We all know that the Democrats have become Marxists and are a split party now. The AOC Squad is responsible for the split/Jeffries/Pelosi/Obama versus the Progressives..
Biden is playing the ends against the middle and trying to support both sides – Hamas terrorists/Israel.
Actress Patricia Heaton, relative of Hamas hostages Rotem Cooper and October 7 survivor Tali Binner explain why they are fighting to combat antisemitism in America on ‘Fox News @ Night
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at a Sept. 2 press conference:
“I was asked whether I am not doing enough to the release of hostages. . . . On August 28—that’s five days ago—[the] Deputy CIA Director said that “Israel shows seriousness in the negotiations. Now Hamas must show the same seriousness.”
I want to ask you something. What has changed in the last five days? What has changed? One thing: These murderers executed six of our hostages. They shot them in the back of the head. That’s what changed! And now after this, we’re asked to show seriousness? We’re asked to make concessions? What message does this send Hamas? It says, kill more hostages. Murder more hostages and you will get more concessions. The pressure internationally must be directed at these killers! At Hamas. Not at Israel. We say yes. They say no all the time, but they also murdered these people. And we now we need maximum pressure on Hamas.
I don’t believe that either President Biden or anyone serious about achieving peace and achieving the release would seriously ask Israel, Israel to make these concessions. We’ve already made them. Hamas has to make the concessions.
One nice thing about it is – all of these lefty worms crawling out in the open and identifying themselves AS DEMOCRAT MARXISTS makes it easier for the party – instead of pampering them and fooling ourselves they are RINO’s. They had to come out in the open after the Bushes declared themselves as Democrat/Marxists – keeping company with the likes of Obama/Clintons.. Do you call them traitors?
Can you imagine hating one person, President Trump, so much that you would give up on your country/Constitution because you didn’t get your way and turn YELLOW?
They fooled the public for many years – didn’t they? There has to be more to this than not liking President Trump. If you love your country/Constitution why would one person turn you away – that is her excuse because she is up to her elbows with the Democrats/Jan6 – and now can’t walk away.
And, for the rest of the story – Dick Cheney, her father, is also voting for Kamala.
“He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him. He can never be trusted with power again,” added Cheney, a controversial figure himself during a decades-long government career that includes roles leading the Pentagon, as White House chief of staff and serving as a Republican leader in the U.S. House.
As you can see – until we know both sides of the story Dick Cheney seems to be afraid of what President Trump knows – if I am reading through his statement.
Now, we need to have the conservatives in office to find out the real story since the left is so afraid of the conservatives. Is there proof that the Democrats cheated in 2020? If so, it needs to be put on the table. Too many questions and not enough answers.
This story goes back in history from the looks of things. We know that Bush I wanted to institute THE ONE WORLD ORDER which is now evident. The Cheney’s know the background since he worked for the Bushes.
Maybe the Cheney’s will write a book about it?
*****
Loony Liz Cheney Offers Unsolicited 2024 Endorsement to Candidate She Once Despised
Disgraced former Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., revealed on Wednesday who she plans to vote for in the 2024 election—an unsurprising but telling choice.
During a Q&A at Duke University’s Sanford School of Public Policy, Cheney said she will vote for Vice President Kamala Harris, a Democrat she previously labeled as a “radical liberal” lacking leadership.
“Because of the danger that Donald Trump poses, not only am I not voting for Donald Trump, but I will be voting for Kamala Harris,” Cheney stated in footage from the Q&A.
.@Liz_Cheney: As a conservative, as someone who believes in and cares about the Constitution, and because of the danger Donald Trump poses, I will be voting for Kamala Harris pic.twitter.com/7105j8xjYp
— Kamala HQ (@KamalaHQ) September 5, 2024
Cheney’s endorsement drew loud applause at Duke, but critics were quick to point out her past disdain for Harris.
Kamala Harris is a radical liberal who would raise taxes, take away guns & health insurance, and explode the size and power of the federal gov’t. She wants to recreate America in the image of what’s happening on the streets of Portland & Seattle. We won’t give her the chance.
— Liz Cheney (@Liz_Cheney) August 11, 2020
“It’s very clear—she is a radical liberal she’s somebody that has said we ought to spend 32 trillion dollars on Medicare for All,” Cheney said during an interview with Fox News in December 2021.
“If you look at her record as well in California she did in fact essentially ban gun sales with executive action and she threatened during the primaries to do the same thing if she’s elected,” Cheney added.
In separate comments, Cheney scolded Harris for failing to secure the southern border after being appointed as the “border czar” responsible for addressing the so-called root causes of illegal crossings.
“Vice President Harris said she was not in charge of the border. Nobody seems to be in charge she hasn’t been there and we have a humanitarian and national security crisis and and health crisis unfolding there,” Cheney said in April 2021.
Cheney’s backing of Harris may surprise some, considering her anti-Trump record, which earned her the “RINO” label, or Republican in Name Only.
She led the infamous Jan. 6 Committee and voted for Trump’s second impeachment, prompting House Republicans to remove her from leadership.
Cheney has long called herself a conservative Republican, serving two terms in the House before being ousted by Wyoming voters.
Voters replaced Cheney with Harriet Hageman, a staunch conservative with a strong record on free speech, gun rights, and limited government. Hageman boasts a 100% conservative score from Heritage Action.
We must elect the conservative party to filter thru all of this pandering between the Democrats and outsiders. All of us know that the Democrat Marxists are deep in muddy waters and this pandering will continue as long as they are in power. WE HAVE TO MAKE A CHANGE to protect our country in the 2024 election.
Isn’t it time for a DEEP DIVE into the whole government to trust but verify how many people are being used as spies in our government – not matter who/what country they are pandering too.
In the latest development in a sweeping political controversy, New York Governor Kathy Hochul has found herself at the center of allegations suggesting potential ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This assertion joins a contentious debate involving several high-profile Democrats, including President Joe Biden and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.
The claims against Hochul surfaced in a report published earlier today by investigative journalist Emily Carter of The Washington Chronicle. Carter’s article cites unnamed sources and unverified documents that allegedly connect Hochul to a network of individuals and organizations with links to the CCP. The specifics of these allegations remain murky, as the report is based on preliminary findings that have yet to be substantiated by concrete evidence.
The report has triggered a whirlwind of reactions across the political spectrum. Hochul, who has been vocal in her stance against foreign interference in American politics, issued a statement this afternoon firmly denying any wrongdoing. “These allegations are baseless and politically motivated,” Hochul declared. “I have always acted in the best interest of New Yorkers and will continue to do so.”
The timing of these allegations is significant, as they come amid ongoing scrutiny of several Democratic leaders regarding their alleged connections to foreign entities. President Joe Biden has faced similar accusations over the past week, spurred by a New York Times report linking him to questionable financial transactions involving Chinese businesses. Meanwhile, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has also been implicated in a separate but related investigation involving alleged CCP interference.
Political analysts suggest that the convergence of these allegations could be part of a broader strategy to influence the upcoming elections and shift public opinion. “The timing of these revelations seems strategically calculated to create doubt and sow discord,” commented Dr. Linda Roberts, a professor of political science at Georgetown University. “It’s important for the public and media to approach these claims with a critical eye and demand verified evidence before jumping to conclusions.”
In the wake of these allegations, the Democratic Party is bracing for potential fallout. Party leaders are urging for transparency and thorough investigations to address the concerns raised. “We stand by the principle of due process and call for a fair and impartial investigation into these claims,” stated DNC Chairwoman Andrea Thompson.
These Democrat ties to the Chinese Communist Party are not rare. Recent disclosures have only intensified scrutiny over several Democratic figures, as allegations of ties to Chinese intelligence operatives continue to make headlines. Prominent among these concerns are Representative Eric Swalwell and the late Senator Dianne Feinstein, whose connections to individuals allegedly linked to Chinese espionage are now drawing renewed attention.
A report published by The Washington Post has reignited debate over Swalwell’s association with Christine Fang, also known as Fang-Fang, a suspected Chinese intelligence operative. According to the report, Fang reportedly cultivated relationships with various U.S. politicians, including Swalwell, during her time as an intern in his office. The article, based on recently declassified intelligence documents, suggests that Fang’s efforts were part of a broader strategy to gain influence within U.S. political circles.
Swalwell, who has previously denied any wrongdoing, responded to the latest allegations in a statement released this morning. “These claims have been thoroughly investigated and debunked,” Swalwell asserted. “My focus remains on serving my constituents and upholding national security, not on unfounded accusations.”
The case involving Feinstein, who passed away earlier this year, has also resurfaced following a Los Angeles Times investigation published earlier this week. The article reveals new details about Feinstein’s former driver, who was reportedly identified as having connections to Chinese intelligence. Feinstein’s driver, who worked for her for nearly two decades, was allegedly involved in activities that raised red flags for national security experts.
Feinstein’s family has since issued a statement addressing the issue: “Senator Feinstein was committed to national security and had no knowledge of any activities involving her former driver that would compromise that commitment. Her legacy of service should not be overshadowed by these allegations.”
The timing of these revelations is significant, coming amid heightened concerns about foreign influence in U.S. politics. Experts argue that these cases reflect a broader issue of potential vulnerabilities within the political system. “These incidents underscore the ongoing challenge of detecting and mitigating foreign espionage efforts,” said Dr. Anna Rodriguez, a former U.S. intelligence officer. “It is essential for all political figures to undergo rigorous vetting and security checks to protect our democratic institutions.”
The Democratic Party has faced increasing pressure to address these allegations, with calls for more stringent security measures and oversight. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi emphasized the need for vigilance: “We must ensure that our political institutions are safeguarded from any form of foreign interference. A thorough investigation into these matters is necessary to maintain public trust.”
As the investigations into these matters continue, the implications for the involved Democrats and the broader political environment remain uncertain. The cases highlight ongoing concerns about national security and the need for robust measures to prevent foreign influence in U.S. politics.
The problem is that’s not what Vance said, and the context was ‘ripped from the headline,’ for lack of a better term
It’s the Democrats/Biden/Harris/Pelosi/Schumer/Obama government who have put the new media in this position when they weaponized the whole shebang.
Plain and simple.
They lie and they lie and, therefore, the media being lefties string along to get along since they are paid on the side to work with the Democrat Marxists.
No different with the polls – everything is slanted to the left. So readers just laugh and say to themselves – THEY ARE LYING. It is at the point that anything the media publishes we laugh at because we know it is not true.
That’s is where we are in our public discourse – dismiss everything the media publishes.
*****
Opinions, like this piece, are important, and civil debate (if that still exists) is required, but we can’t gain the backing of our readers if the ‘trusted’ news people are more concerned with their own political bias and clicks.
I have worked in this business for many years—too long sometimes, I think. I have been through (and fought) rounds and rounds of layoffs and the dreaded non-paid leaves of absence—or what corporations and holding companies like to call “vacations.”
Growing up on the newspaper side of media and falling in love with the very premise of facts and keeping communities informed. How important is that? Very.
But today, it has changed.
(But the public continues to get the lies by misrepresentations by the left media. You can’t believe what they say. Plain and simple.)
For some, it’s not about facts but bias, clicks, social media posts, and time on site.
“Just get the clicks; we are drowning,” an editor yells across the newsroom as the threat of more cuts looms.
When the mantra was, “Get it first, but first, get it right.” The times were better. But today, it’s get it. While newsrooms worldwide are wondering how to stay staffed, maybe, just maybe, if we went back to facts and not bias, we could help mitigate confusion and inform readers so they can make decisions based on facts. What a concept.
Take a look at a recent article published by the Associated Press titled ” JD Vance says school shootings are a ‘fact of life,’ calls for better security.”
What a statement to say on the heels of the violent massacre at the hands of a 14-year-old boy in Georgia. Right?
(That is what the left media do if you want to make Vance look bad – part of the left’s strategy. Nothing new for the lefties – go for the jugular.)
Related video: Vance, Harris spar on social media as Vance calls school shootings in America ‘a fact of life’ (WLWT Cincinnati)
WLWT Cincinnat
Vance, Harris spar on social media as Vance calls school shootings in America ‘a fact of life’,
Vance did, however, emphasize the need to enhance school security, acknowledging that it is a “fact of life” that shooters often target schools.
“What’s really going to solve this problem—and I don’t like to admit this,” Vance said. “I don’t like that this is a fact of life. But if you are a psycho, and you want to make headlines, you realize that our schools are soft targets. We need to bolster security so that if a psycho wants to walk through the front door and harm children, they can’t do it.”
Axios jumped on board and published a piece highlighting VP Kamla Harris’ criticism of Vance’s remark but later added an editor’s note, stating the article was updated to provide “further context” on Vance’s statement. But the damage is done.
(That is the way they work – do the damage and then go back and apologize.)
Despite Vance’s comments calling for increased school security, the Harris campaign’s official X account, Kamala HQ, falsely accused him of dismissing the tragedy of school shootings and attacking gun safety reforms.
“J.D. Vance responds to the deadly shooting in Georgia by saying school shootings are just ‘a fact of life’ and attacking common sense gun safety reform,” Kamala HQ wrote on X.
Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom also criticized Vance, accusing him of being indifferent to the deaths of children in schools.“J.D. Vance: School shootings are just ‘a fact of life,’” Newsom remarked. “Kids are being killed, and he’s shrugging his shoulders. Remember that in November.”
Do you see what happened here?
The AP later updated its headline to read, “JD Vance says he laments that school shootings are a ‘fact of life’ and calls for better security,” but did so without including an editor’s note about the change.
The Associated Press also deleted its original tweet about Vance’s remarks approximately 90 minutes after posting it. The revised tweet provided proper context, stating that Vance “laments that school shootings are a ‘fact of life’ and calls for stronger security measures to prevent further violence.”
“This post replaces an earlier post that was deleted to add context to the partial quote from Vance,” the AP clarified in a late Thursday night post on X.
But again, the damage is done, and AP author moves on to the next ‘gotcha’ piece? Is this how this works?
It won’t work for long, as even in the age of X and cable news commentators (often mistaken for news anchors), the nation wants and needs facts, and credibility still goes a long way.
Opinions, like this piece, are important, and civil debate (if that still exists) is required, but we can’t gain the backing of our readers if the ‘trusted’ news people are more concerned with their own political bias and clicks.
Personalize
By 
Related video: Vance, Harris spar on social media as Vance calls school shootings in America ‘a fact of life’ (WLWT Cincinnati)
WLWT Cincinnat
