When is it wrong to inquire  about the health of a potential President of the United States?  Why are the liberal media going bonkers because Karl Rowe stated Hillary Clinton sustained brain damage after suffering a blood clot in her skull.  Isn’t that what the cause of the hospitalization was?  It was stated on television that she was admitted to the hospital in late December 2012, where doctors discovered a blood clot related to a concussion she had suffered earlier in the month from a fall.  She was then released from the hospital several days later.  Was she in the hospital 30 days as noted?  Did she go and hide to get away from the Benghazi scandal?

I know when she testified in front of, I think it was Congress, she had those thick glasses on when she said “what difference does it make at this time.”  I had not seen those glasses before unless she wore them in private.  It has been noted that her doctor’s statement was “the clot did not cause Clinton to suffer a stroke, and did not result in any neurological damage.”

Where is the liberal media all of this time – in the same liberal tank trying to destroy the country.  One comment by Hillary always pops into my mind, “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”  If you go back even farther in history to her college days, she marched to this drum beat.

As far as I am concerned, I do not think she would make a good president because she and her husband have way too much baggage.  Hillary’s past is not to far past.  We will have a lot of young voters who do not know the stories of the Bill Clinton era.

She seemed to have outstanding investment skills.  With the help of a friend, she invested $1,000 in the cattle futures market.  And, wa-la, she sucked up $100,000 – a 100% profit.  Is this a genius strategy?  Maybe she needs to take up her investment skills after retirement.

Then her skills as a lawyer is also  notable.  She was subpoenaed for her old billing records as part of the Whitewater investigation.  They defied this subpoena for two years without producing even one record.  Then out of the clear blue sky they suddenly appeared and had been in a closet in the White House living quarters the whole time.

Then we all know about the Lewinsky scandal.  She played two roles in this scandal – one a done-gone wronged woman and then a strategist and spokeswoman for her husband by calling Lewinsky all kinds of names.   While at the same time appearing on television blaming the Republicans (the right-wing conspiracy angle) to divert the attention from her philandering husband.  

One of the other misdeeds which was attributed to Hillary was the firing of the whole White House Travel Office.  This was done to steer this business to one of their cronies.  She testified that she did not; but, there is no doubt she was instrumental in eliminating and replacing all of these people in the travel office.  Later, prosecutors admitted her sworn testimony was not true.

 And too, there is just something about Hillary that just doesn’t ring the bell of “competence.”  One thing in particular rings a bell.  That is her right-hand person was Huma Abedin and we all know that side of the story.  We are going to need someone who will be strong enough to bring our country back on her feet and both of them have been too controversial.  I think the Clinton’s need to ride off into the sunset and enjoy their retirement. They all have plenty of money.  What is it – all about power?  We need some new, fresh, young blood with experience this time because we have a big round-up coming in order to gather all of those cattle and clean up the corruption which is surrounding these Democrats..

Boombox comics  certainly makes a point:  There’s a Super Pac called “Ready for Hillary.” And his partner states, “What exactly does it mean to be “Ready for Hillary?”  His answer, “It’s like being ready for a prostate exam – that will last for eight years.

We must not make the same mistake we made when our current leader was elected.  We have to put all of the information out there for the public to see, good or bad, and then they will make the final decision by voting,  hopefully with a voter identification.  In my eyes, this Lady Hillary has a giant credibility problem.  My vote is always for the person not the party and this Democratic Party is a problem because it is leaning too far left, even beyond that!  A thing called – socialism or communism.

kommonsentsjane