Pelosi is too old (84), like Biden. She can’t cut the mustard any more because she is so into being bitter about hating Trump. Biden/Obama/Pelosi are the problem – not the solution. She caused Jan6.
She gave the gavel to Hakeem Jeffries – who is a Muslim and does not follow the Constitution.
We must win the House/Senate/Presidency in order to restore the Constitution.
Pelosi/Biden/Obama have caused the dissatisfaction in the government. They are working with the One World Order to make our country a Marxists country and under the control of the U.N.
As we all know:
You would think Nancy Pelosi would spend all her alleged insider-trading money on a nice beach house she could retire to.
But no, she’s back to STEAL our House Majority out from under us!
Just take a look at what she said:
“We will win the House, we only need to win four seats…
On January 6th, Hakeem Jeffries must be Speaker of the House”
She is trying to turn our country into a Marxists country with the U.N. in charge.
The Democrat Marxists are so bad and that is why they keep trying to put their bad on President Trump because they are so insecure. It is the true story of the yam Dankees. The Biden Marxists are thugs.
Despite Vice President Harris’s claims that world leaders mocked Trump, the overall response from European officials has been one of respect for the policies he championed during his tenure, particularly on defense. Whether this narrative will influence voters in the U.S. remains to be seen, but European leaders have made it clear that they are ready to work with whomever is elected in 2024(WFIN)(FOX 24 WTAT)
Harris doesn’t know the meaning of respect nor does she use it when it is appropriate.
She is one of the thugs in the Democrat/Marxists Party who is only interested in herself – everything has to revolve around her and it has been stated time and time again.
Follow America’s fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices.
In the wake of recent comments by U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris during a presidential debate, European officials have dismissed claims that world leaders “are laughing” at former President Donald Trump.
Harris had stated that Trump’s leadership drew ridicule from international figures, but multiple European foreign ministers and officials have publicly contradicted this narrative, praising Trump for his strong stance on NATO defense spending, which, they say, had a significant impact on Europe’s security landscape.
During the United Nations High-Level Week in late September 2024, foreign ministers from various European nations emphasized their neutrality regarding U.S. elections but acknowledged Trump’s influence during his presidency.
Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani stated that Italy and the U.S. are close allies, and Italy would work with any U.S. administration, past or future. He added that Europe shares a deep bond with the U.S. that transcends individual leaders, highlighting that the transatlantic alliance would remain strong regardless of who is in the White House.
In particular, European leaders praised Trump’s push for increased defense spending among NATO allies. Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavsky described Trump’s message on defense as “strong” and noted that Trump’s demand for NATO members to meet their 2% GDP defense spending commitment resonated, especially amid growing security concerns regarding Russia.
He pointed out that the Trump administration’s insistence on higher defense budgets led to more European nations reaching NATO’s defense spending targets, a policy stance that has only gained more relevance following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjártó also defended Trump, stating that during his presidency, “everything was under control.” He argued that since Trump left office, global security has deteriorated, with increasing instability in regions like Ukraine.
Hungary, under the leadership of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, has been one of Trump’s most vocal supporters in Europe, with Orbán openly praising Trump and maintaining a strong relationship with him. Szijjártó expressed hope for a second Trump administration, asserting that Trump’s return to office could help resolve some of the crises currently plaguing Europe.
Trump’s impact on NATO and defense spending has been a key element of his foreign policy legacy. Before his administration, only a few NATO member states were meeting the 2% GDP defense spending threshold.
However, by 2024, 23 out of 32 NATO nations had reached this target, which NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg credited, in part, to Trump’s pressure on allies. This increase in spending has been crucial in helping NATO respond to new threats, particularly with regard to supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression.
Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis echoed similar sentiments, noting the deep historical ties between Europe and the U.S., and emphasizing that defense cooperation is “more than politics.”
Like other European officials, Landsbergis refrained from directly endorsing any U.S. candidate but stressed the importance of maintaining the strong defense partnerships fostered under Trump.
While some political figures in Europe have reservations about Trump’s rhetoric and approach to international diplomacy, many acknowledge that his administration’s firm stance on defense spending yielded tangible benefits for NATO and European security.
As the 2024 U.S. presidential election approaches, Trump’s foreign policy legacy—particularly in relation to NATO—remains a topic of debate, with his supporters in Europe viewing his strong message as an asset rather than a liability.
Despite Vice President Harris’s claims that world leaders mocked Trump, the overall response from European officials has been one of respect for the policies he championed during his tenure, particularly on defense. Whether this narrative will influence voters in the U.S. remains to be seen, but European leaders have made it clear that they are ready to work with whomever is elected in 2024(WFIN)(FOX 24 WTAT)
****
Harris is nothing but a wet noodle with no experience/background for the job; and it is evident in her role as VICE PRESIDENT. She did nothing and achieved nothing.
Obama is supporting her because he would still be in the mix – help running the show. Her main goal would be to take our guns/money away from us. She has insinuated this in her past – What’s yours will be mine.
How many times is Jack Smith going to the well to try to spread more rumors. Jan6 has been proven to be Pelosi’s baby who is still in diapers and the Pentagon/Milley who did not follow through with an order from the President to furnish the National Guard to protect the area.
Pelosi/Milley should be charged with dereliction of duty.
Jack Smith and an Obama’s judge keep regurgitating the same old news hoping it will stick.
Smith/Judge don’t want to accept the Supreme Court’s ruling that the President’s position is covered by immunity.
The President did what he could do; but, Pelosi interfered/made the mess and needs to clean it up. She hates Trump and is working with the One World Order. It is so obvious.
They won’t admit there was mucho corruption leading up to this.
****
A Fox News star destroyed Jack Smith’s witch hunt with three brutal words
October 4, 2024
3 minute read
Fox Corporation, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Jack Smith found a way to insert himself back into the election.
But his latest move won’t work out like he planned.
And a Fox News star just destroyed Jack Smith’s witch hunt with these three brutal words.
Jack Smith tries to hand the media a weapon
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s trial against former President Donald Trump over January 6 won’t happen until after the election if it ever does at all.
His case was held up most of the year while the Supreme Court considered Trump’s claim of Presidential immunity.
The Supreme Court ruled that Presidents have immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts while in office.
It was left up to lower court Judges to decide which actions by a President are considered official.
That left him with one last card to play to impact the election.
Smith filed a 165-page brief with all of his alleged evidence against Trump with District Court Judge Tonya Chutkan – who was appointed by former President Barack Obama – to determine what’s inadmissible because of Presidential immunity.
Chutkan unsealed the evidence for the public as a last-gasp attempt to deal political damage to Trump before the election.
(Which is election interference.)
Fox News star rips Jack Smith’s latest ploy
Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett called Smith’s brief “bad detective fiction” during an appearance on Fox & Friends.
“Yeah, he’s trying to have a damning trial of Trump without a trial, in the face of the fact that he couldn’t get a trial before the election,” Jarrett said. “And, you know, releasing this motion, this court filing, it sure looks like blatant election interference.”
Chutkan is a hack who worked with Smith to try and put Trump on trial as fast as possible this year.
“Lawrence, you know, Trump’s lawyers urged the Judge, keep it sealed. It will impact the election,” Jarrett explained. “The Judge did it anyway with almost no discussion and there’s no good reason to make it public. It’s premature. There isn’t even a trial date.”
Chutkan and Smith worked together to give Democrats and their allies in the media a club to bash Trump with by unsealing the evidence.
“So, I think this was done knowing full well media and Democrats would seize on provocative details, publicize it to affect voters and damage Trump and sure enough, as I looked at television, the internet and newspapers, that’s what’s happening,” Jarrett stated.
Jarrett said that Smith crammed as much in the brief as possible to try to make Trump look bad even if the evidence is disqualified later.
“At times it reads like bad detective fiction. A lot of it is irrelevant and inadmissible,” Jarrett remarked. “Conversations that other people had that are not connected to Trump directly. So, it seems like deliberate election interference and the incendiary details notwithstanding, Smith’s basic accusations are the same that we have heard all along. Nothing has changed, the theme that Trump deceived people, well, if he honestly believed he won, it’s hard to prove otherwise.”
The Fox News legal analyst thought that much of Smith’s evidence from the brief would eventually be stripped out by Presidential immunity.
“His great challenge is to somehow circumvent the immunity decision here,” Jarret said. “That’s what this motion is all about. The problem for Smith is a lot of his evidence and testimony comes from public officials and their conversations with Trump, including the vice president. Under the Supreme Court decision, that may well be protected information and thus inadmissible.”
Jack Smith may think he dropped bombshell evidence but it remains to be seen if voters are that interested in more January 6 hysteria.
The problem is with the MSNBC/ABC/CBS/CNN streaming disinformation that there is no problem in Springfield/Ohio OVER AND OVER when it has been called out.
You can’t blame the city or the illegals. It the government who has contributed to this BIG PROBLEM when they do not have assimilation plans as they continue to stream in millions of people from the border with no assimilation methods.
Follow America’s fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices.
