KOMMONSENTSJANE – World’s first carbon tax on livestock will cost farmers $100 per cow

6/29/2024

Denmark – A word to the wise should be sufficient.

ttps://kommonsentsjane.com/2022/12/01/kommonsentsjane-the-truth-about-climate-change-and-carbon-dioxide-the-climate-change-argument-is-about-control-2/

KOMMONSENTSJANE – THE TRUTH ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE AND CARBON DIOXIDE – THE CLIMATE CHANGE ARGUMENT IS ABOUT CONTROL -2 | kommonsentsjane

6/28/2024

ttps://finishtherace.com/ella-ford/methane-emissions-tax-denmark-sets-a-global-precedent/?utm_source=FTR%20Newsletter%201&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:92402776&utm_campaign=65df5%20US%20Special%20Forces%20Sound%20Terror%20Al…

Supreme Court Stuns Biden with 5-4 Ruling – Washington Swamp Slammed by Key Case

Supreme Court Stuns Biden with 5-4 Ruling – Washington Swamp Slammed by Key Case

Denmark has embarked on a controversial initiative, becoming the first country to impose a carbon tax specifically targeting methane emissions from livestock.

Is this JUMPING THE GUN?

*******

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/world-s-first-carbon-tax-on-livestock-will-cost-farmers-100-per-cow/ar-BB1oVvbw?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=85cfd26c156345abac36705519430e16&ei=45

A herd of cows near Allerup, Denmark, in August 2021.

A herd of cows near Allerup, Denmark, in August 2021.© Michal Fludra/NurPhoto/Getty Images

Dairy farmers in Denmark face having to pay an annual tax of 672 krone ($96) per cow for the planet-heating emissions they generate.

The country’s coalition government agreed this week to introduce the world’s first carbon emissions tax on agriculture. It will mean new levies on livestock starting in 2030.

Denmark is a major dairy and pork exporter, and agriculture is the country’s biggest source of emissions. The coalition agreement — which also entails investing 40 billion krone ($3.7 billion) in measures such as reforestation and establishing wetlands — is aimed at helping the country meet its climate goals.

“With today’s agreement, we are investing billions in the biggest transformation of the Danish landscape in recent times,” Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said in a statement Tuesday. “At the same time, we will be the first country in the world with a (carbon) tax on agriculture.”

The Danish dairy industry broadly welcomed the agreement and its goals, but it has angered some farmers.

The move comes just months after farmers held protests across Europe, blocking roads with tractors and pelting the European Parliament with eggs over a long list of complaints, including gripes about environmental regulation and excessive red tape.

The global food system is a huge contributor to the climate crisis, producing around a third of greenhouse gas emissions.

Livestock farming has a particularly big impact, accounting for around 12% of global emissions in 2015, according to the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization. A share of this pollution comes from methane, a potent planet-warming gas produced by cows and some other animals through their burps and manure.

Reducing livestock emissions

The tax, expected to be approved by Denmark’s parliament later this year, will amount to 300 krone ($43) per tonne (1.1 ton) of CO2-equivalent emissions from livestock from 2030, rising to 750 krone ($107) in 2035.

A 60% tax break will apply, meaning that farmers will effectively be charged 120 krone ($17) per tonne of livestock emissions per year from 2030, rising to 300 krone ($43) in 2035.

On average, Danish dairy cows, which account for much of the cattle population, emit 5.6 tonnes of CO2-equivalent per year, according to Concito, a green think tank in Denmark. Using the lower tax rate of 120 krone results in a charge of 672 krone per cow, or $96.Access All TV Channels Anywhere, Anytime

With the tax break in place, that levy will rise to 1,680 krone per cow in 2035 ($241).

In the first two years, the proceeds from the tax will be used to support the agricultural industry’s green transition and then reassessed.

“The whole purpose of the tax is to get the sector to look for solutions to reduce emissions,” Concito’s chief economist Torsten Hasforth told CNN. For example, farmers could change the feed they use.

But Danish farmers’ group Bæredygtigt Landbrug said the measures amounted to a “scary experiment.”

“We believe that the agreement is pure bureaucracy,” chairman Peter Kiær said in a statement. “We recognize that there is a climate problem… But we do not believe that this agreement will solve the problems, because it will put a spoke in the wheel of agriculture’s green investments.”

Peder Tuborgh, the CEO of Arla Foods, Europe’s largest dairy group, said the agreement was “positive” but that farmers who “genuinely do everything they can to reduce emissions” should not be subjected to a tax.

“It is essential that the tax base for a (carbon) tax is solely based on emissions for which there are means to eliminate (them),” he added in statement.

Kristian Hundeboll, the CEO of DLG Group, one of Europe’s biggest agricultural businesses and a cooperative owned by 25,000 Danish farmers, said it was “crucial for competitiveness” for the tax to be “anchored” in European Union legislation. “Neither the climate, agriculture nor the ancillary industries benefit from Denmark acting unilaterally,” he said.

Laura Paddison contributed to this article.

Call to Earth is a CNN editorial series committed to reporting on the environmental challenges facing our planet, together with the solutions. Rolex’s Perpetual Planet Initiative has partnered with CNN to drive awareness and education around key sustainability issues and to inspire positive action.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Watch! “Enabler In Chief: Jill Biden’s Disturbing Role In Joe’s Cognitive Decline.”

6/29/2024

Isn’t this fraud? Jill Biden/Obama/Susan Rice/Billary are not elected officials and are using Joe to make high level decisions is putting our country in danger.

6/28/2024

Is that the same man today in North Carolina that debated with President Trump last night? Doesn’t look like it. They must have deprogrammed him today.

Did they send him thru their car wash?

Bringing American Principles To Surface

SHARE

NEWS FOR YOU

Watch! “Enabler In Chief: Jill Biden’s Disturbing Role In Joe’s Cognitive Decline”

Avatar photoJimmy ParkerJune 28, 202414

The recent debate showcased a disturbing moment that cannot be ignored. A silent video captured by Forbes reveals a frail and unsteady Joe Biden being helped down five simple steps by none other than Jill Biden. This clip, barely 45 seconds long, speaks volumes about the dire state of our current president. It’s not just sad and scary—it’s maddening. How did we get to a point where the leader of the free world needs assistance to navigate a few steps? And more importantly, how much of this power hold is due to Jill Biden’s refusal to let go of her coveted position as First Lady?

A Disturbing Sight: Jill Biden Helps Joe Down The Steps

The debate had just ended, and the candidates were ready to leave the stage. Trump, spry and confident, quickly made his way off the platform. Meanwhile, Joe Biden, frail and unsteady, needed Jill’s help to navigate just five steps. Yes, five steps. This wasn’t just a moment of spousal support; it was a glaring display of Joe’s cognitive and physical decline. Jill had to guide him down each step to ensure he didn’t fall. This is the man who is supposed to be leading our nation? It’s terrifying.

Jill Biden: The “Enabler In Chief”

What’s even more infuriating is Jill Biden’s role in all of this. Instead of acknowledging Joe’s obvious decline, she continues to prop him up, acting as his enabler in chief. At a post-debate watch party, she was seen whooping it up, chanting “four more years” as if Joe’s performance was something to celebrate. Then, she had the audacity to turn to Joe and condescendingly say, “You answered all the questions,” like he was a five-year-old who just managed to tie his shoes. This isn’t just patronizing; it’s sickening.

A Power Hold At All Costs

Jill Biden’s behavior begs the question: How much of this is about love and support, and how much is about clinging to power? It seems increasingly clear that Jill is more concerned with maintaining her position as First Lady than with Joe’s well-being or the country’s future. By propping Joe up, she’s enabling a dangerous situation where a cognitively impaired man is in charge of critical decisions that affect us all.

The World Is Watching

This isn’t just a domestic issue. The entire world is witnessing this debacle. Our allies and enemies alike see a leader who can barely make it down a few steps without assistance. This weakens our global standing and makes us a target for those who wish to exploit our vulnerability. The fact that this debate disaster was broadcast for all to see is not just embarrassing—it’s dangerous.

The Real Puppet Master?

How much say does Jill Biden really have in Joe’s daily decisions? Given her apparent influence, it’s fair to ask if she’s the one pulling the strings behind the scenes. Her insistence on keeping Joe in the spotlight, despite his obvious struggles, suggests she’s more involved in the day-to-day operations of the presidency than we might think. This raises serious concerns about who is actually running the country.

Joe’s Decline: A National Concern

Joe Biden’s cognitive decline is no longer just a topic of speculation; it’s a visible and pressing issue. His inability to handle basic tasks without Jill’s help is a clear sign that he is not fit to serve as president. This isn’t just a personal tragedy for Joe and his family—it’s a national concern. We deserve a leader who is mentally and physically capable of performing the duties of the office.

Jill’s Role: Beyond First Lady Duties

Jill Biden’s role has clearly extended beyond that of a supportive spouse. She has taken on the role of caretaker, enabler, and possibly even decision-maker. This overreach is not only inappropriate but also dangerous. The First Lady should not be the one holding up the president, both literally and figuratively. This situation is unprecedented and unacceptable.

Final Thoughts

It’s time to face the truth: Joe Biden’s cognitive decline is a serious issue that cannot be ignored. Jill Biden’s role as his enabler in chief is equally concerning. Her refusal to acknowledge Joe’s struggles and her insistence on keeping him in office at all costs is not only damaging to Joe’s health but also to the country’s well-being. We need to demand better from our leaders and their families. This isn’t about politics—it’s about the future of our nation.

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below. How do you feel about Jill Biden’s role in Joe’s presidency? Is she the real puppet master behind the scenes? Share your opinions and join the conversation.

*****

ttps://thebeltwayreport.com/2024/06/breaking-biden-fails-drug-test/?utm_source=Beltway%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:93355093&utm_campaign=BREAKING:%20Biden%20FAILS%20DRUG%20TEST

Democrats would not submit to the drug test before the debate.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – SCOTUS RULING ON EPA CASE

6/28/2024

SCOTUS ruling is a good thing. Decisions have to be made on a scientific basis consensus – not on a political basis. Biden’s group/Susan Rice/Obama are running the government by the seat of their pants. What do they know about science and the environment. They are trying to generate more money to spend on their nothing items and more control over the people.

Biden’s recent statement – no more gas cars.

*****

ttps://americanjournaldaily.com/scotus-ruling-epa-case/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=pjnewsletter

Supreme Court Stuns Biden with 5-4 Ruling – Washington Swamp Slammed by Key Case

By Jon Brenner

|June 27, 2024

Supreme Court Stuns Biden with 5-4 Ruling – Washington Swamp Slammed by Key Case

Tweet

Share

Navigating the political landscape these days is like trying to sail through a hurricane. Each new ruling and law feels like another wave crashing down on us, testing our resolve.

Recently, the Supreme Court made a significant decision that many of us have been watching closely. Their ruling could have far-reaching implications for states and industries across the nation.

The Supreme Court’s credibility has been under intense scrutiny lately. Critics have questioned their decisions, especially when it comes to the overreach of federal powers. Biden’s administration has been pushing boundaries through agencies like the EPA, causing many to worry about government overreach. It’s no wonder this latest case has everyone on edge.

The EPA, under Biden’s leadership, has been trying to enforce stricter environmental regulations. Many believe these rules overstep federal authority, infringing on states’ rights and burdening industries. The Supreme Court recently stepped in to address one such regulation, which aimed to tackle air pollution crossing state lines.

From CBS News:
The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to block an environmental rule that aims to curb air pollution and address harmful smog that travels from certain states into others while legal proceedings continue. In a 5-4 decision, the court granted the request from Ohio, Indiana, and West Virginia, as well as energy companies and industry groups, to pause the rule.

This ruling has sparked a significant debate. On one side, you have those who argue that strict environmental regulations are necessary to protect our planet. On the other, you have states and industries that feel these regulations are too restrictive and harm their economic interests. The Supreme Court’s decision to pause the rule is seen as a victory for the latter group.

Implications of the Ruling

This ruling has major implications. For starters, it puts a hold on the EPA’s ability to enforce the Good Neighbor Rule. This rule was designed to prevent air pollution from crossing state lines, but many argued it was too burdensome. States like Ohio, Indiana, and West Virginia, along with several energy companies, felt the rule overreached federal authority.

The court’s decision to block the rule allows these states and industries to breathe a sigh of relief, at least for now. They argue that this pause is necessary to protect jobs and the economy. Meanwhile, environmental groups are up in arms, claiming this will lead to increased pollution and health risks.

The Role of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court’s role in this case highlights its critical function in balancing federal and state powers. By pausing the EPA’s rule, the court is essentially saying that there needs to be a more thorough examination of the regulation’s impact. This decision underscores the importance of checks and balances in our government.

It’s worth noting that this isn’t the first time the Supreme Court has stepped in to check the EPA’s authority. In recent years, there have been several cases where the court has ruled against the agency, citing overreach. This trend suggests that the court is wary of allowing federal agencies to wield too much power.

Future of Environmental Regulations

The future of environmental regulations remains uncertain. While the Supreme Court’s ruling is a setback for the EPA, it doesn’t mean the end of environmental protection efforts. Instead, it signals a need for a more balanced approach that considers both environmental and economic impacts.

States and industries will likely continue to challenge federal regulations they see as overreaching. This ongoing battle will shape the future of environmental policy in the United States. As we move forward, it’s crucial to find a middle ground that protects our environment without stifling economic growth.

Closing Thoughts

The Supreme Court’s decision to block the EPA’s Good Neighbor Rule is a significant development in the ongoing battle over environmental regulations. It underscores the importance of checks and balances in our government and highlights the need for a balanced approach to policy-making. As we navigate these stormy waters, it’s essential to remain vigilant and informed, ensuring that our leaders protect both our environment and our economy.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – New Hunter Biden Laptop Bombshell Exposes MASSIVE Collusion.

6/28/2024

Always remember it started at the top of the food chain with Obama.

ttps://therightbriefing.com/new-hunter-biden-laptop-bombshell-exposes-massive-collusion/

The Right Briefing

Categories

New Hunter Biden Laptop Bombshell Exposes MASSIVE Collusion

  • Share this article.

Gather around, folks, because what we have here is the kind of political bombshell that makes Watergate look like a minor hiccup. According to a jaw-dropping new report from the House Judiciary GOP, former CIA contractors colluded with the Biden campaign to discredit the infamous Hunter Biden laptop story in the crucial weeks leading up to the 2020 presidential election. Yep, CIA elites allegedly teamed up with Biden’s camp to label the laptop scandal as Russian disinformation.

So, what exactly happened? The House Judiciary, Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence have laid it all out in black and white. The report unveils how 51 high-ranking former intelligence officials—with their official titles prominently displayed—issued a public statement claiming the Hunter Biden laptop story had all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign. This move gave Joe Biden a slick talking point during debates and media appearances, helping him deflect accusations from then-President Donald Trump.

Here’s where things get really spicy: One of the most shocking revelations is the involvement of Michael Morell and other top-tier former CIA officials who were still under contract with the agency while orchestrating this politically motivated operation. Morell himself admitted that without outreach from then-Biden campaign advisor Antony Blinken, he wouldn’t have written the damning statement.

The timing couldn’t have been more perfect—or more suspicious. When the New York Post published articles based on emails purportedly from Hunter’s laptop, suggesting potentially compromising business dealings involving his father, the Biden campaign leapt into action. Prominent Democrats and former intelligence officials wasted no time labeling the story as Russian disinformation, despite having zero direct evidence of Russian involvement. Their professional assessment managed to shape public perception at a critical juncture in the election cycle.

Social media giants also played a role, limiting the dissemination of the story under the guise of preventing the spread of harmful disinformation. This digital chokehold contributed to the narrative that the laptop was bogus, significantly altering the voters’ decision-making process.

Internal CIA emails and testimonies revealed deep concerns within the agency about the political nature of the statement. One frustrated CIA employee lamented, “This frustrates me. I don’t think it is helpful to the Agency in the long run.” Despite these concerns, then-CIA Director Gina Haspel and senior officials let the statement proceed without thorough vetting, effectively giving it the green light.

The motivation behind this coordinated effort? Simple: To give Biden a solid rebuttal when Trump inevitably brought up the laptop during debates. Morell’s email to potential signatories laid it bare: “We think Trump will attack Biden on the issue at this week’s debate and we want to give the [Vice President] a talking point to use in response.”

Committee members are now calling for legislative measures to ensure that intelligence officials don’t exploit their positions for partisan gain. As Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) succinctly put it, “We reveal how officials at the highest levels of the CIA were aware of the statement and CIA employees knew that several of the so-called former officials were on active contract with the CIA.”

This bombshell report is not just another chapter in the Hunter Biden saga; it’s a blazing testament to the tangled web of politics and intelligence, raising serious questions about the integrity of democratic processes.

*****

Nothing new here – as Americans we knew starting with Obama’s statement that he was “going to change our country” that the whole bundle of wax was weaponized. And, reviewing other information starting with Bush I and his wanting a One World Order and them turning out to be Democrats. It all added to the present as to where we are today. Nothing will surprise me because the whole bunch was in on the crime.

It will be up to the new AG/Supreme Court as to what happens. GITMO has plenty of vacancies and if they go – they will have BEACFH FRONT PROPERTY to enjoy.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment