12/05/2025

As we all know under the guise of Biden/Obama our whole country had been weaponized and law and order was not on the table, nor was the Constitution in play during their 12 years of lawlessness. DOGE proved what the Democrats did to our country.

We are still waiting for that era to be adjudicated. This report covers our country’s weakness and sickness by the Democrats who were in charge.

There is so much to cover – the deer are still looking into the headlights?

Watch: Afghanistan Withdrawal Report to Expose Biden’s Top Brass

• Posted byby Jimmy Parker
• December 5, 2025

In a powerful demonstration of the new era of transparency and accountability ushered in by the administration of President Donald Trump, Senior Advisor Sean Parnell has provided a stunning update on the investigation into the catastrophic Afghanistan withdrawal. Speaking exclusively to The Gateway Pundit at the Pentagon, Parnell, who is leading the comprehensive review for the Department of War, revealed that the damning report will be released to the public sooner than anticipated and in its entirety. “I hope to have it finished, out, published, completely unclassified,” Parnell stated, boldly committing to a level of openness that the previous Biden administration fought ruthlessly to avoid.

This stands in stark contrast to the obfuscation and excuse-making that defined the liberal media’s coverage of the disaster, which left 13 American service members dead in August of 2021. While the legacy press parroted White House talking points and downplayed the failures of leadership, the Trump administration is now ensuring that every detail is laid bare for the families of the fallen and the American people. Parnell emphasized that “the ultimate goal is to declassify everything for the American people,” adding, “There’s really no reason for it to have the classification level that it does. Accountability is a core tenet of this mission.” This commitment exposes how the prior regime used classification not for national security, but as a shield to protect the guilty from the consequences of their lethal incompetence.

The investigation promises to target the highest levels of the failed chain of command, confirming the warnings President Trump has issued for years about the weakness and failed judgment of the previous administration’s appointees. When asked if Biden’s top military leaders will face real accountability, Parnell’s response was unequivocal and refreshing: “Nobody’s immune.” He promised the public will see “a whole hell of a lot more information come out about the scenario that you just outlined, about what we knew about the attack, the attacker, and how it unfolded, and how decisions were made.” This directly addresses the horrific reporting that top officials, including Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and General Mark Milley, knew of the specific threat at Abbey Gate and yet failed to act, a betrayal of duty that the sycophantic media complex spent years trying to bury under a mountain of distractions.

Addressing the deep and justified public cynicism that the powerful ever face consequences, Parnell channeled the frustration of millions of Americans who have watched a two-tiered system of justice operate with impunity. “Can you blame them?” he said, acknowledging the disillusionment. He then reaffirmed the foundational promise of the Trump presidency, stating that this administration is “different” and is dedicated to ensuring the American people “know that their government officials are held to the same standard as them.” This is the principle of equal application of the law that President Trump champions, a principle utterly foreign to the political elites and their media defenders who are now seeing their protected class status revoked.

The resolve of the Trump administration extends beyond retrospective analysis, as shown by the simultaneous investigation into Democratic Senator Mark Kelly for his seditious calls for military insubordination. This bold action underscores a fundamental restoration of order and respect for the chain of command, a stark reversal from the previous administration’s politicization of the nation’s armed forces. It is a clear signal that under President Trump, the era of cowardly leadership and media-enabled corruption is over, replaced by a steadfast pursuit of truth and justice that the American people have demanded.

h/t: Steadfast and Loyal

ttps://beardsofliberty.com/watch-stephen-a-smith-vs-sunny-hostin-the-truth-about-mark-kellys-illegal-orders-message/

Just add an ‘h’ to the above to read.

kommonsentsjane

12/05/2025

https://beardsofliberty.com/watch-stephen-a-smith-vs-sunny-hostin-the-truth-about-mark-kellys-illegal-orders-messag

ttps://beardsofliberty.com/watch-stephen-a-smith-vs-sunny-hostin-the-truth-about-mark-kellys-illegal-orders-message/

Very disappointed in Senator Kelly, especially with all of the experience he has had. .And, the ladies of the view need to stick to subjects they know more about. They sure walked off that cliff.

****

Stephen A. Smith didn’t walk onto The View expecting a warm embrace, but he probably didn’t expect to become the only adult in the room either. Yet here we are. The usually bombastic ESPN star ended up being the sole voice willing to say what everyone else won’t: that Sen. Mark Kelly and a handful of Democrats crossed a line when they released a political warning video encouraging military members to “refuse illegal orders” from Donald Trump. And naturally, the ladies of The View reacted like someone unplugged their teleprompter mid-sentence. Sunny Hostin called him “loud and wrong,” Joy Behar lectured him about military protocol she’s never read, and Whoopi seemed personally offended that Stephen A. dared to question a Democrat. But for once, Stephen A. didn’t back down. And honestly, good for him.

The entire fight revolves around one thing Democrats desperately want to pretend is true: that Trump was issuing illegal military orders. That’s the foundation of Kelly’s video — the quiet insinuation that Trump is a rogue commander instructing troops to do something unlawful. Except Democrats never explain what illegal order they’re talking about, because the moment they do, the whole performance collapses. The “illegal order” in question? Trump authorized U.S. forces to blow up narco-terrorist drug boats operating in international waters. These aren’t fishing vessels or innocent cruise ships. They are cartel-run smuggling crafts transporting poison into the United States — and yes, under federal law, those boats can be seized, disabled, or destroyed. It’s been that way for decades.

Here’s the part Stephen A. should have countered with, the part the women on The View conveniently left out, and the part Democrats never want to say aloud: Trump’s orders were 100% legal. Not sort of legal. Not “interpretation-dependent” legal. Fully, unquestionably legal. Under Article II of the Constitution, the President is the Commander-in-Chief. He has the authority to direct military force against hostile foreign actors. Then add the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, which gives the United States jurisdiction to interdict and destroy vessels involved in drug trafficking — whether or not they’re flying a national flag. Pile on decades of Rules of Engagement and Title 10 authority where the U.S. has repeatedly seized or sunk cartel vessels under multiple administrations. Nothing Trump ordered was new. Nothing he ordered was rogue. Nothing he ordered violated U.S. or international law. And here’s the real kicker: the only difference this time was tone. Trump didn’t sugarcoat the mission, bury it in legalese, or hide it behind an agency press release. He showed America exactly what was happening. He showed the cartel boats being neutralized. He showed the operations. He made the consequences visible. He turned enforcement into deterrence — because when the bad guys see their boats getting vaporized on camera, the message spreads a whole lot faster than a memo from DHS. That’s what Democrats really hated. Not the legality. Not the policy. The visibility. The fact that Trump refused to be polite about taking out narco-terrorists, and instead let the entire hemisphere know the United States wasn’t playing around. And for that, apparently, the military needed a pre-emptive mutiny briefing.

That’s why Stephen A. Smith was right to call out Mark Kelly. Kelly knows the military better than the average Democrat senator. He’s a former Navy combat pilot. He absolutely knows the difference between a lawful and an unlawful command. Which is exactly why his video wasn’t about educating troops — it was about framing Trump as a danger. Kelly wasn’t teaching. He was implying. And implying that the Commander-in-Chief might issue illegal orders is not something a former officer should be doing casually on camera, especially not to score political points.

And this is where The View lost its collective mind. Sunny Hostin, who believes her law degree makes her an expert on every subject known to mankind, tried to lecture Stephen A. on the military code of conduct. Joy chimed in with the classic “He said ILLEGAL orders!” defense, as if inserting the word automatically absolves Kelly of what he was actually doing — planting doubt. Stephen A. pushed back, pointing out that the issue wasn’t the word “illegal,” it was the fact that Kelly’s video framed Trump’s lawful actions as if they were illegal. And in the military, nuance isn’t a suggestion. Troops don’t operate on the principle of “Well, the senator probably meant well.” They operate on clarity, precision, and chain of command. Anything that inserts confusion into that structure is dangerous.

This is where Stephen A. showed more common sense than the entire panel combined. He spoke to people who have actually been in the military — not people who have seen movies about the military — and they told him exactly what veterans know: even implying that a service member should question an order can get that service member into trouble. Civilians don’t get this. Talk show hosts don’t get this. But the military absolutely does. When Kelly made that video, he wasn’t sending a message to Trump. He was sending a message to the rank and file: “We’re not so sure about your Commander-in-Chief.”

If that sounds small to civilians, it isn’t small to anyone who has ever worn the uniform. The chain of command is not a suggestion. It is the backbone of the U.S. armed forces. The moment you encourage troops to individually decide which orders might be “illegal” based on partisan messaging videos, you’re not defending democracy — you’re undermining it. Because the military cannot function if troops are encouraged to operate based on political vibes. And Democrats know this. They just don’t care.

What they care about is creating the narrative that Trump is dangerous. That he’s unstable. That he’s issuing unlawful orders. And that the military must prepare to resist him. But at some point, we have to ask: resist what? Ordering the destruction of drug boats used by cartels? That’s not illegal. That’s called defending the country. It’s called national security. And it’s something Democrats were fine with back when they trusted law enforcement more than drug cartels — a long-forgotten era.

The funniest part of this whole disaster is how furious The View became at Stephen A. for simply refusing to bow. They’re used to steamrolling their guests until they apologize for existing. Instead, Stephen A. told them they were wrong, held his ground, and refused to retreat. They weren’t prepared for that. They expected a guest. They got a debate. And they lost.

Stephen A. Smith didn’t just defend Trump. He defended the truth. He defended military discipline. And he defended the idea that if politicians want to accuse a President of giving illegal orders, they should have the decency to explain which orders and why. Mark Kelly didn’t do that. He didn’t want clarity. He wanted insinuation. And Stephen A. called him on it. But let’s be honest — while Stephen A. was absolutely right, he didn’t package the argument as cleanly as it deserved. He swung hard, he swung fast, but he never quite connected with the knockout point: that the orders weren’t just not illegal — they were standard, lawful military operations that Democrats tried to spin into a crisis. In other words, Stephen A. was on the right battlefield, delivering the right message… he just didn’t fire the heaviest ammunition he had.

The bottom line is simple: Trump’s orders were legal. Mark Kelly’s video was political. The View‘s meltdown was predictable. And Stephen A. Smith was absolutely right to stand his ground and refuse to be intimidated by a table full of people who get louder the moment they get wronger.

WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY

Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com

****

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Afghanistan Withdrawal Report.

Posted on December 5, 2025 by kommonsentsjane

12/05/2025

kommonsentsjane