Follow America’s fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices.
The Biden administration has provided Egypt with $1.3 billion in military aid to help facilitate a ceasefire in Gaza.
According to Reuters, Secretary of State Antony Blinken informed Congress that he waived conditions on the aid, which were related to Egypt’s human rights record, citing U.S. national security interests.
A U.S. spokesperson explained:
“This decision is crucial for advancing regional peace and addressing Egypt’s key role in U.S. national security priorities, including securing a Gaza ceasefire, bringing hostages home, increasing humanitarian aid for Palestinians, and working towards a lasting resolution to the Israel-Hamas conflict,”
The spokesperson also emphasized the ongoing dialogue with Egypt regarding the need for tangible improvements in human rights, a vital element for maintaining a strong U.S.-Egypt partnership.
Despite criticism over Egypt’s alleged human rights abuses under President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi—such as torture and enforced disappearances—Egypt remains a key U.S. ally.
President Sisi has denied accusations of holding political prisoners.
He has stressed the necessity of stability in a country that has faced repeated Islamist militant attacks.
The ongoing Gaza conflict, which escalated after Hamas’s October 7th attack on Israeli civilians, has increased the U.S. administration’s reliance on Egypt for diplomatic efforts.
This includes ceasefire talks.
Egypt’s shared border with Gaza also makes it a crucial channel for delivering humanitarian aid to the region.
Kamala Harris thought she could celebrate a win in her debate with Donald Trump.
But it turned out Kamala Harris popped the champagne corks prematurely.
And Kamala Harris walked off the debate stage and got blindsided by this bad news.
Kamala Harris fails to sway undecided voters
A snap CNN poll after the debate showed 63 percent of viewers thought Kamala Harris won the debate compared to 37 percent who picked Donald Trump.
But that number may be fool’s gold.
Winning the debate isn’t the same thing as winning over voters.
Americans who watched the debate appeared to have given Kamala Harris the win on style, as they didn’t care for Trump’s aggressive approach.
Debate moderator David Muir incorrectly fact-checking Donald Trump on Trump’s true statement that Democrats support allowing babies who survive failed abortion procedures to die may have also played a role, as viewers not well versed in the details of the debate likely trusted Muir even though he deliberately misled them.
But the proof was in the pudding as media outlets spoke to undecided voters.
Reuters ran a focus group that found the undecideds broke decisively for Trump following the debate.
Reuters reported that it “interviewed 10 people who were still unsure how they were going to vote in the Nov. 5 election before they watched the debate. Six said afterward they would now either vote for Trump or were leaning toward backing him. Three said they would now back Harris and one was still unsure how he would vote.”
New York Times also finds Kamala Harris fell short
The Times published a story headlined “Pundits Said Harris Won the Debate. Undecided Voters Weren’t So Sure” that contained major warning signs for Kamala Harris.
Voters across the swing states either said that Kamala Harris failed to make the sale or that they backed Trump.
“She still has to impress me,” 19-year-old Samira Ali, who is a sophomore at the University of Wisconsin-Madison told The Times.
“I’m still deciding,” Ali added, explaining that she needed to hear more from Kamala Harris about inflation and housing costs.
The Times also reported that “in Las Vegas, Gerald Mayes, 40, said he felt both candidates failed to connect their campaign promises to his family’s budget. And he came away confused.”
34-year-old Keilah Miller of Wisconsin said the debate moved her to Trump.
“Trump’s pitch was a little more convincing than hers,” Miller explained. “I guess I’m leaning more on his facts than her vision.”
Miller admitted life was easier for her when Trump was President.
“When Trump was in office — not going to lie — I was living way better,” Miller declared. “I’ve never been so down as in the past four years. It’s been so hard for me.”
Defense contractor Jason Henderson of Arizona also said the debate moved him to Trump.
“Trump had the more commanding presentation,” Henderson said. “There was nothing done by Harris that made me think she’s better. In any way.”
The pro-Kamala Harris media wanted to portray this debate as a one-sided contest where Kamala Harris destroyed Donald Trump.
But the media outlets that spoke to voters in the immediate aftermath found a different story altogether.
President Joe Biden grinned like a fool and refused to address the press after making a speech on Tuesday, September 2. Biden was seen discussing his achievements in a rare appearance before the public at the White House. The theme of the speech was “investing in America” and Biden highlighted claims of economic progress in the wake of the pandemic.
Biden claimed the US is economically strong, despite record inflation during his administration, he also claimed a number of economic records were broken. Biden hilariously claimed that the pandemic “no longer controls our lives,” highlighting how his administration was willing to allow a respiratory illness to abrogate America’s most sacred freedoms.
Disease-related lockdowns destroyed countless American businesses, and put small business owners out of work. This is why Biden can tout “record job growth” and “record growth of small businesses;” because largely Democrat and even many moderate Republican governors allowed their states to shut down for months or years in some cases, abrogating individual ability to work. Economic recovery is mislabeled as “growth.”
In many cases, citizens had to subject themselves to a dangerous experimental injection before being allowed to return to their job. Some were maimed, others died as a consequence, and yet still the issue is largely unaddressed at the national level.
Biden refused to address any questions after his recitation of how awesome his administration has been. Reporters shouted queries about the Israeli-Hamas war, inflation of grocery costs, and a recent proposal by Trump to help reduce the cost of IVF treatment (in vitro fertilization) to help young couples get pregnant. Biden wore a wide grin while his handlers escorted him out of the room; he completely ignored the press.
Ignoring the press has been a mainstay of Biden’s administration. During his 2020 election bid, he regularly “called a lid” on his campaign for days at a time and refused to appear in public or engage in interviews. We’re seeing something similar with how the Democrats are handling Kamala Harris.
Her recent interview with friendly-network CNN only aired 18 minutes of a much longer interview, even with a friendly-network, her running mate beside her, and editing the content, she still came across incredibly weak.
John Kirby’s ‘Reply All’ Blunder: A Cold Glimpse Into Biden’s Disastrous Afghanistan Withdrawal
It was the anniversary of 9/11—a day meant to honor those we lost, a day that changed America forever. Yet this solemn occasion was marred by an email slip-up that shines a spotlight on the Biden administration’s cold, calculated approach to one of the most disastrous military withdrawals in U.S. history. John Kirby, White House National Security Council advisor, accidentally sent an internal email meant for White House staffers to a Fox News reporter. What did it say? Essentially, it told us everything we needed to know about how this administration views our veterans and their concerns about the catastrophic Afghanistan withdrawal: “No use in responding.”
A Callous Dismissal
Kirby’s email, sent out on the anniversary of the most tragic terrorist attack on American soil, couldn’t have been more poorly timed. His dismissive response—labeling concerns from veterans as the opinions of a “handful of vets”—was not just a blunder, but an insight into how the Biden administration operates behind closed doors. It wasn’t meant for public eyes, but the fact that it slipped out in this way gives us a rare, unfiltered glimpse into the coldness that has been behind many of their decisions.
These aren’t just random critics; these are veterans—men and women who served and sacrificed during the 20-year war in Afghanistan. Many of them have lost friends, family, and comrades in this seemingly never-ending conflict. For them, the botched withdrawal that left 13 U.S. service members dead was more than just a military failure—it was a betrayal. Yet Kirby, a man who served in the Navy for 28 years, brushed it off as though their concerns were irrelevant.
A Legacy of Failure
Let’s not forget the context. The Afghanistan withdrawal was an unmitigated disaster. President Biden promised a “safe and orderly” exit, but what we saw was chaos. The images of desperate Afghans clinging to the wheels of departing aircraft, the horrific bombing at Kabul airport that killed 13 American service members, and the hasty, ill-prepared evacuation that left behind thousands of Afghan allies—this wasn’t a planned exit; it was a flaming wreck.
Kirby, who publicly defended the withdrawal as “not chaotic” and claimed it was “one of the most successful airlifts in history,” continues to echo the administration’s narrative that everything went according to plan. But behind the scenes, we now know they think these veteran concerns are just noise, easily ignored.
A Puppet of the Administration
As White House spokesman, Kirby has become nothing more than a mouthpiece for the Biden administration, spinning the narrative and covering up their failures. His email is just the latest example of how tone-deaf this administration is to the voices of those who matter most—our veterans and their families.
Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL), an Army veteran, summed it up best when he said, “The bottom line is that the Biden-Harris administration chose politics over strategy, and Kirby, who I wouldn’t trust to guard my grocery list, is now trying to cover for them.” That’s it, right there. This isn’t about protecting lives or ensuring a safe withdrawal. This was always about optics.
From day one, the administration prioritized looking good over doing the right thing. They wanted to pull out of Afghanistan so they could say, “Look! We ended the war!” But at what cost? They left behind Americans, allies, and those who helped us during our time in the country. They sacrificed lives for a political talking point.
Veterans Betrayed
The real slap in the face is to our veterans. These are the men and women who fought, bled, and sacrificed for this country—many of whom saw the horrors of war up close and personal. And when they raised legitimate concerns about how the Afghanistan withdrawal was handled, they were dismissed with the click of an email.
These veterans aren’t just any group. They’re part of a brotherhood, a group that understands the true cost of war. They’ve lost friends, seen the destruction, and now, they’re watching as the administration glosses over their concerns as if they don’t matter.
Let’s not forget the Gold Star families—those who lost loved ones in Afghanistan. How do you think they feel about being told their concerns aren’t worth responding to? Kirby may try to clean up this mess by claiming the email was an accident, but the truth is, it’s just a window into how this administration operates.
The Real Story Behind the Withdrawal
If you look closely at the withdrawal, it’s clear that the administration knew the Afghan government would collapse. They had intelligence that suggested as much, but instead of planning for a safe and orderly exit, they chose to put on a show. They evacuated without securing the region, left behind military equipment, and worst of all, allowed the Taliban to seize control.
Rep. Mike McCaul’s investigation revealed what many of us already suspected. The administration ignored warnings, dismissed critical intelligence, and chose “optics over security.” And now, they expect us to believe that everything went as planned?
This isn’t just incompetence; this is deliberate. They didn’t want to face the reality of what they were doing, so they covered it up. And now, when veterans speak out, they brush it off as though it doesn’t matter. It’s disgusting.
The Cover-Up Continues
Kirby’s email blunder might be a small glimpse into the administration’s mindset, but it tells us everything we need to know. They don’t care about the truth. They care about controlling the narrative. And when the truth slips out, they try to cover it up as fast as possible.
But veterans like Cory Mills, Brian Mast, and many others won’t let them get away with it. They’re calling out the lies, the manipulation, and the disregard for the people who served this country with honor. As Mills said, Kirby is “dispel[ling] all the truths while covering up all the lies.”
Final Thoughts
John Kirby’s email slip wasn’t just a mistake—it was a look into the soul of this administration. An administration that cares more about its image than the people it’s supposed to serve. An administration that would rather spin a story than face the facts. And in the end, it’s the veterans who are left out in the cold, their concerns dismissed, their sacrifices ignored.
We can’t allow this to continue. Our veterans deserve better. They deserve leaders who respect their service and sacrifice, not bureaucrats who brush them aside. The Biden administration may try to cover this up, but the truth is out now, and we won’t let them forget it.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
by Erica Carlin
