As reported by ZeroHedge, whereas on August 26, 2016 Reuters had predicted a landslide victory for Hillary: 18 days later, Reuters’ polls of September 13 show a big surge in Electoral College votes for Trump, from 171 to 243, and a drop in Hillary’s votes from 295 to 242, so that the two are now virtually […]
Reblogged on kommonsentsjane / blogkommonsents.
Folks, Trump is going to have to win BIG in the popular and the electoral votes – because if we don’t – the tech companies who will be handling the votes are going to cheat – we know that because of the way the media and the tech companies are withholding positive information on Trump and dishing out negative information. Look at CNN (the Hitler news) how they falsely injected the word ‘RACIAL” into his comments when he was discussing profiling for terrorists.
********************************
CNN Defends Adding ‘Racial’ to Trump Profiling Comments, Insists They Knew What He Meant
By Kristine Marsh
September 20, 2016
At least eight times Monday on CNN, various anchors and correspondents made the claim that Donald Trump called for racial profiling. The problem is, he didn’t. Starting at the 4:00 hour all the way through early Tuesday morning, CNN journalists added the term “racial” to Trump’s comments on profiling to combat terrorism, even devoting entire segments to discussing his statement he never actually said.
This isn’t the first time CNN has selectively subtracted or added to what someone said in their reports in order to skew their stories.
Starting on The Lead with Jake Tapper, correspondent Sara Murray stated Trump made an “apparent suggestion” for racial profiling on Fox and Friends Monday morning.
MURRAY: But offering few specifics, beyond his apparent suggestion that the U.S. should begin racial profiling.
But here’s what he actually said:
TRUMP: Our police are amazing, our local police, they know who a lot of these people are. They’re afraid to do anything about it because they don’t want to be accused of profiling. But Israel has done an unbelievable job. And they will profile. They profile. They see somebody that’s suspicious, they will profile. They see somebody that’s suspicious, they will profile and they will take that person in. They will check out. Do we have a choice? Look what’s going on. Do we really have a choice?
Again on The Situation Room, anchor Wolf Blitzer made the same assumption:
BLITZER: Donald Trump this morning said police are simply afraid to go after people in cases like this because they’re afraid of being accused of racial profiling. Is that a serious concern among law enforcement?
In a report, Sara Murray also repeated that Trump “suggested” racial profiling:
MURRAY: The G.O.P. nominee suggesting that the U.S. should instate, racial profiling.
Even after Trump came on Fox News’ The O’Reilly Factor to repeat a similar statement on profiling, again without using the word “racial,” CNN continued to hammer home their message. Erin Burnett Outfront was the worst example on CNN, where the host devoted nearly the whole hour to discussing Trump’s “racial profiling” comments that he never actually said.
Burnett began the show by stating twice, “Donald Trump defending a call for racial profiling” with a chyron that read, “Trump Says ‘Racial Profiling’ Will Stop Terror.”
Burnett then brought on two guests to discuss Trump’s comments, prefacing several questions with the loaded expression.
Again on Anderson Cooper 360, correspondent Dana Bash repeated the line in a more general way:
BASH: But Donald Trump is appealing to voters who very much want the opposite, as Carl was just talking about. And that’s what speaks to the fact that he is doing better among those who want a commander in chief or somebody who’s going to fight terrorism, because he is going with that kind of visceral feeling of we got to get these guys and it doesn’t matter what the costs are, whether it is racial profiling or civil liberties, or immigration policies.
The very early morning shows on CNN Tuesday also made the same allegation.
But later Tuesday morning, CNN’s Carol Costello made it clear that the network’s decision to insert “racial” into Trump’s quote was purposeful. In a discussion with Jeff Zeleny, Costello brought up the criticism and defended the addition of the word “racial” saying:
COSTELLO: And it’s hard to not notice, Jeff, that Donald Trump again brought up the idea of profiling immigrants. I mean, yesterday he was upset that news people used the term racial profiling but he was on The O’Reilly Factor last night and Donald Trump clearly meant racial profiling when he said profiling.
ZELENY: He did.
How did Zeleny/Costello ever come to that conclusion? They just don’t stop lying.
kommonsentsjane
kommonsentsjane 
Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
This is good news and shows that despite everything they can throw at Trump he is still going to win. So what will probably happen just before or after the first debate is that Hillary will have another episode in public as she can’t take pressure. If that happens she is done for sure as there is no way to cover these. Right now she resting before the debate next Monday will it work or not! I’d say no but I can’t see her making it though the entire process its just not in her to hold these feeling in that long!
LikeLike