KOMMONSENTSJANE – Billionaire Bill Ackman Lists 33 Reasons for Losing Confidence in Biden/Harris.

10/15/2024

This should tell you every thing you need to know – why you shouldn’t vote for Harris/Walz..

Billionaire Bill Ackman Lists 33 Reasons for Losing Confidence in Biden-Harris – Daily News Cycle

ttps://dailynewscycle.com/billionaire-bill-ackman-lists-33-reasons-for-losing-confidence-in-biden-harris/

****

Tuesday, October 15

Billionaire Bill Ackman Lists 33 Reasons for Losing Confidence in Biden-Harris

Chelsea BetonieBy Chelsea BetonieOctober 13, 2024Updated:October 13, 2024Politics No Comments5 Mins Read

Share


Listen

Billionaire investor Bill Ackman, once a prominent supporter of Democratic politicians, publicly slammed the Biden-Harris administration, listing 33 reasons for his loss of confidence in the Democratic Party. His scathing critique, posted on X (formerly known as Twitter), signals a major shift in his political stance and has sparked widespread discussion in both political and business circles.

Ackman, known for his significant financial contributions to Democratic campaigns in the past, made waves earlier this year when he endorsed Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. His support for Trump came as a surprise to many, especially given his history of Democratic donations and his voter registration, which had typically aligned with the party.

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=AmatoTalk&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=eyJ0ZndfdGltZWxpbmVfbGlzdCI6eyJidWNrZXQiOltdLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2ZvbGxvd2VyX2NvdW50X3N1bnNldCI6eyJidWNrZXQiOnRydWUsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9L

Ackman’s shift to endorsing Trump followed an assassination attempt on the former president at a July 2024 rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. In his recent post, Ackman clarified that his endorsement of Trump was not driven by personal gain or aspirations for a role in a future administration but rather by his dissatisfaction with the Biden-Harris leadership.

Ackman’s post laid out a comprehensive list of grievances, ranging from economic policies to social issues, that contributed to his loss of faith in the Biden-Harris administration. Among the first concerns he mentioned were the administration’s handling of illegal immigration, inflation, and what he described as the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. Ackman called these issues “catalysts” for his growing disillusionment.

He also criticized Biden’s economic policies, specifically the administration’s push for more stringent energy regulations. According to Ackman, these policies have stifled economic growth, particularly in industries such as fracking. He pointed to attempts to limit or ban fracking as a direct assault on American energy independence, which he believes is crucial for the country’s economic future.

A significant portion of Ackman’s criticism focused on rising crime rates and the administration’s approach to law enforcement. He voiced strong opposition to policies that release violent criminals without bail, citing the increasing threat of shoplifting and its negative impact on small businesses. Ackman argued that decriminalizing certain thefts has led to the destruction of local economies, especially in areas where small businesses are the backbone of the community.

His frustrations extended to social justice initiatives, particularly the administration’s emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) hiring practices. Ackman suggested that these policies are misguided, leading to inefficiencies in business and government. He also took aim at the Biden administration’s stance on LGBT curricula in schools and the promotion of gender-affirming surgeries for minors, expressing concern over the broader cultural implications of such policies.

Ackman’s social critiques did not stop at DEI practices or LGBT policies. He condemned the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests and riots, as well as the Biden administration’s handling of COVID-19 lockdowns during the early months of the presidency. According to Ackman, these events and policies contributed to a broader decline in American society, eroding public trust in institutions and leadership.

His concerns extended beyond domestic issues. Ackman expressed alarm over the rise of anti-Israel protests on college campuses and the increasing spread of antisemitism in the U.S. He linked these developments to what he sees as a failure of leadership under Biden and Harris, as well as the broader Democratic Party’s inability to address these rising tensions.

Ackman also voiced displeasure with vaccine mandates and what he described as censorship of free speech, particularly concerning social media platforms and public discourse. He argued that the administration’s policies have led to the weaponization of the justice system, with movements such as “Defund the Police” further weakening the country’s ability to maintain law and order.

In addition to his domestic grievances, Ackman criticized the Biden-Harris administration’s environmental policies. He referred to government subsidies for what he described as “insufficient products” and expressed concern over federal mandates to phase out gas-powered cars and stoves. According to Ackman, these initiatives are impractical and burden businesses and consumers without providing adequate alternatives.

