KOMMONSENTSJANE – America’s booming economy proves Trump was right – again.

7/29/2025

Why is it that Democrats can never steer the economy ship? Is it that they are too busy usurping our coffers and aren’t smart enough to manage the budget as DOGE proved?

I hope the voters realize that you have to understand how the world works – and keep the people in office who understand how the government works in order to keep the boat afloat. How many times do we have to learn the hard way that the Democrats do not have the capacity to run the country. Their mentality is limited and we hope the country understands that. Obama/Biden were the least capable. We must establish an IQ test for future candidates. We have people now in our government who do not understand how the world/government works and that is the problem.

The twelve years of Democrat control almost sunk the country. Look at all of our blue states – not good. The citizens better “listen up” and learn from what we have been through.

If you don’t like the name Republican – you had better learn from what we have been through. The left almost took us into SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM with their ignorance. The Democrats need to clean up their party of the AOC/Bernie Sanders/et al progressives and bring back the real Democrats.

The spending by the Obama/Biden progressives was out of control as we all know. Ignorance was bliss with them as we witnessed. It is time now to remain true to the Constitution and throw out all of the bums who caused our demise.

****

US President Donald Trump during a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, after the announcement of a trade deal on July 27 2025 - Evelyn Hockstein / Reuters

US President Donald Trump during a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, after the announcement of a trade deal on July 27 2025 – Evelyn Hockstein / Reuters

“Sometimes you have to take the medicine,” said President Donald Trump, back in April, as markets plummeted and the world convulsed in response to his “Liberation Day” tariffs. He denounced his critics as “Panicans”.

Four months on, and the panic has all but passed. After initial discomfort, the patient appears to be digesting Dr Trump’s unorthodox treatment and is responding well. The key to recovery, it seems, is to accept that the global economic order was wrong and the Donald is right. It’s funny how often this seems to be the case.

The stock markets quickly recovered from their slump and hit new highs this week, after the European Union struck an initial trade agreement with the United States. The EU has accepted a 15 per cent levy on its exports to the United States and promised to buy many more American goods. In return, America gave away almost nothing. This is Trumponomics 101: he wins, you pay.

The extent of his domination can be seen in the fact that Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the EU Commission, and Keir Starmer both came in turn to Turnberry, in Scotland, to perform the diplomatic formalities, while he took time out from playing golf on the course he owns. For his part, the gracious host flattered his guests by calling them “tough negotiators” even as they essentially accepted all his terms. This is the Art of the Post-Deal: he flatters, you keep paying.Related video: History behind tariffs, nothing new for American Presidents (KOAA Colorado Springs, CO

History behind tariffs, nothing new for American Presidents

The British Prime Minister grimaced as Donald Trump lectured him on the benefits of low taxation and strong borders as well as the evils of Sadiq Khan and wind turbines. But Starmer knows, deep down, that the only aspect of his premiership which has gone well has been his negotiating of the political weather system that is Donald Trump. Britain bowed to Trump’s agenda first, and was duly rewarded with a 10 per cent levy on all our goods, the lowest on offer.

It’s strange to think that only last year, as Trump campaigned for re-election, the expert classes on both sides of the Atlantic frantically debated whether Trump was serious about imposing a 10 per cent levy on all imports, certain as they were that such a move would tank the financial system. In fact Trump went much further than anyone expected and slapped additional “reciprocal tariffs” on countries, some as high as 50 per cent. But his initial aggression was so bewildering that now the world is falling on his lesser-though-still-significant tariffs as a blessed relief. This is classic New York real-estate stuff: frighten the wits out of opposing parties with a ruinous initial threat, then watch them cave in gratitude when you agree to be slightly less exacting.

“It’s complicated but not that complicated, when you get right down to it,” Trump told von der Leyen on Sunday. The simple truth, which he understood but the rest of the world couldn’t quite admit, is that every country desperately wants access to the US market, which is why he, as America’s Commander-in-Chief, must have the upper hand on global trade. The leverage is his, inevitably.

It’s too soon to say the trade war is over, of course. The deals with Britain, Europe, Japan are only “frameworks” that could fall apart as officials work through the details. And then there’s China, still the factory of the world, and the hardest piece of the Trump trade puzzle to solve.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has spent the last two days in Sweden, conducting intensely difficult negotiations with Chinese officials about extending the pause on America’s onerous tariffs against the world’s second greatest power.

But what’s clear is that America is now in a far more commanding position on trade, even with the world’s second biggest superpower. And that’s down to Donald Trump’s belligerence. He can pause, and pause again, but he doesn’t fold.

Trump understands that, beyond economics, protectionism is a very useful cudgel in diplomacy, because tariffs are like sanctions. America can make warring nations fall in line by threatening to impose steep export taxes if they don’t comply. Last week, Trump used the threat of US tariffs to help broker a peace deal between Thailand and Cambodia last week. He did the same with DR Congo and Rwanda earlier this month and India and Pakistan in May. He wants to be remembered as a peacemaker, and it’s obvious now that Liberation Day is part of his anti-war strategy. This week Trump pleased Starmer and the EU by promising tariffs of up to 100 per cent on Vladimir Putin’s Russia if the conflict in Ukraine doesn’t end in less than two weeks. That’s because he knows that punishment tariffs on unpopular countries are a useful way of keeping allies content.

Back in America, Trump’s political opponents point out that, while Wall Street seems to be enjoying a bounce, the Main Street economy is suffering. Basic economics suggests that tariffs have to be “tax on consumers”, as companies inevitably pass extra costs on to customers. And Americans have been telling pollsters that, as well as inflation, concern about the impact of Trump’s tariffs has made them reign in spending. Yet consumer and business sentiment in the US is actually ticking up not down, and the latest surveys suggest that almost 50 per cent of Americans rate the strength of the US economy as “good”, up from about 35 per cent at the start of the Trump presidency.

Free traders might still grumble about tariffs taking the world backwards. But others are starting to acknowledge that Trump could be late capitalism’s last, best hope.

Trumponomics may force consumers to pay more, but he is taxing Americans less. His administration just extended his significant tax cuts from his first term and added tax relief for pensioners, as well as on people working overtime or for tips. At the same time, the White House can point out that inflation is going down and its “external revenue service” is bringing in $20bn each month in tariffs, which helps reduce America’s vast and fiscally unsustainable deficit.

This is not quite the “golden age” that Trump voters promised when he came into office earlier this year, but the president isn’t exaggerating when he tells reporters that America is “the hottest country anywhere in the world.”

The danger is that, while Trump milks us all on trade, other countries will suffer and become more resentful towards America. We’re already seeing the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India and China) coming closer together as many regard the United States as an avaricious hegemon.

But that process was underway long before Trump first became president. The truth is that Trump has defied the increasingly unpopular economic orthodoxy that has ruled the world since at least 1995, when President Bill Clinton’s America helped found the World Trade Organisation. And he’s winning.

Freddy Gray is deputy and US editor of The Spectator

****

We hope that voters learned from this hard lesson. Not just anyone can be a candidate for office. For heavens sake, VET YOUR CANDIDATES. We need people who are smart – not smart alec’s..

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Op-Ed: How Gabbard’s Latest Russiagate Findings Exposed Obama’s Treachery..

08/04/2025

https://www.tampafp.com/dni-gabbard-whistleblowers-emerge-after-release-of-coup-documents/

ttps://www.tampafp.com/dni-gabbard-whistleblowers-emerge-after-release-of-coup-documents/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/megyn-kelly-demands-hillary-clinton-s-arrest-this-woman-should-be-in-jail/ar-AA1JTbNk?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6891130cbfd143f9b7cc595ab275028a&ei=56

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/megyn-kelly-demands-hillary-clinton-s-arrest-this-woman-should-be-in-jail/ar-AA1JTbNk?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6891130cbfd143f9b7cc595ab275028a&ei=56

****

Yes, the following heading should be an embarrassment to the media in the manner in which they are describing years of people committing treason. They need to read the Constitution.

Voters: Yeah, Obama broke the law with ‘Russiagate,’ must be prosecuted

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/voters-yeah-obama-broke-the-law-with-russiagate-must-be-prosecuted/ar-AA1JSSKM?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=689109bf82304835af84cf8cecad6132&ei=13

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/voters-yeah-obama-broke-the-law-with-russiagate-must-be-prosecuted/ar-AA1JSSKM?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=689109bf82304835af84cf8cecad6132&ei=13

Voters: Yeah, Obama broke the law with ‘Russiagate,’ must be prosecuted

Voters: Yeah, Obama broke the law with ‘Russiagate,’ must be prosecuted

A majority of voters believe former President Barack Obama‘s national security team schemed and lied in pushing the false “Russiagate” scandal to undermine the legitimate election of President Donald Trump, and now want them prosecuted for it.

In the latest Rasmussen Reports survey shared with Secrets, 54% of likely voters said it is likely that Team Obama “committed serious crimes in manipulating intelligence.” Only 41% of respondents disagreed.A.I. Gives Traders "3-Day Warning," Could Transform Stock Portfolios

And even more respondents, 69%, demanded that those involved be “held accountable.”

🚨BREAKING: In a bombshell revelation, CIA Director John Ratcliffe has confirmed that former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey & former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are likely to face indictments due to their involvement in the Russiagate scandal. pic.twitter.com/ugwQh4cjqu

The new poll was conducted after Trump’s national intelligence director, Tulsi Gabbard, reported that Obama and his staff allegedly played a huge role in ginning up the scandal that Russia influenced and manipulated the 2016 election of Trump over the media’s choice, Hillary Clinton.

That new report has led to speculation that Obama and his national security team could be criminally prosecuted.

It turns out that America is on board with that move. Just 21% of respondents disagreed with punishing those involved.

Eighty-six percent of Republicans, 59% of Democrats, and 62% of unaffiliated voters at least somewhat agree with the Gabbard quote about how important it is ‘that people who perpetrate such crimes are held accountable,’” the Rasmussen analysis said.

The survey is the latest to show that the scandal won’t just go away. It dogged Trump’s first term, and MAGA voters remain mad about that and want revenge.

(How many years have the Democrats been scheming to find a crime that fits President Trump – 12 years – while committing these crimes against the people/President Trump – and spending taxpayer funds to commit these crimes. And, there are people who still think nothing of them committing these crimes. This tells you – there are a lot of people who don’t have much reasoning power. That is scary.)

****

07/29/2025

ttps://unmuzzlednews.com/a-cnn-analyst-launched-one-desperate-attack-against-trump-that-backfired-spectacularly/?utm_source=decide&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=umn_2970413263&utm_term=&utm_content=240175

07/28/2025

For those of us paying attention, what hasn’t made sense for the past nine years suddenly becomes clear. Looking back at the photo of Obama sitting next to Donald Trump on Inauguration Day 2017, fully aware of what he had set in motion, it’s a chilling reminder of what a dangerous threat Barack Obama truly is to America.

Sponsored

The Western Journal

Op-Ed: How Gabbard’s Latest Russiagate Findings Exposed Obama’s Treachery

07/28/2025

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/op-ed-how-gabbard-s-latest-russiagate-findings-exposed-obama-s-treachery/ar-AA1JsCFn?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b1b945486fe2450eba1b2fc59bfe4b3b&ei=7

Op-Ed: How Gabbard's Latest Russiagate Findings Exposed Obama's Treachery

Op-Ed: How Gabbard’s Latest Russiagate Findings Exposed Obama’s Treachery© Jim Watson – AFP / Getty Images

Barack Obama sees himself as a historic transformational figure sent to fundamentally change a nation with a paternalistic history, a “fatally flawed” Constitution, racist culture, and economic system that needed revision — by him.

That’s why it must have been a shock when Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election to a billionaire businessman whose worldview opposed everything Barack stood for during his eight years, “waking up every morning in a house … built by slaves.”

Imagine thinking so highly of yourself and then having your successor be so widely rejected.

By choosing Donald Trump, the American public rejected Obama’s vision, which likely bruised his fragile ego. For Obama, Trump’s victory probably felt like a complete rejection of everything the community organizer had achieved during his two terms of trying to transform a constitutional republic into a Marxist state.

Now, nine years after that harsh blow of rejection, America learns that before and after the 2016 election, the world’s most thin-skinned egomaniac and his team of malevolent enforcers believed it was in the country’s best interest to protect their distorted view of democracy by making false accusations against the newly elected president.

Seeing himself as “… the one we’ve been waiting for,” it’s alleged that the former president suppressed the truth to support a story he and his entire cabinet knew was false. If cerebrally-challenged “tea baggers” chose Donald Trump in 2016, who better than Barack Obama to fix the mistake? Regardless of what that involved.

Related video: ‘I Will Do Everything In My Power’: When Donald Trump Telegraphed Russian Interference In The 2016 Election During The Primary Debates (Slingshot News)

‘I Will Do Everything In My Power’: When Donald Trump Telegraphed Russian Interference In The 2016 Election During The Primary Debates

View on Watch

And so, the self-proclaimed champion of “democracy” resolved to do whatever it took to undermine a democratically elected president.

In the lead-up to 2016, the intelligence community repeatedly assessed and reported that Russia was “probably not trying … to influence the election by using cyber means.”

Then, on Dec. 7, 2016, about a month after Trump successfully secured the victory and after Obama was revived with a strong dose of smelling salts, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper delivered some terrible news. Despite Obama believing Russia would be the fall guy, Clapper’s message proved otherwise.

“Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. Presidential election outcome,” he reported.

In other words, the election results showed that America did not want another round of Obama dressed in a pantsuit.

After processing the information, it took 48 hours for President Obama’s White House to strategize how to handle the disappointing turn of events.

The former president gathered his top National Security Council members for a meeting. The group included key figures like Clapper, CIA director John Brennan, National Security Advisor Susan Rice, Secretary of State John Kerry, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, and several other Trump-hating officials.

The topic was to discuss the Russia issue and figure out how to turn it into a problem.

In a follow-up to that meeting, Clapper’s executive assistant was instructed to send an email. The message was addressed to leaders in the intelligence community, instructing them “per the President’s request” to develop a more acceptable assessment that outlines the “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.”

That kind of directive is similar to Obama creating a “more acceptable” short-form birth certificate after his original long form mysteriously went missing.

The email went on to say, “ODNI will lead this effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS.”

Translation: Russia’s level of involvement in the election is unacceptable to Obama. Therefore, the team must craft a more suitable assessment that conveys what Obama wants it to communicate. So, even if that conclusion was a blatant lie, on behalf of upholding democracy, the CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS agreed that the democratic thing to do was to subvert democracy.

Confident that the usual allies would obey the president’s orders, Obama officials then leaked false information to media outlets hostile to Trump, claiming, “Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election.”

Barack Obama likely felt justified in casting doubt on Donald Trump’s presidency, while also straining U.S. relations with a world leader Obama had come to despise almost as much as he despises Trump.

Early enough to cast doubt on Inauguration Day on Jan. 20, 2017, a new Obama-approved intelligence community assessment was released that directly contradicted the findings from the previous six months. According to Trump’s Department of National Intelligence Director, Tulsi Gabbard, these newer, more Obama-approved findings were based on information that, even at the time, was considered non-credible.

According to Gabbard, to delegitimize Trump’s victory, what was released to the public led to prolonged investigations, Congressional impeachment proceedings, arrests, innocent people being jailed, and “heightened Russia tensions.” Money and time were spent, reputations and lives were ruined, years were lost, and tense U.S.-Russian relations emerged, but all of this was a small price to pay, in his own mind, for Obama’s ego to be vindicated.

That’s why it’s easy to believe that during Trump’s first term, Barack Obama was probably working behind the scenes to destabilize the new president and ensure that, no matter what “tea baggers”-turned-MAGA voters decided in 2020, the Trump presidency wouldn’t get a second chance.

And so, perhaps even illegally, a substandard candidate was hand-picked and installed in office in 2020. After Joe Biden was sworn in in 2021, every Obama policy initiative that Americans rejected in 2016 was reinstated and heightened. Obama’s choice was not only a figurehead who could be manipulated, but also an embarrassing presence on the world stage.

President Barack Obama’s fingerprints were everywhere, and Biden’s term in office felt as if a sledgehammer was behind the scenes, crushing the very soul of this nation.

For those of us paying attention, what hasn’t made sense for the past nine years suddenly becomes clear. Looking back at the photo of Obama sitting next to Donald Trump on Inauguration Day 2017, fully aware of what he had set in motion, it’s a chilling reminder of what a dangerous threat Barack Obama truly is to America.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – “You Raise Us Up More Than We Can Be.”

07/28/2025

A very interesting article by one of our local former lady reporters, Verna Benham, for the Daily Times. I always enjoyed and miss her reporting.

****

A night of hope was held by Gateway Fellowship Church on Wed…

‘You raise us up more than we can be’

  • Verna Benham
  • Jul 21, 2025
Verna Benham image
Verna Benham

Facebook

“When troubles come, and my heart burdened be, then I am still and wait here in the silence — until you come and sit awhile with me. You raise me up, so I can stand on mountains. You raise me up to walk on stormy seas. I am strong when I am on your shoulders. You raise me up to more than I can be.”

I don’t know if composers of this song had a spiritual meaning in mind; for me, it speaks to a lifetime walk with God that far surpasses expectations. A piano/organ duet arrangement, majestic with the huge organ of our church, came to mind for a Sunday offertory. As our organist and I played it, thoughts of Jane Ragsdale gave it even greater meaning.

Jane was among those lost in the flooding of our Guadalupe River, beloved in our community for her caring leadership of the Heart O’ the Hills girls’ camp.

Nothing about Jane was ever prideful or boastful — yet she did so much, so well. Her deep relationship with God showed in her simple, unpretentious manner, approaching whatever task with a joyful smile. I hope the message of this offertory spoke to Jane’s life experience: “This is what I was put on Earth to do. You raised me up to more than I could be!”

Jane loved Hill Country life — sharing beautiful photos on Facebook: springtime blossoms, sunsets, the clouds, the river, deer and other critters. Life was full and good. Music meant much to her, always — our church choir. For us, it was like losing family. “Oh no, oh no, not Jane!” I imagine so many have felt that lately — not those wide-eyed, beautiful young children; not that wonderful, young family. Gone. The losses have been gut-wrenching.

Another song, the Shaker tune, “Simple Gifts,” speaks to us: “When true simplicity is gained, to bow and to bend we shan’t be ashamed. To turn, turn will be our delight — till by turning, turning we come round right.” Bowing and bending might seem offensive in today’s culture, taught to resist authority. And how can we think of God as loving, in the face of what just has happened? There are times in life when we’re haunted by such questions.

Encountering abject, grinding poverty for the first time in Bolivia, I raged at God, “How can you stand this?” Or evil, such as bombing civilians to bits in Ukraine. “Can’t you just zap Putin?” These are serious questions about what God is like, how he allowed the world he made to include great suffering and great evil, and how much he intervenes or does not intervene. Ultimately, these are mysteries beyond our comprehension.

Yet, we need to believe, “God is great, God is good.” If not, all is lost.

Those who refuse to believe that God and goodness exist become cynical about humanity as well. Without foundational morality and purposes worth striving for, life degenerates to “Dog eat dog.” But, is desiring to believe wishful thinking, or is there truth to validate it? We glimpse answers.

Once, in a Sunday School class, this question was posed: “What if, getting up each morning, you knew that nothing could possibly go wrong — ever?” Contemplating that, one lady said, “We wouldn’t grow,” another that “It takes the bite out of life, it would be utterly boring.” (That makes me wonder about Heaven!)

Clearly, our lives on Earth contain both great joy and excruciating agony — God’s tough love? Where is he in all of this? Another insight gathered from experience — alongside us, suffering with us.

Reasoning is inadequate; it takes a leap of faith to believe in God’s goodness, trusting our lives to him. But it’s OK to keep asking tough questions. As we look back, we may discern God’s fine hand working for good amidst great tragedy. Instead of complaining or blaming, perhaps we need to be part of the answer.

Many are sacrificially helping now — and we need to watch over them. It’s not only dangerous on the job; an Ingram fireman died later at home, possibly from overwork and anguish.

Back to Jane, she lived in Argentina for a while, writing for Buenos Aires’ leading newspaper, La Prensa, became fluent in Spanish, loved the culture and people. Years later, she launched a mission to some of the “poorest of the poor” — in Guayabales, a tiny village of Guatemala. Teams from our church joined others working to provide a solar-powered water system, electricity, a school, other basics — each year expanding, a new project. This year, a retired ophthalmologist brought eye care to Guayabales and several surrounding villages. Jane was always central as organizer, troubleshooter, coping with suspicious officials asking why so much equipment for a remote spot?

Lastly, a fun memory: A long table of us “gringos” sat in a Mexican restaurant on Mexico’s holiday, Cinco de Mayo. From all appearances, we were unlikely to know Spanish, but Jane knew many of us did.

“Wouldn’t it be fun to surprise them with a Mexican song?”

She printed out words to “Cielito Lindo” passed down the table. We were particularly boisterous on the chorus: “Ay ay ay ay! Canta and no llore, porque cantando se alegran Cielito Lindo los corazones.” I don’t know if “Cielito Lindo” describes a beautiful lady — the words translate “beautiful little sky or heaven.” (Interestingly, in Chinese, a person without reverence or spirituality is described as, “He has no sky.”) The rest translates easily: “Sing and don’t cry, because singing makes hearts become happy.” How appropriate — the very thing Jane would be likely to say — or sing — to us now, as we miss her so — “Canta y no llore!”

Kerrville resident Verna Benham is a former columnist with The Kerrville Daily Times. She spent 20 years traveling the globe as U.S. Foreign Service employee, then as wife of foreign correspondent Joe Benham. She lived in Bolivia, Taiwan, Chile, Brazil and Argentin

ttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/bgssNLPF37U.

YOU RAISE ME UP #panflute #quenacho #quena #nativeflutes #zampoña #livemusic

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Do Not Insult the Intelligence of the American People!

07/28/2025

Jeffrey Mark Goldberg (born 1965) is an American journalist who is the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic. During his nine years at The Atlantic before becoming editor, Goldberg became known for his coverage of foreign affairs. He moderated the PBS program Washington Week (rebranded as Washington Week with The Atlantic) beginning in August 2023, while continuing as The Atlantic‘s editor.

****

Mr. Goldberg has had several run-ins with President Trump through the years with FAKE stories. This is just another “hit and miss.” How do people live with themselves. Mr. Goldberg is an experienced person in life and has chosen the left to serve his purpose. Only Mr. Goldberg can tell who “illegally” opened the door to slip into this highly classified conversation. He knew where and what he was doing by immediately withdrawing and then reporting his intentional sabotage.

My opinion – the internet is not a safe place for this type of discussion. There is nothing ever “confidential” with the type of people who are running the internet.

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/do-not-insult-the-intelligence-of-the-american-people-when-michael-bennet-lost-it-on-trump-s-cia-director-over-pete-hegseth-s-signal-chat-leaks/vi-AA1JoK3X?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=96aac5a6498248489f48d73cfb331f8b&ei=

placeholder

‘Do Not Insult The Intelligence Of The American People!’: When Michael Bennet Lost It On Trump’s CIA Director Over Pete Hegseth’s Signal Chat Leaks

During a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing held on March 25, 2025, Senator Michael Bennet (D-CO) harshly lambasted Trump’s CIA Director John Ratcliffe over Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s disastrous Signal group chat leaks. Bennet shouted at Ratcliffe, “it’s an embarrassment, you need to do better!”

****

Senator Bennet needs to review the definition of “RESPECT” and learn how to employ it in order to better manage his meetings. CIA Director Ratcliffe was his guest, after all?

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment