This article was featured in One Story to Read Today, a newsletter in which our editors recommend a single must-read from The Atlantic, Monday through Friday. Sign up for it here.
Explore the November 2023 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.View More
Ease and confidence have not been the prevailing themes of Harris’s vice presidency. Her first year on the job was defined by rhetorical blunders, staff turnover, political missteps, and a poor sense among even her allies of what, exactly, constituted her portfolio. Within months of taking office, President Joe Biden was forced to confront a public perception that Harris didn’t measure up; ultimately, the White House issued a statement insisting that Biden did, in fact, rely on his vice president as a governing partner. But Harris’s reputation has never quite recovered.
Harris is intensely private, so I was somewhat surprised to be invited to her home. The residence had been redecorated, and in keeping with past practice the work was done without fanfare. There have been no photo spreads, and the designer, Sheila Bridges, signed a nondisclosure agreement. But Harris seemed to enjoy showing me around. In the turret room, she pointed to the banquette seating built along the curve. (“I just love circles,” she said.) She gestured at some of the art she’d brought in, on loan from various galleries and collections, describing each piece in terms of the artist’s background rather than its aesthetic qualities—Indian American woman, African American gay man, Japanese American. “So you get the idea,” she said. We moved into the library, with its collection of books devoted to the vice presidency. (Who knew there were so many?) The green-striped wallpaper pattern that the Bidens had favored when they lived here was gone.
The No Body Counts (NBC) news who are Obama’s mother suckers showed our former Canadian illegal alien Kamala Harris on the Colbert show mixing it up with the “manufactured news” diatribe.
When I saw her on the spectacle review of the part she played in the Kavanaugh hearing, it gave us what her character consisted of which was not a pretty picture and she is thinking of running for a 2020 presidency.
When someone has so much hate in their hearts and not being born and raised with American values, it tells me – it is time we elect more born and bred Americans who care about the country and its people. And, on top of that – she is so racists as indicated in these hearings.
When America elects a woman to run this country as we saw with Hillary Clinton – it has to be a woman with character and principle – not someone who came up the ladder with a shoddy liberal mindset.
We want a man or woman who was born and bred with American values and believes in the Constitution and laws – not some former Canadian liberal illegal alien.
We must put it all out on the table and tell it like it is because we don’t want another hating lying president like Obama who trolled the world spewing how much he hated America and its people (the world loved hearing him making fun of the people and the country) – and Harris comes from that hate camp.
Donald Trump faced the most unfair Presidential debate in history.
Trump walked into a liberal media ambush.
But now a key Democrat blew the whistle on how ABC rigged the debate against Donald Trump.
Former Hillary Clinton advisor alleges ABC gave the questions to Kamala Harris in advance
Former Hillary Clinton pollster Mark Penn told Just the News’ John Solomon that ABC should conduct an investigation into if someone at the network passed the debate questions to Kamala Harris’ campaign.
“I actually think they should do a full internal investigation, hire an outside law firm. I don’t know how much of this was planned in advance,” Penn stated.
“I don’t know what they told the Harris campaign,” Penn added.
But Penn said that ABC needed to make sure that moderators Muir and Davis didn’t let it slip out that they planned to rig the debate by acting like Kamala Harris’ truth squad and fact-check Donald Trump at every turn while letting Kamala Harris lie left and right unchallenged.
“I think the day after, suspicion here is really quite high, and I think a review of all their internal texts and emails really should be done by an independent party to find out to what extent they were planning on, in effect, you know, fact-checking just one candidate and in effect, rigging the outcome of this debate,” Penn added.
The debate could determine the outcome of the election, and Americans deserve to know if it was on the level.
“I think the situation demands nothing less than that,” Penn concluded.
Donald Trump reacts
By fact-checking Trump and not Kamala Harris, the moderators made the debate a three-on-one affair.
Trump posted on Truth Social that he thought it was “very likely” that Muir and Davis colluded with the Kamala Harris campaign.
“People are saying that Comrade Kamala Harris had the questions from Fake News ABC. I would say it is very likely. The two so-called “Anchors” were a disgrace to Modern Day Journalism. David Muir should be ashamed of himself, as should Linsey Davis, who I never heard of, but both were nasty and rude when they were making statements that they knew were false,” Trump began.
Trump cited Muir, falsely claiming Trump was wrong to say crime was up when the latest stats from the Department of Justice show violent crime up 37 percent from 2020.
Muir’s conduct was so outrageous that Trump said no Republican should ever do a debate on ABC again.
“As an example, the FBI said they didn’t give all the information when coming up with Crime stats, making me RIGHT. Despite having to debate three people, Polls firmly state that I won, and EASILY. I felt that also, but no Politician should ever do a Debate with ABC News,” Trump added.
Trump called for revoking ABC’s broadcast license if proven that ABC gave the questions to Kamala Harris and argued it wasn’t out of the question since ABC employs Donna Brazile as a commentator.
In 2016, leaked emails showed that Brazile passed questions for a CNN town hall to Hillary Clinton when CNN employed Brazile as a contributor.
“They have proven NOT WORTHY, and hopefully an investigation will be done as to whether or not they gave the Debate questions to Comrade Kamala, whose best friend is a top ABC Executive. If she did give the questions to Kamala, ABC’s license should be TERMINATED. Remember, Donna Brazile works for ABC, and she gave the questions to Hillary Clinton!” Trump concluded.
(Alt-Market)—There is a popular school of thought that believes most economic stability is purely psychological; that the health of the economy relies on the population NOT knowing the true state of things. In other words, “ignorance is bliss.” I partially agree with the premise but only under certain conditions. If an economy is built on lies then yes, the exposure of those lies would certainly put that system at risk. My argument is, if an economy is built on lies it’s not really worth saving.
The US public in particular is now struggling with the slow realization that our financial and monetary structures are not secure. Many of us in the alternative media have been warning about this for decades. I warned about the inevitability of a stagflation crisis for many years and was criticized as a “doom monger,” at least until 2021 when the crisis became undeniable. But that’s what happens when you live in an economy of lies and you start talking about reality – Some people will see you as a threat.
Even today with everything that’s happening there are still blind muppets and disinformation shills out there that assure us “all is well”. And, usually they’ll cite manipulated government stats as evidence to support their faulty position.
The Biden Administration has proven to be one of the worst culprits when it comes to data misrepresentation and manipulation. To be sure, Biden has had plenty of help with his “Bidenomics” agenda and he wouldn’t be able to rig the numbers without aid from the Federal Reserve, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the corporate media, etc. Most presidents get help from these institutions when promoting a sick economy as a healthy economy. Some presidents do not…
With that fact in mind, I’ve been wondering lately what will happen when Biden exits the White House in January 2025? What happens to the numbers after that? Will there be a statistical reset? Will the real data be exposed all at once; an avalanche of reality crashing down on the delusional system?
I’m still not convinced that any outcome is beyond dismissal for elections in November. If someone was to ask me what I predict, I would have to say Trump will be president again. From all the evidence I’ve seen the Harris campaign is an astroturf movement with a limited voter base. She’s obviously not very bright and I don’t think the theatrical “joy” strategy is convincing very many people of her competency. Her economic policies (including price controls) are full bore communist and would be devastating to any form of US recovery. Her fiscal plan will be even worse than Bidenomics has been.
Important: Our sponsors at Jase are now offering emergency preparedness subscription medications on top of the long-term storage antibiotics they offer. Use promo code “Rucker10” at checkout!
But hey, I was certain Trump was getting a second term in 2020 and I was wrong. Who could have known Biden was going to get that unprecedented mail-in voter boost in the middle of the night after everyone went to bed? Truly, he is the most popular presidential candidate of all time. Why they dropped him for Kamala I’ll never fathom…
But seriously, the point is, we have come to a crossroads in our election process where anything is possible (whether real or engineered). I suspect that if Trump enters office once again there will be a multitude of changes to our economic data and they will happen quickly. Some of the rigging is already being exposed, just not on a level where the majority of the populace is aware of it.
Some examples of this rigging include:
Biden’s steady sale of US strategic oil reserves in order to drive down energy and gas prices, thereby artificially reducing CPI (official monthly inflation numbers). By June of this year Biden had sold off at least 50% of the nation’s emergency oil supply just to keep CPI down a few points. Keep in mind, bringing down the CPI does nothing to cut the real inflation that has already accumulated in necessities (30%-50% higher prices depending on the product or service).
Don’t wait for a stock market crash, dedollarization, or CBDCs before securing your retirement with physical precious metals. Genesis Gold Groupcan help.
Then there’s the manipulation of BLS unemployment data to show millions of new jobs that don’t actually exist. After it was announced that Biden was no longer the Democratic candidate, suddenly the US Payroll has been revised down by over 818,000, likely with more revisions to come. Meaning, Bidenomics was being fluffed with fake job creation.
An even greater concern is the fact that all new jobs created for the past several years have been going to illegal aliens, not legal citizens. In fact, since October of 2019 native-born US workers have lost over 1.4 million jobs. Over the same period, migrants illegally residing in the US have gained 3 million jobs. The new narrative among leftists is that this is a good thing; they claim that the US needs illegal immigration and open borders in order to support the jobs market and “bring down inflation.”
I’m doubtful that the jobs boost to illegals is real, either. More likely the migrant jobs data is rigged because it’s much harder to track and confirm. But these people don’t seem to understand how inflation works – Greater population means higher resource demand, and that helps drive up prices (as we’ve seen in housing). It doesn’t bring prices down, nor does it reduce the existing money supply.
It should also be noted that full time jobs numbers have plunged while part time low-wage jobs have increased. These are the kinds of issues no one in the Biden Admin is talking about.
kommonsentsjane 