KOMMONSENTSJANE – THE PEACEMAKER…

8/19/2025 PM

Reblogged on kommonsentsjane.

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Time For A Pause! →

KOMMONSENTSJANE – President Trump Reveals 10 Striking Takeaways From Putin Summit.

Posted on August 17, 2025 by kommonsentsjane

8/17/2025

****

8/19/2025

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-painfully-obvious-truth-about-trump-s-capitulation-opinion/ar-AA1KNjBG?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=7e3bc0799230457e8614e6d680fe076f&ei=8

https://thefederalist.com/2023/06/07/exclusive-bill-barr-confirms-rep-jamie-raskin-lied-about-biden-family-corruption-investigation/

ttps://thefederalist.com/2023/06/07/exclusive-bill-barr-confirms-rep-jamie-raskin-lied-about-biden-family-corruption-investigation/

EXCLUSIVE: Barr Confirms Raskin Lied About Biden Bribery Probe

Why are the Democrats so afraid of a peace deal between Russia/Ukraine? Is it because of the Democrats/Biden investigation being exposed in their dealings with Ukraine?

How many years have we been down this Democrat “road of despair?” The left has worked so hard to destroy “the peace-maker” – twenty-four hours a day – since we knew after Bush I’s throat cut they were in bed with the Democrats. During the Obama/Biden’s administration, they tried to destroy him and we know that story well, especially now with the DOJ/grand jury road show exposing all of their crimes, one by one. The lefties think if they keep trying “make him sick” after not exposing the real sickie person, Biden, they will get rid of him.

So, day in day out, they have strived to print after print – that something is wrong with our President. Nothing he does makes them feel good – only evil. But, yet, Biden was not sick even one day while in office. Now they seemed to have become physicians over night and give us a daily dose of symptoms.

So, the following is no different.

|It seems the Democrats are the sick ones who need help.

Why is all of this so important – because with the DOJ/Grand Jury, it will part the waves of those who were responsible for the demise of our country under the Democrats non-leadership.

It tell us a lot when the Democrats state – President Trump did not get anything? What was he supposed to get – he is only the “go between” to pull two sides together?

Peacemaker – a person who brings about peace, especially by reconciling adversaries.

****

I don’t know why, but few are saying what’s plainly obvious about the president’s “summit” with his Russian counterpart. He’s afraid of him.

Donald Trump made all kinds of noise about “severe consequences” that Vladimir Putin would face if he did not agree to a ceasefire with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the war in Ukraine.

Trump created conditions, however feeble they may have seemed, in which he appeared to negotiate from a position of strength. “I’ve solved six wars in the last six months,” he said before the trip, all lies.

Then, when the moment came, nothing. Trump got nothing.

Not so for Putin.

“The extraordinary meeting at Anchorage’s Elmendorf Air Force base has ended Putin’s pariah status and brought Washington’s stance on the war closer to Moscow’s,” the Financial Times reported Saturday.

“And Putin did not need to budge an inch.”

Liberals and Democrats tend to think Donald Trump gets along with Putin due to them being birds of a feather. Putin is a strongman. Trump is a strongman. Both love power. Both hate liberal democracy. While true, that doesn’t explain the president’s dramatic heel-turn.

But fear does.

The White House clearly believed it was important, not only for the meeting but for the president’s image at home, for him to look strong beforehand. Professor Heather Cox Richardson has the context:

Related video: Trump’s Ukraine Pledge: Day One Turns Into 50-Day Ultimatum For Putin (Newsweek)

Newsweek

Trump’s Ukraine Pledge: Day One Turns Into 50-Day Ultimatum For Putin0

View on Watch

“US envoy Steve Witkoff had been visiting Moscow for months to talk about a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine when he heard through a back channel that Putin might be willing to talk to Trump in person to offer a deal. On August 6, after a meeting in Moscow, Witkoff announced that Russia was ready to retreat from some of the land it occupies in Ukraine. This apparent concession came just two days before the August 8 deadline Trump had set for severe sanctions against Russia unless it agreed to a ceasefire.”

But then, Putin said not gonna happen. Moreover, Putin said Trump really got a raw deal with the 2020 election. He totally won. So unfair! And with that combo of flex and flattery, Putin “got what he wanted — to play for time and press his military advantage over Ukraine,” exiled Russian political scientist Ilya Matveyev told the Financial Times.

Here’s how it looked to Fox reporter Jacqui Heinrich: “The way that it felt in the room was not good. It did not seem like things went well. And it seemed like Putin came in and steamrolled, got right into what he wanted to say and got his photo next to the president and then left.”

She went on:

“Of course, that is only the piece of the picture we have right now and certainly President Trump, who is the host and who is the president, would not want to enable something that would make him look weak.”

Too late.

Now the president can be “safely ignored,” Anne Applebaum wrote.

“If the US is not willing to use any economic, military, or political tools to help Ukraine, if Trump will not put any diplomatic pressure on Putin or any new sanctions on Russian resources, then the US president’s fond wish to be seen as a peacemaker can be safely ignored,” she said

She even enumerated the moments of disgrace.

“It was embarrassing for Americans to welcome a notorious wanted war criminal on their territory. It was humiliating to watch an American president act like a happy puppy upon encountering the dictator of a much poorer, much less important state, treating him as a superior. It’s excruciating to imagine how badly Trump’s diplomatic envoy … misunderstood his last meeting with Putin in Moscow if he thought that the Alaska summit was going to be successful.”

I don’t know if Putin has something on the president (kompromat). I don’t know if Trump is in Putin’s pocket. I can speculate, but I don’t know. What I do know is Trump talked a good game and choked. I know he humiliated himself and America. And I know something else.

All this is rooted in cowardice. It’s safe to attack friends, because they won’t fight back, because they’re friends, but it’s not safe to attack enemies, because they will fight back, and because they are enemies.

Trump’s MO has always been to do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, to whomever he wants, safe in the knowledge that no one has the will to stop him. That holds up as long as the “no one” in question is American or an American ally. Actual enemies, though? Nuh-uh.

Trump was “very tough” with Zelensky the last time he was at the Oval Office. (He will probably be “very tough” with him today.) But that’s because Trump knows that Zelensky will never fight back, as Zelensky needs America’s support to defeat an even more malicious opponent.

But Putin?

He gets smiles, handshakes, the red-carpet treatment. He gets photos of himself riding in “The Beast)” with the United States president and of American troops seeming to kneel in front of his plane, all of which is for the purpose of make believing back home that Russia is once again America’s equal and that the glory days of empire are soon to return.

All because Trump is scared.

It’s a pattern we’ve seen so often Robert Armstrong came up with an acronym to memorialize it: TACO or “Trump Always Chickens Out.” Trump “does not have a very high tolerance for market and economic pressure, and will be quick to back off when tariffs cause pain,” he said.

Same thing with foreign affairs. According to one analysis, Trump has threatened “severe consequences” 22 times against adversaries, but pulled the trigger just twice. He has chickened out even in the face of America’s weakest foes. For instance, the Taliban conceded absolutely nothing in exchange for American troops leaving the country in 2021.

Liberals and Democrats spend a lot of time thinking about the unseen. Is Trump compromised? Is he in Russian pay? And so on. But we don’t spend enough time on the seen, which is damning enough all by itself.

Trump is the biggest chicken on the planet.

Putin knows it.

If only the Democrats would come around.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Bank executives blow the whistle on how Obama, Biden admins pressured them to debank conservatives.

08/18/2025

Fox Business

Story by David Spector

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bank-executives-blow-the-whistle-on-how-obama-biden-admins-pressured-them-to-debank-conservatives/ar-AA1KNxWG?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=d98e7a8fafcf4f3088aa99c0938f4f10&ei=51

Fox Business

Coinbase chief policy officer lauds Trump’s executive order targeting debanking.

View on Watch

In the wake of President Donald Trump‘s executive order outlawing debanking, major bank executives told Fox News Digital that they were under pressure by the Obama and Biden administrations to deny services to individuals and businesses for political reasons. 

“Those pressures were very, very real. When your regulator gives you a suggestion, it’s not a suggestion, it’s an order. The political stuff is very real, those pressures are real,” a senior banking executive told Fox News Digital.Open A CD with 4.40% Interest - These Banks Pay up to 4.40%

Debanking refers to the practice of banks closing accounts or denying services to individuals or businesses, often with no explanation. The practice originated as part of federal anti-money laundering laws and regulations. An entity can be debanked after its transactions are marked suspicious, but in recent years, conservative and religious groups have accused banks of discriminating against them for their beliefs. 

Fox News Digital spoke with two executives at leading U.S. banks, who asked to remain anonymous, fearing reprisals. President Trump claims he was a victim of debanking. Getty Images

President Trump claims he was a victim of debanking. Getty Images© Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

RED STATE OFFICIAL RECOUNTS PERSONAL EXPERIENCE OF BEING ‘DEBANKED’ AND WHY IT ‘HAS TO BE STOPPED’

The executives said that ambiguity in federal laws was exploited by regulators under the Obama and Biden administrations in order to pursue political objectives. According to one executive, banks were pressured to deny services to certain industries as part of Operation Choke Point and Operation Choke Point 2.0.

“When there’s ambiguity in the law, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and for a long time the beholder was the Obama and Biden administration,” the official said. 

A House Oversight Committee report found that “Operation Choke Point,” a DOJ task force whose aim was to “choke out” legal companies disfavored by the Obama administration, worked with bank regulators to label certain industries, including firearms sales, as “high risk.”

Trump ended “Operation Choke Point” in 2017 during his first term. However, a House Financial Services Committee hearing last week heard accusations that former President Joe Biden had rebooted the initiative and targeted crypto firms for debanking as part of “Operation Choke Point 2.0.” 

Trump claimed to be a victim of debanking, and accused JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and others of refusing more than $1 billion in his deposits. First lady Melania Trump wrote in her memoir that she and her son Barron were debanked, as well.The S&P’s Top Performer Is in Our Portfolio

“I was shocked and dismayed to learn that my long‑time bank decided to terminate my account and deny my son the opportunity to open a new one. … This decision appeared to be rooted in political discrimination, raising serious concerns about civil rights violations,” Melania wrote.President Obama's "Operation Chokepoint" was accused by a congressional report of having targeted legal businesses for debanking. Getty Images

President Obama’s “Operation Chokepoint” was accused by a congressional report of having targeted legal businesses for debanking. Getty Images© Getty Images

“We welcome the Trump administration’s efforts to provide regulatory clarity to banks. We’ve provided detailed proposals and will continue to work with the administration and Congress to improve the regulatory framework,” Bank of America told Fox News Digital in a statement. 

Former Republican senator Sam Brownback accused JPMorgan Chase of having debanked his nonprofit, the National Committee for Religious Freedom, in 2022. JPMorgan maintains that they never engaged in political debanking, but updated their code of conduct to state that they do not discriminate based on political views or religious beliefs in 2025 — which the bank stated was merely the codification of existing policy. 

“We don’t close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed. We’re pleased to see the White House is addressing this issue, for which we’ve been advocating for many years, and look forward to working with them to get this right,” a JPMorgan representative told Fox News Digital in a statement.

According to Inspire Investing CFA Tim Schwarzenberger, whose firm has been deeply involved with combating debanking, banks would use the criteria of “reputational risk” to deny services to politically disfavored groups and individuals. 

Trump’s order, entitled “Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans,” which he signed Thursday, promised to ban banks from denying services to a customer based off of their political views or other beliefs. The order prohibits banks from using “reputational risk” as a criterion to deny someone services in a politicized way. CitiGroup has committed to combat the practice of debanking. Getty Images

CitiGroup has committed to combat the practice of debanking. Getty Images© Getty Images

HERE’S WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT DEBANKING, THE UN-AMERICAN ABUSE OF POWER BY REGULATORS

“The executive order really is a breakthrough moment,” Schwarzenberger told Fox News Digital. 

Another senior banking executive said that negative news coverage was considered criteria for “reputational risk.” During the period between the 2020 presidential election and Trump’s return to the Oval Office in 2024, he was subject to a flurry of lawsuits and negative press. Banks, according to the official, responding to the wishes of regulators, would use the negative press directed at conservatives as a pretext to debank them.

“It’s all kind of set up, it’s like somebody set the table, and it all ends up focusing on Republicans and conservatives,” the executive said.

The executive added that banks were under constant regulatory pressure to file more “suspicious activity reports,” reports submitted to the Treasury about unusual banking activity, and to debank more customers. He said the regulators didn’t need to explicitly tell banks to deny services to any particular individual or business. The administration’s preferences were well known, and the banks were expected to comply.Trump's executive order would prohibit the use of "reputational risk" as a means of politicized debanking. Getty Images

Trump’s executive order would prohibit the use of “reputational risk” as a means of politicized debanking. Getty Images© Getty Images

The first banking executive said that while regulators may have good intentions, their worldviews would inevitably influence their decisions and that there were “real reasons to think there was political considerations.” Rather than get on the wrong side of the regulators, banks would preemptively refuse to take certain clients. 

“It’s better for us to just not take on certain business if we suspect an examiner can come in and say six months ago you shouldn’t have taken this client,” the bank official told Fox News Digital. 

Schwarzenberger told Fox News Digital that there is reason for optimism that debanking for political reasons will become a thing of the past, and pointed to commitments that banks made on their own before Trump’s executive order was issued.

In addition to JPMorgan, Bank of America, CitiGroup and PNC Bank have all taken steps to reassure customers that they do not discriminate based on political or religious views. 

When reached for comment, Citi referred Fox News Digital to a June statement which said that the bank “has always been fully committed to treating all current and potential clients fairly, and we have policies, procedures and controls in place for this express purpose.”

PNC declined to comment. 

Representatives for Obama and Biden didn’t respond to a request for comment. 

Original article source: Bank executives blow the whistle on how Obama, Biden admins pressured them to debank conservatives

****

This is what happens when the voters elect people who do not follow the Constitution or do not have American values. Think about that when you vote. Think about what DOGE found out how crooked the Biden/Obama administrations were.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – What Has Our First Lady Done to You To Be So Disrespectable? Grandma Jackie Is Probably Turning Over In Her Grave.

8/19/2025

Lack of common sense? Careful what you post, it follows your future ambitions.

(1) Jack Schlossberg on X: “A message from our BEAUTIFUL FIRST LADY thank you for your attention to this matter !! https://t.co/5Dwv6ye1vJ” / X

08/18/2025

The young man better go to the grave yard and check on Grandma.

As a citizen of this great country and as children our Mother taught us to respect our President and his First Lady. Your Grandma was respected and we loved her and your Grandpa even though we were Republicans. So, I am so disappointed in your actions to show such disrespect to our current First Lady. Also, after reading Melania’s letter, what did you not understand is what is concerning? It was in English with words put together with the alphabet. Now, I am worried?

Now, what did you get from this show of disrespect for our First Lady? Was it the attention you wanted? Your party is in disarray. Maybe this attention should have been used to help your party from becoming a Progressive/Muslim country or better still help your party get on its feet and “save our DEMOCRACY.”

What happened to the real Democratic Party – do you know?

Is it time to take a course in “RESPECT?” Or, maybe an apology?

****

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jfk-s-grandson-dons-blonde-wig-to-mock-melania-trump/ar-AA1KK4Gj?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=68a3592aaf274984aaab95ea62bb9274&ei=19

L: First lady Melania Trump listens as U.S. President Donald Trump (not pictured) delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House on July 04, 2025 in Washington, DC. R: Jack Schlossberg speaks on stage during the second day of the Democratic National Convention at the United Center on August 20, 2024 in Chicago, Illinois.

L: First lady Melania Trump listens as U.S. President Donald Trump (not pictured) delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House on July 04, 2025 in Washington, DC. R: Jack Schlossberg speaks on stage during the second day of the Democratic National Convention at the United Center on August 20, 2024 in Chicago, Illinois.© Samuel Corum/Getty Images/Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Jack Schlossberg, the grandson of the late President John F. Kennedy, recently shared a video on Instagram where he donned a blonde wig and read aloud First Lady Melania Trump‘s letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin, mocking her.

Newsweek has reached out to a representative for Melania Trump and to Schlossberg outside of regular working hours via email for comment.

Why It Matters

In a letter shared to the first lady’s social media, Melania Trump appealed to Putin to “singlehandedly restore” the “melodic laughter” of children caught up in the nearly three-and-a-half years of full-scale war in Ukraine.

The letter comes as President Donald Trump met with Putin in Alaska, as relations have soured due to Russia’s refusal to ink a ceasefire deal brokered by the U.S. to stop fighting in Ukraine. Though no deal was reached, Trump has described the summit as “useful,” pivoting his position on a ceasefire and saying that he would move straight to a permanent peace deal.

Ukraine has consistently said it wants to end the full-scale war in a lasting way. The current phase of the conflict sparked when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022.

What To Know

Schlossberg, 32, is a Harvard graduate, and his parents are JFK’s only surviving child, Caroline Kennedy, and her husband, Edwin Schlossberg. He regularly goes viral online and is known for using his social media to speak about politics and against Trump.

In the video, which has been viewed over 200,000 times as of reporting, Schlossberg dons a blonde wig and imitates Melania Trump’s accent, reading her letter aloud.

Toward the end of the video, Schlossberg criticizes the letter and says, “What am I saying, this makes no sense. Please be more specific, Miss Melania Trump.”

(Correction – she is MRS. MELANIA TRUMP,)

The video is consistent with the content Schlossberg usually shares. He has shared videos mocking public figures before, including a video impersonating White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.

Melania Trump’s letter has seen a mixed response, with some criticizing the gesture from the first lady, and others sharing messages of support.

What People Are Saying

Jack Schlossberg, speaking in his video shared to Instagram: “That was my dramatic reading of Melania Trump’s letter to President Putin. I don’t think it made any sense, I don’t think it said anything… A very confusing letter, a very confusing message, not that confusing of a conflict in Ukrain

Melania Trump, in her letter to Vladimir Putin: “A simple yet profound concept, Mr. Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation’s descendants begin their lives with a purity – an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology…. In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone – you serve humanity itself. Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today.”

@JohnMcCloy, in a post viewed on X over 180,000 times: “Putin was given a letter from First Lady Melania Trump requesting for him to end the war for the safety of the Children. I’ll bet it was very impactful and meant a lot coming from Melania Trump.”

@DesireeAmerica4 in a post viewed over 15,000 times on X: “It’s her most diplomatic, most humanist message yet. And it shows why she quietly serves as one of Trump’s most profound advisers and First lady.”

@TheMaineWonk in a post on X viewed over 84,000 times: “Trump down so bad, he enlisted Melania to try and bring Putin back to the negotiating table. Sad!”

What’s Next

Zelensky will meet Trump in the White House on Monday, along with European leaders and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. It is currently unclear how much progress will come out of the White House talks and whether Zelensky’s trip will bring a deal closer.

****

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/first-lady-melania-trumps-peace-letter-putin-it-time?msockid=2af1f5ca0eae6a0012ece0830f8b6bda

ttps://www.foxnews.com/politics/first-lady-melania-trumps-peace-letter-putin-it-time?msockid=2af1f5ca0eae6a0012ece0830f8b6bda

Melania’s Letter to President Putin:

Melania Trump

First Lady Melania Trump’s ‘peace letter’ to Putin: ‘It is time’

Fox News Digital exclusively obtains copy of first lady’s ‘peace letter’ to Putin

 By Brooke Singman Fox News

Published 

Only President Trump could force Putin to the negotiating table, says Nile Gardiner

Panelists Philip Breedlove and Nile Gardiner discuss their takeaways from the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Listen to this article

EXCLUSIVEFirst Lady Melania Trump wrote a “peace letter” to Russian President Vladimir Putin telling him “it is time” to protect children and future generations around the globe, Fox News Digital has learned.

Fox News Digital exclusively obtained the “peace letter” the first lady penned to Putin, which  President Trump hand-delivered to the Russian leader before their summit in Alaska, Fox News Digital has learned.

TRUMP RATES PUTIN SUMMIT A ’10 OUT OF 10′ AND TOUTS ‘VERY GOOD PROGRESS’ TOWARD PEACE

Immediately upon receiving the letter, Putin read it as the American and Russian delegations looked on.

Melania Trump

Full portrait of First Lady Melania Trump. (White House)

“Dear President Putin,” the first lady’s letter begins. “Every child shares the same quiet dreams in their heart, whether born randomly into a nation’s rustic countryside or a magnificent city-center. They dream of love, possibility, and safety from danger.”

“As parents, it is our duty to nurture the next generation’s hope,” the letter continued. “As leaders, the responsibility to sustain our children extends beyond the comfort of a few.”

“Undeniably, we must strive to paint a dignity-filled world for all—so that every soul may wake to peace, and so that the future itself is perfectly guarded,” read the letter. “A simple yet profound concept, Mr. Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation’s descendants begin their lives with a purity—an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology.”

https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/08/peace-letter.pdf

The first lady continued that “in today’s world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them—a silent defiance against the forces that can potentially claim their future.” 

TRUMP REVEALS 10 STRIKING TAKEAWAYS FROM PUTIN SUMMIT IN HANNITY INTERVIEW

“Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter,” the first lady wrote. “In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone—you serve humanity itself.”

“Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today,” she wrote. “It is time.”

Mrs. Trump’s “peace letter” was written ahead of her husband’s historic meeting with Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, Friday. The high-stakes meeting was the first U.S.-Russia summit since June 2021, which was under former President Joe Biden’s administration and only eight months before Putin invaded Ukraine. 

Though Trump and Putin had not met in person in years prior to Friday, they have spoken on the phone numerous times this year to discuss an end to the Russia’s war with Ukraine.

Putin and Trump shake hands

President Donald Trump greets Russia’s President Vladimir Putin, Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/The Associated Press)

Following the meeting, President Trump, said the summit was “extremely productive,” but that the parties were “not there yet” on ending the war. 

“There were many, many points that we agreed on, most of them, I would say,” Trump told the press following the meeting. “A couple of big ones that we haven’t quite gotten there, but we’ve made some headway. So, there’s no deal until there’s a deal.”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected to travel to Washington D.C. to meet with President Trump on Monday. 

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Court Split Leaves Trump’s Civil Fraud Appeal Stuck in Slow Lane.

08/18/2025

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/court-split-leaves-trump-s-civil-fraud-appeal-stuck-in-slow-lane/ar-AA1KIITl?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=b9f5ca0042144ebdbfa62e3ae2fc3634&ei=72

Time to split the peas. Letitia James is part of the “Get Trump Crowd” and they were all peeing in the same pot. What does she know about the value of real estate? We all value our property in terms of value differently and value it higher than the person actually making the determination. Real estate has varying costs because the owner knows how much he has actually invested in time and money. Also, when you have more than one person interested in a given property, a bidding war can ensue – which happens in many important pieces of property. This will cause the property to be sold at a higher price.

As a former second job real estate person, it happens every day.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ny-ag-letitia-james-subpoenaed-by-justice-department-over-454m-civil-fraud-case-against-trump/ar-AA1KaoVe?ocid=BingNewsSerp

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ny-ag-letitia-james-subpoenaed-by-justice-department-over-454m-civil-fraud-case-against-trump/ar-AA1KaoVe?ocid=BingNewsSerp

Wasn’t this part of the LAW FARE, whereby James has been found out and is part of this gang of thieves?

NY AG Letitia James subpoenaed by Justice Department over $454M civil fraud case against Trump

New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, sued Trump in 2022, alleging he fraudulently inflated the value of parts of his real-estate empire for financial benefit, primarily lower-interest loans. Justice Arthur Engoron presided over a monthslong civil trial and ruled James proved her case, which relied upon a state statute that grants the attorney general broad authority to investigate “persistent fraud or illegality” in business.

****

For President Trump, the fraud case is his main private legal headache.

For President Trump, the fraud case is his main private legal headache.© Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The New York court weighing President Trump’s appeal of a roughly $500 million civil-fraud judgment typically acts swiftly and unanimously, with many of its decisions coming within weeks after hearing arguments.

Trump’s experience stands out as an unusual exception.

A five-justice panel has yet to render a decision nearly a year after taking up the case, leaving him and his business in limbo. Behind the scenes, members of the panel have been divided, and three of them have been writing opinions, according to people familiar with the matter. It couldn’t be determined how they are split. Justices do occasionally shift their positions, and the number of opinions could change the people said.

A spokesman for the New York state court system said it doesn’t comment on pending litigation. A spokesman for Trump’s legal team said, “It is time for the New York Courts to step in and end this witch hunt once and for all.”

For the New York Appellate Division’s First Department, the Trump matter is among the most high-profile cases in its history, and the outcome could influence future business regulation in the state. For Trump, whose legal entanglements largely faded after his return to the White House, the fraud case is his main private legal headache. At stake isn’t only the half-billion dollar penalty, growing by the day with interest, but the possibility that his sons could be barred from running his family company in the near term. The president asks regularly why the court hasn’t ruled, said people who speak to him.If the appellate court upholds the trial judge’s decision, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump would be barred from holding a position as an officer of a New York company for two years.

If the appellate court upholds the trial judge’s decision, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump would be barred from holding a position as an officer of a New York company for two years.© Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, sued Trump in 2022, alleging he fraudulently inflated the value of parts of his real-estate empire for financial benefit, primarily lower-interest loans. Justice Arthur Engoron presided over a monthslong civil trial and ruled James proved her case, which relied upon a state statute that grants the attorney general broad authority to investigate “persistent fraud or illegality” in business.

The judge in February 2024 ordered Trump to pay more than $350 million plus interest and imposed an array of other sanctions that restricted the Trump Organization from borrowing money and effectively prohibited Trump’s two eldest sons from running the business for two years. Trump quickly appealed, and the First Department put those restrictions on hold while it considered the case.

The appeals court heard arguments this past September, and some of the judges’ questions appeared favorable to Trump. One wondered whether there should be some “guardrails” on the attorney general’s power. Another questioned the size of the judgment. “The immense penalty in this case is troubling,” said Justice Peter Moulton. A lawyer for James defended it: “There was a lot of fraud.”

Other justices appeared to see James’s lawsuit as within the bounds of the law, despite the Trump lawyers’ arguments that banks didn’t lose money and no victims were harmed. Presiding Justice Dianne Renwick noted the statute refers to “persistent fraud or illegality,” but not harm.

Lengthy waits and disagreeing judges are a common occurrence on some appeals courts. But recent leadership of the First Judicial Department, which reviews thousands of lower-court decisions and motions annually, has emphasized speed.

The First Department typically issues decisions within 30 days, according to a 2024 court report. For each of the past five years, that report said, the court began its new annual session each September with zero pending and undecided appeals.

“Is this normal? No,” said Bill White, a lawyer at appellate consulting firm Counsel Press. “This is something I imagine they are anxious to have on their docket for so long, with everyone’s expectation and the pressure building.”

Alongside that promptness has come unanimity. From 2024 through this July, the court decided roughly 2,900 appeals, according to an analysis of public court data. Only about two dozen of those rulings—or less than .01%—came with a recorded dissent.

If the court upholds the trial judge’s decision, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. would be barred from holding a position as an officer of a New York company for two years. Trump and his company for three years couldn’t apply for loans from financial institutions registered in New York. The losing side can appeal to the state’s highest court.

The wait has cost the company. It is paying a court-appointed monitor, the former federal judge Barbara Jones, whom Trump lawyers previously accused of charging “exorbitant fees” amounting to more than $2.6 million over 14 months. On top of that, Trump has paid more than $2 million in fees on the bond he secured to guarantee the judgment while he appeals, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The panel hearing the Trump appeal includes four judges appointed by Democratic governors and one Republican appointee, David Friedman, who is regarded as among the most conservative of the court’s 21 members. The court’s presiding justice, Renwick, also on the panel, is viewed as a stalwart liberal who has an institutional interest in seeking consensus and guarding the court’s reputation.

Write to Corinne Ramey at corinne.ramey@wsj.com

****

kommonsntsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment