Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.
If that is common practice – then it tells me as the saying goes – FAMILIARITY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
For what reason – WOULD IT BE COMMON PRACTICE FOR CONYERS TO BE WALKING AROUND HIS STAFF IN HIS UNDERWEAR?
Is that the way congressmen or senators respect their staff AND CONDUCTS BUSINESS? Or is that just lowering the bar of morality to LET Conyers go to the next lower level called GROUP SEX?
He could have worn a robe to show respect for his staff or is this the way the black caucus operates?
Um, ok. How many times have you walked in on your boss in his underwear? Not cool by any means.
From Daily Mail: A male former aide to Rep. John Conyers has pooh-poohed claims by a female lawyer that the Democrat invited her to a meeting while he was in his underwear.
Melanie Sloan, who served as minority counsel for House Judiciary Committee, said last week that she was called up to Conyers’ office during her time there only to find him in his underwear.
But on Wednesday Bob Weiner, who was Conyers’ communications director from 1994-2000, said the representative’s underwear was a common sight at the time. ‘Most of us have walked in on him accidentally without knocking and have seen him in his underwear,’ he told CNN. ‘Big deal.’
Sloan told the Washington Post that she had been called to brief Conyers on a matter…
View original post 622 more words