KOMMONSENTSJANE – Historic Poll Devastates Democrats: Worst Voter Approval Rating in 35 Years.

7/27/2025

A Democratic pollster who worked on the survey said that it was because his party had lost the ability to be credible opposition.


“The Democratic brand is so bad that they don’t have the credibility to be a critic of Trump or the Republican Party,” John Anzalone said.

ttps://www.westernjournal.com/historic-poll-devastates-democrats-worst-voter-approval-rating-35-years/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=western%20journal%20politics&utm_campaign=dlvrit&utm_content=square

Editor’s Pick

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard talks to reporters in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on July 23, 2025, in Washington, D.C.

Gabbard Accuses Obama of Dodging the Truth of ‘Treasonous Conspiracy’ Following Release of Intel Files

Commentary

U.S. Senate Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer speaks to reporters after a weekly luncheon in Washington, DC on July 22, 2025.

Commentary

U.S. Senate Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer speaks to reporters after a weekly luncheon in Washington, DC on July 22, 2025. (Alex Wong / Getty Images)

Historic Poll Devastates Democrats: Worst Voter Approval Rating in 35 Years

 By C. Douglas Golden  July 26, 2025 at 5:00am

If you’ve been paying attention to the news lately, you must be thinking that the Democrats are cruising to a 2026 midterm bonanza.

After all, we’ve got that “MAGA civil war” over the Iran attacks. (Except that kind of went away once the Iran attacks went well.) Now we have “MAGA civil war” over the Epstein files. (Which will probably go away now that the Trump administration is making transparency on the dead sex trafficker and financier a priority.)

And, of course, you have that Big Beautiful Bill, which — we were all reliably informed — was going to kill millions — if not billions or even trillions — of seniors instantly the moment it was passed because of health care cuts. (Haven’t seen the data on that yet, but when have the Democrats ever been wrong when they’ve fallen back on shrill messaging that fiscal continence and reasonable budgetary priorities mean “people will die?”),

So clearly, now that MAGA is gearing up to fight its own Antietam over foreign policy or Epstein or something (quick organizational question for the civil war thing: How do we tell which side is which when we’re all wearing red caps?) and seniors are dropping dead in the streets because of Donald Trump and the GOP, the Democrats must be doing better than ever, right?

Actually, they’re doing worse than ever. And I don’t mean that in a hyperbolic way: Literally, the Democratic Party is at its lowest point in The Wall Street Journal’s history of party-approval polling, which dates back to 1990.

RELATED NEWS: Historic Poll Devastates Democrats: Worst Voter Approval Rating in 35 Years, and other top stories from July 26, 2025.READ MORE

“Democrats have been hoping that a voter backlash against the president will be powerful enough to restore their majority in the House in next year’s midterm elections, much as it did during Trump’s first term,” the Wall Street Journal said in announcing the results on Friday night.

“But the Journal poll shows that the party hasn’t yet accomplished a needed first step in that plan: persuading voters they can do a better job than Trump’s party.”

Give this much to the Wall Street Journal: They’re nothing if not masters of understatement there. In the strip “Calvin and Hobbes,” Calvin once said that scientists missed the boat on conveying the scope of the big bang by not calling it the “horrendous space kablooie!” In the same way, the WSJ probably should have considered “Horrendous Poll Kablooie!” as its headline.

In a poll of 1,500 registered voters taken between July 16-20, 63 percent of respondents said they held an unfavorable view of the Democratic Party, compared to just 33 percent who held a favorable view.

Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge via email. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

That 30 percent gap is the highest ever recorded by the publication — and its down nine points since April, when the party had a negative 21 percent gap.

Even in a poll released July 2, 2024 — this was after Biden had proved he was non compos mentis on a debate stage on June 27 but before he actually pulled out of the race because America had figured out with their own eyes that he’d outsourced most of his executive powers to Jill, Hunter, and their retinue — the Democrats only had a minus-20 approval rating.

The Republicans aren’t doing grand, either, with a negative 11 percent approval rating. But that’s hardly a low, particularly in the post-Iraq quagmire era where the rating for the GOP has always been underwater.

The only good piece of news was that, in a hypothetical congressional ballot, voters said they would back a Democrat over a Republican 46 to 43 percent. That’s close to the 2.5 percent margin of error, though — and in 2017, at the same point, the lead was 8 points for the Democrats.

Furthermore, Trump’s approval rating is at 46 percent with 52 percent disapproval — but this is also higher than the 40 percent approval at this point in his first term.

“We were already watching the tide moving out for the Republican Party by this point in 2017, and that’s not where we are today,” said Bill McInturff, a Republican pollster.

“And that’s worth jumping up and down and trying to explain: how much more competitive Trump and the Republicans are today than in 2017.”