On the international stage, Ackman accused the administration of emboldening America’s foreign adversaries. He suggested that the Biden-Harris approach to foreign policy has weakened the U.S. standing globally, leaving the country vulnerable in critical areas such as energy and defense.

A particularly scathing part of Ackman’s post focused on Vice President Kamala Harris. He criticized the process by which Harris was selected as Biden’s running mate, accusing the Democratic Party of using “a backroom process by undisclosed party leaders” to choose her for the role. Ackman argued that voters should have had a say in whether to replace Biden on the 2024 ballot, especially given concerns about Biden’s leadership and health.

Ackman went on to call Harris an “inferior candidate,” suggesting that her presence on the ticket has further eroded public trust in the Democratic Party. He also raised concerns about the integrity of the electoral process, particularly regarding laws that prevent the implementation of voter ID requirements, which he believes would restore confidence in the accuracy of the nation’s voting system.

Ackman ended his lengthy post with an open invitation for public discussion, stating, “I welcome your thoughts.” This public critique marks a significant departure from his previous support of Democratic policies and underscores the growing dissatisfaction among some high-profile donors and political figures with the current administration.

As the 2024 election approaches, Ackman’s detailed list of grievances highlights key issues that could shape the future of American politics, particularly for those who, like Ackman, have shifted their allegiances after years of supporting the Democratic Party.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – VP Harris On Hot Seat – Constitutional Remarks Trigger Alarm

10/15/2024

This proves she is nothing but an empty-headed vessel and trying to WING IT UNTIL THE ELECTION by fooling people.

Wise up, folks.

Just another Obama with nothing to offer.

The controversy surrounding Harris’ remarks on the Bill of Rights goes beyond mere political point-scoring. It raises fundamental questions about the quality of leadership and the state of civic education in America. If our highest-ranking officials struggle to accurately represent the foundational principles of our government, how can we expect the general public to be well-informed and engaged citizens?

*****

RightWing

ttps://www.rightwing.org/vp-harris-on-hot-seat-constitutional-remarks-trigger-alarm/?utm_source=JW2024&utm_placement=RWnewsletter&utm_medium=email

Vice President Kamala Harris ignited a firestorm of controversy with her recent remarks on the Bill of Rights, exposing a potentially alarming gap in her constitutional knowledge.

At a Glance

  • Harris’ comments on the Bill of Rights omitted key amendments, sparking debate
  • The incident highlights the importance of leaders’ constitutional understanding
  • Harris made history as the first black and Asian-American woman on a major party’s presidential ticket
  • Her statements have been scrutinized for accuracy and context
  • The debate underscores the need for precise constitutional knowledge in political discourse

Harris’ Controversial Remarks Spark Constitutional Debate

Vice President Kamala Harris, the first black and Asian-American woman to lead a major party’s presidential ticket, has found herself at the center of a heated debate following her recent comments on the Bill of Rights. Her remarks, which notably omitted several key amendments, have raised serious questions about the depth of constitutional knowledge expected from our nation’s leaders that Harris failed to demonstrate.

This incident has ignited a firestorm of criticism from conservatives who argue that a comprehensive understanding of the Constitution should be a fundamental requirement for those in positions of power. “Imagine the Constitution of the United States, which guarantees the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable search and seizure by a government on you, the Fifth Amendment, the Sixth Amendment,” Harris said at Univision town hall in Las Vegas. She notably left out any mention of the First and Second Amendments.

The oversight in Harris’ statements has not only fueled ongoing debates about how leaders interpret and prioritize different amendments but has also highlighted the delicate balance between political rhetoric and the historical context of our nation’s founding documents.

The Importance of Constitutional Literacy in Leadership

The controversy surrounding Harris’ remarks underscores a critical issue in contemporary American politics: the expectation that our leaders possess a thorough and nuanced understanding of the Constitution. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences when those in power demonstrate a less-than-comprehensive grasp of these foundational texts.

Harris’ Record of Misleading Statements

The controversy over Harris’ Bill of Rights comments is not an isolated incident. According to an NPR fact-check, the Vice President made 12 misleading or lacking-in-context statements during her speech at the Democratic National Convention. These inaccuracies ranged from claims about Trump’s intentions to jail journalists and political opponents to assertions about his stance on Social Security and Medicare.

