There was no leak of data,” Lambert told ABC News in a statement. “I provided evidence of criminal acts to law enforcement. The Dominion file contained evidence of perjury by John Poulos, Dominion CEO, Honest Service Fraud, Wire fraud, etc. I’m on my way back to Michigan, and I look forward to truth and transparency for everyone.
According to Detroit News, her lawyer, Dan Hartman, had tried to get the warrant withdrawn claiming that her absence was due to communication issues with her former attorney.
Lambert was the focus of a status hearing Monday in the civil case after lawyers for Dominion requested to disqualify Lambert for allegedly violating a protective order.
The hearing is part of a lawsuit filed by Dominion against former President Donald Trump’s allies including Byrne, Rudy Giuliani, Mike Lindell, Sidney Powell and right-wing network OAN over allegations that they pushed false conspiracy theories that the voting machine company had helped to rig the 2020 presidential election in favor of Joe Biden. The defendants have denied any wrong doings.
Again – “There was no leak of data,” Lambert told ABC News in a statement. “I provided evidence of criminal acts to law enforcement. The Dominion file contained evidence of perjury by John Poulos, Dominion CEO, Honest Service Fraud, Wire fraud, etc. I’m on my way back to Michigan, and I look forward to truth and transparency for everyone.”
*****
3/19/2024
What took so long? Sure we believe they were missing?
Lambert insisted that the Dominion documents she encountered while under discovery were indicative of “crimes” and should be made public. Byrne supported her stance, suggesting that exposing a crime is obligatory, comparing the necessity to report finding inculpatory evidence such as a severed head to law enforcement.
Some times trying to be FAIR – smacks you in the noodle!
“What can have got into that precious noodle of thine?”
Watching Lemon was something I would never do on CNN. Lemon is so into himself that it is an insult to anyone’s intelligence to watch him perform his ritual.
Lemon is “disgusting.” I was so surprised when I read the news and saw that Musk was interviewed by him. My totem pole doesn’t go that far down. Now that I am reading the interview – all of his questions were to “try to bring Musk down to his level.” All of the questions were “word-salad” based with lemon juice sprinkled in between to fit his narrative.
Nothing good could ever come out of an interview with Lemon. He is a died in the wool Obama person.
“Elon Musk has canceled the partnership I had with X, which they announced as part of their public commitment to amplifying more diverse voices on their platform. He informed me of his decision hours after an interview I conducted with him on Friday,” Lemon, who was fired by CNN in 2023, said..
Tammy Bruce and Stephen Miller discuss former President Obama’s visit to the UK prime minister’s residence on ‘Hannity.’
3/18/2024
This man is an insult to every American’s intelligence. The words in this article is a description that every American should absorb.
This is a sick man and is incapable of making decisions and therefore we have his mentor, Obama/et al breaking the world apart. Look at Haiti/Africa. They were blown apart just like a bomb had been used. It is no different than our blue states. They don’t know how to lead and crime is just like a flaming fire.
Maybe you’ve noticed that the world has become markedly more unstable during Joe Biden’s tenure in office. Indeed, the precarity in which the U.S.-led world order finds itself is hard to miss.
Those who have somehow managed to avert their eyes from the many crises abroad rather than look upon Biden’s works and despair depend on the national media’s complicity to preserve their happy ignorance. National Review will not play along. That’s why I hope you’ll consider supporting our work by donating to our web.
This president entered office with the ignominious distinction of having been outspokenly wrong on just about every consequential matter relating to foreign affairs over the last half century, as NR chronicled. He went about earning his reputation as a blunderer on the world stage by engineering the disastrous and bloody withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan, setting the tone for the conflicts to come and handing that Central Asian state over to the Taliban. And while most in media have tired of chronicling Afghanistan’s devolution back into a safe haven in which Islamist terrorist outfits plot the renewed export of mass violence abroad, we have not.
That undeniable confirmation for the world’s revisionist forces that America was an exhausted power incapable of defending its interests for very long was swiftly followed on by Russia’s second invasion of Ukraine — a horrific war of territorial conquest unseen on the European continent since 1945. It seems as though few in the mainstream press can identify the extent to which Biden’s fecklessness contributed to Vladimir Putin’s test of Western resolve, even though both Russian and American government officials have connected the dots for them. That willful obtuseness may serve the political interests of those in power, but that’s all it does. National Review will not placate those whose political careers are built on the premise that they can advance their own interests by sacrificing America’s.
Related video: President Biden has ‘definitively’ caused global conflict: Christian Whiton (Fox Business)
Confusion reigns similarly when the American Left and its allies in media survey the chaos in the Middle East and see only rational actors responding with, perhaps, excess zeal to the sin of Israel’s very existence. Open the aperture, and we see a region that erupted in violence almost at the instant that Hamas unleashed a wave of inhuman brutality like nothing seen in generations — violence all but wholly attributable to Iran. Hamas is an Iranian proxy. So, too, are the Houthis, who have waged a campaign of terror and piracy in the Red Sea so successful that it represents a real challenge to American hegemony and its guarantee of free maritime navigation rights. Iran maintains similar operational control over the Shiite militias that have launched over 200 attacks on U.S. soldiers in the region, killing three and injuring scores more. Where others obfuscate to preserve the comforting fiction that Israel is the cause of all the region’s ills, we will not.
And looming ever larger on the horizon is the prospect that China will take maximum advantage of the window of opportunity provided by a weak presence in the Oval Office. In the meantime, Beijing makes no pretense of its support for all these and many more challenges to American dominance. It enjoys immunity from Houthi aggression, and it provides Iran with material support for its regional aggression in kind. China and its allies in North Korea arm and train with Russian military forces, which are supported by the lethal drones manufactured in Iran. Beijing’s efforts to supplant the U.S. in the Middle East — as evinced by its efforts to broker a rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia in 2023 — are materially advanced by Hamas’s terrorism. China and its illiberal allies seek to restore the “Palestinian issue” to a place of prominence, from which the Abraham Accords took it.
It is all one conflict. Despite their parochial disagreements, America’s enemies are united in their effort to put the age of U.S. hegemony to an end. That Manichaean binary discomfits those who prefer to believe America’s challenges abroad can be isolated and compartmentalized. The consequences if they’re wrong are too terrible to imagine, so they simply don’t. We do.
Biden’s fatal conceit is one against which National Review has railed since its founding: the grave error of “internationalism” that William F. Buckley opposed at the outset of this venture in 1955. It’s a tendency manifesting today as much in useless multinational talk shops as in rudderless military coalitions in which the United States meekly leads “from behind.” We are as true to our mission today as we were nearly 70 years ago. “We must preserve a forward-leaning posture abroad — better to counter threats before they come to our shores — and an American-led system of alliances as a force multiplier,” NR’s statement of priorities reads. “Our overwhelming priority is advancing our national interests.” And we know that yours is, too.
For that reason, we hope you will consider either donating directly to our for-profit publication, National Review (these contributions are not tax deductible), or making a tax-deductible gift to National Review Institute, the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit journalistic think tank that supports NR’s efforts and is busily incubating a new generation of remarkable conservative thinkers. Or, of course, you may give to both. Thank you for your consideration and assistance. We could not do it without you.
***
May God intervene and help us because it looks like the right folks are the only ones concerned.
Biden states at DC roast that of 2 presidential candidates one was mentally unfit – the other one is me? This is Biden speaking the truth for once.
The release of President Biden’s latest monstrous budget “plan” (largely a reprise of last year’s) proves Bank-Breaker Joe is still at it — happy to promise the moon to buy his way to victory, all fiscal responsibility be damned.
None of the numbers really means anything, it’s just a “vision” of how he’d spend $7.3 trillion in one year, to be offset with $5.5 trillion in tax hikes.
There’s massive green spending (beloved by the Dem base), like $23 billion in “climate adaptation and resilience” across an alphabet soup of fed agencies, $7.5 billion for “rural renewable energy projects” (jam the wind and solar farms in the sticks: They’re not voting Democratic, anyway) and around $1.5 billion for “environmental justice efforts” (green pork for urban activists, for sure).
A scheme for price controls to magically cap out-of-pocket drug costs at $2,000 for all private health plans, pitched as a bribe to 189 million Americans if any of the details actually worked (in a “budget plan,” of course, such questions are out of bounds).
A move to kill the origination fee on federal student loans, costing about $19 billion over the next 10 years. Hey, it wouldn’t be a Biden budget without a student-loan giveaway, even if higher-end families get most of the benefits.
An unprecedented $258 billion on “affordable” housing, including $10 billion to help homebuyers whose parents don’t own homes — in other words, a naked bribe to the less well-off locked out of the housing market by the massive interest rates that Biden’s policies have produced.
How does the president pretend to pay for all this?
By slamming corporations and billionaires, of course.
He’d hike the minimum tax rate for billion-dollar companies to 21% and the general corporate tax rate to 28%, while adding punitive taxes on stock buybacks and a supposed “wealth tax,” a 25% minimum income tax for people with net worth above $100 million.
None of this is stuff he tried to actually pass when Democrats controlled Congress his first two years; at least some of it (like the wealth tax) is blatantly unconstitutional; it’s got as much to do with reality as Biden’s whoppers about his teen faceoff with gang leader “Corn Pop” or his insistence he never had a thing to do with son Hunter’s “business.”
It’s a campaign document, and not even a serious one.
And like everything else Biden has done to try stanch the electoral bleeding — blaming the GOP for the border crisis he caused; denouncing Israel’s “excesses” in Gaza to appease pro-Hamas Democrats — it’s desperate, foolish and utterly partisan.
This plan, with its massive handouts, would only drive prices up and thus force the Fed to keep rates high.
So as economics, it’s nonsense; as politics, it’s just a pack of symbols meant to show that Biden stands for . . . exactly the same things he has since taking office.
Related video: President Biden has ‘definitively’ caused global conflict: Christian Whiton (Fox Business)
Fox Business