The only other good news is that voters disapproved of how Trump was handling some issues — but also felt the alternative would be worse:

In some cases, the disparities are striking. Disapproval of Trump’s handling of inflation outweighs approval by 11 points, and yet the GOP is trusted more than Democrats to handle inflation by 10 points. By 17 points, voters disapprove rather than approve of Trump’s handling of tariffs, and yet Republicans are trusted more than Democrats on the issue by 7 points.

Voters have significant concerns about the centerpiece of Trump’s agenda—his immigration policies—opposing some of his deportation tactics by double-digit numbers. And yet they trust congressional Republicans more than Democrats on immigration by 17 points and on handling illegal immigration by 24 points.

A Democratic pollster who worked on the survey said that it was because his party had lost the ability to be credible opposition.

“The Democratic brand is so bad that they don’t have the credibility to be a critic of Trump or the Republican Party,” John Anzalone said.

“Until they reconnect with real voters and working people on who they’re for and what their economic message is, they’re going to have problems.”

Of course, maybe it’s the fact that people remember who caused a lot of these problems in the first place — and who told them, in the run-up to the 2024 election, that they’d never had it so good, they just didn’t know it.

And then there’s the shifting electorate. Remember that old phrase “demographics is destiny” — the idea that the changing racial and age makeup of the United States meant we’d invariably become more Democratic? You don’t hear that anymore, because a funny thing happened on the way to assuming people vote based on the color of their skin or their country of origin:

At about this point in 2017, more voters called themselves Democrats than Republicans by 6 percentage points in Journal polling. The Democratic tilt meant that many Republicans, in a sense, were running uphill even before they started, depending on the makeup of their House district.

Now, more voters identify as Republicans than as Democrats, a significant change in the structure of the electorate—and a rarity in politics. Republicans last year built their first durable lead in more than three decades in party identification, and they have maintained that lead today. In the new Journal survey, more voters identify as Republicans than as Democrats by 1 percentage point, and the GOP led by 4 points in the April poll.

While I don’t see a granular breakdown here, we’ve seen too many other polls that show the GOP’s broader base for this to be a non-issue. It’s almost like two decades and change of Democrats effectively telling America “if you’re young, you’re non-white, or female, shut up and vote for us, we’ll give you free stuff and make the old white patriarchy pay” somehow wasn’t a winning message. I can’t imagine how.

And by the way — generally speaking, in the Journal’s poll, at this point the opposition party to the White House should be on the upswing. It shouldn’t be trending downward like Peloton stock after the stay-at-home orders were lifted, which is basically what the Democratic Party approval graph looks like right now. And yet, we’re told that the GOP is in disarray, and Trump’s base is splintering over [insert issue here], and the Democrats are poised to take control once our civil war gets underway in earnest.

Meanwhile, when they’re not fighting the possibility of Zohran Mamdani being the face of the party for the foreseeable future, they’re fighting the lowest approval numbers they’ve ever seen. Let’s hope the horrendous poll kablooie turns out to be the horrendous midterm kablooie, as well.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

2024 election2026 midterm electionsDemocratsDonald TrumpPollsTrump administration

C. Douglas Golden

Contributor, CommentarySummaryMoreRecentContact

C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he’s written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Trump is telling the truths Europe’s leaders won’t.

7/27/2025

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-is-telling-the-truths-europe-s-leaders-won-t/ar-AA1JlIhn?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=3a405271c0f24703a0b2c4c9701082db&ei=16

President Donald J. Trump waves as he plays at Trump Turnberry golf course

President Donald J. Trump waves as he plays at Trump Turnberry golf course.

The most important skill in European politics is the ability to pretend that all is well. In London, Paris, Berlin and a dozen other capitals, the order of the day is continuing the series of polite lies that exculpate a generation of politicians from bearing responsibility for their failures.Jim Rickards: New Economic Boom Starting This Summer (act Fast)

Things that intrude on this bubble – videos of protests circulating online, the views of the electorate, writers who draw attention to the catastrophic consequences of a toxic combination of welfarism and open borders – are censored, ignored or threatened with legal action.

Donald Trump’s occasional forays into European affairs have much the same effect on the political class as a stick of dynamite chucked into a lake does on fish. His comments are followed by floundering, gasping, and goggle-eyed outrage. They are not met with actual rebuttal.

With Europe engaged in a project of total self-delusion, it has fallen to the American president to tell us the truths we are unwilling to tell ourselves. For all Mr Trump’s failings, he is rarely accused of being insufficiently blunt. And on Europe, he has a regrettable tendency to be correct.

While our politicians wring their hands over vast numbers of economic migrants abusing an outdated asylum system, attempting to square the circle of an open borders approach to migration, generous welfare states, and hopelessly outdated laws and treaties, Mr Trump is free to state what he sees: “You better get your act together or you’re not going to have Europe anymore.

Related video: Trump ‘has a point’ calling out ‘huge scale’ immigration flood into Europe, says former NATO ambassador (FOX News)

FOX News

Trump ‘has a point’ calling out ‘huge scale’ immigration flood into Europe, says former NATO ambassador (Fox News.)

View on Watch

It is a view that will resonate with voters across the continent. The great weakening of Europe’s borders has been unfolding for a decade now, since German chancellor Angela Merkel crumpled when confronted with a crying child and attempted to reshape her country around the slogan “wir schaffen das”: “we can do this”. Political will, however, was not sufficient to change reality on its own. The cultural costs have not been negligible. Nor have the economic consequences, particularly alongside other flawed policies.

The costs of net zero continue to mount, with politicians seemingly eager to dismantle Europe’s industrial base in a fit of moral fervour. When Mr Trump tells Sir Keir Starmer that Britain should go against this consensus and drill for the oil in the North Sea, or objects to the “detrimental” effect of windfarms on the “beauty of Scotland”, he is articulating the views of millions of British voters. That they are unpopular in Westminster means that these criticisms are frequently ignored or overruled. It does not mean that they are untrue.

Indeed, it is often the truth of Mr Trump’s statements that triggers the most furious backlash against them. When he says Europeans risk “losing their wonderful right to freedom of speech”, or his vice-president J D Vance criticises “digital censorship”, the criticisms sting because they are clearly correct, and all the more so contrasted against attempts to rebut them.

When the French mission to the UN asserted that “in Europe, one is free to speak, not free to spread illegal content” – a statement that would have been just as true of the Soviet Union – the official State Department account responded by pointing out the only true effect was to protect Europe’s “leaders from their own people”. It is hard to disagree with this sentiment.

It is difficult, too, to disagree with Trump’s blunt statement that recognising a Palestinian state “doesn’t matter”. French president Emmanuel Macron has declared that France will join Spain and Ireland in this policy. As Mr Trump says, however, it is a statement that “doesn’t carry weight”, and is “not going to change anything”.

In this, it is a perfect summary of Europe’s travails. Political leaders who have squandered the legacies they were handed still behave as if the world hangs upon their word, even as events overtake them. Gesture policies like state recognition are thrown out without any thought as to their actual effect or practicality. What does it mean to recognise a Palestinian state in an area controlled by Hamas?

How is this policy meant to assist in quelling the fanatical opposition amongst Palestinian elites to any Jewish state in the Middle East, or for that matter the presence of any other minority? In what sense is rewarding Hamas’s butchering and raping of Israeli civilians meant to have any effect other than prolonging this bloody conflict?

Mr Trump is not always right. His protectionist trade policy is a catastrophic misstep. He was similarly disastrously wrong on Ukraine, and it is by good fortune rather than design that his ham-fisted attempts to force Kyiv into a terrible deal failed. There, Europe’s leaders were for once in the right. The difference is that Mr Trump appears to have realised the error of his ways, and shifted his policies accordingly.

To date, this has only once occurred in the other direction. It is clearly for the good that Europe is coming round to Mr Trump’s views on defence, with Nato pledging to raise defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP after pressure from the White House, implicitly affirming the truth of his statement that the continent had been “freeloading”.

This was not cheap but it was necessary. We must now hope that similar reversals will follow in other fields, before irreparable damage is done. 

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Sling Shot is a Lefty Newspaper and Missed Their Target. She is One of God’s Angels.

07/26/2025

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/you-seem-to-like-people-gop-sen-john-kennedy-characterizes-anti-voting-rights-extremist-harmeet-dhillon-as-inclusive-in-tone-deaf-remarks/vi-AA1Jkr5a?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=285f79ed82424fd68fd00598f2ec6d9f&ei=14

placeholder

Click to unmuteClick to unmute

Slingshot News

(Sling shot arrow missed the mark completely.)

‘You Seem To Like People’: GOP Sen. John Kennedy Characterizes Anti-Voting Rights Extremist Harmeet Dhillon As ‘Inclusive’ In Tone-Deaf Remarks

During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on July 23, 2025, Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) described Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon as an “inclusive person.” Though, Dhillon has a history of anti-voting rights rhetoric (not true) and has served as one of Trump’s legal advisers.

That is not true!

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – All of You Missed the Whole Point!

07/26/2025

From an environmental stand point!

Yes, try walking in high heels in grass and soil; but, just think how much water will be saved from not having to water all of that grass?


Entertainment

‘Trashy’: Donald Trump Blames Women’s ‘High Heel’ Shoes for Rose Garden Redo, Critics Say Makeover Is Just a Golden Shrine to Himself.

Posted byBy Nicole Duncan-Smith | Published on: July 26, 2025 

Donald Trump’s latest White House renovation has transformed one of America’s most iconic outdoor spaces into what many are calling a concrete testament to his personal aesthetic.

The president’s controversial makeover of the historic Rose Garden is nearing completion, with recent photographs revealing the dramatic extent of changes to the beloved green space that has hosted countless presidential moments since the Kennedy administration.

Trump paved over the White House Rose Garden with concrete, claiming it protects women in high heels from sinking into wet grass during events. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Recent images taken on July 22 showcase the stunning reality of Trump’s vision, according to Town and Country.  

Some images and videos have been posted online.

Where manicured grass once provided a verdant backdrop for press conferences and state events, a large concrete slab now dominates the historic landscape. The paved surface represents a radical departure from the garden’s traditional design, which featured a central lawn established in 1961 at President John F. Kennedy’s request.

Trump defended his decision during a March interview with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham, offering a practical explanation that has sparked both support and ridicule.

“You know, we use [the Rose Garden] for press conferences, and it doesn’t work because the people fall,” he explained matter-of-factly. “The terrain can be wet, and the soft ground can be an issue for some… Women, with the high heels, it just didn’t work.”

The president’s reasoning centers on safety concerns, particularly for female attendees navigating the outdoor space during official events. He also posted a picture of the men he hired to complete the job.

This marks the second major alteration to the Rose Garden in recent years.

First lady Melania Trump previously oversaw significant changes in 2020, introducing limestone borders that drew fierce criticism from historians.

NBC News presidential historian Michael Beschloss described her botanical vision as “grim,” writing that the “evisceration of White House Rose Garden was completed a year ago this month, and here was the grim result — decades of American history made to disappear.”

Melania’s office fired back sharply at the historian’s assessment, defending their work through social media. Her team wrote that Beschloss “has proven his ignorance by showing a picture of the Rose Garden in its infancy. The Rose Garden is graced with a healthy & colorful blossoming of roses. His misleading information is dishonorable & he should never be trusted as a professional historian,” according to People.

The current renovations go far beyond Melania’s earlier limestone additions. A White House official described the new construction as a “restoration” that demonstrates the first family’s “deep respect for the history of the White House and for the Rose Garden.” The official emphasized that this project “preserves the beauty of the space and builds on the work done in 2020, with a focus on enhancing practical use and guest experience for those attending special events.”

Yet critics see something entirely different in Trump’s redesign philosophy.

The concrete makeover coincides with the president’s broader transformation of White House interiors, including extensive gilding of the Oval Office. Trump enlisted his “gold guy,” cabinetmaker John Icart, to create golden borders for political portraits, gilded fireplace mantel carvings, and a gold Trump crest in a doorway.

These updates echo the aesthetic of both Mar-a-Lago and Trump’s Trump Tower apartment, creating a stark contrast to the understated elegance favored by previous administrations.

Public reaction has been swift and divided.

People readers reveal the depth of feeling surrounding the changes.

“They are letting the world know who they are pure cold hearted. Stone. Black,” wrote one critic, connecting the physical transformation to broader symbolic meanings.

Another commenter expressed historical concern, noting, “This was Dolly Madison rose garden i think she would be highly upset that it was destroyed.”

The practical versus aesthetic debate continues to rage online.

“How sad. Take a lovely garden area and kill it. Hopefully another administration can restore it,” lamented one observer, while another sarcastically commented, “Oh God forbid you wouldn’t be able to look at those women in there high heels.”

Perhaps the most pointed criticism came from someone who wrote, “It’s supposed to be the Rose GARDEN – not the Rose Driveway or Rose Walkway. Remaking the historical White House into a second gaudy, trashy Mar-a-Lago isn’t what most Americans want.”

Another commenter joked, “The Beverly Hillbillies have moved into the White House.”

The Rose Garden’s transformation represents more than mere landscaping changes. The space, originally designed by philanthropist Rachel Lambert “Bunny” Mellon during the Kennedy era, has served as a backdrop for everything from formal state dinners to crucial press briefings and presidential award ceremonies.

Construction crews are working to complete the renovations by mid-August, with the National Park Service overseeing the project through funding from the Trust for the National Mall. When finished, Trump’s Rose Garden will stand as perhaps one of the most dramatic reimagining of White House grounds in modern presidential history, forever changing how future administrations and visitors experience this cornerstone of American political tradition.

****

The lefty news continue their fake news as described below:

What do you call a high heel that can’t stop talking? A pump with a big mouth.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment