It looks like GA is in the spotlight after Rep Majorie Green has moved to the left?
As we know, the left has been hijacked by the progressives and must split their party to remain as true Democrats. The Democrat Speaker does not use the Constitution of the U.S. – nor did the previous Biden/Obama Admin. for 12 years. That is the problem that our country is facing, today.
The votes of the people is what counts in the election, The citizens of this country are having a difficult time accepting the hard times in which President Trump is trying to solve and the left is pulling against all things which must happen to correct the corruption (a good example is Minnesota’s corruption which is in the billions of dollars, Somalia/Walz/Talib) and this is just one blue state. It is time to DOGE all states.
Also, we have the GA lady who is resigning against all odds because of a disagreement first with Speaker Johnson and then the President. She has decided to resign in an achieved time in service award this year and will pack up her stock which was achieved through status as a Congress person.
Since then, she has vollied herself through the daily left talk shows by washing her dirty laundry rather than wishing all of her co-hearts well and is now playing her “poor pitiful Pearl role” from the bottom to the top.
Is it true she has thrown HER whole MAGA role/co-hearts under the bus because the Speaker would not use her bill about Obamacare? As she has found out, “politics is not an easy sport” to play and is trying to humiliate the President and Speaker as she makes the rounds of the left Media.
She needs to take the “water glass” test – since it always brings a person back to reality. No one is indispensable.
Olive Oil Shop Owner Just Flipped a Trump (+12 ) Georgia District — Here’s What It Means
Surprisingly, Democrat Eric Gisler has flipped Georgia’s 121st House District. The district backed Donald Trump by roughly 12 points as recently as last year. CNN’s Decision Desk called the race Tuesday night, and Democrats are already celebrating.
This win adds to the Democrats’ recent streak. After last month’s special elections, which reshaped statewide seats, local legislative maps, and delivered pickups in places like Iowa and Pennsylvania, the party is showing some off-year strength. But Gisler’s victory in northeast Georgia (where Watkinsville and Southeast Athens anchor the district) is particularly striking. The area has been a reliable Republican stronghold for years. And then came the olive oil guy.
That’s because Gisler isn’t a typical political climber. The Georgia native is an IT veteran, a longtime tech worker, and the owner of a specialty olive oil and vinegar store called The Olive Basket. In an interview with Athens Politics Nerd, Gisler described a path that took him from UGA to financial services tech, through layoffs, startups, and ultimately small-business ownership. He says he decided to run because he’s concerned about the direction Georgia’s politics has taken.
He wants to push for ranked-choice voting, as Gisler believes Georgia’s runoff system is outdated and expensive. He opposes abortion bans, the stagnant minimum wage, tort reform, and SB 202. He also criticized “MAGA Republicans” in Washington for holding back already-appropriated emergency SNAP benefits. He also criticized Georgia’s leaders for refusing to tap into a $14 billion surplus (plus roughly $5 billion in rainy-day reserves) to make sure families don’t go hungry.
He said:
“If 1.4 million citizens in your state are not able to access food is not a rainy day, I don’t know what qualifies.”
He wants to expand Medicaid (or get as close as legally possible within the new legal limits), shore up rural hospitals, invest in schools, and reform Georgia’s prison system. Gisler said there’s a line between traditional conservatives and MAGA conservatives. He believes those voters are open to crossing over if Democrats give them something tangible to vote for.
In case you didn’t know: Georgia Republicans hold majorities in the legislature, but Democrats have won two statewide offices and this state House seat now. Senate and governor races are coming in 2026. Meanwhile, Georgia’s district has been without representation since Republican Marcus Wiedower resigned in October.
****
Yes, we are in hard times at this time in our lives and, if we lose the Constitution – we lose our freedom.
Are we going to “smart up,” knuckle down, or, are we going to play cowards and allow the left/media to continue screwing the people?
If not, let’s hear some noise in support of our President – for God’s sake.
The Minnesota fraud scandal has grown so enormous, so chaotic, and so politically radioactive that calling it a “COVID-era mistake” might be the single most dishonest description anyone could offer. This wasn’t confusion. This wasn’t a glitch. This was a statewide collapse of oversight that allowed a billion dollars—possibly far more—to disappear while Gov. Tim Walz and his administration either looked away, froze in fear, or convinced themselves that confronting obvious fraud would be politically incorrect. What began as a simple welfare-meal reimbursement program has become the largest pandemic fraud case in the United States, with federal prosecutors uncovering shell companies, phantom meal sites, and fraudulent autism services that ballooned into hundreds of millions of dollars. Just when Minnesotans thought the situation couldn’t get worse, the Treasury Department revealed it is tracking overseas wire transfers tied to the fraud, including transfers to Somalia and the Middle East—regions where al-Shabaab, a designated terrorist organization, operates. This isn’t rumor. This is the federal government confirming they’re investigating where the stolen money went. Add to that an ongoing House Oversight investigation into Walz’s response, new scrutiny of Attorney General Keith Ellison, and Rep. Ilhan Omar’s increasingly defensive interviews, and you have a political disaster that keeps expanding outward. Nobody is accusing Omar of running the fraud, but her dismissive tone, shifting explanations, and finger-pointing at the FBI haven’t helped. Meanwhile, Minnesota’s agencies look like they were asleep at the wheel—or terrified of appearing discriminatory—while criminals ransacked the system in broad daylight. This isn’t a Minnesota problem anymore. It’s a national one.
How the Fraud Grew Into a Billion-Dollar Monster
Federal investigators are still stunned by the numbers. The Feeding Our Future scandal alone involved nearly $300 million in fraudulent reimbursements for meals that never existed. Prosecutors say some defendants claimed to feed 91 million meals—numbers that were mathematically impossible based on location size, staffing, and physical capacity. One site reported feeding 6,000 children a day in a town with a population of 2,500. Other operators billed for autism therapy sessions that never occurred, inflating the autism program from $3 million in 2018 to nearly $400 million by 2023. Housing Stabilization Services, budgeted at $2.6 million per year, exploded to more than $100 million. Whistleblowers said they alerted state leaders. State auditors saw the warning signs. Even federal staff flagged issues before COVID hit. But Walz’s agencies ignored, reassigned, or sidelined anyone who tried to expose what was happening. Nonprofits accused of fraud responded with claims of racism, and Minnesota officials backed down instead of pushing forward. When the Department of Education tried to halt payments to Feeding Our Future, the nonprofit sued, claiming discrimination, and a judge ordered the state to resume funding—something federal prosecutors later said allowed the fraud to grow exponentially. You couldn’t design a system more vulnerable to abuse if you tried.
Ilhan Omar Becomes the Face of Deflection
Rep. Ilhan Omar stepped into the media spotlight and delivered what might be one of the most evasive interviews of the year. On Face the Nation, she insisted she had no knowledge of wrongdoing, no involvement with the individuals charged, and no understanding of why Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said people implicated in the fraud had also donated to her campaign. Omar said she refunded the donations long ago, though she didn’t explain why multiple fraudsters felt comfortable supporting her politically in the first place. When Brennan pressed her on the possibility of overseas transfers reaching al-Shabaab, Omar pivoted to blaming the FBI and the U.S. court system, saying that if any fraud-linked money touched terrorism networks, “that is a failure of the FBI.” That’s quite a statement. Omar didn’t create the fraud, but her reactions have become the political fog surrounding the scandal—an attempt to minimize the scale, cast doubt on inconvenient facts, and emphasize that the Somali community is also a victim. While it’s true that most Somali-Americans had nothing to do with the fraud, the reality remains that prosecutors say nearly all charged individuals are of Somali descent, operating in Omar’s district, during her tenure, while some donated to her. Optics matter, and these optics are devastating.
Federal Government Steps In After Minnesota Loses Control of Its Own Programs
Nothing underscores the severity of the Minnesota fraud scandal more than the federal government stepping in and effectively telling the state: You cannot be trusted with your own money anymore. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz—yes, that Dr. Oz—sent a formal letter to Gov. Walz declaring that Minnesota’s Medicaid programs were suffering from “systemic fraud” and that the federal government was done footing the bill for Minnesota’s incompetence. Oz cited Housing Stabilization Services as a prime example: projected to cost $2.6 million annually, it paid out more than $100 million in 2024 alone. CMS had already intervened in October, helping Minnesota shut the program down entirely because the fraud risk was so high. Now CMS is imposing sweeping corrective actions. Minnesota must provide weekly updates on fraud mitigation, freeze provider enrollment in more than a dozen high-risk programs, verify every existing provider as legitimate, remove fraudulent operators, and submit a comprehensive corrective action plan within 60 days—or face funding consequences. The Trump administration is not bluffing. CMS made it clear that federal funds may be withheld, stating bluntly: “We are done footing the bill for your incompetence.” Walz’s office responded with a deflection so predictable it bordered on parody, claiming: “While the Governor has been working to ensure fraudsters go to prison, the President is letting them out.” That’s rich, considering the fraud exploded under Walz’s leadership, after multiple warnings, and resulted in programs ballooning into financial monsters overnight. Walz only paused payments to 14 major state programs after the scandal became impossible to ignore and after CMS stepped in. You don’t get credit for slamming the brakes after the car has already gone through the guardrail. The federal message was unmistakable: Minnesota cannot continue operating its social-services programs without adult supervision.
Why the Terrorism Angle Matters, Even If unproven
The Treasury Department made headlines when it confirmed that investigators are tracing fraud-linked money that moved overseas through informal hawala networks. The question is whether any of that money reached al-Shabaab. While no formal conclusion has been reached, Minnesota’s history with radicalization and overseas recruitment makes this a national-security concern. In the late 2000s, around 20 Somali-Americans left Minnesota to join al-Shabaab. One became the first ever American suicide bomber. Federal officials say the threat still exists today. Omar’s instinct to shift blame to the FBI rather than the criminals or the oversight failures does not inspire confidence. Whether or not terrorism is involved, the fact that investigators have to check is itself evidence of catastrophic oversight.
Crime, Assimilation, and the Taboo No One Wants to Touch
Minnesota’s Somali community may not be defined by the criminals within it, but the concentration of fraud cases and recent violent crimes—including kidnappings, sexual assaults, and gang-related shootings—has shaken public confidence. Community leaders argue that crime is an individual act, not a cultural indictment, and they are right. But political leaders have repeatedly refused to confront even the patterns, preferring to hide behind accusations of racism rather than address the root causes. This dynamic—fear of speaking hard truths—allowed fraud to expand unchecked. It also deepened the gap between political elites and everyday Minnesotans who see what their leaders refuse to acknowledge.
The Real Victims in the Minnesota Fraud Scandal
It’s important to remember who was harmed. The fraud didn’t hurt the government—it hurt the vulnerable families the programs were designed to support. It hurt children who needed meals. It hurt autistic kids who needed therapy. It hurt the Somali-American community itself, which trusted that the programs meant to help them would be safeguarded. Fraud of this scale steals not just money but opportunity, stability, and trust. And the bitter truth is that Minnesota’s leadership let it happen.
Why Walz and Omar Cannot Escape the Political Consequences
Neither Walz nor Omar orchestrated the fraud. But both were responsible for recognizing the warning signs and responding decisively. Walz controlled the agencies that failed. Omar represented the community most affected, received donations from individuals later charged, and offered political narratives that softened criticism rather than sharpened scrutiny. Leadership is not about avoiding blame. It’s about stepping into the fire when things go wrong. Walz and Omar stepped back instead. And the Minnesota fraud scandal burned everything behind them.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW. JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
Thank you Mr. O’Reilly. The American people appreciate your honesty, especially since there isn’t much around – except for Fox News. The public misses your reporting.
When Bill O’Reilly broke down the latest so-called “scandal” involving Trump’s military strikes on drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean, you could practically see the smoke coming out of cable news studios nationwide. Meanwhile, Jimmy Kimmel and the late-night crowd treated the operation like it was some kind of slapstick comedy skit—because why take cartel violence seriously when you can score political points? What we actually have is a textbook example of how the media, Congress, and far-left commentators twist reality into a pretzel whenever Trump successfully uses force. The truth: the strikes were legal, justified, and effective. But buckle up—because the people screaming the loudest aren’t very good with facts.
The Fake Scandal Congress Tried to Manufacture
Congress hauled in Admiral Frank “Mitch” Bradley, head of the military operation, to grill him on whether Secretary of War Pete Hegseth ordered him to “kill two smugglers.” The admiral calmly explained that the mission was simple: destroy two heavily armed cartel boats barreling across the Caribbean at 90 mph. No “extra instruction,” no assassination plot, no clandestine war crime. The boats were hit, one boat’s destruction wasn’t fully complete, a follow-up strike finished the job, and two smugglers died because they were still engaged in the armed operation. That’s it. That’s the story. Congratulations to Congress for holding a hearing on something that wasn’t even wrong, questionable, or unusual in military operations. A whole lot of drama for absolutely nothing.
Why the Strikes Were 100% Legal—Despite Cable News Fantasyland
Here’s the legal bottom line that nobody on the Left wants to touch: the President, under Article II of the Constitution, is Commander-in-Chief. He has inherent authority to take direct action against hostile foreign actors posing a threat to national security. On top of that, the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act gives the U.S. explicit jurisdiction to target cartel drug-smuggling vessels operating on the high seas. Add in years of precedent supporting interdictions, rapid-response force, and lethal engagement when vessels are armed, and this was not even a gray-area call. It was legal. Crystal clear. Completely justified. You’d know this if you spoke to a military officer, a constitutional lawyer, or literally any adult who has read a government manual. But apparently cable news prefers pretending fishermen with $250,000 speedboats are victims of government overreach.
What the Hell Is Rand Paul Thinking?
And then there’s Rand Paul, who somehow managed to join hands with Schumer, Schiff, and Tim Kaine (a political barbershop quartet nobody asked for) to push a War Powers resolution banning Trump from acting against drug cartels without congressional permission. In what universe does that make sense? The idea that you’re going to stop and hold a Senate vote while cartel boats are ripping across the Caribbean at freeway speeds is the kind of thinking only Washington could produce. Rand Paul usually has moments of clarity, but this wasn’t one of them. You cannot micromanage rapid-strike interdictions from Capitol Hill. You cannot legislate your way through a high-speed water chase. And you absolutely cannot fight armed drug cartels with wishful thinking about “proper process.” This resolution isn’t just misguided—it’s dangerous. Thankfully, it’s also dead on arrival.
Jimmy Kimmel, Rachel Maddow, and the ‘Just Fishermen’ Theory
And of course, we have the comedy wing of the Democratic Party—also known as the “news media”—claiming that the cartel boats “weren’t pointed at the United States” and “might have been fishermen.” Right. Because all normal fishermen travel in $250K high-speed vessels capable of 90 mph, outfitted with radio-jamming tech, narco-modified hulls, and armed crew members. Sure. Totally your casual island hobbyists. Then we get the “How do we know they had drugs on board?” routine. Maybe, just maybe, because U.S. intel follows cartel routes, trafficker patterns, satellite movements, and signal intercepts. But somehow Rachel Maddow knows better from the comfort of her television desk, armed with nothing but a script and a predetermined conclusion that Trump must be wrong. The whole argument collapses under even minimal scrutiny, but hey—why let reality interrupt a perfectly good chance to bash the President?
Bill O’Reilly Breaks Down What the Media Refuses to Admit
While the media gets amnesia about how interdictions work, O’Reilly laid out the obvious: Trump’s military acted within full legal authority, stopped a dangerous smuggling operation, and removed violent cartel actors from the battlefield. That’s called deterrence. That’s called enforcing the law. That’s called winning. Trump didn’t sugarcoat it. He didn’t hide it. He treated the cartels like the dangerous criminal enterprises they are, not potential extras in a Greenpeace documentary. And O’Reilly was right to mock the media’s meltdown—because it wasn’t just wrong. It was embarrassing.
The Real Reason This Story Became a Story
This entire narrative only exists because Trump is president. If a Democrat had launched these exact same strikes, the headlines would have read: “Brave President Takes Bold Action Against Deadly Drug Traffickers.” Instead, because it’s Trump, we get hysterics about “fishermen,” bogus accusations about “war crimes,” and manufactured outrage on late-night TV. The facts don’t matter—only the opportunity for political theater.
Meanwhile, the Cartels Know Exactly What Just Happened
Cartels pay attention. They watch U.S. action. And now they know: under Trump, your $250,000 boat full of narcotics isn’t making it to port. Your crew isn’t outrunning a drone. Your operations are not safe. That’s how you create deterrence—by making the consequences unmistakable and unavoidable. The media may not like it, but the cartels absolutely fear it.
The Bottom Line
The strikes were legal. The targets were cartel smugglers. The mission was justified. The outrage is fake. Congress wasted everyone’s time. The media embarrassed itself. And the only reason this moment didn’t earn bipartisan applause is because Trump was the one making the call. That’s America in 2025: results get criticized, failure gets praised, and fishermen now apparently pilot narco-boats at 90 miles an hour.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW. JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.