10/17/2025
To view click on the following.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2-_Qn_F49U&t=97s
ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2-_Qn_F49U&t=97s
Add an ‘h’ if WordPress erases theirs.
kommonsentsjane
10/18/2025
10/17/2025
Why does the world countries keep fighting over territory/religion.
Isn’t the world big enough for each country/religion to allow the beliefs of each country? We have to challenge the mentality of those who want war/killing/destruction of different religions. The world has a lot going for it when people work together and especially helping those countries who are less educated and are struggling to make it in this complicated world.
When we discuss money in trillions and we still don’t have enough to satisfy our appetite for greed – then it is time for the world to recalibrate. We don’t have to have one country dictate – they can all be winners to their own people by participating and sharing our worldly goods by rooting out the evil by discussing the problems not using war as the only weapon of disagreement.
A lot of countries are endowed with rare earth minerals/oil/gas and could share by bartering. A good example would be – to have a world wide employment list of people who are qualified for different jobs and shared by the world – no matter what job. Then, we wouldn’t have people trying to enter countries illegally. Countries who would like to participate could establish training programs for this effort.
As we all know the problem in the Middle East is religion. Our President has tackled that problem. That area has to understand that all religions should be recognized. Those who don’t agree should understand – none of us own any part of the world. We are only temporary citizens until your God calls.
This fight about territory between Ukraine/Russia is between two humans who disagree. In the mean time the war that is continuing is killing a lot of people which is not necessary.
The question is – what does each side want to solve and stop this war? This should be put in writing where the world can view and better understand it. It seems both sides do a lot of talking; but, no results.
Also, what is the United Nations job in this war between Russia/Ukraine.
Time for some give and take.
kommonsentsjane
10/17/2025
AGAIN: Tail Dragging a Socialist/Progressive.
Time for Sanders’ voters to understand that Sanders is not working for the good of our country. President Trump is working for all of the country 24/7, so let’s give him 24/7 support. We don’t have to tell you what the left is doing to our country – DOGE TOLD US. So no matter what side your on – support the U.S. We won’t have any side if we don’t let the President fix the broken system.
ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bernie-sanders-ripped-after-clash-with-gop-audience-member-over-gov-t-shutdown-blame-just-got-wrecked/ar-AA1OC6IG?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=DCTS&cvid=68f252ca6b1f44048ead96e01557558d&ei=46
Story by Andrew Mark Miller
Bernie Sanders pushes back on GOP student’s question on Chuck Schumer
Conservatives on social media joined White House accounts in blasting Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders over an exchange where he pressed a town hall audience member on who is to blame for the government shutdown.
“How do you think this shutdown reflects on Chuck Schumer’s leadership?” Sanders was asked by an audience member, Rohan Naval, during a CNN town hall on Wednesday night.
Sanders responded by saying the shutdown “reflects more on Mike Johnson’s leadership” along with the leadership of President Donald Trump, which prompted a smirk from the audience member.
“Well, tell me how do you feel?” Sanders said. “You tell me, you think it’s a good idea to give $1 trillion in tax breaks to the richest people in the country and then make massive cuts to healthcare for working-class people?”
SECRETARY OF EDUCATION POINTS OUT THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN SHOWS HER DEPARTMENT IS UNNEEDED
Sen. Bernie Sanders faced ridicule after a viral exchange at a town hall Wednesday night, where a conservative audience member challenged him over who’s to blame for the government shutdown. Getty Images© Getty Images
Naval, an intern at Americans for Tax Reform, responded, “I think Chuck Schumer has voted for a continuing resolution 13 times in the last four years, and he has the opportunity to vote for one again, but he’s refusing to come to the table.”
The exchange quickly made waves on social media, with White House accounts and conservatives praising Naval’s response to the Vermont senator.
“Crazy Bernie just got wrecked on national television,” the White House Rapid Response team posted on X.
“Bingo,” GOP Rep. Ken Calvert posted on X. “The Schumer Shutdown is all about politics.”
“Bernie Sanders got embarrassed HARD,” Florida’s Voice News assistant director Eric Daugherty posted on X.
TRUMP IS USING THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN TO DO SOMETHING NO PRESIDENT HAS EVER DONE
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is taking heat for the government shutdown. Associated Press© AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
“LOL this kid just rekt Crazy Bernie,” White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson posted on X.
“Bernie got COOKED,” Townhall.com posted on X. “This guy just calmly smacked Bernie Sanders down in a single sentence. BRUTAL.”
“Bernie Sanders gets owned by a man who calls out Chuck Schumer for repeatedly voting for continuing resolutions and now suddenly not,” conservative influencer Paul A. Szypula posted on X. “The only reason Schumer isn’t funding the government is because he’s afraid of losing his Senate seat to brainless AOC.”
After Naval’s response, Sanders replied, “Look, here’s what I have said. There are 53 Republican senators, correct? They need 60. It means you have to talk to the other side. Mike Johnson is not talking. John Thune is not talking. President Trump is not talking. That is the problem.”
On Thursday, Senate Democrats for a 10th time blocked Republicans’ attempts to reopen the government.
Sen. John Thune is determined to continue on the same course of action to keep bringing the House-passed continuing resolution (CR), which would reopen the government until Nov. 21, up for a vote again and again.
Sanders was mocked online after his back-and-forth with an intern at Americans for Tax Reform went viral online. Getty Images© Getty Images
Though some in the GOP are mulling a new end date for the CR, that would require the House, which has been out of session for nearly a month, to come back and pass a new one.
While Thune and Republicans are adamant that their plan is the only pathway to ending the shutdown, now on Day 16, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and the Senate Democratic caucus still want to hammer out a deal on expiring Obamacare subsidies — and they want Trump to get directly involved in negotiations.
“The bottom line is [Republicans] won’t even negotiate with us,” Schumer said. “So that’s a premature question. But of course, I’m not going to negotiate in public. We need to address the crisis that has afflicted, and that’s the right word, the American people.”
Fox News Digital’s Alex Miller contributed to this report.
Original article source: Bernie Sanders ripped after clash with GOP audience member over gov’t shutdown blame: ‘Just got wrecked’
kommonsentsjane
10/16/2025
Reblogged on kommonsentsjane
Democrats blowing smoke. Why would anyone not want their city safe? Why is it the blue state Governors want these killings in the cities in their state. Ask them?
Following is a blog which is interesting. I didn’t see any judge blocking Obama?
Posted on May 16, 2015 by kommonsentsjane
HAPPY NEWS YEARS – READ THE LAST PARAGRAPH! While we were celebrating New Year’s Eve – our illustrious leader was doing dirt!
THE INAUGURATION OF POLICE STATE USA 2012. Obama Signs the “National Defense Authorization Act ”
Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research
Monday, January 2, 2012
With minimal media debate, at a time when Americans were celebrating the New Year with their loved ones, the “National Defense Authorization Act ” H.R. 1540 was signed into law by President Barack Obama. The actual signing took place in Hawaii on the 31st of December.
According to Obama’s “signing statement”, the threat of Al Qaeda to the Security of the Homeland constitutes a justification for repealing fundamental rights and freedoms, with a stroke of the pen.
The controversial signing statement (see transcript below) is a smokescreen. Obama says he disagrees with the NDAA but he signs it into law.
“[I have] serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of suspected terrorists.”
Obama implements “Police State USA”, while acknowledging that certain provisions of the NDAA are unacceptable. If such is the case, he could have either vetoed the NDAA (H.R. 1540) or sent it back to Congress with his objections.
The “National Defense Authorization Act ” (H.R. 1540) is Obama’s New Year’s “Gift” to the American People.
He justifies the signing of the NDAA as a means to combating terrorism, as part of a “counter-terrorism” agenda. But in substance, any American opposed to the policies of the US government can –under the provisions of the NDAA– be labelled a “suspected terrorist” and arrested under military detention.
“Moreover, I want to clarify that my Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens. Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a Nation. My Administration will interpret section 1021 in a manner that ensures that any detention it authorizes complies with the Constitution, the laws of war, and all other applicable law.”
Barack Obama is a lawyer (a graduate from Harvard Law School). He knows that his signing statement –which parrots his commitment to democracy– is purely cosmetic. It has no force of law.
His administration “will not authorize” what? The implementation of a Law signed by the US president?
Section 1021 is crystal clear. The Executive cannot refuse to implement it. The signing statement does not in any way invalidate or modify the actual signing by President Obama of NDAA (H.R. 1540) into law.
“Democratic Dictatorship” in America.
The “National Defense Authorization Act ” (H.R. 1540) repeals the US Constitution. While the facade of democracy prevails, supported by media propaganda, the American republic is fractured. The tendency is towards the establishment of a totalitarian State, a military government dressed in civilian clothes.
The passage of NDAA is intimately related to Washington’s global military agenda. The military pursuit of Worldwide hegemony also requires the “Militarization of the Homeland”, namely the demise of the American Republic.
In substance, the signing statement is intended to mislead Americans and provide a “democratic face” to the President as well as to the unfolding post-911 Military Police State apparatus.
The “most important traditions and values” in derogation of The Bill of Rights and the US Constitution have indeed been repealed, effective on New Year’s Day, January 1st 2012.
The NDAA authorises the arbitrary and indefinite military detention of American citizens.
The Lessons of History
This New Year’s Eve December 31, 2011 signing of the NDAA will indelibly go down as a landmark in American history.
If we are to put this in a comparative historical context, the relevant provisions of the NDAA HR 1540 are, in many regards, comparable to those contained in the “Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of People and State”, commonly known as the “Reichstag Fire Decree” (Reichstagsbrandverordnung) enacted in Germany under the Weimar Republic on 27 February 1933 by President (Field Marshal) Paul von Hindenburg.
Implemented in the immediate wake of the Reichstag Fire (which served as a pretext), this February 1933 decree was used to repeal civil liberties including the right of Habeas Corpus.
Article 1 of the February 1933 “Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of People and State” suspended civil liberties under the pretext of “protecting” democracy: “Thus, restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press, on the right of association and assembly, and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications, and warrants for house-searches, orders for confiscations, as well as restrictions on property rights are permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.” (Art. 1, emphasis added)
Constitutional democracy was nullified in Germany through the signing of a presidential decree.
The Reichstag Fire decree was followed in March 1933 by “The Enabling Act” ( Ermächtigungsgesetz) which allowed (or enabled) the Nazi government of Chancellor Adolf Hitler to invoke de facto dictatorial powers. These two decrees enabled the Nazi regime to introduce legislation which was in overt contradiction with the 1919 Weimar Constitution.
The following year, upon the death of president Hindenburg in 1934, Hitler “declared the office of President vacant” and took over as Fuehrer, the combined function’s of Chancellor and Head of State.
The Reichstag Fire, Berlin, February 1933
Germany’s President (Field Marshal) Paul von Hindenburg
Obama’s New Year’s Gift to the American People
To say that January 1st 2012 is “A Sad Day for America” is a gross understatement.
The signing of NDAA (HR 1540) into law is tantamount to the militarization of law enforcement, the repeal of the Posse Comitatus Act and the Inauguration in 2012 of Police ACT.
Congress, what do you have to say for yourself? Time to get off the “pot.” We’ve got plumbing problems.
****
President Trump is working to make our cities safe for citizens; but, Obama was trying to be the King or was the King Dictator and did not use the Constitution.
There is a difference.
kommonsentsjane
kommonsentsjane 