The growing migrant crisis in Springfield, Ohio, has led to escalating tensions between residents and Haitian nationals, a situation that Tremont City Police Chief Chad Duncan believes could have been avoided with better government planning.
In a candid interview with Blaze News’ Julio Rosas, Duncan expressed frustration with how the local and federal governments have handled the sudden influx of Haitian migrants into the community. He described the situation as chaotic, harmful for both residents and migrants, and a result of poor government management.
Duncan’s criticism stems from what he sees as a lack of effort to integrate the migrants into the local culture. Many residents share his concerns, feeling that the government’s failure to facilitate proper assimilation has left Springfield and surrounding areas overwhelmed. “It’s not good for either side, and that’s a shame,” Duncan said, echoing the sentiments of many locals who feel their concerns have been dismissed or misunderstood.
One of the most significant challenges Springfield now faces is the increase in traffic accidents, many caused by unlicensed drivers, including newly arrived Haitian migrants.
“People are losing their lives,” Duncan said, noting that local insurance rates have spiked as a result. He explained that his department has tried to address the issue by towing vehicles driven by unlicensed drivers, a measure intended to deter repeat offenses. “I found hitting people’s pocketbooks gets their attention,” Duncan remarked, adding that a tow typically costs around $400, which, combined with fines, can make a significant impact.
In Springfield, however, Duncan believes the local police department has not taken similarly strict measures, allowing unlicensed migrants to continue driving even after accidents. According to Duncan, this leniency could be linked to the federal government’s Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program.
Under TPS, migrants who commit two misdemeanors risk deportation, which may explain why Springfield authorities appear reluctant to enforce certain laws. Duncan cited an example where a driver he stopped had already committed three misdemeanors for operating without a license, yet there seemed to be little consequence.
Beyond the roads, Duncan highlighted other problems that have resulted from the mass arrival of Haitian migrants. Springfield, like many U.S. cities dealing with a sudden influx of immigrants, is grappling with how to manage the needs of these new residents. Duncan believes the situation has created a divide in the community, not just between long-time residents and migrants but also between citizens and their government.
One particularly troubling aspect for Duncan is the lack of communication between law enforcement agencies. He mentioned that Springfield’s police department had recently encrypted its radio communications, making it difficult for surrounding municipalities, like Tremont City, to coordinate on public safety matters. This issue becomes particularly concerning during high-speed chases or emergencies that could spill over into neighboring towns. Duncan recounted an incident where a car fleeing through Springfield at over 100 miles per hour entered his jurisdiction, a dangerous situation made worse by the lack of communication between departments.
The broader issue, according to Duncan, is the government’s failure to properly integrate migrants before placing them in communities like Springfield. He argued that the Haitian migrants should have been brought to a centralized location where they could learn English, acquire driver’s licenses, and gain basic life skills before being distributed across the country. “There was an alternative way that would have been beneficial to everybody involved,” Duncan said. Instead, the mishandled situation has left both residents and migrants in a state of confusion and frustration.
Duncan was quick to clarify that his criticisms are not directed at the migrants themselves but at the government’s failure to provide proper support. “Anybody that has a heart, that has any empathy, has any intelligence, when your home country is the way Haiti is right now, you want to get out. You want to find safety, and you want to take care of your family and yourself,” Duncan remarked, expressing sympathy for the difficult circumstances the migrants face.
He shared a story of pulling over a young Haitian woman for a traffic violation. When he explained that his frustrations were with the government and not with the migrants, the woman began to cry. She told Duncan she had believed the community hated her and her fellow Haitians. Duncan reassured her, saying, “We’re not against you Haitians. We just don’t like the way our government puts you here. It doesn’t help you. It doesn’t help us.”
For Duncan, this interaction was a powerful moment of understanding. “We kind of built a little bridge there, and that’s what it’s all about,” he said, reflecting on the importance of empathy and communication in resolving the tensions between migrants and locals.
The police chief’s frustrations also extend to the media’s role in the crisis. Bill Monaghan, a former journalist, told Blaze News that many residents have self-censored out of fear of being labeled racist or intolerant for expressing concerns about the influx of migrants. Monaghan noted that when locals raise legitimate issues like housing shortages or increased traffic accidents, they are often met with accusations of racial bias.
Duncan’s message to the government is clear: the situation could have been handled much more effectively with a bit more planning and care. Instead, both sides—locals and migrants—are left to navigate the resulting turmoil. “The end result is, we’re just going to constantly have turmoil because they haven’t adjusted to our culture,” Duncan concluded. “It’s not good for either side, and that’s a shame.”
