In August, the association’s president and CEO, Franklin Graham, turned to the social platform X to voice his displeasure at Evangelicals for Harris’ use of his father’s sermons.
“The liberals are using anything and everything they can to promote candidate Harris. They even developed a political ad trying to use my father @BillyGraham’s image. They are trying to mislead people,” he wrote. “Maybe they don’t know that my father appreciated the conservative values and policies of President @realDonaldTrump in 2016, and if he were alive today, my father’s views and opinions would not have changed.”
What do you think would be the biggest specific difference?
FOX News
Kamala Harris tells ‘The View’ how she would be different than Joe Biden as president
Critics of Vice President Kamala Harris said she damned her campaign by telling “The View” she couldn’t think of anything she would have done differently from President Biden.
The Biden presidency has been consistently dogged by crises ranging from domestic issues like inflation and chaos at the border, to international scandals like the disastrously managed withdrawal from Afghanistan. As Harris has tried to prove to the American people that she would be a competent president, many have argued that her connection with Biden’s unpopularity is a liability for her election prospects.
As Harris spoke to co-hosts of “The View” on Tuesday, she was asked by co-host Sunny Hostin, “If anything, would you have done something differently than President Biden during the past four years?”
Harris responded, “There is not a thing that comes to mind.”
“Kamala Harris is more of the same,” Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, wrote. “She admits it herself.”
Many conservatives on social media expressed joy and disbelief that Harris chose to hitch her reputation to the embattled president, with some arguing she is helping her opponent, former President Donald Trump.
OutKick’s Riley Gaines suggested, “She’s done more to elect Trump than she has to elect herself.”
“Oh my goodness,” Fox News’ Guy Benson responded to the clip, later joking it would make an excellent campaign ad for Trump, “’I’m Donald Trump and I approve this message.’”
“This will be the nail in Kamala Harris’s coffin,” The Federalist co-founder Sean Davis predicted.
“It reminds me of John Kerry’s ‘I voted for the $87 billion before I voted against it’ comment about Iraq war funding when he was fighting charges of being a spineless flip-flopper,” he added. “That single comment ended his campaign.”
“I’m floored by this,” CNN senior political commentator Scott Jennings said. “Honestly can’t believe it.”
Political strategist Chris Barron argued Harris’ comment would sink her chances at the White House, “Say good night to Kamala’s campaign.”
“The View Lady accidentally asks the most brutal question Kamala’s gotten,” podcaster Wade Stotts posted.
Some public figures argued that “more of the same” is an election-losing proposition.
“More of the same,” Former Trump ambassador Richard Grenell said. “Wars. Bidenomics. Open borders. Gas prices. Grocery prices.”
The official account of the Republican Party cited a few key issues on American voters’ minds, “Prices up over 20%, the worst border crisis in U.S. history, and the world on the brink of world war III…and Kamala says she wouldn’t have done anything differently.”
Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders slammed Harris for a similar litany of issues, saying, “Prices are up 20%, millions have crossed our southern border illegally, and our allies around the world are under attack. But don’t worry, America. Kamala says she wouldn’t change a thing.”
“13 brave service members losing their life, run away inflation, 14 million illegals over our southern border, 300,000 unaccounted for children sold into God knows what,” Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., said as he recalled the infamously bungled withdrawal from Afghanistan. “Should I go on?”
Impose all of this really important information that you just….
FOX News
Last week, Biden said during a White House press briefing that he and Harris were in constant contact and “singing from the same song sheet.”
“Now, she was a major player in everything we’ve done, including passage of legislation which we were told we could never pass. And so she’s been, and her, her staff is interlocked with mine in terms of all the things we’re doing,” Biden said.
ActBlue Faces Investigation Over Alleged ‘Smfing’ in Campaign Donations
In the world of political fundraising, two platforms dominate the landscape. Republicans rely on WinRed, while Democrats use ActBlue, a fundraising giant that has helped process billions of dollars for left-wing candidates and political action committees (PACs). ActBlue, in particular, has long been heralded as a trailblazer for its digital fundraising tools that efficiently gather small-dollar donations from a wide base of supporters. However, recent allegations suggest that ActBlue’s practices may not be as above board as they seem.
A group of Republican lawmakers and 19 state attorneys general are now investigating ActBlue for allegedly skirting campaign finance laws through a money-laundering technique known as “smurfing.” The accusations, if proven, could have major implications for Democratic fundraising efforts and potentially lead to serious legal consequences.
The trouble for ActBlue began in August when whistleblowers came forward with allegations that the platform was using questionable methods to process donations. These accusations prompted Rep. Bryan Steil (R-WI), chairman of the Committee on House Administration, to call for an emergency investigation into ActBlue’s practices. Steil’s committee sent a letter to top officials at the Federal Election Commission (FEC), urging immediate action.
In the letter, Steil called on the FEC to “initiate an emergency rulemaking” that would require political campaigns to verify the card verification value (CVV) of online donors and prohibit the use of gift cards or prepaid debit cards for campaign donations. This move was aimed at tightening oversight of online contributions and ensuring compliance with existing campaign finance laws.
The urgency of Steil’s request underscores the seriousness of the allegations. The lack of stringent verification processes, such as not requiring a CVV for donations, opens the door for fraudulent donations or money laundering activities. The implications of such behavior are far-reaching, as they could distort the flow of campaign finances and provide an unfair advantage to one political party over the other.
At the heart of the investigation is the accusation that ActBlue is engaging in “smurfing.” Smurfing is a well-known money-laundering technique where large sums of money are broken into smaller transactions to avoid detection by regulatory agencies. These smaller transactions are often spread across various accounts to stay below financial reporting thresholds.
This technique is illegal and is typically used by criminals to launder money without drawing attention from law enforcement. If ActBlue is involved in such practices, it would mean that vast sums of money are being funneled into Democratic campaigns without proper oversight, violating both state and federal campaign finance laws.
The accusations from 19 state attorneys general suggest that ActBlue may be structuring political donations in ways that help donors avoid regulatory scrutiny. They have demanded answers from ActBlue’s legal counsel, asserting that the American public deserves to know if the platform is complying with the law.
The Patriot Act, passed after the 9/11 attacks, introduced strict regulations to combat money laundering, including requirements to report any financial transaction over $10,000. These rules were designed to prevent illegal activities such as terrorism financing and large-scale money laundering. However, if a fundraising platform like ActBlue were to structure transactions in smaller amounts through smurfing, it could potentially avoid detection while channeling significant funds into political campaigns.
If ActBlue is found guilty of these allegations, it would represent a major violation of campaign finance laws and could result in hefty fines, criminal charges, or both. Furthermore, it would severely damage the platform’s reputation, possibly forcing Democratic candidates to find alternative fundraising methods at a critical point in the election cycle.
The group of state attorneys general leading the investigation has set an October 23, 2024 deadline for ActBlue to respond to their inquiries. This deadline comes well before Election Day, indicating that the investigation could have a direct impact on the upcoming elections. Depending on the outcome, this probe could significantly alter the political fundraising landscape.
Political fundraising is a fierce battleground, with both parties vying for every dollar they can get. Any illegitimate advantage could sway electoral outcomes, making the allegations against ActBlue particularly concerning. If the platform is indeed engaging in smurfing, it would constitute blatant election interference, giving Democrats an unfair edge in the all-important race to raise funds.
The Republican-led investigation, along with the state-level probe, highlights the growing concern over how campaign donations are solicited, processed, and reported. For now, the focus remains on ensuring transparency and legality in political fundraising. Whether ActBlue’s practices will withstand scrutiny remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: this investigation is unlikely to conclude quietly.
As the October 23 deadline approaches, both political parties—and the voters—will be closely watching the outcome. Should ActBlue be found in violation of campaign finance laws, it could shake the very foundation of digital political fundraising, reshaping how future campaigns are financed.
Anyone want a job as a potential canvassers – Musk is asking.
The PAC is offering starting wages of $30 per hour to individuals willing to work on expanding voter registration and turnout ahead of the election. “Pay starts at $30 per hour, with bonuses for performance,” the PAC’s website states, underscoring the financial incentives to join the voter outreach effort.
The PAC’s aggressive voter canvassing initiative, which offers high pay of $30 per hour—more than 400% higher than the federal minimum wage—has garnered attention on social media. Users have pointed out that the attractive pay is a powerful motivator for potential canvassers, especially given the current economic climate. The strategy aligns with Musk’s belief in merit-based incentives, with the PAC even offering performance bonuses to workers who excel in their outreach efforts.
Follow America’s fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices.
Elon Musk, the billionaire tech mogul and founder of Tesla and SpaceX, is taking a more active role in shaping the 2024 election through his political action committee (PAC), America PAC. Musk’s PAC is dedicated to increasing voter participation, particularly in key battleground states, and has announced an aggressive plan that offers high pay for canvassing efforts._
The PAC is offering starting wages of $30 per hour to individuals willing to work on expanding voter registration and turnout ahead of the election. “Pay starts at $30 per hour, with bonuses for performance,” the PAC’s website states, underscoring the financial incentives to join the voter outreach effort.
Musk’s PAC has targeted several swing states crucial to the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. These include Nevada, Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, North Carolina, and other highly competitive districts across the U.S. The focus on these areas reflects the critical role they will play in determining the next president, as well as control of Congress.
Musk, who publicly endorsed former President Donald Trump earlier this year, has closely aligned America PAC’s efforts with Trump’s re-election campaign. At a recent rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, Musk joined Trump on stage and highlighted the importance of the upcoming election, calling it “the most important election of our lifetime.”
Musk’s endorsement of Trump comes after a long period of political ambiguity, during which the tech billionaire had described himself as a “moderate Democrat.” However, in recent years, Musk has been more outspoken in his criticisms of the Democratic Party, particularly on issues like free speech, regulation, and social policies. His political pivot has made headlines, and his financial support for Republican causes is now being closely watched.
At the rally in Butler, Musk echoed the urgency of voter participation, stating, “The other side wants to take away your freedom of speech. They want to take away your right to bear arms… They want to take away your right to vote effectively.” Musk’s comments were met with applause from the audience, many of whom were Trump supporters. He urged attendees to mobilize their communities, encouraging them to ensure everyone they know is registered and ready to vote.
“Honestly, you want to just be a pest,” Musk said, emphasizing the need for persistence in voter outreach. “Just be a pest to everyone—you know, people on the street, everyone.”
The rally also saw Musk echoing Trump’s defiant rhetoric from an earlier rally in July, where Trump was injured in an assassination attempt. Musk repeated Trump’s rallying cry of “Fight, fight, fight, vote, vote, vote,” a chant that has since become popular among Trump’s base.
Musk’s America PAC, officially launched earlier this year, has a mission focused on promoting free speech, free markets, and a merit-based society. The PAC’s website and financial reports show that it has dedicated significant resources to canvassing and get-out-the-vote operations in these swing states, which are expected to be pivotal in deciding the 2024 election.
According to filings from the Federal Election Commission (FEC) in late September, America PAC has already invested over $2.4 million in a dozen key congressional races. Additionally, Musk has signaled that he plans to commit up to $45 million per month to support the PAC’s efforts, a substantial financial commitment that could make a significant impact on voter outreach and turnout.
The PAC’s aggressive voter canvassing initiative, which offers high pay of $30 per hour—more than 400% higher than the federal minimum wage—has garnered attention on social media. Users have pointed out that the attractive pay is a powerful motivator for potential canvassers, especially given the current economic climate. The strategy aligns with Musk’s belief in merit-based incentives, with the PAC even offering performance bonuses to workers who excel in their outreach efforts.
America PAC has also partnered with conservative advocacy groups like Turning Point Action to strengthen the ground game in critical states. Last week, Politico reported that the two groups had teamed up in Wisconsin, a state that could prove decisive in the upcoming election. Andrew Kolvet, a spokesperson for Turning Point, noted the importance of having boots on the ground to drive voter turnout, saying, “We’ve always known bodies in the field equals ballots in the box.”
Musk’s growing involvement in Republican politics marks a significant shift for the tech entrepreneur, who has historically avoided such direct political activism. In August, he hosted Trump for a two-hour conversation streamed on X (formerly Twitter), during which they discussed a wide range of issues, including immigration, inflation, and the assassination attempt on Trump.
With America PAC’s extensive resources and Musk’s vocal support for Trump, the billionaire is playing a central role in shaping the political landscape ahead of the 2024 election. By mobilizing financial resources and building a strong network of canvassers, Musk’s efforts aim to ensure high voter turnout in swing states that will likely determine the next president and control of Congress.
As the 2024 election approaches, Musk’s influence in the political arena is only expected to grow, making him a key player in Republican efforts to reclaim the White House.
FOX News
“This will be the nail in Kamala Harris’s coffin,” The Federalist co-founder Sean Davis predicted.
