KOMMONSENTSJANE – Elon Musk Says He will Take Legal Action After California Officials Cited His Politics When Rejecting SpaceX Launches.

10/15/2024

These people in CA don’t realize this is STILL the U.S. and we do have a Constitution/Bill of Rights that cover our “booties” and they can’t go around making up their own laws to govern the people.

Right on – ELON!

****

Elon Musk says he will take legal action after California officials cited his politics when rejecting SpaceX launches (msn.com)

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/elon-musk-says-he-will-take-legal-action-after-california-officials-cited-his-politics-when-rejecting-spacex-launches/ar-AA1scLVi

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/elon-musk-says-he-will-take-legal-action-after-california-officials-cited-his-politics-when-rejecting-spacex-launches/ar-AA1scLVi

Inside Elon Musk’s burn book — the non-exhaustive list of billionaires he’s fought with in 2024©Richard Bord/WireImage via Getty Images

  • Elon Musk’s ire this year has extended from Mark Zuckerberg to MacKenzie Scott.
  • The mercurial billionaire has often fired insults and traded barbs at his contemporaries on X.
  • “I have fun sparring with Elon. He likes to troll and so do I,” Mark Cuban told BI.

Elon Musk runs half a dozen companies, but the work involved in keeping the Muskonomy humming hasn’t stopped him from beefing with his fellow billionaires this year.

His platform of choice for trading barbs, firing insults, and sharing generally unfiltered thoughts is X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, which he bought in late 2022.

“Have I shot myself in the foot multiple times? Yes,” Musk said of his posting habits in an April 2023 interview with BBC’s James Clayton.

“I think I should not tweet after 3:00 a.m. If you’re gonna tweet something that maybe is controversial, save it as a draft, then look at it the next day and see if you still want to tweet it,” he added.

To be sure, Musk’s history of fights stretches way further back than 2024, and not everyone he trades barbs with takes it personally.

“I have fun sparring with Elon. He likes to troll and so do I,” Mark Cuban told BI on Monday. “I have no issues with him.”

Here’s a non-exhaustive list of the billionaires Musk has fought with in 2024.

Representatives for Musk didn’t respond to a request for comment from BI for this story.See moreThe California Coastal Commission on Thursday denied a request from the US Space Force for more-frequent SpaceX launches. Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

The California Coastal Commission on Thursday denied a request from the US Space Force for more-frequent SpaceX launches. Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images© Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

  • Elon Musk responded after California officials rejected a request for more-frequent SpaceX launches.
  • The state’s Coastal Commission denied a request from the US Space Force on Thursday.
  • Some commissioners expressed concern about Musk’s politics.

Elon Musk threatened to take legal action following reports that a California state commission cited his politics in a decision.

The California Coastal Commission on Thursday rejected a request for more-frequent SpaceX launches.

The request was filed by the US Space Force, seeking more launches from the state’s Central Coast. It was rejected by six votes to four.

Space Force had asked the commission to allow SpaceX to carry out 50 launches a year of its Falcon 9 rocket at Vandenberg Space Force Base, up from 36.

In a video of the meeting viewed by Business Insider, the commissioner Gretchen Newsom expressed concerns over Musk’s political posts and working conditions at SpaceX.

“Elon Musk is hopping about the country, spewing and tweeting political falsehoods and attacking FEMA while claiming his desire to help the hurricane victims with free Starlink access to the internet,” she said before the vote on Thursday.

“It appears that rather than prioritizing the welfare of SpaceX employees and the environment, the focus has been on profit maximization,” she added.

In response to Newsom’s statement, the commission chair, Caryl Hart, said: “You could argue that it’s bringing in politics, but this is a political matter to some extent because it involves the US government, it involves the Coastal Commission.”

Hart said that while she greatly appreciated the Space Force’s work, they were “dealing with a company, the head of which has aggressively injected himself into the presidential race.”

Musk responded to a Politico story about the commissioners’ comments, writing on X alongside a screenshot of the story: “Incredibly inappropriate. What I post on this platform has nothing to do with a ‘coastal commission’ in California!”

“Filing suit against them on Monday for violating the First Amendment,” he wrote, adding: “Tuesday, since court is closed on Monday.”

The commission, which aims to protect California’s coast and ocean, also disagreed with SpaceX and the military characterizing the launches as federal agency activities, which would exempt the company from obtaining a permit.

Commissioners argued that SpaceX was primarily a private company and should, therefore, obtain a permit itself.

“It is essential that SpaceX apply for a CDP,” Hart said, referring to a Coastal Development Permit, adding: “There is no other way forward in my opinion.”

Some commissioners took the opportunity to commend the military’s recent efforts in working with staff on environmental issues. The commission also noted concerns about impacts on the local environment caused by the rockets’ sonic booms.

Ravi Chaudhary, an assistant secretary of the Air Force, told the hearing that the Space Force remained committed to protecting the coastline and local coastal species.

Business Insider contacted both the California Coastal Commission and SpaceX for comment.

******

The average person probably doesn’t know about all the lawsuits

Video Player is loading.

Business Insider

Silicon Valley’s political divide is now public — and petty

If you enjoyed this story, be sure to follow Business Insider on Microsoft Start.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Obama’s Callout to Black Men Touches a Nerve Among Democrats.

10/15/2024

Obama is trying to place the blame on Black men for the trouble he and Pelosi are heaping on the Democrat Marxists Party after he and Pelosi first used and then back-stabbed Biden with Biden’s primary win/votes/cash.

Typical Obama-style politics. Every one knows it was Obama/Pelosi/Clooney who played the trick on Biden.

Where have we heard those words to Biden – FOR THE GOOD OF THE PARTY when neither candidate has the brains to put two words together that make any sense.

The left keeps “CHASING AFTER EMPTY WORDS.”

10/13/2024

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/obama-s-callout-to-black-men-touches-a-nerve-among-democrats-is-election-year-misogyny-at-play/ar-AA1s9yu7?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=3e0e7d89e84b4dbaaa4b4b08712da776&ei=60

Obama’s callout is just an election day callout when he/Pelosi need your vote.

Black people look at what Obama/Pelosi has done to our country. Look at their trickery with what they did to Biden by back-stabbing him and sliding Harris into his place without a proper primary for her.

Obama says Harris is just like you and grew up like you did and you know that is not true.

If Harris loses Obama becomes irrelevant – that is what he is trying to protect.

He is working with the One World Order/Soros/U.N. to take over our country as Marxists.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Kamala Harris Accused of Plagiarism in Co-Authored 2009 Book…

10/15/2024

When has the history of the NYT lying been something to brag about or take home to Mother to try to put the NYT back on the shelf of TRUTH with MOM?

Place the NYT article as part of the FUNNIES part of the newspaper for lack of honesty/integrity and put a rubber band around the book to indicate when you remove the rubber band, open and read the book that the book is stretching the truth.

****

Chris Rufo refutes New York Times coverage on Kamala Harris plagiarism story: ‘Lied by omission’ (msn.com)

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/entertainment-celebrity/chris-rufo-refutes-new-york-times-coverage-on-kamala-harris-plagiarism-story-lied-by-omission/ar-AA1siLHr?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=928b26f5a93743a1a6a30aca69e46be3&ei=26

Well, ironic, isn’t it, that Veritas is the motto of……

FOX News

Rufo: It’s brazen, it’s repeated, and it’s very serious.

View on Watch

Conservative activist Christopher Rufo accused the New York Times on Monday of undermining his exclusive story on Vice President Kamala Harris allegedly plagiarizing passages in her book “Smart on Crime: A Career Prosecutor’s Plan to Make Us Safer.”

Rufo first reported so-called “plagiarism hunter,” Austrian professor Stefan Weber, finding 27 times that Harris and her co-author allegedly committed some form of plagiarism, writing, “24 fragments are plagiarism from other authors, [and] 3 fragments are self-plagiarism from a work written with a co-author.”US:Why everyone is excited about this $59 New Blood Sugar Smartwatch

“Taken in total, there is certainly a breach of standards here. Harris and her co-author duplicated long passages nearly verbatim without proper citation and without quotation marks, which is the textbook definition of plagiarism,” Rufo wrote.

The New York Times, however, downplayed the impact of these instances, citing only five passages from Rufo. The story was headlined, “Conservative Activist Seizes on Passages From Harris Book,” and has three credited authors.

HARVARD PRESIDENT PLAGIARISM SCANDAL LIKELY TIP OF ICEBERG OF WIDESPREAD ‘ACADEMIC CORRUPTION’, SCHOLAR SAYSChris Rufo reported on more than two dozen instances of plagiarism in one of Vice President Kamala Harris' books. Getty Images

Chris Rufo reported on more than two dozen instances of plagiarism in one of Vice President Kamala Harris’ books. Getty Images© Left:  (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images), Right: (Photo by Thomas Simonetti for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

“In a review of the book, The New York Times found that none of the passages in question took the ideas or thoughts of another writer, which is considered the most serious form of plagiarism. Instead, the sentences copy descriptions of programs or statistical information that appear elsewhere,” the article read.

It also cited a plagiarism consultant, Jonathan Bailey, who said Rufo had taken minor infractions and tried to “make a big deal of it.” Bailey wrote on X on Monday that he had not performed a full analysis of Harris’ book.

“For those coming here from the NY Times Article. I want to be clear that I have NOT performed a full analysis of the book. My quotes were based on information provided to me by the reporters and spoke only about those passages,” he wrote.

Rufo took to X after the story was published to call out the New York Times, accusing it of misrepresenting the story.

“This past Saturday, I provided the Times not only with my written analysis, which argues that there are ‘more than a dozen,’ but with Weber’s full dossier, which included 18 allegations of varying severity. So, the Times deliberately withheld this crucial contextual information from its readers and from the supposed plagiarism expert, who, based on this limited information, called it ‘not serious.’ They could have easily confirmed the ‘more than a dozen’ point, but instead, lied by omission,” Rufo wrote.

He also attacked the article for citing “some academics” who have characterized his past reporting and research as racist.

MEDIA RUSH TO DEFEND EX-HARVARD PRESIDENT CLAUDINE GAY, DOWNPLAY PLAGIARISM AND BLAME ‘RACIST’ CONSERVATIVESA New York Times article argued the instances from Rufo were not an example of the "most serious form of plagiarism." Fox News

A New York Times article argued the instances from Rufo were not an example of the “most serious form of plagiarism.” Fox News© Fox News Photo/Joshua Comins

Rufo wrote, “This is just a way of laundering in a smear to complement the absurd headline that my reporting on plagiarism by a presidential candidate is ‘seiz[ing] on’ a transgression that is ‘not serious’—in other words, framing me as the villain of the story, rather than the plagiarism by a presidential candidate.”US:Why everyone is excited about this $59 New Blood Sugar Smartwatch

He added, “My rule of working with journalists is simple: If you treat me fairly, I treat you fairly. After publication of the Times piece, I called the reporter and editor at the Times to ask politely for a correction. The editor, Mary Suh, had nothing but excuses. And so, we’re going to fight this one out. They should issue a correction, but, even if they do not, I will correct the record in public.”

Fox News Digital reached out to the New York Times for a comment but did not immediately receive a response.

In a comment to the New York Times, a spokesperson for the Harris campaign dismissed the accusations from Rufo’s report.

“This is a book that’s been out for 15 years, and the vice president clearly cited sources and statistics in footnotes and endnotes throughout,” Harris spokesperson Jamie Singer said.The Harris campaign has denied the accusations of plagiarism. AP Newsroom

The Harris campaign has denied the accusations of plagiarism. AP Newsroom© AP Photo/Susan Walsh

Fox News Digital independently verified that Harris’ book features verbatim and near-verbatim reproductions from a 2008 NBC News report, a press release from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, a Wikipedia page and a report from the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), among others.

Original article source: Chris Rufo refutes New York Times coverage on Kamala Harris plagiarism story: ‘Lied by omission’

*****

10/14/2024

New York Post

New York Post

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/kamala-harris-accused-of-plagiarism-in-co-authored-2009-book/ar-AA1sfGBG?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=352bd68ce2434316b080d4b8cd8edd61&ei=13

WASHINGTON — Vice President Kamala Harris is facing allegations of plagiarism after numerous passages from the Democratic presidential nominee’s 2009 book “Smart on Crime” were discovered to closely resemble — or perfectly match — wording from other sources.

Harris, then San Francisco’s district attorney, wrote the book promoting a reform-minded approach to prosecuting crimes alongside ghostwriter Joan O’C. Hamilton — who told The Post when contacted Monday that she was surprised to learn about the alleged copying.

Conservative activist Christopher Rufo published the allegations Monday and credited an investigation by Austrian “plagiarism hunter” Stefan Weber — with Rufo posting screenshots on X of five examples in which the wording in the book closely resembles other sources

The five highlighted passages indicate that Harris lifted wording from an Associated Press article, a John Jay College of Criminal Justice press release, a Wikipedia article, a Bureau of Justice Assistance report and an Urban Institute report.

“Oh gosh,” Harris’ ghostwriter told The Post over the phone shortly after the allegations were published.

“I haven’t seen anything,” she added. “I’m afraid I can’t talk to you right now, though, I’m in the middle of something. Let me go try to figure that out.”https://x.com/realchrisrufo/status/1845848760620073048

A report compiled by Weber and published by Rufo said there were numerous other issues detected in the book.

Related video: ‘Man enough’ video supporting Kamala Harris slammed as ‘cringiest’ political ad (FOX News

FOX News

‘Man enough’ video supporting Kamala Harris slammed as ‘cringiest’ political ad

“Kamala Harris fabricated a source reference, inventing a nonexistent page number. The self-promotional content from Goodwill Industries was copied verbatim without citing the source (Goodwill Industries was her ‘primary partner’ on in [sic] the ‘Back on Track’ program),” Weber wrote.

“In many other instances, even when a source was cited with a footnote, the text was directly copied and pasted without using quotation marks. Quotation marks would have been the most transparent and honest approach, also in non-academic books. Further signs of dishonesty may be evident when sources were copied but specific details were altered, such as replacing a Subway store owner with a sandwich shop clerk (p. 124) or highlighting Southeast Asia in the context of the US gang problem (p. 184).”

Spokespeople for both Harris’ presidential campaign and her vice presidential office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Plagiarism allegations often are fatal to the careers of journalists and academics, but politicians have survived similar controversies in the past — most notably retiring President Biden, who plagiarized a paper during his first year in law school, and during his 1987 run for the presidency misappropriated the family history and public remarks of British politician Neil Kinnock.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – CBS News 60 Minutes Fails to Address VP Kamala Harris Edit Controversy in Latest Episode.

10/14/2024

Is CBS Kamala Harris’ lackey?

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/cbs-news-60-minutes-fails-to-address-vp-kamala-harris-edit-controversy-in-latest-episode/ar-AA1sfm4l?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=0495a2859d64404299c1767923635947&ei=29

Doesn’t look good for CBS by making BAD LOOK GOOD.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment