KOMMONSENTSJANE – Joe Rogan’s Donald Trump Episode Racks Up 26 Million Views in First 24 Hours.

10/28/2024

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/joe-rogan-s-donald-trump-episode-racks-up-26-million-views-in-first-24-hours/ar-AA1t0Dtb?ocid=StaticFallback&pc=U531&cvid=08a3f16c98a9461aa94c5d7e1d314242&ei=45

Donald Trump speaking during a news conference, Oct. 25, 2024, in Austin, Texas, left, and Joe Rogan, right, at a UFC event, Aug. 18, 2023, in Boston. The former president appeared on Rogan's podcast on Friday.

Donald Trump speaking during a news conference, Oct. 25, 2024, in Austin, Texas, left, and Joe Rogan, right, at a UFC event, Aug. 18, 2023, in Boston. The former president appeared on Rogan’s podcast on Friday.© Uncredited/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump‘s podcast interview with Joe Rogan has been viewed over 26 million times on YouTube in its first 24 hours.

It is the most viewed podcast appearance so far for either candidate in the 2024 presidential campaign, and among the highest viewed Joe Rogan Experience episodes in history.

Trump sat with Rogan for a full three-hour podcast episode, discussing topics ranging from UFOs, the alleged impact of wind turbines on the mental health of whales, to Trump’s regrets in office, and his false claim that the 2020 election was stolen through widespread voter fraud.

The Joe Rogan Experience is the most watched podcast in the world. It has 14.5 million Spotify followers and 17.5 million YouTube subscribers. Although Spotify and Apple Podcasts do not release viewership data for individual episodes, the YouTube views suggest it is one of the biggest episodes in the show’s history, and reached more viewers than other podcasts so far on the campaign.

According to Rogan fan website JRE Library, across the podcast’s 15-year, more than 2,000-episode-long history, the 10 most watched episodes were between 27 million times and 68 million times on YouTube, so the Trump interview falls just outside that range in its first 24 hours.Related video: Top 10 Moments from Joe Rogan’s Interview With Trump (WatchMojo)

*****

But I had a contract with The Apprentice..

WatchMojo

Top 10 Moments from Joe Rogan’s Interview With Trump

View on Watch

The most viewed episode ever was his September 2018 interview with tech billionaire Elon Musk, who has endorsed Trump in his 2024 presidential bid. In the show, which has been viewed more than 68 million times, the Tesla owner famously smoked marijuana and drank whiskey with the host.

Rogan’s podcast was exclusively available on Spotify from 2020 until earlier this year. The episodes from that time have since been reuploaded to YouTube, but do not have full viewership data from the time they were released due to being uploaded to the site retrospectively.

The most recent Rogan episode to have as many YouTube views as the Trump interview was in May 2020 when he spoke with radio host Alex Jones and comedian Tim Dillon, which has been viewed almost 28 million times.

Jones is a prominent conspiracy theorist who was ordered to pay almost $1 billion to the families of Sandy Hook victims after he spent years defaming them by saying their children had not been murdered, but were instead “crisis actors.”

Did Joe Rogan Endorse Donald Trump?

Rogan did not endorse Trump during the interview. Rogan has previously endorsed Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has since suspended his campaign and endorsed Trump.

In the podcast, Trump praised Rogan, calling him “a fascinating guy,” while the host praised the candidate’s sense of humor. “One of the beautiful things about you is that you freeball,” Rogan said, telling the former president that he thought his impression mocking President Joe Biden was “funny stuff.”

Rogan said that he would be interested in doing an interview with Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris, but her campaign has since confirmed that she will not join him on the show before Election Day.

Related Articles

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – CNN Panel Swarms Kevin O’Leary After He Exposes Kamala’s Rise to the Top.

10/27/2024

ttps://dailyallegiant.com/cnn-panel-swarms-kevin-oleary-after-he-exposes-kamalas-rise-to-the-top/

Add an ‘h’ to view if Google erases this.


The Daily Allegiant

An Unfiltered News Experience

  1. CNN Panel Swarms Kevin O’Leary After He Exposes Kamala’s Rise to the Top

Headlines

CNN Panel Swarms Kevin O’Leary After He Exposes Kamala’s Rise to the Top

 By Thomas Cooper  

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned or a CNN panel confronted with the truth.

And make no mistake: Most of the panel that was convened at 10 p.m. Eastern on Thursday had just been confronted, the day prior with the first genuine bomb of Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign.

Sure, she had that interview with Fox News, but that was Fox News. CNN is friendly territory; anyone who pretends otherwise is delusional or believes CNN viewers are dupes. Indeed, I’m not sure those two things are mutually exclusive.

However, nobody who witnessed the previous hour, where Harris flailed and failed with a mostly simpatico Anderson Cooper, could ignore questions like this:

CNN: You’ve been in the White House for four years. Why haven’t you done any of this already?

KAMALA: “I’m pointing out things that need to be done that haven’t been done that need to be done.”

pic.twitter.com/Ia5z5BSVXX

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 24, 2024

COOPER: Is there something you can point to in your life that is a mistake that you’ve learned from?

KAMALA: “I have worked very hard to make sure that I’m well-versed on issues.”

The Kamala you see stumbling in every unscripted answer she gives is what she calls “well-versed.” pic.twitter.com/fmENkOtpvI

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 24, 2024

There were plenty of takeaways to discuss even a day after the event, and in a sober panel who realized the disaster that the event was, they’d likely be talking about how the vice president clearly hasn’t unburdened herself of her past cringeworthiness in the past four years or so.

However, given that the panel was given over mostly to lefties to moderator Abby Phillip, Washington Post opinion writer Catherine Rampell, CNN en Español political commentator Maria Cardona, and former Comedy Central host Larry Wilmore, it was up to conservative strategist Shermichael Singleton and “Shark Tank” panelist and businessman Kevin “Mr. Wonderful” O’Leary to represent the right side of things.

O’Leary went a bit further than offering an apologia for Donald Trump, arguing that the very selection process that gave the Democrats Harris as a nominee without her earning a vote was partially responsible for her sinking poll numbers and disastrous performances.

“I would like to introduce the concept to the panel tonight. It’s going to be a short dissertation. But I want you to think about this, because I watched like you did yesterday and something hit me pretty hard,” he said.

“Only 90 days ago, Pelosi went to Biden and said, ‘you need to step aside,’ and convinced him to do so. He made the decision, and he did actually ask her, and we’ve now learned this — is she the right person to drive this home? He questioned that,” he said of Harris.

“He could have said, we need to run a process in order for me to make this move, but they decided not to. I don’t know who they is. Was it Obama? Was it Pelosi? I don’t care who it was. In stock picking, just listen to this analogy, you may agree, you may not, 88 percent of managers, because of the world I live in, cannot beat the S&P year in, year out. So, you give them $1,000, the S&P beats them, they can’t pick stocks. This is the second time the Democratic Party has circumvented democracy and chose –“

“That’s not true,” Rampell cut him off.

“Yes it is. Hillary Clinton was chosen … And what happened to her? And now we’ve chosen —

“Kevin, Hillary Clinton won a primary, OK?” Phillip said. “She won a primary.”

But, as O’Leary pointed out, that wasn’t exactly a primary where the Democratic Party allowed much in the way of a challenge: “Nobody could compete with her, even Bernie Sanders,” he said.

“She won a primary,” Phillip reiterated.

“So, did Kamala Harris win the primary?” O’Leary shot back.

Crosstalk ensued. Phillip tried to end it by resorting to the last refuge of the desperate: Blame Canada!

“I know that you are from Canada, but the primary process–” she said, before getting cut off.

“That’s why it’s — I’m perfect for this,” O’Leary countered. “I have no skin in the game other than to get a great president.”

WARNING: The following video contains graphic language that some viewers will find offensive.

NEW: CNN panel completely loses it after Shark Tank’s Kevin O’Leary (correctly) points out that Kamala Harris was not democratically nominated.

The “pro-democracy” party really hates it when you point out that they don’t actually support democracy.

O’Leary: “Listen to this… pic.twitter.com/HhpIIUQpgJ

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 25, 2024

“I think the case I’m trying to make to all of you and I hope I’m going to win it by the end of this show, is that there’s nothing wrong with the policies or whatever they are,” O’Leary said.

“This is the same candidate that lost in 2019 and 2020 and has never been tested by the markets for various reasons we can argue about, but she’s never won anything.”

O’Leary went on to note that he does have some skin in the game; his kids were born in the United States and most of his investments are here, he says. However, the salient point is this: A small group of individuals who choose a candidate rarely outperform the primary process, flawed indeed though it may be.

The only time we had something that looked like a primary process was on the 2016 and 2024 side for Republicans (Donald Trump won both) and in 2020 for the Democrats, which produced the electable-if-senescent Joe Biden. More importantly, it rooted out a clique of younger, more progressive Democrats who were beloved by the media but didn’t translate electorally. Harris — along with Beto O’Rourke, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand and Julián Castrointer alia — were casualties of this hype.

In 2016, there were primaries — and surprisingly close ones — but the Democratic National Committee made sure that Hillary Clinton won.

We all know what happened in the first case: Bernie Sanders came surprisingly close to her in a number of key primaries and, even though he lost, cast a pall over her campaign. Thankfully, she was faced with a candidate she was sure she could smear with so much mud that he was unelectable: Donald Trump, along with his “basket of deplorables.” That worked out about as swimmingly as you can imagine it would in hindsight, but at the time nobody seemed to notice anything amiss until Election Day turned into election night, which turned into tears and anxiety attacks for anyone wearing an “I’m With Her” button.

What does she have in common with Kamala Harris? Both candidates were handpicked by party elites because it was Their Turn. Neither had grassroots support. And it all seemed like it was going to work, until it didn’t.

The polls are showing both Harris and Trump essentially even nationally — a huge blow for Harris, who likely needs to win by several points in the popular vote to carry the swing states she needs. It’s unlikely to improve over the next week-and-a-half.

This is what happens when you don’t allow the people to select a nominee. Individual investors generally can’t outperform the market in picking stocks, and party elites can’t outperform their voters in picking someone that America will vote for. It’s a lesson the Democrats, holding on for sweet life, are learning far too late — if they learn it all.

Source

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – What Kamala’s “UNBURDENED” Phrase Really Means: The Radical Agenda Exposed.

10/28/2024

We must not underestimate her rhetoric or the impact it could have on those who are already radicalized. It’s time to wake up to the truth behind Kamala’s favorite phrase and what it really signals for the future of America.

ttps://redrightupdates.com/what-kamalas-unburdened-phrase-really-means-the-radical-agenda-exposed/?email=robjoy87%40windstream.net&ptn=29&source=BEC2P&r=false

Kamala Harris loves repeating one phrase—over and over—as if she’s discovered the secret to life itself: “Imagine what can be, unburdened by what has been.” At first glance, it’s easy to dismiss this as another example of Kamala’s garbled “word salad” speeches. But there’s something more sinister beneath the surface—this isn’t just a random collection of words meant to sound profound. No, this is a calculated dog whistle, cloaked in progressive ideals, designed to signal her true, radical intentions.

What the Phrase Really Means: Unpacking the Leftist Dog Whistle

Let’s start by dissecting the phrase itself. “Imagine what can be…” sounds hopeful at first, right? It’s a call to envision a bright, limitless future. But then comes the kicker: “…unburdened by what has been.” Here’s where the danger lies—Kamala isn’t talking about removing past mistakes to move forward; she’s talking about erasing history.

It’s straight out of the playbook of Marxist revolutionaries. Think about it: every attempt at reshaping society into a so-called “utopia” has required the eradication of history, traditions, and culture—all in the name of starting over. From the brutal purges under Mao in China to Pol Pot’s violent “Year Zero” campaign in Cambodia, the goal has always been the same: wipe out the past to control the future. Kamala’s phrase is a dog whistle to those who see America’s foundational values as obstacles to be destroyed, not preserved. This is how radical change is justified—by presenting history itself as a burden rather than a foundation.

Why Kamala’s Rhetoric Matters: It’s More Than Just Stupidity

Kamala’s repeated use of this phrase is infuriating for a reason: it’s not just empty rhetoric—it’s intentional propaganda. And that’s why we can’t afford to simply write her off as dumb or ill-prepared. Kamala Harris’s words might seem ridiculous on the surface, but their underlying message is cunning. This is an attempt to galvanize her base, especially the radical left that sees America’s history as inherently evil.

Kamala’s dog whistle isn’t meant for the average American—it’s designed for those who are deeply committed to a radical transformation of America’s core. To them, her phrase is a call to erase everything that came before—to rip out the roots of American exceptionalism in the name of “equity” and “social justice.” This isn’t progress; it’s a revolutionary agenda hiding in plain sight.

The Reality Behind the ‘Unburdened’ Phrase: A Call for Cultural Erasure

When Kamala talks about imagining what can be “unburdened by what has been,” she’s not promoting progress—she’s promoting cultural erasure. The unburdening she speaks of isn’t just about eliminating oppression; it’s about dismantling everything that defines America as it currently stands:

  • Free speech? That’s a burden.
  • Second Amendment rights? Another burden.
  • Traditional family values? Yet another burden.

To Kamala and her ilk, these foundational principles aren’t virtues to be cherished—they’re shackles to be broken. But make no mistake: this vision of “progress” doesn’t lead to a utopia. It leads to chaos and authoritarian control, as history has repeatedly shown.

Why Kamala’s Phrase Should Worry Every American

Kamala Harris isn’t just stumbling through speeches, bumbling her way from one gaffe to the next. This phrase is carefully crafted, and its repetition is strategic. She’s dog-whistling to a very specific audience—those who believe in fundamentally transforming America by obliterating its past. It’s the same tactic we’ve seen throughout history, from Marxists to modern leftists: disguise your true intentions behind vague but “inspirational” language. The mainstream media may call it “visionary,” but conservatives should call it what it really is: a warning sign.

Kamala’s vision of “unburdening” isn’t just empty talk. It’s a coded message to radicalize the left and push America further down the path of socialist-style upheaval. It’s a veiled threat against the very foundations of our republic—against the Constitution, against freedom, and against everything that has made America great.

Final Thoughts

It’s easy to laugh off Kamala Harris as uninformed or out of her depth. But her repeated use of this phrase should be seen for what it is: a call to erase America’s heritage in the name of a new, radical order. It’s not merely incompetence—it’s a calculated move to pave the way for a revolution that tears down what the left views as “burdensome” history.

Again – we must not underestimate her rhetoric or the impact it could have on those who are already radicalized. It’s time to wake up to the truth behind Kamala’s favorite phrase and what it really signals for the future of America.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – A Campaign of Lies: The Truth Behind Kamala Harris’ Presidential Run..

10/27/2024

As her former staff stated – she always blames us when she doesn’t prepare herself for her appearances which always happens. Her staff turnover was so great that no one wanted to work for her.

Does she ever tell the truth?

A Campaign of Lies: The Truth Behind Kamala Harris’ Presidential Run – Rants of Izzo

https://rantsofizzo.com/dominick/a-campaign-of-lies-the-truth-behind-kamala-harris-presidential-run/

ttps://rantsofizzo.com/dominick/a-campaign-of-lies-the-truth-behind-kamala-harris-presidential-run/

Follow America’s fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 



As Kamala Harris continues her bid for the White House, her campaign has been marked by a series of misleading statements and outright lies. Fact-checkers from across the political spectrum have repeatedly called her out, yet she continues to propagate these falsehoods. For a campaign that claims to champion transparency and honesty, the frequency of Harris’s distortions paints a very different picture.

Let’s break down some of the most significant instances where Harris has been caught misleading the American public, particularly on issues close to voters’ hearts—Social Security, Medicare, abortion, and immigration. For any conservative, pro-Trump supporter, it’s important to know just how often Harris has been caught playing fast and loose with the truth.

The Project 2025 Lie: Social Security and Medicare

One of Harris’s most persistent lies during her campaign is the claim that Donald Trump intends to slash Social Security and Medicare through “Project 2025.” In multiple speeches, she has alleged that Trump’s re-election would lead to a dismantling of these programs that so many Americans depend on.

https://video.spreely.com/embed/1A11RKkJKJyjTsR?color=04abf2

It is IMPOSSIBLE for Cops to Be this Perfect! Trump Assassination Attempt Breakdown!

Fact-checkers quickly debunked this claim. Trump has been on the record repeatedly stating his opposition to cutting Social Security or Medicare. In fact, during his first term, Trump’s administration resisted efforts to make cuts to these programs, and he pledged that under no circumstances would he allow any reductions. Even after leaving office, Trump has reiterated this stance, most recently in July 2024, promising that not “one penny” would be cut from either program​.

Harris’s reference to Project 2025 is equally misleading. While Project 2025, developed by conservative think tanks, includes many proposals to reform government agencies, it does not advocate for cutting Social Security or Medicare. Instead, Harris has intentionally twisted the truth to scare voters into believing Trump supports policies that he has explicitly rejected​.

False Claims About Abortion and IVF

Abortion has been a contentious issue in the 2024 campaign, and Harris has taken full advantage of it to spread misinformation. During a debate, she falsely claimed that Trump’s abortion restrictions were preventing couples from accessing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments. This claim was quickly fact-checked and proven false. There is no evidence that any of Trump’s policies have impacted IVF access, which remains legal in all 50 states​.

Moreover, Harris also spread false information about late-term abortions. She claimed that “nowhere in America” could a woman seek an abortion late in her pregnancy. This was categorically false. In reality, several states, including Colorado and Minnesota, allow abortions without gestational limits, meaning that abortions can legally be sought even in the third trimester​.

The Charlottesville Lie: Misrepresenting Trump’s Remarks

Harris, like many other Democrats, continues to push the false narrative that Trump called white supremacists “very fine people” following the Charlottesville protests in 2017. This claim has been thoroughly debunked by multiple fact-checkers. While Trump’s remarks were taken out of context by his opponents, he explicitly condemned white supremacists and neo-Nazis in the same press conference. Yet Harris, undeterred by the truth, has repeated this lie in an attempt to smear Trump’s character​.

For someone who claims to represent truth and justice, Harris’s willingness to propagate a lie that has been debunked countless times is concerning, to say the least.

Misleading Claims on Education and Race

Harris also twisted the facts when she visited Florida to criticize the state’s education curriculum, claiming that Florida was teaching students that enslaved people “benefited from slavery.” This was rated “Mostly True” but misleading. While it’s true that controversial language about the skills enslaved people learned was included in Florida’s curriculum, Harris exaggerated the claim for political gain. Even historians who opposed the curriculum’s language agreed that her characterization was an oversimplification​.

Additionally, Harris falsely claimed that some states have banned the teaching of Latino and Hispanic history. This claim was found to be mostly false. Harris pointed to outdated examples, such as a 2010 Arizona law that was overturned in 2017. No current state laws explicitly ban the teaching of Latino or Hispanic history​.

Immigration Lies: The So-Called ‘Border Czar’

Another misleading claim from Harris was her portrayal of her role as the so-called “border czar.” While Republicans labeled her as such, implying that she was directly responsible for the border crisis, Harris herself claimed that she was only addressing the root causes of migration, not directly managing border security. However, fact-checkers found her characterization of her responsibilities as inaccurate and designed to deflect responsibility from the immigration failures under the Biden-Harris administration​.

Conclusion: A Campaign Built on Falsehoods

Kamala Harris has repeatedly shown her willingness to mislead the public on key issues, from Social Security and Medicare to abortion and immigration. Her false claims and half-truths should be deeply concerning to anyone who values honesty in leadership. While Harris presents herself as a candidate who fights for the American people, her long trail of fact-checked lies tells a different story.

For conservatives and Trump supporters, it’s clear that Harris’s campaign of deception is an attempt to manipulate voters rather than provide real solutions. With each false claim she makes, Harris proves that she is not fit to lead America. As voters head to the polls, they deserve the truth, not more of Harris’s lies.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment