Kirk had previously excluded Fox from his annual AmericaFest event in December 2023, telling Breitbart in an interview: ‘I love Fox. They’ve been very good to me. I hope we can heal our relationship, because for whatever reason, it’s gone off the reservation.’ He said at the time that he hadn’t been on the network since Tucker Carlson sensationally left Fox in April of that year.
Yes, Megan was a SOLID reporter for Fox and we do miss her, just like O’Reilly. Fox lost two winners when they let them go.
Fani Willis got hit with one crushing defeat that ended her political career for good
September 18, 2025
Joseph Sohm via Shutterstock
Fani Willis thought she could weaponize the justice system to take down Donald Trump.
She bet everything on a corrupt prosecution that blew up in her face.
And Fani Willis got hit with one crushing defeat that ended her political career for good.
Georgia’s Supreme Court slams the door on Fani Willis
The Georgia Supreme Court just delivered the final blow to one of the most corrupt prosecutions in American history.
Willis tried every trick in the book to salvage her bogus case against President Trump, but the state’s highest court wasn’t buying what she was selling.
The court flat-out refused to hear her appeal, which means she’s officially done prosecuting Trump and anyone else in this sham election interference case.¹
Here’s what really happened behind the scenes.
Willis got caught red-handed having an affair with Nathan Wade, the guy she handpicked as chief prosecutor in the Trump case.
Court testimony revealed that Willis and Wade were involved in a personal relationship while he was serving as the lead prosecutor she had appointed.²
The whole setup stunk to high heaven, and even Georgia’s liberal court system couldn’t ignore the obvious corruption.
Court exposes Willis for what she really is
Justice Andrew Pinson didn’t mince words when he wrote the majority opinion.
The guy basically said this kind of corruption is so obvious that it’s unlikely to happen again in future cases – which tells you everything you need to know about how badly Willis screwed up.³
“Thus, even if one believes that the Court of Appeals erred in reaching that decision, granting review to answer that question would be mere error correction, and this Court generally does not exercise our certiorari jurisdiction merely to correct errors that do not have some broader impact on Georgia law,” Pinson wrote.
Translation: This case was so corrupt it’s not even worth our time to review it.
But here’s the kicker – even one of the liberal justices saw right through Willis’s scheme.
Justice Carla Wong McMillian actually wanted to hear the case, but not to help Willis.
She wanted to make sure every lawyer in Georgia understands that this kind of corrupt behavior will get you disqualified.⁴
Republicans celebrate the end of Willis’s witch hunt
Georgia Republicans wasted no time celebrating the death of Willis’s political career.
U.S. Representative Mike Collins summed it up perfectly: “End the witch hunt.”⁵
Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones was even more direct about what just happened.
“The Supreme Court just shut Fani Willis down. Her political circus is over. She came after myself, President Trump and all of our conservative values, and has now lost – twice. Georgia deserves better than a DA who weaponizes the justice system for her own political gain,” Jones wrote on social media.⁶
And you know what? He’s absolutely right.
Willis didn’t lose once – she lost twice.
First, the Court of Appeals kicked her off the case, and now the Supreme Court refused to bail her out.
Look what this really means for corrupt prosecutors
Here’s what makes this victory so important.
The Georgia Supreme Court just sent a clear message that you can’t weaponize the justice system without facing consequences.
Willis thought she was untouchable because she was going after Trump, but even liberal judges have their limits when it comes to obvious conflicts of interest.
And when she got caught, she had the nerve to act like the victim.
And when she got caught, she had the nerve to act like the victim.
Willis told WSB-TV that she “disagreed” with the court’s decision, like anyone cares what she thinks at this point.⁸
Here’s why this victory matters for America
Look, this isn’t just about one corrupt prosecutor in Georgia.
This is about what happens when radical leftist District Attorneys think they can weaponize the justice system to take down their political enemies.
Willis thought she was untouchable because she was going after Trump.
She figured the media would cover for her, the Democrat establishment would protect her, and the courts would look the other way.
But here’s what she didn’t count on – even liberal judges have their limits when it comes to this kind of brazen corruption.
When you’re caught having an affair with your handpicked prosecutor while paying him with taxpayer money, that’s a bridge too far even for the most partisan court.
This sends a message to every corrupt prosecutor in America: You can’t weaponize the justice system without consequences.
Willis bet her entire career on taking down Trump, and she lost everything.
Her prosecution is dead, her reputation is destroyed, and her political career is over.
The woman who thought she was going to be the hero who brought down Trump is now just another cautionary tale about what happens when you put politics ahead of justice.
And that’s exactly what she deserves.
¹ Kim Jarrett, “Georgia’s top court declines to hear Fani Willis appeal,” The Center Square, September 16, 2025.
Related earlier – Why Charlie Kirk’s murder is a “tragic loss for our country- his ability to debate while maintaining civility is unmatched in anyone in our lifetime.”
All of you, the right and the left – can someone explain to me – what was accomplished by this killing? A young man who did the killing has lost all rights in living a life in FREEDOM by this act. And, then, his friends will lose respect from the public for their hate. Some of his friends will be investigated for perhaps being a part of the murder of Charlie Kirk.
Now – tell me about all of these folks who are cheering on about the murder of Charlie Kirk? Does it make you feel better to celebrate Charlie Kirk’s murder? What about Charlie Kirk’s mother/father/rest of the family – wife who doesn’t have a husband and and two children don’t have a dad – and how that alters their lives. The children who will grow up and not have a father? Then, all of his friends. The suffering all of the family is going through for the rest of their life and the amount of time that will be spent investigating the murder and all of those people who will now suffer and pay a toll.
Was it really worth it?
Freedom of speech – includes everyone not just the right or the left. In the U.S. that includes everyone.
Hate is a word that should not be celebrated because the outcome does not reap any rewards.
Therefore, all of you folks who are celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death and think his death is “better than sliced bread” as you celebrate – take a minute and “walk in Charlie Kirk’s wife/family’s shoes and the killer’s family” and see if you would still celebrate Charlie Kirk’s murder and walk in the killer’s shoes?
All of you have to understand – Charlie Kirk’s death does not stop his ideas and words from moving forward.
So all of you who want to celebrate Charlie Kirk’s murder – go ahead and see if your joy moves any mountains.
Is that stain on you is how you want to pass through life being remembered as “that person who hated Charlie Kirk and how you want to be called out as the person who hated Charlie Kirk?
That is how people will remember those people who “hated” Charlie Kirk – and celebrated the person who murdered Charlie Kirk.
Now, the question is – how does this person who murdered Charlie Kirk think about what he has done?
We now need to pray for the family and those who are filled with so much hate to help them through this useless act. There were no winners with this senseless murder.
Truss also urged Oxford University to expel George Abaraonye, a student and incoming president of the prestigious Oxford Union, after he responded to the attack on Kirk by posting “Charlie Kirk got shot loool” on social media.
Why It Matters
The assassination of 31-year-old Kirk, co-founder of influential conservative group Turning Point USA, sparked condemnation from prominent Republican and Democratic politicians, though there was controversy after some posts celebrating or mocking his death went viral on social media.
Kirk was fatally shot in the neck on September 10 at the Utah Valley University campus while debating with students.
Tyler James Robinson, aged 22, has been charged with aggravated murder and has yet to enter a plea. Prosecutors have indicated they will seek the death penalty.
What To Know
Speaking to Newsweek, Truss said she met Kirk when he visited the UK this year, during which he addressed students at both the Oxfordand Cambridge Unions in May.
She said: “I met Charlie Kirk when he was over in the UK earlier this year. He’s a fantastic guy. We were very keen to work with him on how we could help change Britain and Europe, learn the lessons of what he’d built in the US, reaching out to young people, talking about conservatism, talking about ideas, and what happened to him is just appalling.
“I think what has happened on the extreme left, basically using intimidation, even being prepared to assassinate somebody, shows how wrong, wrong they’ve gone, and how kind of anti civilizational they are.
“So, it was a huge shock. Huge shock. Somebody that, you know, I’d recently met, that we were all talking about just suddenly gone like that.”
Asked if political assassinations are “just a problem on the left” Truss said “if you look what happened to Trump, what happened to Charlie Kirk, we didn’t see that kind of threat to Biden or Kamala Harris. You know, this is deliberate intimidation and the celebration of his killing by people on the left has been absolutely shocking, including the president elect of the Oxford Union.”
Following Kirk’s shooting Abaraonye, the incoming Oxford Union president who debated the conservative commentator during his appearance before the body in May, on Instagram wrote: “Charlie Kirk got shot loool.” Loool appears to be an extended version of lol, an abbreviation for “laugh out loud.”
According to British newspaper The Daily Telegraph in a private Whatsapp group for students Abaraonye also wrote: “Charlie Kirk got shot, let’s f****** go.”
Student publication The Tab reported Abaraonye later said he regretted acting “impulsively” adding his comments were “sharped by the context of Mr Kirk’s own rhetoric.”
Speaking to Newsweek an Oxford University spokesperson said: “The Oxford Union is independent of the University. We deplore comments appearing to endorse violence—they are unacceptable and entirely contrary to the values of our community.”
The Oxford Union, which is student run but not controlled by the university, said complaints regarding Abaraonye’s comments would be “addressed with the utmost seriousness.”
Truss was UK prime minister from September to October 2022, a period that covered the death of Queen Elizabeth II.
What People Are Saying
Speaking to Newsweek Truss said: “I want Britain to have its MAGA moment…we need the type of revolution that we’re seeing in the US, the MAGA, the independent media revolution, and now the Trump revolution, that is exactly what we need in Britain and Europe. Otherwise, we are in very, very serious trouble so I want to see that. I think that the uprising from the public is evident. Look at the protests outside migrant hotels. Look at the [September 13 in London] Unite the Kingdom rally. Look at the support for Reform. All of those things point to very, very unhappy public.”
In a statement Baroness Amos, the master of University College, Oxford, where Abaraonye studies, said: “Though Mr Abaraonye’s comments are abhorrent, they do not contravene the college’s policies on free speech, or any other relevant policy. Therefore, no disciplinary action will be taken.”
What Happens Next
The Trump administration has vowed to take action against individuals or groups it believes glorified or celebrated Kirk’s assassination, and such efforts are likely to continue in the coming weeks.
****
God Bless Charlie Kirk/his wife/children/and the family.
Thank you for putting Schiff in his place. Schiff and Gavin Newsom are a disgrace to society.
On Tuesday afternoon, a heated argument between lifelong political opponents Adam Schiff and Kash Patel escalated to a climax, resulting in a brief interruption of a continuing hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The altercation started when California Democrat Adam Schiff questioned FBI director James Patel about the decision to transfer Ghislaine Maxwell, a friend of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, to a less secure jail.
Schiff probed Patel further, asking whether he thought the American people were “stupid” enough to accept his explanation that the relocation of Maxwell was a decision made independently by the Bureau of Prisons, rather than a politically driven action by the White House.
“What I am doing is protecting this country… and combating the weaponization of intelligence by the likes of you,” Patel interrupted Schiff, his voice filled with determination. Regarding Russiangate, on January 6, we have repeatedly shown that you are unreliable. You have to be the most dishonest senator who has ever served in America’s capital.
He was further characterized by Patel as “a political buffoon at best.”
Schiff has been at odds with Comey ever since he oversaw the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election while serving as leader of the House Intelligence Committee. The investigation’s credibility was to be undermined by Patel, who was employed by the House Intelligence at the time.
Five years down the road, Schiff was a member of a select committee that looked into the assault on the Capitol on January 6, 2021; in the meantime, Patel was a lawyer for several rioters in prison.
Years later, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee used Patel’s reposting of a meme depicting him putting a chainsaw to Schiff’s head as evidence that he should not be confirmed to head the FBI. According to another photo that Democrats posted, Patel appears to be holding something, while Schiff’s face is positioned next to a catapult.
Earlier this year, Patel accused Schiff, while serving as leader of the Intelligence Committee, of plotting to release damaging material on President Trump. The allegations have been refuted by Schiff, via his spokeswoman.
The senior Democrat on the Judiciary panel, Sen. Dick Durbin, urged with chair Chuck Grassley to take command of the situation as the yelling continued on Tuesday. With a series of hammer blows, Grassley proclaimed, “Both of you be quiet.”
On Tuesday, during what was arguably the most contentious part of the questioning, Patel was asked a number of questions on his handling of the Epstein case and the investigation into the murder of conservative political analyst Charlie Kirk, among other subjects.
This, however, was only the day’s first heated exchange. Another entanglement that Patel had with Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) was when Booker informed the head of the FBI, “I think you’re not gonna be around long”—implying that Trump will betray him at some point.
As a result of the remark, another yelling match ensued, with Booker responding with the words “I’m not afraid of you” and Patel labeling Booker as “an embarrassment to your country.”
Schiff accused Patel of trying to “save his job” by appearing before Congress and said that Patel was “performing for an audience of one” in a social media post following the hearing’s completion. Also, the president’s nickname for Schiff, “Pencil Neck,” was praised by the White House for Patel’s pursuit of Schiff.
On Wednesday, Patel is scheduled to appear before the House Judiciary Committee.
kommonsentsjane 
