are going rogue?  They are way out of line.  They are making law not ruling on the Constitution.

What this judge ruled on, the DACA illegals, is not even legal since it was an Executive Order by Obama and did not go through Congress; therefore, it makes the judges ruling illegal.  He is ruling on an illegal executive order by Obama and Obama did not have the authority.

These liberal judges are ruling on illegal acts and someone has to stop this.  It has gotten  so ridiculous – rumor has it – that this District of New York Judge Nicholas Garaufis,  RULED AGAINST A HAM SANDWICH CAUSE TRUMP ORDERED IT.

These liberal judges have to be called on the carpet – they are completely out of line and have gone rogue.  These judges have been put into office by Bill Clinton and Obama and are working with the Democratic Party and Obama’s dark government and are part of the Russian collusion who are working against the American people and our President.

*************************

Second Judge Rules Against Trump on Illegal Immigration

A second federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration, finding that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) cannot end the Obama administration’s 2012 amnesty order Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York Judge Nicholas Garaufis (appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton) ruled that DHS cannot end DACA until pending litigation on the program has ended.

“Defendants thus must continue processing both initial DACA applications and DACA renewal requests under the same terms and conditions that applied before September 5, 2017, subject to…limitations.”

It is significant to note that Judge Garaufis’ ruling also makes quite clear what the ruling is not:

This order does not hold that the rescission of DACA was unlawful.

This order does not hold that Defendants may not rescind the DACA program.

This order does not require Defendants to grant and particular DACA applications or renewal requests.

This order does not prevent Defendants’ from revoking individual DACA recipients’ deferred action or work authorization.

Contrary to what some in the mainstream media would have us believe, the court has not found that President Trump does not have the right to end DACA;  rather it cannot be ended while it is still being litigated.   In the body of the ruling, we read, “The question before the court is thus not whether Defendants could end the DACA program, but whether they offered legally adequate reasons for doing so.”

Claims of judicial activism have begun again.

President Barack Obama unveiled the DACA program in 2012; Janet Napolitano (DHS secretary at the time) presented the criteria that would grant ‘temporary relief from deportation’ for 800,000 illegal aliens. In 2015, Obama introduced a much larger program, Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (or DAPA), which would grant indefinite legal status to four million illegal aliens. Several dozen states immediately sued the Obama administration charging that DAPA was illegal unless Congress passed a law.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit agreed, finding DAPA illegal. The Supreme Court tied 4-4 on the issue after Justice Scalia died.

When President Trump took office, Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued the legal opinion that the same reasons that the federal courts struck down DAPA meant that DACA was also illegal. Several lawsuits were immediately filed in California against the Trump administration arguing that even though Obama had created DACA by executive fiat, President Trump’s decision to end DACA the same way was illegal. San Francisco based U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup (also a Clinton appointee) agreed, and found on January 9, 2018 that A.G. Sessions acted according to a ‘flawed legal premise’ that Obama did not have the authority to implement DACA status to illegal aliens. Alsup ordered that DACA be reinstated.

As a result, DACA recipients who did not renew their status by last year’s deadline will have a chance to submit renewal applications. (This decision does not allow for new application submissions.) Claims of Judicial activism arose. Fast forward to the ‘Schumer Shutdown’, that 69-hour period where the Democrats demanded a deal on DACA, turning their backs on countless military families until moderates in their own party realized they were being (rightfully) blamed for the shutdown and urged Schumer to vote to re-open the government. In turn, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell promised a vote on DACA.

Senator Chuck Schumer attempted to identify the deal as the best they could get while Dems are not in power, but many illegal immigrant activists groups considered Schumer’s ‘ cave-in’ a betrayal. Some threatened repercussions at mid-term elections. President Trump has offered to support a pathway to citizenship for 1.8 million DACA recipients (many more than the 800,000 proposed) but asks for $25 billion for a border wall, the end to the lottery program and chain migration.

********************

Again, these judges are working for the Democrat liberals.

kommonsentsjane