This points to a pattern of exaggeration and misrepresentation in Harris’ political rhetoric. This ongoing exchange of accusations and counter-accusations underscores the need for voters to critically evaluate the statements of all political figures, regardless of party affiliation.

The Broader Implications for American Democracy

The controversy surrounding Harris’ remarks on the Bill of Rights goes beyond mere political point-scoring. It raises fundamental questions about the quality of leadership and the state of civic education in America. If our highest-ranking officials struggle to accurately represent the foundational principles of our government, how can we expect the general public to be well-informed and engaged citizens?

This incident should serve as a wake-up call for all Americans. It highlights the critical need for a renewed focus on civic education, not just in our schools but throughout our society. Only by fostering a deep and widespread understanding of our constitutional rights and responsibilities can we hope to preserve and strengthen our democratic institutions for future generations.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Harris Book Publisher Appears to Release Internal Memo Mistakenly After Plagiarism Allegations…

10/15/2024

Twitter information:

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ on X: “The investigation was conducted by Dr. Stefan Weber, a famed Austrian “plagiarism hunter” who has taken down politicians in the German-speaking world. We independently confirmed multiple violations, which are comparable in severity to the plagiarism found in former Harvard https://t.co/P9DTpZS4kV” / X

10/15/2024

Harris book publisher appears to release internal memo mistakenly after plagiarism allegations (msn.com)

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/harris-book-publisher-appears-to-release-internal-memo-mistakenly-after-plagiarism-allegations/ar-AA1sgS8E?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=71a8fd69841240568d5c0f47cc0521c7&ei=39

Harris book publisher appears to release internal memo mistakenly after plagiarism allegations

The journalist who accused Vice President Kamala Harris of plagiarizing a book she wrote in 2009 claimed her publisher is in crisis mode and attempting “damage control.” 

Christopher Rufo highlighted on Monday at least a dozen portions of Smart on Crime that appear to have shown significant similarities to Wikipedia entries and reports. Smart on Crime’s publishing company, Chronicle Books, “accidentally” revealed its strategy to respond to the debacle to Rufo, according to the journalist later on Monday evening. 

“Kamala Harris’s publisher, Chronicle Books, is in damage control mode,” Rufo wrote in a post to X. “The company accidentally sent my team an internal communication indicating that VP Lauren Hoffman is requiring that all inquiries about Harris’s plagiarism go through the higher-ups.” 

The journalist attached a screenshot to his post that appeared to show top Chronicle executives advising employees about what to say to people inquiring about the Smart on Crime plagiarism accusations. 

“Hey Sarah, Per Lauren Hoffman (VP, Executive Director, marketing and publicity) please do not respond or comment on any inquiries regarding SMART ON CRIME, and please continue to forward them directly to me,” the email shared by Rufo begins. 

BREAKING: Kamala Harris’s publisher, Chronicle Books, is in damage control mode. The company accidentally sent my team an internal communication indicating that VP Lauren Hoffman is requiring that all inquiries about Harris’s plagiarism go through the higher ups. pic.twitter.com/seiF3bu0R2Related video: Kamala Harris accused of ‘plagiarism’ in 2009 book; JD Vance mocks: ‘Wikipedia…LMAO’ | US Elections (The Economic Times

The Economic Times

Kamala Harris accused of ‘plagiarism’ in 2009 book; JD Vance mocks: ‘Wikipedia…LMAO’ | US Elections— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) October 14, 2024

“Really appreciate your help on this it is a very sensitive topic,” the email continues. 

With the accusations coming 22 days before the election, the Harris campaign has argued that the book “clearly cited sources and statistics in footnotes and endnotes throughout,” per comments to the New York Times.

But Rufo said Harris and her publisher know she is lying.

“Paraphrasing Solzhenitsyn: They know Kamala lied,” he said. “They know that we know Kamala lied. In America, plagiarism has become a moral pillar of the regime — and they will slander anyone who notices.”

Throughout Monday, Rufo published additional excerpts from Smart on Crime that he says prove Harris plagiarized, and he criticized legacy media outlets such as the New York Times for “refus[ing]” to cover the reports.

EXCLUSIVE: This is another instance of verbatim plagiarism by Kamala Harris, which we had provided to the New York Times over the weekend—and which the Times refused to acknowledge in its report today.US:Why everyone is excited about this $59 New Blood Sugar Smartwatch

This makes six significant instances. And we have more in reserve. pic.twitter.com/DULCaoyYSP— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) October 14, 2024

“This is another instance of verbatim plagiarism by Kamala Harris, which we had provided to the New York Times over the weekend — and which the Times refused to acknowledge in its report today. This makes six significant instances. And we have more in reserve,” he wrote on X.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Pressure on Kamala Harris as Poll Shows Voters Want to See CBS Transcript. Not the edited video.

10/15/2024

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pressure-on-kamala-harris-as-poll-shows-voters-want-to-see-cbs-transcript/ar-AA1sjF11?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=1a3469ed13584a2e9e94728bd305d1fd&ei=30

*******

Newsweek

Kamala Harris’ Poll Lead Trails Biden and Clinton’s at Same Stage

Pressure is mounting on Vice President Kamala Harris following her 60 Minutes interview with CBS News after a poll found the vast majority of voters wanted the transcript released.

Harris sat down with veteran correspondent Bill Whitaker for a wide-ranging interview that aired October 7, touching on global politics, the economy, Harris’ presidential campaign, her position on prominent issues, and her Republican rival, former President Donald Trump. The interview was edited, containing several cuts.US:Why everyone is excited about this $59 New Blood Sugar Smartwatch

Following the interview, Trump’s campaign called for the full transcript be released, saying that the broadcast was “deceptively edited.”

Trump campaign press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the New York Post: “On Sunday, 60 Minutes teased Kamala’s highly-anticipated sit-down interview with this epic word salad that received significant criticism on social media.”

Democratic presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris speaks during a campaign rally at Erie Insurance Arena on October 14, 2024 in Erie, Pennsylvania. A survey conducted by The Harris Poll/HarrisX between October 11-13 found that most voters believe the full transcript of Harris’ “60 Minutes” interview should be released. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images© Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

“During the full interview on Monday evening, the word salad was deceptively edited to lessen Kamala’s idiotic response. Why did 60 Minutes choose not to air Kamala’s full word salad, and what else did they choose not to air?”

The Post said Leavitt was referencing a response in the aired version of the show to a question about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, which differed from an earlier promotional clip shared by 60 Minutes.US:Why everyone is excited about this $59 New Blood Sugar Smartwatch

“The American people deserve the full, unedited transcript from Kamala’s sit-down interview. We call upon 60 Minutes and CBS to release it. What do they, and Kamala, have to hide?” Leavitt added.

Trump himself has criticized the interview on more than one occasion. On Tuesday the former president wrote on Truth Social that he had “never seen a very poor answer being REPLACED by another, totally unrelated answer, in order to save the person great personal and professional embarrassment.” It was unclear which segment of the interview Trump was referencing.

Newsweek contacted CBS and 60 Minutes for comment.

A survey conducted by the Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll between October 11-13 found that 85 percent of all voters are keen to see the transcript.

Eighty-seven percent of Democratic voters thought the transcript should be released by CBS, as did 88 percent of Republican voters, and 80 percent of independent voters.US:Why everyone is excited about this $59 New Blood Sugar Smartwatch

Furthermore, a slight majority (53 percent) said they thought the interview was edited to make the vice president “look better” – though this was mostly split along party lines, with 73 percent of Democratic voters saying it was fairly and objectively edited versus 19 percent of Republicans who said the same.

The poll also examined whether respondents thought Harris’ recent media interviews on 60 MinutesThe Howard Stern Show and the Call Her Daddy podcast “helped” or “hurt” her campaign.

Again, respondents broadly answered along party lines, with 86 percent of Democratic Party voters saying they helped, and 81 percent of Republican Party voters saying they hurt Harris.

Newsweek has contacted the Harris campaign for comment via email outside of standard working hours.

The poll was conducted among 3,145 registered voters. As part of the sample, 2,596 likely voters and 898 battleground state voters were also interviewed. The margin of error for the total sample was +/- 1.8 pts on a 95 percent confidence level, and results were weighted for age within gender, region, race/ethnicity, marital status, household size, income, employment, education, political party, and political ideology where necessary to align them with their actual proportions in the population.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment