KOMMONSENTSJANE – President Trump Reveals 10 Striking Takeaways From Putin Summit.

-8/17/2025

Sean Hannity

ttps://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-reveals-10-striking-takeaways-from-putin-summit-hannity-interview?intcmp=fb_fnc&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook

Donald Trump

Trump reveals 10 striking takeaways from Putin summit in Hannity interview.

President Trump was tight-lipped after his high-stakes summit but offered some key insight with Sean Hannity.

 By Peter Pinedo Fox News

Published 

President Trump reveals whether another meeting is in the cards after Alaska summit with Putin

President Donald Trump discusses how his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin went and what’s next in peace negotiations and more in an exclusive interview on ‘Hannity.’

President Donald Trump was tight-lipped after his high-stakes summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday but offered some key insight into the meeting to Fox News’ Sean Hannity in an exclusive interview.

Here are the key takeaways from Trump’s highly anticipated meeting with the Russian leader as shared with Hannity. 

1. ‘No deal until there’s a deal’

Trump told Hannity that “as far as I’m concerned, there’s no deal until there’s a deal.” He noted, however, that “we did make a lot of progress.”

2. Putin ‘wants to see it done’

The president noted to Hannity that he believes Putin is not only open to peace but that he “wants to see it done.” 

TRUMP SAYS HE ‘WON’T BE HAPPY’ IF PUTIN DOES NOT AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE IN UKRAINE DURING ALASKA SUMMIT

Trump and Putin greet each other in Alaska

President Donald Trump shakes hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the tarmac after they arrived at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Aug. 15, 2025. (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

3. Not prepared to share what the sticking point was

Pressed by Hannity to share what the “one big issue you don’t agree on” that kept the leaders from walking away with a ceasefire deal, Trump declined to share. He said, “No, I’d rather not. I guess somebody’s going to go public with it, they’ll figure it out, but no, I don’t want to do that, I want to see if we can get it done.” 

4. Up to Zelenskyy and Europe

After taking such a major step as to physically meet with the Russian president, Trump said it is now “up to [Ukrainian] President [Volodymyr] Zelenskyy to get it done and maybe the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit.”

5. Trump open to trilateral meeting

The president said he would be open to attending a trilateral meeting with the presidents of Ukraine and Russia, saying, “If they’d like, I’ll be at that meeting. They’re going to set up a meeting now between President Zelenskyy and President Putin and myself, I guess, not that I want to be there, but I want to get it done.” 

He added, “I’ll be there.” 

PUTIN PRAISES TRUMP’S ‘SINCERE’ PEACE EFFORTS, SIGNALS POSSIBLE US-RUSSIA NUCLEAR DEAL

Putin and Trump

President Donald Trump meets with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin on Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

6. Meeting a ‘10’

Trump said he would rate the meeting a 10 out of 10, saying, “I think the meeting was a 10 in the sense that we got along great.” 

7. Russia respects America now

Asked what he thought finally brought Putin to the negotiating table, Trump answered, “I don’t want to say anything brought him, he’s a very smart guy, nothing brought him to the table, so to speak.” 

“I think he respects our country now, he didn’t respect it under Biden, I can tell you that, he had no respect for it.” 

8. No war if Trump was in office

Trump also commented that he “was so happy” that Putin shared his belief during their joint press conference that the Russia-Ukraine war would never have happened had he been in office at the time. 

ZELENSKYY NOT INVITED TO UPCOMING TRUMP, PUTIN TALKS — WHITE HOUSE SAYS THIS WAS THE REASON

Putin Meets Trump

Putin and Trump meet on the tarmac at Elmendorf Air Force Base in Alaska. (Reuters/Kevin Lamarque)

9. Advice to Zelenskyy

Without hesitating, Trump said his advice to Zelenskyy after Friday’s meeting with Putin would be “make a deal.” 

10. 2020 election rigged

Trump shared that Putin told him he believed the 2020 election was rigged because of the widespread mail-in voting, saying, “You can’t have a great democracy with mail-in voting.” 

Peter Pinedo is a politics writer for Fox News Digital.

****

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – A Navy SEAL told Obama to sit this one out with some brutal advice.

0816/2025

“You’ve done enough damage. Probably best to sit this one out,” Crane told Obama directly.

Obama tried to sell Obamacare nostalgia, but voters haven’t forgotten the reality. Premium hikes. Doctor shortages. Cancelled policies.

****²

ttps://unmuzzlednews.com/a-navy-seal-told-obama-to-sit-this-one-out-with-some-brutal-advice/?utm_source=decide&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=umn_2996285929&utm_term=&utm_content=240175


A Navy SEAL told Obama to sit this one out with some brutal advice

August 15, 2025

marekuliasz via Shutterstock

Barack Obama has been making waves in political circles lately.

The former President thought he could step back into the spotlight without consequences.

And a Navy SEAL told Obama to sit this one out with some brutal advice.

Obama tries to defend his healthcare disaster

The former President decided to wade back into the healthcare fight with a post on X defending his signature legislation.

Obama claimed that Republicans were “quietly weakening” Obamacare and urged people not to let them get away with it.

“Since we passed the Affordable Care Act, Republicans have tried over and over to repeal it. And over and over, they’ve failed – in part because millions of people now depend on the ACA for quality, affordable health care,” Obama wrote.¹

“Now Republicans are trying something different: quietly weakening the law and hoping you won’t notice. We can’t let them,” he added.

The timing was particularly tone-deaf considering the ongoing healthcare struggles American families continue to face under his so-called “Affordable” Care Act.

Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ), a former Navy SEAL who served his country with honor before coming to Congress, wasn’t about to let Obama’s revisionist history slide.

The Arizona congressman fired off a response that perfectly captured what millions of Americans were thinking.

“You’ve done enough damage. Probably best to sit this one out,” Crane told Obama directly.²

The blunt response immediately resonated with conservatives who remember the broken promises and skyrocketing costs that came with Obamacare.

Crane’s military background and no-nonsense approach to politics made him the perfect messenger to deliver this reality check to the former President.

Other Republicans quickly piled on to support Crane’s assessment and remind Americans of Obamacare’s actual track record.

Republicans expose Obamacare’s real legacy

Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) pointed out the uncomfortable truth about who really benefited from Obama’s healthcare scheme.

“Obamacare was a great deal – for huge healthcare companies,” Lee wrote. “But it’s made healthcare less affordable for hardworking American families, who have seen their healthcare costs skyrocket – while a small handful of healthcare giants have reaped a windfall of billions of dollars a year.”³

Former Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, now president of the Young America’s Foundation, highlighted one of Obamacare’s most destructive aspects.

“The worst part of Obamacare was putting able-bodied, working-age adults on government assistance instead of helping them find employment,” Walker said. “I’ve been vocally against this since day one. Medicaid should be for needy children, families, and seniors. Not for those who can work!”⁴

The criticism struck at the heart of what conservatives have been saying for years – Obamacare was never really about helping people get quality healthcare.

White House backs up the criticism

Even the Trump White House weighed in to support the Republican pushback against Obama’s healthcare nostalgia tour.

White House spokesman Kush Desai delivered a statement that perfectly summarized the administration’s view of Obama’s legacy legislation.

“Obama should start by acknowledging that ACA was a failed promise – a program that was riddled with waste, fraud, and abuse that President Trump and Republicans are slashing,” Desai said.⁵

“The Administration’s policies are strengthening America’s healthcare system with commonsense reforms to cut red tape, protect Medicaid, and lower drug prices by making wealthy countries finally pay their fair share,” he added.

The coordinated response showed that Republicans aren’t going to let Obama rewrite history about his signature policy disaster.

The real Obamacare record

The facts about Obamacare’s impact on American families tell a very different story than Obama’s social media spin.

Healthcare costs have continued to skyrocket for middle-class families who don’t qualify for subsidies but can’t afford the massive premiums and deductibles.

Rural hospitals have closed at alarming rates, leaving communities without access to emergency care.

Many doctors have left the traditional healthcare system entirely, moving to concierge practices that bypass insurance altogether.

Small businesses have struggled with the mandate requirements and reporting burdens that came with the law.

The individual mandate penalty forced millions of Americans to pay fines for not being able to afford insurance – a particularly cruel twist that hit working families hardest.

Conservative base rallies behind Crane

Rep. Crane’s direct response to Obama resonated with conservative voters who are tired of politicians trying to gaslight them about their lived experiences.

Crane doesn’t pull punches when it comes to calling out failed policies. His military service gives him credibility that resonates with voters who are sick of typical political double-talk.

Most Republicans spent Trump’s first term walking on eggshells around Obama. Not anymore.

The response also highlighted how Trump’s return to the White House has emboldened Republicans to fight back against Democrat narratives more aggressively.

Obama tried to sell Obamacare nostalgia, but voters haven’t forgotten the reality. Premium hikes. Doctor shortages. Cancelled policies.

Crane’s blunt response cut right through the former President’s spin. When someone tells you they’ve “done enough damage,” that’s not political theater – that’s accountability.

The healthcare debate isn’t going away, but Republicans are clearly ready to fight it on the facts rather than letting Democrats control the narrative.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – JUSTICE!

08/15/2025

https://www.facebook.com/JaySekulow

ttps://www.facebook.com/JaySekulow

How many years were we under this trauma?

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – President Trump Scores Major Win At Appeals Court.

8/13/2025

Can you believe anyone would waste their money in this fashion when we are 32 trillion in debt and hosed down every day with a 1 trillion interest rate? And, we have to borrow the money to give to charity – does that make sense?

We have people in our country who could use this charity.

Charity is supposed to start at home and then you give charity/money you have left over to help others.

****

Donald Trump scores major win at appeals court

Story by Hannah Parry

Story by Hannah Parry

 • 8h • 

President Donald Trump scores major win at appeals court

Story by Hannah Parry 

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/donald-trump-scores-major-win-at-appeals-court/ar-AA1KsFjW?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=4db695a112d54834965ad9abe77d913e&ei=111

President Donald Trump was handed another court victory on Wednesday morning, after a federal appeals court ruled that his administration can stop making foreign aid payments.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued the 2-1 decision lifting a lower court injunction that had required the Trump administration to restore foreign assistance payments previously approved by Congress.

Why it Matters

Trump has been a vocal critic of foreign aid, which he has called “wasteful” and not in line with his America First policies. On his first day back in office, on January 20, he immediately imposed a 90-day pause on all foreign aid, and he has since made sweeping cuts and attempts to dismantle most of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Today’s decision will not only allow Trump to continue to wind down foreign aid grants, but it will also make it easier for the government to refuse to spend money already in the budget.

Trump Foreign Aid Appeal: What We Know

Two non-profit groups that received federal funding, AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition and Journalism Development Network, had sued the Trump administration for $10 billion in funds that Congress had allocated to the State Department and USAID for global health and HIV/AIDS programs. The grant recipients argued that Trump’s funding freeze violated federal law.

A lower U.S. district court had sided with the grant recipients and ordered the administration to pay nearly $2 billion in outstanding aid to humanitarian partners.

But on Wednesday, the federal appeals court vacated that injunction.President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an event at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., Aug. 13, 2025. (Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images) Francis Chung/AP

President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an event at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., Aug. 13, 2025. (Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images) Francis Chung/AP© Francis Chung/AP

Judge Karen Henderson, a Reagan appointee, wrote in her opinion that only the Comptroller General, which falls under the legislative branch’s Government Accountability Office, has the ability to sue over alleged impoundment.

The Impoundment Control Act “created a complex scheme of notification of the Congress, congressional action on a proposed rescission or deferral and suit by a specified legislative branch official if the executive branch violates its statutory expenditure obligations,” Henderon wrote.t does not make sense that the Congress would craft a complex scheme of interbranch dialogue but sub silentio also provide a backdoor for citizen suits at any time and without notice to the Congress of the alleged violation.”

The Court of Appeals ruling means that only the legislative branch will be able to sue a presidential administration if it makes changes to congressionally approved budgets.

The court also emphasized that obligations to satisfy existing contracts were largely distinct from the question of future disbursements and that challenges rooted in existing, executed contracts remained available through other legal avenues.

The panel majority said the record about grantees’ future survival without these funds was “simply less developed.”

What is the Impoundment Control Act?

The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (ICA) limits a president’s ability to withhold or cancel spending that Congress has already approved, preserving Congress’s constitutional “power of the purse.” Passed after President Nixon refused to release funds for programs he opposed, the law requires the president to notify Congress of any delays and get congressional approval within 45 days for permanent cancellations or else the money must be spen

Enforced by the Government Accountability Office, the ICA has been central to disputes such as the 2019 Ukraine aid delay, which the GAO ruled violated the law.

What People Are Saying

Attorney General Pamela Bondi wrote on X, “Another Justice Dept victory in court for President Trump’s agenda! In a 2-1 ruling, the DC Circuit lifted an injunction ordering President Trump to spend hard-earned taxpayer dollars on wasteful foreign aid projects. We will continue to successfully protect core Presidential authorities from judicial overreach.”

Judge Florence Pan, a Biden appointee, wrote in her dissent, “It is our responsibility to check the President when he violates the law and exceeds his constitutional authority. We fail to do that here.”

Lauren Bateman of Public Citizen Litigation Group, lead attorney for some of the grantees, told reporters after the decision she would”seek further review from the court. In the meantime, countless people will suffer disease, starvation, and death from the administration’s unconscionable decision to withhold life-saving aid from the world’s most vulnerable people.” Where are the United Nations?

What Happens Next

It is not yet clear whether the plaintiffs will try to appeal their case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment