KOMMONSENTSJANE – Polling Numbers

07/30/2025

https://www.windstream.net/news/read/article/the_associated_press-its_a_year_of_rapid_change_except_when_it_comes_to-ap

ttps://www.windstream.net/news/read/article/the_associated_press-its_a_year_of_rapid_change_except_when_it_comes_to-ap

After fighting the fight with the left – we knew it wasn’t going to be easy to try to put the pieces back together. Our country has suffered for 12 years under the Democrats and now the pieces are coming together – even after pushing and pulling against the factions. It is not always that you can “move people with kindness,” as we all know,” when you have to use force – that isn’t easy either. Sometime you have to move them anyway, especially when they don’t want to react. Therefore, the actions are not pretty; but, neither are the actions of the moving party.

Citizens have to be patient when action is required. For those who are not happy with the tactics – might want to volunteer to participate in the action and see how you would react to difficult situations. It is easy to be a bystander; but, it not easy to be the leader and perform the job – which in most cases it is life-threatening.

****

It’s a year of rapid change, except when it comes to Trump’s approval numbers, AP-NORC polling finds.

The Associated Press

By AMELIA THOMSON-DEVEAUX and JONATHAN J. COOPER – Associated PressJul 27, 2025

President Donald Trump speaks with supporters before departing on Marine One from the South Lawn of the White House, Friday, July 25, 2025, in Washington. The President is traveling to Scotland.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Eric Hildenbrand has noticed prices continue to rise this year, even with President Donald Trump in the White House. He doesn’t blame Trump, his choice for president in 2024, but says Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats who control his home state, California, are at fault.

“You can’t compare California with the rest of the country,” said Hildenbrand, who is 76 and lives in San Diego. “I don’t know what’s going on in the rest of the country. It seems like prices are dropping. Things are getting better, but I don’t necessarily see it here.”

Voters like Hildenbrand, whose support of the Republican president is unwavering, help explain Trump’s polling numbers and how they have differed from other presidents’ polling trajectory in significant ways. An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted in March found that 42% of U.S. adults approved of Trump’s job performance. That is a lower rating than those of other recent presidents at the beginning of their second terms, including Democrat Barack Obama and Republican George W. Bush.

The most recent AP-NORC poll, from July, puts Trump at 40% approval. While that is not a meaningful change from March, there is some evidence that Trump’s support may be softening, at least on the margins. The July poll showed a slight decrease in approval of his handling of immigration since earlier in the year. Some other pollsters, such as Gallup, show a downward slide in overall approval since slightly earlier in his term, in January.

But even those shifts are within a relatively narrow range, which is typical for Trump. The new AP-NORC polling tracker shows that Trump’s favorability rating has remained largely steady since the end of his first term, with between 33% and 43% of U.S. adults saying they viewed him favorably across more than five years.

Those long-term trends underscore that Trump has many steadfast opponents. But loyal supporters also help explain why views of the president are hard to change even as he pursues policies that most Americans do not support, using an approach that many find abrasive.Persistently low approval of Trump’s job performance

Trump has not had a traditional honeymoon period in his second term. He did not in his first, either.

An AP-NORC poll conducted in March 2017, two months into his first term, showed that 42% of Americans “somewhat” or “strongly” approved of his performance. That is largely where his approval rating stayed over the course of the next four years.

The recent slippage on immigration is particularly significant because that issue was a major strength for Trump in the 2024 election. Earlier in his second term, it was also one of the few areas where he was outperforming his overall approval. In March, about half of U.S. adults approved of his handling of immigration. But the July AP-NORC poll found his approval on immigration at 43%, in line with his overall approval rating.

Other recent polls show growing discontent with Trump’s approach on immigration. A CNN/SSRS poll found that 55% of U.S. adults say the president has gone too far when it comes to deporting immigrants who are living in the United States illegally, an increase of 10 percentage points since February.

“I understand wanting to get rid of illegal immigrants, but the way that’s being done is very aggressive,” said Donovan Baldwin, 18, of Asheboro, North Carolina, who did not vote in the 2024 election. “And that’s why people are protesting because it comes off as aggression. It’s not right.”

Ratings of Trump’s handling of the economy, which were more positive during his first term, have been persistently negative in his second term. The July poll found that few Americans think Trump’s policies have benefited them so far.

Even if he is not a fan of everything Trump has done so far, Brian Nichols, 58, of Albuquerque, New Mexico, is giving him the benefit of the doubt.

Nichols, who voted for Trump in 2024, likes what he is seeing from the president overall, though he has his concerns both on style and substance, particularly Trump’s social media presence and his on-again, off-again tariffs. Nichols also does not like the push to eliminate federal agencies such as the Education Department.

Despite his occasional disagreements with Trump, though, Nichols said he wants to give the president space to do his job, and he trusts the House and Senate, now run by Republicans, to act as a safeguard.

“We put him into office for a reason, and we should be trusting that he’s doing the job for the best of America,” Nichols said.Overall views of Trump have been fairly steady since 2019

Trump has spent the past six months pushing far-reaching and often unpopular policies. Earlier this year, Americans were bracing themselves for higher prices as a result of his approach to tariffs. The July poll found that most people think Trump’s tax and spending bill will benefit the wealthy, while few think it will pay dividends for the middle class or people like them.

Discomfort with individual policies may not translate into wholesale changes in views of Trump, though. Those have largely been constant through years of turmoil, with his favorability rating staying within a 10-percentage point range through the COVID-19 pandemic, a felony conviction and attempted assassination.

To some of his supporters, the benefits of his presidency far outweigh the costs.

Kim Schultz, 62, of Springhill, Florida said she is thrilled with just about everything Trump is doing as president, particularly his aggressive moves to deport anyone living in the country illegally.

Even if Trump’s tariffs eventually take effect and push prices up, she said she will not be alarmed.

“I’ve always had the opinion that if the tariffs are going to cost me a little bit more here and there, I don’t have a problem with that,” she said.

Across the country, Hildenbrand dislikes Trump’s personality and his penchant for insults, including those directed at foreign leaders. But he thinks Trump is making things happen.

(Yes, it is easy to be nice to everyone when they are not ripping you off; but, everyone needs to understand – our past leaders have allowed the foreign countries to take advantage of the U.S. – DOGE proved that and our foreign aid was completely out of hand by having to borrow money to give to them with a debt of trillions. Was that okay?)

“More or less, to me, he’s showing that he’s on the right track,” he said. “I’m not in favor of Trump’s personality, but I am in favor of what he’s getting done.”

****

As the old saying goes, you can please some of the people some of the time – but not all of the people all of the time.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – What is Behind the Rest of the Story??

07/31/2025

The original purpose of flooding the country with anti-conservative rhetoric is the release of the Russiagate story about former President Obama which is akin to treason and the left is trying to smother it with the Epstein story.

When did the Wall Street Journal become a tabloid paper? Was it with this issue? We all know when the One World Order were shifting chairs in Europe – a lot of that side of the world responded with, “No Way Jose.” And, they held their ground and would not accept illegals coming into their country and even built fences. In the U.S., with the Democrats in control – illegals in the millions flooded our country. What happens when this occurs – it changes your culture because the traditions and the Constitution were left on the cutting room floor of newspapers. Now, our conservative President is swiftly sending the illegals back to their home country.

This is what is happening in the U.S. especially in the world of newspapers/TV which are owned now by liberals. Most of the CEO’s are former Obama/Biden employees and that is why all of the bad publicity and “take down” orders of our President.

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/ex-abc-news-reporter-admits-employer-biased-against-trump-due-to-lack-of-viewpoint-diversity/ar-AA1JE0F7?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=688b814c3ee642789cd647a01ccbc5d3&ei=152

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/only-one-view-study-shows-morning-show-s-overwhelming-bias-for-liberal-guests/vi-AA1JEjE6?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=688b814c3ee642789cd647a01ccbc5d3&ei=301

Following is how blatant the left is in their thinking.

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-one-man-who-has-the-strength-to-finish-off-donald-trump/ar-AA1JzDhm?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=81b90d58fa304c33bf18c08f9bb1fb61&ei=9

In response to the WSJ paper (with a new CEO from the Netherlands) tried to take down our conservative President by still ragging about the Epstein story and used the owner of the WSJ as the prop of the main story. Did the retired owner realize the paper was using him as the main story before attending a function sponsored by our President? If not, then, this is elder abuse by using the elderly person without his knowledge.

07/30/2025

The struggle for power is still evident. Whoever wrote this story has provided their side.

The American people struggled through 12 years of Democrat control which did not end well. We almost lost our country to SOCIALISM via the Obama/Biden facade. There will always be evil in all of our lives and this story/opinion proves it. It always ends with sex as being used against mankind.

The American people are tired of being used by the Democratic Party to further their own ambitions which is to tear up our country. The REAL Democrats need to realign their party and quit allowing the progressives to use their funds to take over their party. Make them establish their own party (like AOC/Talib).

Let’s hear from Mr. Latour and his side of the story. There was more than one birthday card sent and why did the WSJ just use one in the story – being President Trump?

The following information is interesting:

“I’d like to thank Rupert Murdoch, Lachlan Murdoch and Robert Thomson for their trust — and for their deep and continued support for and investment in quality journalism and the national and international institution that is Dow Jones,” said Mr. Latour. “Our role is more important than ever before. Our millions of readers and users in the U.S. and beyond are all faced with uncertainty in time ahead and our unique brand of factual news and analysis serves to help them make decisions in business, finance and personal life. Will Lewis and the team have left Dow Jones in great shape. We are well positioned to take The Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, MarketWatch, Newswires, Factiva and our other brands to more people everywhere and continue — and accelerate — our growth. As always, our mission is to help people put the truth to good ends.”

The most interesting part of the above information was:

As always, our mission is to help people put the truth to good ends.”

News Corp Appoints Almar Latour as CEO of Dow Jones, Publisher of The Wall Street Journal – News Corp

“As always, our mission is to help people put the truth to good ends.”

How many more gotcha stories will be used to continue this persecution of one person? Who would believe that a “birthday” card would be such a story. After all – what is the difference in the Biden/Obama illegal immigration story and the Epstein story? Were they both using “sex” in the process?

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-one-man-who-has-the-strength-to-finish-off-donald-trump/ar-AA1JzDhm?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=81b90d58fa304c33bf18c08f9bb1fb61&ei=9

****

Fox News Founder Rupert Murdoch Is Retiring

https://www.npr.org/2023/09/21/1200761443/fox-rupert-murdoch-steps-down-retires-lachlan

ttps://www.npr.org/2023/09/21/1200761443/fox-rupert-murdoch-steps-down-retires-lachlan

Fox founder Rupert Murdoch steps down from his media empire, handing it to his son
Updated September 21, 2023


David Folkenflik


Rupert Murdoch, 92, is stepping down as chair of his global media empire, which includes Fox News and The Wall Street Journal.


Rupert Murdoch, the media magnate who built an unmatched global media empire over seven decades from a single newspaper he inherited in his native Australia, announced on Thursday that he would step down.

“I have been engaged daily with news and ideas, and that will not change,” Murdoch wrote in a memo to employees at Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, and the many other properties that make up his two corporations, Fox Corp. and News Corp. “The time is right for me to take on different roles.”

Murdoch’s career has been marked by a singular drive for business success, an eagerness to have sway over elections and policies, and the repeated eruption of scandals. Fox News, which he founded in 1996, has played an increasingly prominent role in his profits, his influence, and his crises.


In his note to staff, Murdoch, 92, took a shot at unnamed elites, saying they “have open contempt for those who are not members of their rarified class” and said most of the rest of the media was in “cahoots with those elites.”

His elder son Lachlan Murdoch, who has been leading the companies with him, will become the sole chairman of both Fox Corp., the broadcast arm of the family’s holdings, and News Corp., which encompasses newspapers and book publishing. Rupert Murdoch will become chairman emeritus.

The changes will take effect in November, when the two companies, together worth about $26.5 billion, have their shareholder meetings. While they are publicly traded, Murdoch is considered to control more than 40% of their voting shares. Bloomberg estimates his fortune at more than $8.2 billion.
From tabloids to papers of record

Through outlets he acquired and others he founded, Rupert Murdoch ultimately dominated journalism and politics in Australia, the U.K. and the U.S. Outside the U.S., he leveraged his outlets to support politicians from the center-left to the far right. In this country, his sway is almost entirely limited to the Republican Party.

Media magnate Rupert Murdoch, right, huddles with Preston Padden, president of network distribution for Fox, during a hearing of the Federal Communications Commission in May 1995. A generation later, Padden says Murdoch is unfit to hold the licenses for local television stations due to Fox News.
Media.


A former Fox executive now argues Murdoch is unfit to own TV stations
Though Murdoch built his fortune initially on populist tabloids, he bought prestige newspapers such as the Journal and the Times of London to reach elites who forged policy and set consensus. He also created The Australian in 1964, that country’s only national daily.

That high-low approach, and his willingness to boost favored politicians, gave him entrée to top leaders in Australia and the U.K.; those seeking office would fly thousands of miles to court him. He did not have the same level of access in the U.S. except when former President Donald Trump, whom Murdoch privately disparaged, was in office.

****

Trump Hosted Murdoch at Weekend Game Before Explosive WSJ Epstein Story – Newsweek

Trump Hosted Murdoch at Weekend Game Before Explosive WSJ Epstein Story

Published Jul 17, 2025 at 9:46 PM EDTUpdated Jul 17, 2025 at 10:21 PM

By Sonam Sheth and Peter Aitken

President Donald Trump hosted NewsCorp CEO Rupert Murdoch at the FIFA Club World Cup Final just days before The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had written a “bawdy” birthday letter to disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for Epstein’s 50th birthday.

Murdoch was among several high-profile political and media figures who joined Trump in his suite at the World Cup final on July 13, the Associated Press and CBS News reported. Others included Attorney General Pam Bondi, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and football legend Tom Brady.

The Context

Trump and Murdoch have had a cozy professional relationship for years, with Murdoch’s media empire—which includes Fox News and the New York Post—publishing a slew of stories that have been favorable to Trump, from when he was a Manhattan real-estate tycoon, to when he entered politics and finally when he became president of the United States.

But Trump’s relationship with Murdoch reached a boiling point this week, when the Journal reported that Trump was among dozens of people who wrote letters to Epstein celebrating his 50th birthday in 2003. The story threw a wrench into Trump’s repeated efforts to distance himself from the disgraced businessman as the administration grapples with the fallout from its handling of the investigation into Epstein’s 2019 death in a New York City jail.

What To Know

On Thursday, four days after Murdoch joined Trump at the FIFA final, the Journal reported that the president was among the people who wrote letters to Epstein celebrating his birthday. Trump’s letter is said to have featured several lines of typewritten text surrounded by the outline of a naked woman, sketched in marker, and included Trump’s signature.

“Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret,” the letter said, according to the report.

When the Journal approached Trump before publishing its story, the president said in an interview that the letter was “fake” and threatened to sue the paper if it published the explosive report.

Trump raged against the Journal in a Truth Social post on Thursday after its report was published, saying he would sue the paper “shortly” over its “defamatory story.”

The president said he had “personally” warned the outlet and Murdoch before they printed the report that he would sue them if they pressed ahead with publication, and said that Murdoch had assured him that he would “take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so.”

Trump said on Truth Social that in addition to the Journal, he plans to sue Murdoch and the Journal‘s parent company, NewsCorp.

“The Press has to learn to be truthful, and not rely on sources that probably don’t even exist,” he wrote, adding that he “looks forward to suing and holding accountable the once great Wall Street Journal.”

Newsweek reached out to NewsCorp via email outside of normal business hours for comment.

The public and media’s renewed focus on Epstein exploded after the Department of Justice, released a memo last week concluding that the sex offender died by suicide in 2019 in his Manhattan jail cell and that the government was not in possession of an “incriminating” list of Epstein’s “clients.”

The memo threw cold water on years of conspiracy theories—amplified for months by Bondi and other Trump administration officials—suggesting that Epstein was killed as part of a government cover-up. In the days since, Trump administration officials have alternated between saying there are no Epstein files and that the files were a “hoax” perpetrated by Democrats.

Trump also lambasted his supporters as “weaklings” and said they got “duped” by the Epstein “hoax,” despite the fact that his own officials, including Bondi and Vice President JD Vance, had repeatedly suggested that Epstein’s death was a cover-up.

What People Are Saying

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote on X: “The Wall Street Journal published a hatchet job article with a FAKE ‘birthday letter’ that is supposedly from 2003 … The WSJ refused to show us the letter and conceded they don’t even have it in their possession when we asked them to verify the alleged document they’re basing their ENTIRE fake story on.”

She added: “When has President Trump ever spoken like the conversation alleged in the fake WSJ story? That’s not at all how he speaks or writes. The WSJ knowingly published false information to smear the President of the United States.”

Democratic Representative Sean Casten of Illinois wrote on X: “Like all things Trump, this is simultaneously disgusting and entirely unsurprising. He is exactly who we always understood him to be.”

Technology reporter Kara Swisher reacted to the report on Thursday evening, telling CNN’s Anderson Cooper: “Even if he denies it … it creates a feeling, and especially online, that gets amplified and really weaponized in a lot of ways. So it’s not going to end here until he releases these files in some substantive way, which he seems reluctant to do…”

What Happens Next

Trump asked Bondi on Thursday evening to produce “any and all” grand jury testimony relevant to Epstein, subject to court approval, in order to put an end to what he described as the “ridiculous” publicity Epstein has gotten over the last week.

Update 7/17/25, 11:32 p.m. ET: This story has been updated with additional information and context.

****

The Host of the WSJ is Almar Latour and is from the Netherlands. It looks like Mr. Murdock’s “word” didn’t reach Mr. Latour?.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – America’s booming economy proves Trump was right – again.

7/29/2025

Why is it that Democrats can never steer the economy ship? Is it that they are too busy usurping our coffers and aren’t smart enough to manage the budget as DOGE proved?

I hope the voters realize that you have to understand how the world works – and keep the people in office who understand how the government works in order to keep the boat afloat. How many times do we have to learn the hard way that the Democrats do not have the capacity to run the country. Their mentality is limited and we hope the country understands that. Obama/Biden were the least capable. We must establish an IQ test for future candidates. We have people now in our government who do not understand how the world/government works and that is the problem.

The twelve years of Democrat control almost sunk the country. Look at all of our blue states – not good. The citizens better “listen up” and learn from what we have been through.

If you don’t like the name Republican – you had better learn from what we have been through. The left almost took us into SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM with their ignorance. The Democrats need to clean up their party of the AOC/Bernie Sanders/et al progressives and bring back the real Democrats.

The spending by the Obama/Biden progressives was out of control as we all know. Ignorance was bliss with them as we witnessed. It is time now to remain true to the Constitution and throw out all of the bums who caused our demise.

****

US President Donald Trump during a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, after the announcement of a trade deal on July 27 2025 - Evelyn Hockstein / Reuters

US President Donald Trump during a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, after the announcement of a trade deal on July 27 2025 – Evelyn Hockstein / Reuters

“Sometimes you have to take the medicine,” said President Donald Trump, back in April, as markets plummeted and the world convulsed in response to his “Liberation Day” tariffs. He denounced his critics as “Panicans”.

Four months on, and the panic has all but passed. After initial discomfort, the patient appears to be digesting Dr Trump’s unorthodox treatment and is responding well. The key to recovery, it seems, is to accept that the global economic order was wrong and the Donald is right. It’s funny how often this seems to be the case.

The stock markets quickly recovered from their slump and hit new highs this week, after the European Union struck an initial trade agreement with the United States. The EU has accepted a 15 per cent levy on its exports to the United States and promised to buy many more American goods. In return, America gave away almost nothing. This is Trumponomics 101: he wins, you pay.

The extent of his domination can be seen in the fact that Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the EU Commission, and Keir Starmer both came in turn to Turnberry, in Scotland, to perform the diplomatic formalities, while he took time out from playing golf on the course he owns. For his part, the gracious host flattered his guests by calling them “tough negotiators” even as they essentially accepted all his terms. This is the Art of the Post-Deal: he flatters, you keep paying.Related video: History behind tariffs, nothing new for American Presidents (KOAA Colorado Springs, CO

History behind tariffs, nothing new for American Presidents

The British Prime Minister grimaced as Donald Trump lectured him on the benefits of low taxation and strong borders as well as the evils of Sadiq Khan and wind turbines. But Starmer knows, deep down, that the only aspect of his premiership which has gone well has been his negotiating of the political weather system that is Donald Trump. Britain bowed to Trump’s agenda first, and was duly rewarded with a 10 per cent levy on all our goods, the lowest on offer.

It’s strange to think that only last year, as Trump campaigned for re-election, the expert classes on both sides of the Atlantic frantically debated whether Trump was serious about imposing a 10 per cent levy on all imports, certain as they were that such a move would tank the financial system. In fact Trump went much further than anyone expected and slapped additional “reciprocal tariffs” on countries, some as high as 50 per cent. But his initial aggression was so bewildering that now the world is falling on his lesser-though-still-significant tariffs as a blessed relief. This is classic New York real-estate stuff: frighten the wits out of opposing parties with a ruinous initial threat, then watch them cave in gratitude when you agree to be slightly less exacting.

“It’s complicated but not that complicated, when you get right down to it,” Trump told von der Leyen on Sunday. The simple truth, which he understood but the rest of the world couldn’t quite admit, is that every country desperately wants access to the US market, which is why he, as America’s Commander-in-Chief, must have the upper hand on global trade. The leverage is his, inevitably.

It’s too soon to say the trade war is over, of course. The deals with Britain, Europe, Japan are only “frameworks” that could fall apart as officials work through the details. And then there’s China, still the factory of the world, and the hardest piece of the Trump trade puzzle to solve.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has spent the last two days in Sweden, conducting intensely difficult negotiations with Chinese officials about extending the pause on America’s onerous tariffs against the world’s second greatest power.

But what’s clear is that America is now in a far more commanding position on trade, even with the world’s second biggest superpower. And that’s down to Donald Trump’s belligerence. He can pause, and pause again, but he doesn’t fold.

Trump understands that, beyond economics, protectionism is a very useful cudgel in diplomacy, because tariffs are like sanctions. America can make warring nations fall in line by threatening to impose steep export taxes if they don’t comply. Last week, Trump used the threat of US tariffs to help broker a peace deal between Thailand and Cambodia last week. He did the same with DR Congo and Rwanda earlier this month and India and Pakistan in May. He wants to be remembered as a peacemaker, and it’s obvious now that Liberation Day is part of his anti-war strategy. This week Trump pleased Starmer and the EU by promising tariffs of up to 100 per cent on Vladimir Putin’s Russia if the conflict in Ukraine doesn’t end in less than two weeks. That’s because he knows that punishment tariffs on unpopular countries are a useful way of keeping allies content.

Back in America, Trump’s political opponents point out that, while Wall Street seems to be enjoying a bounce, the Main Street economy is suffering. Basic economics suggests that tariffs have to be “tax on consumers”, as companies inevitably pass extra costs on to customers. And Americans have been telling pollsters that, as well as inflation, concern about the impact of Trump’s tariffs has made them reign in spending. Yet consumer and business sentiment in the US is actually ticking up not down, and the latest surveys suggest that almost 50 per cent of Americans rate the strength of the US economy as “good”, up from about 35 per cent at the start of the Trump presidency.

Free traders might still grumble about tariffs taking the world backwards. But others are starting to acknowledge that Trump could be late capitalism’s last, best hope.

Trumponomics may force consumers to pay more, but he is taxing Americans less. His administration just extended his significant tax cuts from his first term and added tax relief for pensioners, as well as on people working overtime or for tips. At the same time, the White House can point out that inflation is going down and its “external revenue service” is bringing in $20bn each month in tariffs, which helps reduce America’s vast and fiscally unsustainable deficit.

This is not quite the “golden age” that Trump voters promised when he came into office earlier this year, but the president isn’t exaggerating when he tells reporters that America is “the hottest country anywhere in the world.”

The danger is that, while Trump milks us all on trade, other countries will suffer and become more resentful towards America. We’re already seeing the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India and China) coming closer together as many regard the United States as an avaricious hegemon.

But that process was underway long before Trump first became president. The truth is that Trump has defied the increasingly unpopular economic orthodoxy that has ruled the world since at least 1995, when President Bill Clinton’s America helped found the World Trade Organisation. And he’s winning.

Freddy Gray is deputy and US editor of The Spectator

****

We hope that voters learned from this hard lesson. Not just anyone can be a candidate for office. For heavens sake, VET YOUR CANDIDATES. We need people who are smart – not smart alec’s..

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Op-Ed: How Gabbard’s Latest Russiagate Findings Exposed Obama’s Treachery..

08/04/2025

https://www.tampafp.com/dni-gabbard-whistleblowers-emerge-after-release-of-coup-documents/

ttps://www.tampafp.com/dni-gabbard-whistleblowers-emerge-after-release-of-coup-documents/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/megyn-kelly-demands-hillary-clinton-s-arrest-this-woman-should-be-in-jail/ar-AA1JTbNk?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6891130cbfd143f9b7cc595ab275028a&ei=56

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/megyn-kelly-demands-hillary-clinton-s-arrest-this-woman-should-be-in-jail/ar-AA1JTbNk?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6891130cbfd143f9b7cc595ab275028a&ei=56

****

Yes, the following heading should be an embarrassment to the media in the manner in which they are describing years of people committing treason. They need to read the Constitution.

Voters: Yeah, Obama broke the law with ‘Russiagate,’ must be prosecuted

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/voters-yeah-obama-broke-the-law-with-russiagate-must-be-prosecuted/ar-AA1JSSKM?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=689109bf82304835af84cf8cecad6132&ei=13

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/voters-yeah-obama-broke-the-law-with-russiagate-must-be-prosecuted/ar-AA1JSSKM?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=689109bf82304835af84cf8cecad6132&ei=13

Voters: Yeah, Obama broke the law with ‘Russiagate,’ must be prosecuted

Voters: Yeah, Obama broke the law with ‘Russiagate,’ must be prosecuted

A majority of voters believe former President Barack Obama‘s national security team schemed and lied in pushing the false “Russiagate” scandal to undermine the legitimate election of President Donald Trump, and now want them prosecuted for it.

In the latest Rasmussen Reports survey shared with Secrets, 54% of likely voters said it is likely that Team Obama “committed serious crimes in manipulating intelligence.” Only 41% of respondents disagreed.A.I. Gives Traders "3-Day Warning," Could Transform Stock Portfolios

And even more respondents, 69%, demanded that those involved be “held accountable.”

🚨BREAKING: In a bombshell revelation, CIA Director John Ratcliffe has confirmed that former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey & former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are likely to face indictments due to their involvement in the Russiagate scandal. pic.twitter.com/ugwQh4cjqu

The new poll was conducted after Trump’s national intelligence director, Tulsi Gabbard, reported that Obama and his staff allegedly played a huge role in ginning up the scandal that Russia influenced and manipulated the 2016 election of Trump over the media’s choice, Hillary Clinton.

That new report has led to speculation that Obama and his national security team could be criminally prosecuted.

It turns out that America is on board with that move. Just 21% of respondents disagreed with punishing those involved.

Eighty-six percent of Republicans, 59% of Democrats, and 62% of unaffiliated voters at least somewhat agree with the Gabbard quote about how important it is ‘that people who perpetrate such crimes are held accountable,’” the Rasmussen analysis said.

The survey is the latest to show that the scandal won’t just go away. It dogged Trump’s first term, and MAGA voters remain mad about that and want revenge.

(How many years have the Democrats been scheming to find a crime that fits President Trump – 12 years – while committing these crimes against the people/President Trump – and spending taxpayer funds to commit these crimes. And, there are people who still think nothing of them committing these crimes. This tells you – there are a lot of people who don’t have much reasoning power. That is scary.)

****

07/29/2025

ttps://unmuzzlednews.com/a-cnn-analyst-launched-one-desperate-attack-against-trump-that-backfired-spectacularly/?utm_source=decide&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=umn_2970413263&utm_term=&utm_content=240175

07/28/2025

For those of us paying attention, what hasn’t made sense for the past nine years suddenly becomes clear. Looking back at the photo of Obama sitting next to Donald Trump on Inauguration Day 2017, fully aware of what he had set in motion, it’s a chilling reminder of what a dangerous threat Barack Obama truly is to America.

Sponsored

The Western Journal

Op-Ed: How Gabbard’s Latest Russiagate Findings Exposed Obama’s Treachery

07/28/2025

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/op-ed-how-gabbard-s-latest-russiagate-findings-exposed-obama-s-treachery/ar-AA1JsCFn?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b1b945486fe2450eba1b2fc59bfe4b3b&ei=7

Op-Ed: How Gabbard's Latest Russiagate Findings Exposed Obama's Treachery

Op-Ed: How Gabbard’s Latest Russiagate Findings Exposed Obama’s Treachery© Jim Watson – AFP / Getty Images

Barack Obama sees himself as a historic transformational figure sent to fundamentally change a nation with a paternalistic history, a “fatally flawed” Constitution, racist culture, and economic system that needed revision — by him.

That’s why it must have been a shock when Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election to a billionaire businessman whose worldview opposed everything Barack stood for during his eight years, “waking up every morning in a house … built by slaves.”

Imagine thinking so highly of yourself and then having your successor be so widely rejected.

By choosing Donald Trump, the American public rejected Obama’s vision, which likely bruised his fragile ego. For Obama, Trump’s victory probably felt like a complete rejection of everything the community organizer had achieved during his two terms of trying to transform a constitutional republic into a Marxist state.

Now, nine years after that harsh blow of rejection, America learns that before and after the 2016 election, the world’s most thin-skinned egomaniac and his team of malevolent enforcers believed it was in the country’s best interest to protect their distorted view of democracy by making false accusations against the newly elected president.

Seeing himself as “… the one we’ve been waiting for,” it’s alleged that the former president suppressed the truth to support a story he and his entire cabinet knew was false. If cerebrally-challenged “tea baggers” chose Donald Trump in 2016, who better than Barack Obama to fix the mistake? Regardless of what that involved.

Related video: ‘I Will Do Everything In My Power’: When Donald Trump Telegraphed Russian Interference In The 2016 Election During The Primary Debates (Slingshot News)

‘I Will Do Everything In My Power’: When Donald Trump Telegraphed Russian Interference In The 2016 Election During The Primary Debates

View on Watch

And so, the self-proclaimed champion of “democracy” resolved to do whatever it took to undermine a democratically elected president.

In the lead-up to 2016, the intelligence community repeatedly assessed and reported that Russia was “probably not trying … to influence the election by using cyber means.”

Then, on Dec. 7, 2016, about a month after Trump successfully secured the victory and after Obama was revived with a strong dose of smelling salts, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper delivered some terrible news. Despite Obama believing Russia would be the fall guy, Clapper’s message proved otherwise.

“Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. Presidential election outcome,” he reported.

In other words, the election results showed that America did not want another round of Obama dressed in a pantsuit.

After processing the information, it took 48 hours for President Obama’s White House to strategize how to handle the disappointing turn of events.

The former president gathered his top National Security Council members for a meeting. The group included key figures like Clapper, CIA director John Brennan, National Security Advisor Susan Rice, Secretary of State John Kerry, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, and several other Trump-hating officials.

The topic was to discuss the Russia issue and figure out how to turn it into a problem.

In a follow-up to that meeting, Clapper’s executive assistant was instructed to send an email. The message was addressed to leaders in the intelligence community, instructing them “per the President’s request” to develop a more acceptable assessment that outlines the “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.”

That kind of directive is similar to Obama creating a “more acceptable” short-form birth certificate after his original long form mysteriously went missing.

The email went on to say, “ODNI will lead this effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS.”

Translation: Russia’s level of involvement in the election is unacceptable to Obama. Therefore, the team must craft a more suitable assessment that conveys what Obama wants it to communicate. So, even if that conclusion was a blatant lie, on behalf of upholding democracy, the CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS agreed that the democratic thing to do was to subvert democracy.

Confident that the usual allies would obey the president’s orders, Obama officials then leaked false information to media outlets hostile to Trump, claiming, “Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election.”

Barack Obama likely felt justified in casting doubt on Donald Trump’s presidency, while also straining U.S. relations with a world leader Obama had come to despise almost as much as he despises Trump.

Early enough to cast doubt on Inauguration Day on Jan. 20, 2017, a new Obama-approved intelligence community assessment was released that directly contradicted the findings from the previous six months. According to Trump’s Department of National Intelligence Director, Tulsi Gabbard, these newer, more Obama-approved findings were based on information that, even at the time, was considered non-credible.

According to Gabbard, to delegitimize Trump’s victory, what was released to the public led to prolonged investigations, Congressional impeachment proceedings, arrests, innocent people being jailed, and “heightened Russia tensions.” Money and time were spent, reputations and lives were ruined, years were lost, and tense U.S.-Russian relations emerged, but all of this was a small price to pay, in his own mind, for Obama’s ego to be vindicated.

That’s why it’s easy to believe that during Trump’s first term, Barack Obama was probably working behind the scenes to destabilize the new president and ensure that, no matter what “tea baggers”-turned-MAGA voters decided in 2020, the Trump presidency wouldn’t get a second chance.

And so, perhaps even illegally, a substandard candidate was hand-picked and installed in office in 2020. After Joe Biden was sworn in in 2021, every Obama policy initiative that Americans rejected in 2016 was reinstated and heightened. Obama’s choice was not only a figurehead who could be manipulated, but also an embarrassing presence on the world stage.

President Barack Obama’s fingerprints were everywhere, and Biden’s term in office felt as if a sledgehammer was behind the scenes, crushing the very soul of this nation.

For those of us paying attention, what hasn’t made sense for the past nine years suddenly becomes clear. Looking back at the photo of Obama sitting next to Donald Trump on Inauguration Day 2017, fully aware of what he had set in motion, it’s a chilling reminder of what a dangerous threat Barack Obama truly is to America.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment