KOMMONSENTSJANE – Outrage as National Guard Insiders Reveal They Were Primed for J6 Action, Only to be Held Back by Pentagon Bureaucracy!

4/16/2024

ttps://freedomphase.com/outrage-as-national-guard-insiders-reveal-they-were-primed-for-j6-action-only-to-be-held-back-by-pentagon-bureaucracy/

What took so long for the truth to surface? They are blaming the Pentagon when they all are to blame for Pelosi’s movie produced by her daughter. So, they could put the blame to GET TRUMP! Now it is time to finalize the Durham Report.

******

Outrage as National Guard Insiders Reveal They Were Primed for J6 Action, Only to be Held Back by Pentagon Bureaucracy!

 Logan Sheffield

 Daily

 April 14, 2024

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Washington DC Mayor Muriel Bowser have come under fire for their controversial decisions regarding the security situation leading up to the infamous events of January 6th at the US Capitol. Reports suggest that both Pelosi and Bowser rejected the idea of deploying National Guard troops at the Capitol on this critical day, with political motives supposedly influencing their actions.

Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund had sought approval from House and Senate security officials to have the D.C. National Guard ready for potential backup. However, his plea fell on deaf ears as Pelosi, Bowser, and other government officials dismissed his request.

This refusal came despite receiving multiple warnings weeks in advance about potential violence at the planned rallies on January 6th. It’s clear that these warnings were not taken seriously enough.

The FBI under Chris Wray has also been held accountable for failing to adequately alert the Trump administration and cabinet secretaries about the potential for violence similar to mass protests at the Capitol. Moreover, reports suggest that Pelosi specifically declined National Guard presence at the Capitol due to her political agenda.

John Solomon of Just The News recently unveiled information about warnings given to Capitol Police about possible violence two weeks prior to January 6th.

In addition, a report by The Daily Mail highlighted forthcoming testimonies from National Guard members who were prepared for deployment on January 6 but were restrained by orders from the Pentagon.

The Daily Mail reported:

Whistleblowers from the Washington D.C. National Guard will tell Congress that Donald Trump did want them deployed during the Capitol riot and the Army delayed telling them to mobilize in a bombshell hearing next week.

DailyMail.com can exclusively reveal that at least three officers will appear Wednesday before a House subcommittee to claim their stories were also ignored by the Democrat-led January 6 committee, because it didn’t fit their narrative.

The hearing will aim to further prove that Acting Defense Secretary at the time Christopher Miller did give advance approval of D.C. National Guard deployment at the direction of then-President Donald Trump.

A person familiar with the review by the House Administration Committee’s Oversight Subcommittee said the whistleblowers will provide testimony that then-Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy delayed by at least two hours providing official notice to D.C. National Guard Commander William Walker to deploy troops to the Capitol.

Instead of getting to the bottom of the breakdown in communication and focusing on improving Military preparedness for future incidents, the witnesses feel the January 6 panel was solely focused on pinning blame for the events that day on Trump…

Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund and DC National Guard leader Maj. Gen. Walker said that Army Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt (ret.), who was Army Staff Director at the time of the riot, delayed or ignored Sund’s request for National Guard support.

They accused Piatt of saying: ‘I don’t like the visual of the National Guard standing a police line with the Capitol in the background.’

…The D.C. National Guard whistleblowers will be able during Wednesday’s hearing to corroborate this despite Piatt testifying under oath that he never mentioned optics.

The whistleblowers are scheduled to testify before a House subcommittee, asserting that their accounts were dismissed by the Democrat-led January 6 committee as it did not support their narrative.

The hearing is expected to demonstrate that Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller had authorized D.C. National Guard deployment at then-President Donald Trump’s direction.

Testimonies are anticipated to highlight delays by Army officials, including Army Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt (ret.), in deploying troops to the Capitol, who allegedly prioritized optics over security measures.

This raises serious questions about communication failures and decision-making processes leading up to January 6th. Critics argue that key figures prioritized political agendas over ensuring adequate security measures were in place, which is completely unacceptable.

The focus on blaming Trump rather than addressing systemic issues has drawn backlash from those seeking accountability and improvements in military preparedness for future incidents.

As debates continue over responsibility for the events of January 6th, concerns persist about justice being served fairly and transparently without sacrificing individual rights or perpetuating political biases within investigative processes.

****

When will they blame the whole ball of wax on Obama/Biden/Democratic Party? It is time.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – IT’S TIME TO FLIP THE SCRIPT ON STUDENT LOAN BAILOUTS – MAKE COLLEGE ENDOWMENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR BAILOUTS…

4/15/2024

You made the student loan – your debt?

The colleges made the loans – make them fix it. They are all rich. They allowed this to happen – make them absorb the loss.

Even more importantly, tying the university sector itself to the problem of student debt would finally force higher ed to put some skin in the game, and provide a sharp incentive to take responsibility for the debt burdens of their graduates.  

Since the 1960s, we have been lavishing benefits and honors on universities, and the government has been spending trillions in service of sending as many people through their halls as possible. Universities have proven themselves wholly unworthy of that special treatment. 

Instead of cynical stopgaps and election-year ploys, we should deliver real debt relief to millions, not from one group of citizens to another, but out of the pockets of the universities that have become rich selling a product that’s bad for their students and bad for America.

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/money/personalfinance/it-s-time-to-flip-the-script-on-student-loan-bailouts-here-s-how-to-make-schools-pay-up/ar-BB1lDJao

FOX News

View on Watch

After his first attempt at large-scale student loan forgiveness produced a last-minute surge of young voters to the polls in the 2022 midterms before it was struck down by the Supreme Court, President Joe Biden is trying the same trick again in 2024. In swing state Michigan on April 8, the president unveiled another plan to unilaterally reduce or eliminate the loans of 23 million undergraduate and graduate borrowers. 

In announcing what is now a third round of student loan forgiveness after a more minor middle attempt, the Biden administration is performing a cynical dance for young voters: vote for me now and blame the courts when this latest gambit to avoid Congress pulls the rug out from under them. But because Republicans have advanced no serious alternative that addresses the growing student loan crisis, the oldest demagogue trick in the book is likely to succeed. 

The student debt crisis is very real — $1.7 trillion and counting — and derives from a simple truth: the value of a college degree has not kept up with the skyrocketing cost of tuition. College costs have soared well above already-inflationary middle-class staples like health care and grocery bills for decades, a rise fueled by generous government loans and grants, as well as the greed of the universities themselves, even when labeled “nonprofit.” 

BIDEN ACCUSED OF ‘SHREDDING THE CONSTITUTION’ WITH NEW STUDENT LOAN BAILOUTS: ‘A STUNNING ACT OF CONTEMPT’

Universities have used that taxpayer-funded boom to hire disproportionate swarms of administrators and bureaucrats, as well as to construct fantasy-like facilities, like lazy rivers and rock-climbing walls, alongside classes on Harry Potter to attract the next graduating class of hapless 18-year-olds.  

The same combination of federal incentives and lack of institutional scruples has led universities to drop academic standards for admission, to the extent that only 60% of incoming freshmen end up graduating in six — not four — years. 

Four in 10 find themselves in the unenviable position of having college loans but no degree, a situation that predictably often leads to default. If it were private banks making these six-figure loans to 18-year-olds for trips to Machu Picchu, everyone would recognize the scheme as predatory, but for some reason universities get left off the hook. And private banks are basically nonexistent in the student debt market, where the federal government holds 93% of all loans.

All this has worked out well for universities, some of which have been able to build endowments the size of top-10 hedge funds, but badly for everyone else. Graduating high school students face Hobson’s choice between taking out ever-higher loans for degrees stagnating in value, or facing a shrinking market for jobs that don’t require a credential.  

The latter pool is shrinking less because entry level positions that didn’t require a bachelor’s 20 years ago suddenly discovered how much better a receptionist with a Queer Studies degree performs, and more because employers have been forbidden, under regulatory expansions of the Civil Rights Act never intended by its authors, to administer virtually any other assessment of basic competency.

FOX News

Biden: The Supreme Court ‘didn’t stop me’ from canceling student debt

Simple screening tests asking potential employees to prove some level of aptitude for the tasks of the job produce a “disparate impact” on the racial group level, a reality unforgivable to the DEI crowd. It’s a rigged system aptly described by legal scholar Gail Heriot, who holds a longtime position on the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, as an interpretation of the law that “makes almost everything presumptively illegal.”  

Everything, that is, that the EEOC, the committee made up of unelected bureaucrats who govern the application of Title VII, chooses to look at. Conveniently, the EEOC has never applied that same disparate impact lens to $100,000 college credentials, which also produce racial disparities alongside burdensome debt. 

Coupled with degree inflation, escalating government loans, and the increasing academic unseriousness of universities themselves, this dynamic has produced a kind of “credentialing treadmill,” which forces young Americans to take out more and more debt in order to stay in place, getting the same jobs their parents did without six-figure loans.  

It’s a treadmill that’s unsustainable, which is why if Biden’s first unconstitutional attempt at forgiveness had succeeded, we would be back at the current level of debt crisis in a mere four years. 

Supporters of student debt forgiveness demonstrate outside the Supreme Court on June 30, 2023, in Washington, DC. Getty Images

Supporters of student debt forgiveness demonstrate outside the Supreme Court on June 30, 2023, in Washington, DC. Getty Images© Photo by OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images

Loan forgiveness without reform of the system and without giving universities any reason to provide a better value for a lower cost, as the Biden administration proposes, is a temporary band-aid; an extremely unfair one to the millions of taxpaying Americans who either did not go to college or have painstakingly paid off their loans who now find themselves stuck with the bill. 

But, as with any scheme to rob Peter to pay Paul, it’s popular with the desperate young voters starting out in life with a debt burden that would have been unthinkable a couple decades ago. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

The reality is that college cost and the attendant debt catastrophe are not going away, and affect millions of Americans — Americans who vote. Democrats will continue to cynically use public debt giveaways to bolster their poll numbers while doing nothing to address the underlying problems in higher education.  

The only fair solution is to place the bill — a bill which is currently looming over taxpayers whether we like it or not — where it justly belongs, with the universities that have profited generously from a system that leaves everyone else indebted or on the hook. 

FOX News

Dave Ramsey on student loan debt concerns: ‘It’s hard, but you’re gonna have to face this’

Republicans should propose debt forgiveness and restructuring for the same borrowers the Biden administration is appealing to, but instead of asking the mechanic without a four-year degree to pay the check, they should pay it by raising the tax on university endowments, and closing loopholes around other university moneymaking enterprises.  

Unlike any of the three forgiveness plans from the current administration, this solution would not blow a hole in an already deficit-laden federal budget, nor would it ask economically struggling Americans to dig into their own pockets to pay off the loans of others. 

Even more importantly, tying the university sector itself to the problem of student debt would finally force higher ed to put some skin in the game, and provide a sharp incentive to take responsibility for the debt burdens of their graduates.  

Since the 1960s, we have been lavishing benefits and honors on universities, and the government has been spending trillions in service of sending as many people through their halls as possible. Universities have proven themselves wholly unworthy of that special treatment. 

Instead of cynical stopgaps and election-year ploys, we should deliver real debt relief to millions, not from one group of citizens to another, but out of the pockets of the universities that have become rich selling a product that’s bad for their students and bad for America.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – PETRAEUS SAYS IRAN ATTACK IS A VERY BIG DEAL.

4/14/2024

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/petraeus-says-iran-attack-is-a-very-big-deal/ar-BB1lBLRn?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=93ee30fd8b0e4afbbd444e6645f4d49e&ei=94

Petraeus says Iran attack is a ‘very big deal’

Petraeus says Iran attack is a ‘very big deal’© Provided by The Hill

Former CIA Director David Petraeus called the Iranian attack on Israel a “very big deal” in an interview Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

“Well, it is significant. It’s a very big deal. And I think Israel will have to take some action in response,” Petraeus said.

“I think it’s very clear that the U.S. would like to see that be as limited as is possible. Keep in mind that the real issue here, in addition to Israel’s security, of course, which is first and foremost, but it’s also about freedom of navigation from the Gulf or the oil and gas that come from the Gulf and fuel much of the global economy,” he continued.

Petraeus said he thinks it’s in everyone’s interest not to continue escalating the situation, noting Iran likely wants to be careful to preserve freedom of navigation in the Gulf, since they export more than a million barrels of oil each day and likely do not want to interfere with that.

“That’s the biggest issue here. And Iran, I don’t think, wants to have that disrupted either, because they export about 1.6 or 1.7 million barrels a day themselves. So, keep your eye on that. Brent Crude is already above $90 a barrel, and it would really spike if there was something that interfered with freedom of navigation,” he said. “In, fact we need to figure out what’s going on. Iran did take a ship the other day that they claimed was in some way dealing with Israel.”

“But this is another step up the rung of escalation. I think it’s in the interest of everyone to stop the increasing escalation. But we will have to see what Israel decides to do in this case,” Petraeus added.

Related video: Israel is going to put Iran in ts place ‘very soon’: Israeli Special Ops vet (FOX News)

For more on this, let’s bring in Aaron Cohen.

FOX News

Israel is going to put Iran in its place ‘very soon’: Israeli Special Ops vet

Iran launched dozens of missiles in Israel’s direction on Saturday, the “vast majority” of which were intercepted by Israel, the U.S. and other allies.

The U.S. and other Western allies have pledged support for Israel. Petraeus noted there are many possible responses Israel can take — not all of which are as escalatory in nature.

“There’s a … whole menu of actions that they can take, not all of which are necessarily overt. They can pursue covert. They can pursue asymmetric attacks, cyberspace and so forth. And keep in mind that, of course, Washington is meeting with the other G7 countries to determine what kind of diplomatic and economic responses should follow in a coordinated effort as well,” he said.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – HOW BARACK OBAMA FUNDAMENTALLY (WEAPONIZED) TRANSFORMED THE U.S.

4/14/2024

ttps://www.ncregister.com/news/how-barack-obama-fundamentally-transformed-the-united-states

https://www.ncregister.com/news/how-barack-obama-fundamentally-transformed-the-united-states

My opinion is – that the word transformed is not the correct word – it was through the weaponization of the government against WE THE PEOPLE. The Durham Report is still “hanging fruit” and the people have not been held accountable for those acts of aggression due to the dereliction of the investigators.

“The Justice Department and FBI “failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law,” Durham concluded in the 306-page report.”

ttps://www.bing.com/search?q=what+is+th+durham+report+2020&form=ANSPH1&refig=1ba87da6462f42cca0822c649affab86&pc=U531

what is th durham report 2020 – Search (bing.com)

After 4-year probe, Durham report slams FBI for actions in 2016 Russia investigation – ABC News (go.com)

A Service of EWTN News, Inc.

How Barack Obama Fundamentally Transformed the United States

COMMENTARY: The true Obama legacy has occurred not in economics, government, or foreign policy, but in culture.

Paul Kengor NationJanuary 12, 2017

“We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”So declared Barack Obama in Columbia, Missouri, on Oct. 30, 2008, on the cusp of his historic presidential election.

It was a bold statement, revolutionary even, surpassed only by the response of those in attendance, who, rather than pausing to reflect upon such an audacious assertion, wildly applauded. To be sure, these Obama enthusiasts would have ecstatically cheered anything he said at that moment.

There was a full-fledged personality cult in motion at that time. The new president could have promised anything and received a giddy reaction. Obama himself admitted to serving as a kind of “blank screen” upon which Americans desiring some warm-and-fuzzy “hope and change” could project whatever they wanted.

But even then, the words “fundamentally transform” should have alarmed everyone. We Americans generally don’t do fundamental transformation. We make changes, yes, small and large, but who among us — other than the most radical revolutionaries — actually want to fundamentally transform the nation?

Many people think that America has many problems, but those can be addressed without a fundamental transformation. Ask professors who teach history or political ideologies (as I have for two decades), and we will tell you that totalitarianism is the ideology that fundamentally transforms.

Indeed, the textbook definition of totalitarianism, which I’ve scribbled on the chalkboard every fall and spring semester since 1997, is to seek to fundamentally transform — specifically, to fundamentally transform human nature via some form of political-ideological-cultural upheaval.

So, that being the case, I winced when Barack Obama said that, and then felt sick to the stomach when I watched people blissfully and blindly applaud without question or objection.

But now here we are, at the end of Obama’s two-term presidency, and the question begs to be pondered: Did Barack Obama fundamentally transform the United States of America, as he promised?

The answer is absolutely Yes.

That fundamental transformation, however, has not happened in areas where many might have hoped (or feared) in 2008. It has not been a fundamental shift in the attitudes of the vast majority regarding the role of government, taxation, regulations, economics, education or even health care, where Obama had his signature legislative achievement. It hasn’t happened in foreign policy, though Obama has made a seriously detrimental impact in regions from Eastern Europe to the Middle East.

The reality is that the true fundamental transformation has been in the realm of culture, notably in matters of sexual orientation, marriage and family. The shift there has been unprecedented and far beyond anyone’s imagination eight years ago.

Looking back, I think that was where Obama’s heart was, and that was where his deepest impact will be felt. Changes there, more than anywhere, seem irreversible by anything other than the miraculous, than anything short of a religious revival or dramatic shift in spiritual-moral thinking.

Obama’s cultural revolution on the sexual-gender-family front is all around us.

We see it in the culture of fear and intimidation by the forces of “diversity” and “tolerance” who viciously seek to denounce, dehumanize, demonize and destroy anyone who disagrees with their brazen newfound conceptions of marriage and family, even as our position (not theirs) has been the prevailing position of 99.99% of human beings who have bestrode the earth since the dawn of humanity.

Instead, in the Obama era, we are the ones portrayed as the outliers, as abnormal, as extremists, as “haters.” If you dissent from this new vociferous breed of human-nature redefiners, they sue you, they jail you, they smear you, they boycott you, they harass you, they ruin you — and they do so (with no sense of their hypocrisy) in the name of “tolerance” and “diversity.”

Whether you’re a Baptist grandma who bakes cakes or a Catholic photographer who takes wedding photos or a Mormon florist who arranges flowers, they refuse your appeals to your conscience; they steamroll you. Changes by Obama and his allies here have constituted a major attack on religious liberty, where 200-year-old First Amendment guarantees have been torched by modern culture warriors discerning heretofore unknown higher rights like “marriage equality” and co-ed toilets.

That is a fundamental transformation of a culture and a nation that did not exist prior to Barack Obama’s ascent.

The manifestations of this are so ubiquitous that laying them out here isn’t necessary, but I’d like to offer just a handful of brief illustrations and images:

The first was the Newsweek cover from May 2012 showing Barack Obama with a rainbow halo over his head above the words, “The First Gay President.” This was in response to Obama coming out for same-sex “marriage,” which for five years he had claimed to oppose. This public shift occurred as Obama was ramping up his re-election campaign, just as Hillary Clinton would do later that year when she announced her 2016 campaign.

After that announcement, Obama employed an aggressive agenda of fundamental transformation on the sexual-gender-family front, one that picked up speed, depth and arrogance throughout his second term.

The second is another image, more profound than the Newsweek creation/coronation because it was real. It was from June 2015, when the Obama White House, the nation’s first house, was lit up in the colors of the “LGBTQ” rainbow on the day of the Obergefell v. Hodges decision, when a Catholic Supreme Court justice, Anthony Kennedy, led the liberal bloc of the court in redefining marriage and imposing this nonexistent “constitutional right” on all 50 states. If ever there was a picture of Obama’s fundamental transformation of America, that was it.

Third was the bathroom fiat, when, according to Obama’s word, all public schools were ordered to revolutionize their restrooms and locker rooms to make them available to teenage boys who want to be called girls (among other gender novelties).

It is hard to conceive a more surreal example of executive overreach.

Truly, George Washington is rolling over in his grave.

Fourth is an ironic moment of Obama’s own doing, one that got virtually no press coverage. It occurred at a town-hall meeting in London last April, where Obama was scolded by a young man for not doing enough to “recognize non-binary people” such as himself. This young man wanted the British government to “respect pronouns” — using not words like “he” or “she,” but rather “hir” or “ze” — in addition to “commit to gender-neutral toilets.”

“I really, really wish that yourself and [British Prime Minister] David Cameron would take us seriously as transgender people,” pushed the student. “And perhaps you could elucidate as to what you can do to go beyond what has been accepted as the LGBTQ rights movement, in including people who fit outside the social norms.”

It was almost hilarious to observe Barack Obama, of all people, reprimanded for inadequacies in this area, which brings me to my final example.

That London incident might have prompted a remarkable action by the Obama White House a few weeks later, which also got virtually no news coverage: The White House Press Office released two extraordinary fact sheets detailing Obama’s vast efforts to promote “LGBT” rights at home and abroad. Not only was it telling that the White House would assemble such a list, and tout it, but the sheer length of the list is striking to behold. It is hard to find any similar roster of such dramatic changes by the Obama White House in any policy area. The list runs page after page.

In short, what we see here is the true Barack Obama legacy, the genuine fundamental transformation.

It has occurred not in economics, government, or foreign policy, but in culture.

When we look back at Barack Obama’s eight years, we should visualize not Obamacare or something in foreign policy, but that White House illuminated in rainbow colors on June 26, 2015, or a rainbow-haloed Obama celebrated as the “first gay president.”

Those are the crowning images of the fundamental transformation of America that Barack Obama achieved.

Paul Kengor is a professor of political science and executive director of The Center for Vision & Values at Grove City College. His forthcoming book is A Pope and a President: John Paul II, Ronald Reagan and the Extraordinary Untold Story of the 20th Century (April 2017).

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment