KOMMONSENTSJANE – WHO ARE THE LAW BREAKERS: OPINION: DEMOCRATS SAY NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW – EXCEPT ON IMMIGRATION??

2/20/2024

Humor

Google stop messin’ with the writer.

ttps://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/07/16/democrats-say-no-one-is-above-law-except-illegal-immigrants/

Do the DEMOCRAT vermin still stand on their following principal?

As Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) put it in a 2009 speech, that “illegal immigration is wrong, plain and simple.

Upsy-daisy?

******

This article was published more than 4 years ago

Opinion  Democrats say no one is above the law — except on immigration

By Marc A. Thiessen Columnist|

July 16, 2019 at 3:34 p.m. EDT

(Her mascara is showing.)

We have heard a lot about the importance of the rule of law from Democrats lately. During special counsel Robert S. Muller III’s investigation of President Trump, Democrats in Congress delivered a clear and unified message.

“No one is above the law, especially the president of the United States,” declared House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). “Donald Trump is the most corrupt president in our lifetime. … No one is above the law. Not even the president,” said Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). “Everyone should be held accountable. And the president is not above the law,” said Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif). Republicans “are basically saying that in America one man is above the law and that’s not a fact,” said Senate Minority Whip Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.). “No one is above the law [and] everybody ought to be held accountable,” said South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg.

No one, that is, except illegal immigrants.

Fast-forward to this past weekend, when the Trump administration announced that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers would soon begin enforcement actions to remove illegal immigrants who have been issued final deportation orders by a federal judge. Those same Democrats and the rest of their party delivered a clear and unified message.

“It’s so appalling, it’s outside the circle of civilized human behavior,” said Pelosi. “The Trump administration’s cruelty runs bone-deep. A Warren administration will not rip families apart to try and score political points,” said Warren. “The aim is to scare immigrant communities. … And so, he’s going to … do these raids which is a crime against humanity,” said Harris. “We are on your side, we stand with you together,” Durbin told activists protesting ICE enforcement. “It’s really designed to strike fear into people at a moment when fear is something we’ve got way too much of in this country,” said Buttigieg.

So, Democrats were for rule of law when it comes to the Mueller probe, which did not find that the president broke the law. But they are against rule of law when it comes illegal immigrants who have been found by a federal judge to be in violation of U.S. immigration law.

Illegal immigrants subject to ICE enforcement have been given their constitutional right to due process, with the right to a hearing in a federal immigration court and the right to be represented by counsel. If they show up at their hearing and are not granted relief by an immigration judge, they have the right to appeal. If they lose that appeal, they are issued a final order of removal. Once such an order is issued, they must either voluntarily depart the country or turn themselves in to an ICE facility for deportation. If they fail to depart or turn themselves in, then their case is referred to the ICE fugitive unit, which is tasked with finding them.

It is a long process to get to the point where ICE is knocking on someone’s door to enforce a final order of removal. Those now subject to a final deportation order either failed to show up to immigration court; showed up and lost their case; waived their right to appeal; lost their appeal; did not show up for their appeal hearing; were granted voluntary departure but did not leave; or failed to turn themselves in to ICE for court-ordered removal. In each case, a federal judge has ruled that they do not have the right to be in the United States and must leave. But Democratic leaders are now saying they should be allowed to stay, in contravention of our immigration laws.

Then again, Democrats didn’t think this way when they held the White House. President Barack Obama deported far more illegal immigrants than Trump. Axios reports that “under the Obama administration, total ICE deportations were above 385,000 each year in fiscal years 2009-2011, and hit a high of 409,849 in fiscal 2012.” I don’t recall Democrats in Congress accusing Obama of a “crime against humanity” or actions “outside the circle of civilized human behavior.”

Back then, Democrats agreed, as Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) put it in a 2009 speech, that “illegal immigration is wrong, plain and simple.” Since Trump took office, Democrats have become the party of illegal immigration. The want to decriminalize illegal border crossings, cut ICE detention beds to force the agency to release illegal immigrants and then refuse to enforce lawful deportation orders. So, it’s a little hard to take Democrats seriously when, in investigating Trump, they claim to be fighting for the principle that no one is above the law.

****

And now, and now:

THE BIGGEST LAW BREAKERS ARE????

DEMOCRATS! Worst since President Trump became the leader with their GET TRUMP.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – DERSHOWITZ: LETITIA JAMES “OUGHT TO BE BROUGHT UP BEFORE THE BAR”..

2/20/2024

ttps://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/02/14/prosecutors-reportedly-met-with-biden-admin-before-3-trump-indictments/

BREAKING FROM BREITBART:
Three separate prosecutors reportedly met with White House aides before indicting former President Donald Trump


>>> In Georgia: Radical Atlanta DA Fani Willis met with White House counsel twice – she indicted Trump NINE MONTHS LATER. 

>>> In Florida: Special Counsel in DC Jack Smith met with a member of Joe Biden’s counsel – he indicted Trump THREE MONTHS LATER.

>>> In New York: Far-Left Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg met with federal law enforcement – he indicted Trump TWO WEEKS LATER.

This is truly a jaw-dropping revelation. 

*****

My wording would be – She should be brought DOWN BEFORE THE BAR.

The main problem in our society is – these people get by with injustices. They didn’t earn their positions – MOST OF THEM ARE DEI’S – who were given every step in life and then consider themselves “special.” Give her an IQ test and see how she qualifies.

Dershowitz: Letitia James ‘Ought to Be Brought Up Before the Bar’

Dershowitz: Letitia James ‘Ought to Be Brought Up Before the Bar’© Provided by State Of The Union

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz criticized New York Attorney General Letitia James for her $350 million fine against Donald Trump, arguing on Hannity that she openly campaigned to “get Trump” and only pursued the case for political reasons.

Dershowitz said James should be brought before the bar for an elected prosecutor promising to target a particular defendant.

Sean Hannity said, “Professor Dershowitz, I’ll start with you. You wrote a best-selling book ‘Get Trump.’ Where did you get the title for that book?”

Dershowitz answered, “I didn’t make it up. I wish I were creative and original, but I got it from obviously Letitia James campaign. She ought to be brought up before the bar. You should not have an elected prosecutor campaigning on the promise to get a particular defendant. Now if she didn’t get him. She would lose the election.

“This is a variation of Stalin and Beria back in the 1930s when the head of the KGB says to Stalin, show me the man, I’ll find you the crime. This is — show me the man, we know who it is. She told us who it was, Donald Trump, and we’ll find you the fraud even though there was no harm,” he continued.

He noted there were no actual damages in the case against Trump, and that fines are usually reduced on appeal when no damages exist, yet James manipulated numbers to reach her desired result.

Dershowitz explained, “Say there’s a million dollars of damages, you can give $3 million fine. But when you have zero damages, no matter how many times you multiply it, zero plus and nth times whatever, is all still zero. So it it’s outrageous. Now, I don’t know whether it’s going to be reversed in the appellate division.”

“The appellate division is also elected judges mostly by Democrats in a county which is 85% Democrat. The New York Court of Appeals which is the highest court may indeed come and give justice generally fines like this are reduced considerably, and that may very well happen in this case,” suggested Dershowitz.

Dershowitz warned this politicization and weaponization of the justice system could discourage business people from running for office out of fear of partisan investigations.

“But this tells us so much about the politicization of our justice system, the weaponization of our system and it’s so dangerous because it will mean that business people are not going to want to run for office because they know if they run for office, partisans are going to go after them, investigate them, figure out some way of getting them like over-evaluating.”

He hopes appellate courts will closely scrutinize the ruling.

Dershowitz concluded, “You know, this is a judge, which over-evaluates when he wants to, $350 million for no damage, then under-evaluates when he wants to, Mar-a-Lago, $18 million. He’s just willing to manipulate the numbers to get him to the result he wanted. I hope the courts will look at this with a very, very, very stringent eye.”

*****

The Raw news writer has never been exposed to a real estate transaction(s). A good story would be the difference in what the tax rolls show, what the appraised value is in real time, and then the market value. Which would this writer take?

Stupid is as stupid does. This court case was just a joke to say anything to GET TRUMP. Will time show this person was corrupt?

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – HE’S SENILE – INTERNET SLAMS JOE BIDEN AS PUBLISHER ACKNOWLEDGES WHITE HOUSE FRUSTRATION OVER REPORTING ON PRESIDENT’S AG.

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/he-s-senile-internet-slams-joe-biden-as-publisher-acknowledges-white-house-frustration-over-reporting-on-president-s-age/ar-BB1iz4o4?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=9358672b82484e64ac5170bc2bfd8ea4&ei=20

'He's senile': Internet slams Joe Biden as publisher acknowledges White House frustration over reporting on president's age

‘He’s senile’: Internet slams Joe Biden as publisher acknowledges White House frustration over reporting on president’s age© Provided by Meaww

WASHINGTON, DC: The New York Times publisher said on Monday that the White House is “very upset” at the way the paper covered President Biden‘s low support ratings and voters’ worries about his age. 

In an interview with the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, AG Sulzberger said, “He is a historically unpopular incumbent and the oldest man to ever hold this office. We’ve reported on both of those realities extensively, and the White House has been extremely upset about it.”

Sulzberger vows to ‘continue to report fully and fairly’

The 43-year-old Sulzberger promised that his newspaper would “continue to report fully and fairly” despite the 81-year-old president’s staff’s criticism.

He explained, “We are not saying that this is the same as [former President Donald Trump‘s] five court cases or that they are even. They are different. But they are both true, and the public needs to know both those things.”

Concerns over Biden's memory and mental clarity have intensified in the wake of special counsel Robert Hur's critical report (Getty Images)

Concerns over Biden’s memory and mental clarity have intensified in the wake of special counsel Robert Hur’s critical report (Getty Images)© Provided by Meaww

In the wake of special counsel Robert Hur‘s critical report on the president’s handling of secret White House records, concerns over Biden’s memory and mental clarity have intensified.

Hur’s examination, which was made public earlier in February, discovered that throughout their two-day interview, Biden “did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended (‘if it was 2013 – when did I stop being Vice President?’), and forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term began (‘in 2009, am I still Vice President?’)”

Robert Hur's report stated that Joe Biden's memory appeared hazy when describing the Afghanistan debate that was once so important to him (Getty Images)

Robert Hur’s report stated that Joe Biden’s memory appeared hazy when describing the Afghanistan debate that was once so important to him (Getty Images)© Provided by Meaww

The report states, “He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died [May 2015]. And his memory appeared hazy when describing the Afghanistan debate that was once so important to him. Among other things, he mistakenly said he ‘had a real difference’ of opinion with General Karl Eikenberry, when, in fact, Eikenberry was an ally whom Mr Biden cited approvingly in his Thanksgiving [2009] memo to President Obama.”

Related video: Democrats use Trump to deflect concerns about Biden’s cognitive health (FOX News

FOX News

Democrats use Trump to deflect concerns about Biden’s cognitive health

White House spokesperson Ian Sams wrote a four-page letter to White House Correspondents’ Association President Kelly O’Donnell of NBC last week criticizing the New York Times and other media for their coverage of Hur’s article.

Internet slams Joe Biden for criticizing New York Times’ reporting

Many internet users took a jibe at President Biden as the White House got ‘extremely upset’ with its reporting on Biden’s age and poor polling. A user wrote on X, “He’s senile who cares his age,” while one added, “The White House wants only propaganda from the news.”

A person added, “Anyone who’s too mentally incapacitated to stand trial should not be in White House,” whereas one commented, “Yes, I’m sure “The White House” does. Not Biden – he doesn’t know what year it is – but the people actually in charge I’m sure are very upset that their power is hinging on the re-election of a cadaver.”

A person also mentioned, “Maybe if Biden could stop telling us he has been talking to dead people this would not be a problem.”

kommonsentsjane

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – GUTFIELD – A FINANCIAL COLUMNIST GOT CONNED OUT OF $50K.

2/20/2024

If it sounds too good to be true – it is!

Always, HANG UP!

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/money/savingandinvesting/gutfeld-a-financial-columnist-got-conned-out-of-50k/vi-BB1iyiWq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=c7d40bd040d7411c9e78291813f0614b&ei=40

Gutfeld: A financial columnist got conned out of $50K | Watch (msn.com)

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Money - KOMMONSENTSJANE - GUTFIELD - A FINANCIAL COLUMNIST GOT CONNED OUT OF $50K., Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment