KOMMONSENTSJANE – ‘Is She Drunk?’: Kamala Harris Gets Viciously Mocked After Bizarre Order to Her Crowd During Detroit Rally.

Posted on October 22, 2024 by kommonsentsjane

10/22/2024

SANE OR INSANE? You be the judge when you cast your vote.

She is not on my grocery list!

‘Is She Drunk?’: Kamala Harris Gets Viciously Mocked After Bizarre Order to Her Crowd During Detroit Rally

It’s a case of Madame Vice President and Mrs. Hyde.

TEST

Some days, Kamala Harris has been running a campaign straight out of the “joy and vibes” playbook — inconsequential, facile, stupid, but happy and cool. And then there’s other days — like during her interview with Fox News this week, in which she rolled out the Trump-is-a-literal-Nazi-who-will-put-you-in-a-detention-camp fear-stoking rhetoric.

Friday was apparently a joy-and-vibes day. So much so, in fact, that Trump’s official war room account wondered if she might be intoxicated.

It occurred as Harris was speaking in Detroit, her third rally of the day in the battleground state of Michigan.

In the midst of her remarks, after she talked about standing up “for workers and seniors,” she said that “as president, I will fight for all the American people, always.”

“Shout your own name for a minute,” a giddy Harris then said.

“That’s what I’m talking about. Because its about you, its about your families, its about you.

“That’s what I’m talking about,” she added.

This is what Donald Trump’s people were talking about, however:

Is she drunk? pic.twitter.com/OPtpZpUAra

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 19, 2024

And, indeed, they were hardly alone in this assessment:

Kamala sounds drunk

— Cash Loren (@CashLorenShow) October 19, 2024

Trump has to win. Nobody can survive 4 years of this.

— CallVoter 🇺🇸 (@CallVoter) October 19, 2024

She appears to be absolutely wasted.

— Real Defender🇺🇸 (@real_defender) October 19, 2024

The moment in context:

Now, just a reminder: This is what Harris sounded like earlier in the week.

Kamala Harris actually had the audacity to BLAME Trump for the “Turning the Military on the American people.”

Need I remind you that it was the Biden/Harris DoD that just updated a directive giving the green light for the Military to work with Law Enforcement and KILL Americans… pic.twitter.com/kYhelSGxTs

— Illinois girl Desi (@d_ewinger) October 17, 2024

So with Bret Baier, she’s literally fighting someone who will lock you up for the mere act of disagreeing with him. This is thoroughly untrue, but just as important is the fever-dream, fear-stoking tone.

Then, a few days later, she’s treating her crowd like they’re kindergarteners. Shout your name out! Very good. Shout out your ABCs! Excellent! You get a gold star! And you get a gold star! Way to do to exactly what you’re told to do by someone on a stage.

She isn’t drunk, she’s just dumb. And that’s the entire point. This part of her campaign is appealing for a bit, but it’s like living on candy: You can only do it for so long before the crash comes. Then, you realize how silly it all is.

******

Don’t really know – whether she is high on something or something is missing upstairs.

Vote your conscience.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Did Jack Smith Cross the Line?

Posted on October 22, 2024 by kommonsentsjane

10/22/2024

Jack Sprat could not eat any fat. His wife could not eat any lean. However, they only licked the platter clean. 

Jack Smith crossed a line that could end with prison stripes as this scary move backfires on him

Jack Smith was down to his last chance to make an impact on the election. 

He played his final card against Donald Trump. 

But Jack Smith crossed a line that could end with prison stripes as this scary move backfires on him. 

Obama Judge releases portions of Jack Smith’s evidence against Trump to the public 

Special Counsel Jack Smith hoped that he was going to tie down former President Donald Trump during the height of the election with a trial for the January 6 case. 

A protracted legal battle over Presidential immunity paused the case for most of this year. 

The Supreme Court ruled in July that Presidents have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts committed while in office. 

It was left for lower courts to determine what’s considered an official act by a President. 

D.C. District Court Judge Tonya Chutkan – who was appointed by former President Barack Obama – resumed the January 6 case in August. 

Smith filed a superseding indictment that kept the original four charges against Trump but removed evidence the Supreme Court ruled was covered by Presidential immunity. 

A trial in the January 6 case won’t happen until after the election if it ever happens at all. 

Trump winning would allow his Justice Department to fire Smith and drop the case. 

Smith can’t get his trial before the election so he’s playing the last card he has left. 

He filed a 165-page brief with the court that outlined the evidence he has against Trump. 

Trump’s legal team and Smith’s office now have to duke it out over what’s considered an official act and covered by Presidential immunity. 

Smith and Obama’s Judge’s scheme to hurt Trump politically

The Special Counsel can’t get a trial before the election but he’s trying to release his evidence to the public to deal the maximum amount of political damage before the election. 

Trump’s legal team can’t contest the validity of the evidence because this portion of the legal proceedings is strictly whether evidence is covered by Presidential immunity. 

Chutkan has ruled in Smith’s every step of the way in the case. 

She rejected a request by Trump’s legal team to keep some of the sealed evidence from being made public. 

Trump’s legal team argued that making the evidence public now was election interference. 

“There is undoubtedly a public interest in courts not inserting themselves into elections, or appearing to do so,” Chuktan wrote in a ruling. “But litigation’s incidental effects on politics are not the same as a court’s intentional interference with them.”

Chutkan laughably claimed that holding back the evidence from the public would be its own form of election interference. 

“If the court withheld information that the public otherwise had a right to access solely because of the potential political consequences of releasing it, that withholding could itself constitute—or appear to be—election interference,” Chutkan stated. 

More evidence from Smith’s January 6 case is public in the closing weeks of the election. 

It remains to be seen if voters outside of hardcore Democrats still care about January 6. 

Judge Chutkan and Jack Smith are trying to get as much damaging evidence as they can into the public. 

Harvard Law professor slams Jack Smith in a devastating New York Times op-ed

But now,  a Harvard Law professor  just leveled a damning charge against Jack Smith in the New York Times 

Harvard Law Professor Jack Goldsmith is a Never Trumper but that doesn’t mean he is willing to let Jack Smith twist the law for Kamala Harris’ political ambitions.

In a New York Times op-ed, Goldsmith argued that prosecutors’ cases are supposed to be “conducted fairly and apolitically.”

That’s a foundational principle of the American Justice System, or it used to be until, as Goldsmith puts it, Smith damaged “public confidence” in the system.

Goldsmith insisted that by putting out the 165-page brief, Smith “failed” to take, “scrupulous care to assure the public that the prosecutions are conducted in compliance with pertinent rules.”

Goldsmith believes Smith violated the Justice Department’s “60-day rule,” which is supposed to bar Justice Department officials from prosecutorial actions on cases that may affect the outcome of an election within 60 days of that election.

Smith’s brief went public 30 days before the election.  

Goldsmith suggested Smith made the briefing public to influence the outcome of the election.

“It is hard to understand any reason to go forward this close to the election other than to influence it—a motive that would clearly violate department policy,” Goldsmith stated. “It is imperative that the department explain in detail why this inference is false and why its actions comported with past department practices and understandings.”

Stay tuned to Unmuzzled News for any updates to this ongoing story

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Letters to the Editor: No Articles on Kamala Harris’ Felonies and Insurrection? So unfair of the L.A. Times.

Posted on October 22, 2024 by kommonsentsjane

10/22/2024

Letters to the Editor: No articles on Kamala Harris’ felonies and insurrection? So unfair of the L.A. Times

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/letters-to-the-editor-no-articles-on-kamala-harris-felonies-and-insurrection-so-unfair-of-the-l-a-times/ar-AA1sHFsz?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=a3cb4171ef8345acb2ebbde2b6e64f55&ei=46

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/letters-to-the-editor-no-articles-on-kamala-harris-felonies-and-insurrection-so-unfair-of-the-l-a-times/ar-AA1sHFsz?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=a3cb4171ef8345acb2ebbde2b6e64f55&ei=46

Vice President Kamala Harris campaigns last week in Washington Crossing, Pa. ((Jacquelyn Martin / Associated Press))

Vice President Kamala Harris campaigns last week in Washington Crossing, Pa. ((Jacquelyn Martin / Associated Press))© (Jacquelyn Martin / Associated Press)

To the editor: The letter you printed regarding the large number of negative articles about former President Trump and very few negative articles about Vice President Kamala Harris is dead on. You should be printing comparable articles about her.

I suggest that you provide coverage for her federal trial over her conduct on Jan. 6, 2021, and her efforts to steal the presidency; her New York civil trial for defamation and sexual abuse; her other New York trial for fraud; her federal Florida trial for allegedly stealing documents and refusing to return them; and her Georgia election interference trial.

You should also have coverage for every time that she has talked about using the U.S. military against the American people, every desire she has ever uttered about wanting to be a dictator, and every tariff she has ever championed that would act like a tax on the American people.

Emery Galambos, Los Angeles

..

To the editor: To those readers who accuse the L.A. Times of unfairness in its coverage of the two presidential candidates, I offer the following scenario for consideration.

If the Democratic candidate routinely spouted false and dangerous prattle while the Republican candidate consistently offered fact-based and sensible solutions for a better America, what would be the likely approach for the L.A. Times to take?

I have no doubt that this newspaper’s journalistic integrity and commitment to truthful reporting would dictate extensive and aggressive coverage.

The L.A. Times is a Democratic Party apparatchik? Hardly.

Frederick Miller, Los Angeles

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Will Michelle Obama Go Low Again?

Posted on October 22, 2024 by kommonsentsjane

10/22/2024

Michelle Obama Suggests the Presidency Is a ‘Black Job’ in Divisive DNC Speech

Michelle Obama Suggests the Presidency Is a ‘Black Job’ in Divisive DNC Speech

ttps://www.westernjournal.com/michelle-obama-suggests-presidency-black-job-divisive-dnc-speech/

Vice President Kamala Harris claimed she worked at McDonald's, but no one could find an employment record for it. Now the company has responded.

Where Is the Proof? McDonald’s Finally Says Why Kamala Harris Can’t Verify Working for Them

Students Who Were Booted from Kamala Harris Rally for Saying ‘Jesus Is Lord’ Set the Record Straight

Mark Cuban Rails Against One of Kamala Harris’ Policy Proposals While Campaigning for Her

On Friday, CNN polling expert Harry Enten, right, said that Vice President Kamala Harris', left, momentum is beginning to stall out, but President Trump’s has not.

Analyst Gives Kamala Cold Hard Truth About Trump’s Popularity on CNN: Harris Should Be Terrified

Commentary

Former first lady Michelle Obama speaks on stage during the second day of the Democratic National Convention at the United Center in Chicago, Illinois, on Tuesday. (Andrew Harnik / Getty Images)

Michelle Obama Suggests the Presidency Is a ‘Black Job’ in Divisive DNC Speech

 By Joe Saunders  August 21, 2024 at 7:37am

If her speech to the Democratic National Convention on Tuesday night proved anything, it’s that Michelle Obama is still going low.

The former first lady put the politics of racial division front and center in her address to the Democratic delegates at Chicago’s United Center and her attacks on former President Donald Trump.

And she even suggested in a sly twist on a Trump quote that the American presidency these days is a “black job.”

“For years, Donald Trump did everything in his power to try to make people fear us,” Obama told the crowd.

“See, his limited, narrow view of the world made him feel threatened by the existence of two hardworking, highly educated, successful people who happened to be black.”

As the trained-seals crowd cheered, Obama tried to quiet them.

Did the Obamas hurt race relations in the U.S.?Yes No

“Wait,” she said. “I want to know. I want to know — who’s going to tell him, who’s going to tell him that the job he’s currently seeking might just be one of those ‘black’ jobs?”

As a piece of intellectual dishonesty, the whole statement was brazen.

Pretending opposition to the Obama agenda was based on race is an easy way out for progressives who can’t admit that tens of millions of Americans don’t want the government running their lives.

It wasn’t Donald Trump who made conservative Americans fear and fight the leftist goals of President Barack Obama and his wife. It was the Obamas themselves who did that. Trump has simply become the champion of those Americans.

Michelle Obama knows that. Just like her husband knows it. Whatever their many faults, the Obamas are not stupid people.

Related:

Longtime Democratic Campaign Operative Quits the Party After What She Saw at the DNC

But playing into identity politics is the Obama way — and pushing their obsession with race has been their path to power.

That was behind Obama’s sly suggestion about the “black job” in the White House.

The reference was to the grotesquely unfair treatment Trump received during an appearance at the National Association of Black Journalists when he was obliquely criticized for a comment he made during the June 27 presidential debate that illegal immigration is destroying “black jobs.”

Every normal American knows what he meant — service jobs, low-skilled jobs that don’t require college education, the kind of jobs illegal immigrants can take away from American citizens — black and white. Bureau of Labor Statistics figures show black Americans are by no means limited to those occupations, but no one who heard the comment could have failed to understand Trump’s point.

When ABC’s Rachel Scott asked Trump at the NABJ interview, “What exactly is a ‘black job,’ sir,” she knew what he meant, too.

The intent was not to elicit a legitimate response to a legitimate question about the impact of the Biden-Harris illegal immigration invasion on lower-income Americans — including black Americans. It wasn’t even to elucidate for Trump and her audience what the numbers show.

It was to score cheap political points.

And that’s where Michelle Obama’s speech came in, too.

Claiming the American presidency “might be one of those ‘black’ jobs” served the dual purpose of putting down Trump and pushing Vice President Kamala Harris as suitable for the Oval Office on the grounds that her skin contains more melanin than Trump’s.

The facts that Harris is devoid of her own political accomplishments, that she has been part of an administration that has been disastrous — at home and abroad — and that the prospect of Harris in the White House for four more years is appalling for the country’s future are far more important than the color of her skin, or the color of Trump’s skin, or the color of the skin of the Americans who will be voting.

But colorblind, logical thinking doesn’t suit the Obama-Democratic mindset.

Back at the 2016 Democratic National Convention, Michelle Obama claimed that the difference between Republicans and Democrats is that “when they go low, we go high.”

It wasn’t true then. It’s not true now.

The fusillade of insults Obama launched against Trump on Tuesday — as baseless as her jibe about his supposedly “narrow” worldview and shot about the presidency being a “black job” for the “black” Kamala Harris — showed that when it comes to going low, few are as proficient as the former first lady, even if she dresses it up in high-sounding rhetoric.

If her speech did nothing else, it proved that.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:

2024 election, Democratic convention, Donald Trump, Identity politics, Michelle Obama, Politics, Race, Race relations

****

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment