Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.
Okay, so where were these equal branches of government when Obama was in office and defied the U.S. Constitution and used Sharia law to govern?
I sure didn’t hear any noise from those branches of government when Obama usurped the Constitution?
But, now the branches want to shut down Prez Trump at every stage of the game.
So what gives? It is time to “show and tell.” Especially with this memo that needs to be released.
Following is an interpretation of the title, “Commander-in-Chief.”
President is not Commander-in-Chief of Foreign Policy
by Alan M. Dershowitz
March 17, 2015
Politicians should stop referring to the President of the United States as “the Commander-in-Chief,” as he is often referred to. Most recently, Hillary Clinton, whom I admire, said the following about Republican senators who wrote an open letter to Iran:
“Either these senators were trying to be helpful to the Iranians or harmful to the Commander-in-Chief in the midst of high-stakes international diplomacy.”
But the president is not the Commander-in-Chief for purposes of diplomatic negotiations. This characterization mistakenly implies that President Obama — or any president — is our Commander, and that his decisions should receive special deference. This is a misreading of our constitution, which creates a presidency that is subject to the checks and balances of co-equal branches of the government. The president is only the…
View original post 765 more words