Voting for Trump will bring us prosperity/freedom/Constitution. Voting for Harris will bring us Harris’ progressive agenda – which the Democrats Marxists have been giving us for the last four years – that we are GARBAGE/THEY BRING HATE/AND GIVE OUR MONEY TO TERRORISTS – which ends in hate/poverty.
Harris tries to Glock up the vote, but triggers female gun owners: ‘She’s completely anti-gun’
View on Watch
Vice President Kamala Harris made waves on the campaign trail when she announced she and running mate Tim Walz were both gun owners in an attempt to paint the Democratic ticket as friendlier toward the Second Amendment.
But some women who own guns told Fox News Digital they aren’t buying it.
“When Kamala Harris started talking about owning a Glock, I felt nothing,” said Amara Barnes, founder of Women Gun Owners Association of America. “We all realize that it’s pandering and virtue signaling to the right, and she’s hoping that we’re too dumb not to realize that she is completely anti-gun.”
During the presidential debate on Sept. 10, former President Trump attempted to highlight how Harris has distanced herself from previously held far-left stances, pointing to past stances on fracking, defunding the police and gun control. Trump claimed Harris wanted to take people’s guns away, which Harris immediately disputed.
KAMALA HARRIS ONCE SAID POLICE COULD PAY SURPRISE VISITS TO LEGAL GUN OWNERS’ HOMES FOR SAFE STORAGE CHECKS
Instructor Jane Milhans shows a woman how to shoot an AR-15 at a rifle range near Tacoma, Washington. Fox News
“Tim Walz and I are both gun owners,” she said. “We’re not taking anybody’s guns away. So stop with the continuous lying about this stuff.”
For weeks, her campaign dodged questions about the specific type of gun she owns and which state it was registered in.
“I have a Glock, and I’ve had it for quite some time,” Harris finally said in an October interview with CBS’ “60 Minutes.” And in a livestreamed town hall with Oprah Winfrey, Harris said if someone breaks into her house, “they’re gettin’ shot.”
Washington-based firearms instructor and Second Amendment advocate Jane Milhans called Harris’ Glock talk “smokescreen campaign rhetoric.”
“I do not believe that she is a gun owner that practices and supports our right to protect ourselves,” Milhans said.
Jane Milhans teaches a gun-safety class at a rifle range near Tacoma, Washington. Fox News
Milhans came face-to-face with two burglars in her home nearly 20 years ago, and now dedicates 100 hours of her time each year to training other women how to safely handle firearms.
“I come across, every single day, women that have survived something or want to be able to protect themselves in the high crime areas,” she told Fox News Digital.
While men are still more likely to own a gun, women have been arming themselves more over the past few years.
Gun ownership rates vary along political lines too, with Republicans and GOP-leaning independents more than twice as likely to say they personally own a gun than Democrats and Democratic leaners, according to a 2023 Pew Research Center survey.
“Most women in America who own a firearm are not going to be voting for Kamala Harris,” Barnes said. “Her stance on gun rights doesn’t align with private firearm ownership.”
The percent of women who own a firearm increased 7% from 2016 to 2022, according to Gallup surveys. Male firearm ownership rates have remained stagnant around 40% over the same period. Fox News
When she ran for president in 2019, then-Sen. Harris pledged to sign a series of executive orders on gun control if Congress failed to act within her first 100 days in office. She also expressed support for mandatory gun buyback programs.
Milhans is especially worried about the judges whom Harris may appoint if she is elected president, which could affect legal battles over gun control at both the state and federal level.
“She will appoint judges that most likely are anti-Second Amendment, anti-constitutional rights,” Milhans said. “When there are bad bills that go against our constitutional rights, we need to be assured that the court system is a fair process.”
The Harris campaign declined comment to Fox News Digital.
Original article source: Harris tries to ‘Glock’ the vote, but triggers female gun owners: ‘She’s completely anti-gun’
Follow America’s fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices.
House Speaker Mike Johnson has revealed ambitious Republican plans to overhaul the federal government if they secure congressional majorities and former President Donald Trump returns to the White House. In a recent interview with Just the News, Johnson discussed a blueprint to downsize Washington’s bureaucracy by moving federal agencies out of D.C., aiming to reduce government size, cost, and proximity to wealthy lobbyist.
Central to this plan is Johnson’s call to “deport” tens of thousands of federal bureaucrats from Washington and relocate them to other parts of the country. The move, he says, would shift federal offices, personnel, and assets closer to the American people, effectively uprooting what he calls “entrenched bureaucracies.” Johnson described the planned restructuring as aligning with Trump’s vision, which includes appointing billionaire Elon Musk to lead a government efficiency office dedicated to trimming bureaucracy.
“There’s a lot of talk about uprooting, you know, these entrenched bureaucracies and putting them out elsewhere around the country,” Johnson said. He added that transferring agencies to other states would not only save taxpayer dollars but would also reduce the influence of powerful special interests.
Johnson outlined the plan as a fundamental reorganization of the federal government, which currently employs more than two million workers. This vision is aligned with fiscal conservatives’ aim to reallocate federal spending to the states through block grants. According to Johnson, relocating agencies could naturally reduce government size, as many federal employees may choose not to relocate.
“You don’t have all these career civil service law-protected bureaucrats,” Johnson said. “Some of them have been camped out in these agencies for decades. They’re nameless, faceless. We don’t know who to hold accountable.” By moving agencies to locations such as “northern Kansas or southwest New Mexico,” he argued, many federal employees would not follow, preferring to stay in D.C., where they often become lobbyists or stay within the “swamp,” as he termed it.
This shift, Johnson suggested, would allow a “business reorganization” of the federal government, opening up positions for new hires with a limited-government mindset. “Almost all the agencies are bloated and inefficient,” he continued. “You can scale that down. And then in the cubicles that you do need to fill, we’ve had the America First Policy Institute and some of our other think tanks working to develop a notebook full of highly qualified, previously vetted, limited government conservatives who have expertise in these areas.”
The House Speaker’s remarks marked his most detailed public comments on the GOP’s strategy to cut government costs and reduce the regulatory state. He highlighted a recent Supreme Court decision, which overturned the “Chevron doctrine,” as a significant moment in restructuring federal power. Under the new ruling, Johnson explained, federal bureaucrats cannot interpret their own regulations; they must instead strictly follow what Congress authorizes.
“This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to really claw back Article 1 authority to the Legislative Branch under the Constitution,” Johnson said. With Trump in office, he believes, the GOP would have an administration ready to enact sweeping changes to the structure and scope of federal agencies. “I just think there’s almost unlimited potential in front of us, and we’ve got to seize that moment,” he continued.
Johnson also reiterated that a Republican-led Congress would work in full alignment with Trump’s proposed agenda. A top priority would be securing the U.S. southern border. Johnson emphasized that within hours of taking office, Trump would likely issue an executive order to begin securing the border. “We’ll come behind that with legislative action to secure it, seal it up,” Johnson said. Addressing the influx of individuals who have entered the U.S. under current immigration policies would follow shortly after, according to Johnson.
Besides immigration reform, Johnson underscored the GOP’s focus on economic issues, notably lowering inflation, extending Trump-era tax cuts, and reducing the cost of living. “The cost of living is unsustainable, unaffordable, and we know how to fix it,” Johnson argued, noting that with control of Congress, Republicans could prioritize economic relief measures immediately. Extending tax cuts set to expire in the coming year would be a top economic priority for the party.
Johnson’s statements mark a broad commitment by GOP leaders to reshape the federal government and scale back its reach. The emphasis on decentralizing federal agencies reflects an effort to reduce Washington’s influence while promoting local governance. This strategy, Johnson believes, would encourage government officials to be more accountable to everyday Americans, rather than operating within the insulated power structures of the capital.
The Speaker’s comments also highlight the GOP’s strategy to rein in what many Republicans view as bureaucratic overreach. By limiting the reach of federal agencies and redistributing their roles, Johnson argued, government efficiency would improve while taxpayer savings would increase.
As GOP leaders plan for a possible return to power, they see these structural changes as key to fulfilling promises of a leaner, more accountable government. With a presidential election around the corner, the proposed federal reorganization could become a defining issue, particularly for voters concerned about federal overreach and the concentration of government power in Washington. As Johnson envisions it, the path forward involves “taking a blowtorch” to bureaucratic excess, placing more power into the hands of the legislative branch and closer to the American people.
As Election Day nears, Republicans are shaping a platform focused on economic reform, border security, and reducing federal government presence in Washington. For Johnson and his colleagues, this approach marks an opportunity to fulfill long-standing conservative goals of decentralizing power and holding government accountable to its citizens.
Elon Musk has called the euthanisation of an internet celebrity squirrel “deeply wrong”.
The owner of Tesla has waded into the online discourse by saying it was not right for Peanut the squirrel to have been put down.
P’Nut or PNUT, as he is sometimes known, became a celebrity after being rescued by Mark Longo seven years ago.
Peanut’s journey has been documented on Mr Longo’s social media while the exploits have won him 533,000 followers on Instagram.
Mr Longo also set up P’Nuts Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary in honour of the animal.
But fans were given the sad news that the squirrel has been euthanised.
Sky reported that New York City state stepped in as the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) seized Peanut and Mr Longo’s other pet, a raccoon called Fred.
“Peanut and Fred were beautiful creatures,” wrote Ian Miles Cheong on Twitter.
“The New York government decided that they needed to be put down to check if they had rabies… They did not have rabies.”
The last point may or may not be true as the DEC has not confirmed whether the animals had rabies or not.
Even so, Mr Musk replied to the tweet by saying the response was “deeply wrong”. He later wrote a message in support, quoting a line from Star Wars. “‘If you strike me down, I will become more powerful than you could possibly imagine’ Obi PNut Kenobi,” he added.
Elon Musk has been seen jumping for joy at the thought of a Trump presidency (Getty Images)
The DEC and Chemung County Department of Health confirmed on Friday that the animals were put down after Peanut bit someone – although this fact has been disputed.
Instagram Famous animals Peanut the squirrel and Fred the raccoon
E! News
Peanut the Squirrel Euthanized by New York Authorities Per Owner
He added: “What kind of person do these agencies employ? Who has it in them to murder a bloody pet squirrel?
“The government is a mindless and heartless killing machine.”
Mr Longo told the Associated Press this weekend: “Honestly, this still kind of feels surreal, that the state that I live in actually targeted me and took two of the most beloved animals on this planet away, didn’t even quarantine them.
“They took them from my house and just killed them.”
The DEC is expected to make a comment on the issue but no statement was made available to the press at the time of writing.
*****
The way some people look at life after the U.S. aborted 3.5 M babies and even selling body parts is surreal. New York lost a lot of old folks during Covid and what were the results – just a big YAWN. So, losing a pet to these kind of people is “just part of the job.”
Losing a pet is very sad.
And, then ask the question – Where is our future work force?
We must realize – every thing has value in our lives or it wouldn’t have existed.
We must get serious about abortions and rethink – what are we doing – playing GOD?
E! News
kommonsentsjane 