KOMMONSENTSJANE – Court Split Leaves Trump’s Civil Fraud Appeal Stuck in Slow Lane.

08/18/2025

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/court-split-leaves-trump-s-civil-fraud-appeal-stuck-in-slow-lane/ar-AA1KIITl?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=b9f5ca0042144ebdbfa62e3ae2fc3634&ei=72

Time to split the peas. Letitia James is part of the “Get Trump Crowd” and they were all peeing in the same pot. What does she know about the value of real estate? We all value our property in terms of value differently and value it higher than the person actually making the determination. Real estate has varying costs because the owner knows how much he has actually invested in time and money. Also, when you have more than one person interested in a given property, a bidding war can ensue – which happens in many important pieces of property. This will cause the property to be sold at a higher price.

As a former second job real estate person, it happens every day.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ny-ag-letitia-james-subpoenaed-by-justice-department-over-454m-civil-fraud-case-against-trump/ar-AA1KaoVe?ocid=BingNewsSerp

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ny-ag-letitia-james-subpoenaed-by-justice-department-over-454m-civil-fraud-case-against-trump/ar-AA1KaoVe?ocid=BingNewsSerp

Wasn’t this part of the LAW FARE, whereby James has been found out and is part of this gang of thieves?

NY AG Letitia James subpoenaed by Justice Department over $454M civil fraud case against Trump

New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, sued Trump in 2022, alleging he fraudulently inflated the value of parts of his real-estate empire for financial benefit, primarily lower-interest loans. Justice Arthur Engoron presided over a monthslong civil trial and ruled James proved her case, which relied upon a state statute that grants the attorney general broad authority to investigate “persistent fraud or illegality” in business.

****

For President Trump, the fraud case is his main private legal headache.

For President Trump, the fraud case is his main private legal headache.© Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The New York court weighing President Trump’s appeal of a roughly $500 million civil-fraud judgment typically acts swiftly and unanimously, with many of its decisions coming within weeks after hearing arguments.

Trump’s experience stands out as an unusual exception.

A five-justice panel has yet to render a decision nearly a year after taking up the case, leaving him and his business in limbo. Behind the scenes, members of the panel have been divided, and three of them have been writing opinions, according to people familiar with the matter. It couldn’t be determined how they are split. Justices do occasionally shift their positions, and the number of opinions could change the people said.

A spokesman for the New York state court system said it doesn’t comment on pending litigation. A spokesman for Trump’s legal team said, “It is time for the New York Courts to step in and end this witch hunt once and for all.”

For the New York Appellate Division’s First Department, the Trump matter is among the most high-profile cases in its history, and the outcome could influence future business regulation in the state. For Trump, whose legal entanglements largely faded after his return to the White House, the fraud case is his main private legal headache. At stake isn’t only the half-billion dollar penalty, growing by the day with interest, but the possibility that his sons could be barred from running his family company in the near term. The president asks regularly why the court hasn’t ruled, said people who speak to him.If the appellate court upholds the trial judge’s decision, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump would be barred from holding a position as an officer of a New York company for two years.

If the appellate court upholds the trial judge’s decision, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump would be barred from holding a position as an officer of a New York company for two years.© Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, sued Trump in 2022, alleging he fraudulently inflated the value of parts of his real-estate empire for financial benefit, primarily lower-interest loans. Justice Arthur Engoron presided over a monthslong civil trial and ruled James proved her case, which relied upon a state statute that grants the attorney general broad authority to investigate “persistent fraud or illegality” in business.

The judge in February 2024 ordered Trump to pay more than $350 million plus interest and imposed an array of other sanctions that restricted the Trump Organization from borrowing money and effectively prohibited Trump’s two eldest sons from running the business for two years. Trump quickly appealed, and the First Department put those restrictions on hold while it considered the case.

The appeals court heard arguments this past September, and some of the judges’ questions appeared favorable to Trump. One wondered whether there should be some “guardrails” on the attorney general’s power. Another questioned the size of the judgment. “The immense penalty in this case is troubling,” said Justice Peter Moulton. A lawyer for James defended it: “There was a lot of fraud.”

Other justices appeared to see James’s lawsuit as within the bounds of the law, despite the Trump lawyers’ arguments that banks didn’t lose money and no victims were harmed. Presiding Justice Dianne Renwick noted the statute refers to “persistent fraud or illegality,” but not harm.

Lengthy waits and disagreeing judges are a common occurrence on some appeals courts. But recent leadership of the First Judicial Department, which reviews thousands of lower-court decisions and motions annually, has emphasized speed.

The First Department typically issues decisions within 30 days, according to a 2024 court report. For each of the past five years, that report said, the court began its new annual session each September with zero pending and undecided appeals.

“Is this normal? No,” said Bill White, a lawyer at appellate consulting firm Counsel Press. “This is something I imagine they are anxious to have on their docket for so long, with everyone’s expectation and the pressure building.”

Alongside that promptness has come unanimity. From 2024 through this July, the court decided roughly 2,900 appeals, according to an analysis of public court data. Only about two dozen of those rulings—or less than .01%—came with a recorded dissent.

If the court upholds the trial judge’s decision, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. would be barred from holding a position as an officer of a New York company for two years. Trump and his company for three years couldn’t apply for loans from financial institutions registered in New York. The losing side can appeal to the state’s highest court.

The wait has cost the company. It is paying a court-appointed monitor, the former federal judge Barbara Jones, whom Trump lawyers previously accused of charging “exorbitant fees” amounting to more than $2.6 million over 14 months. On top of that, Trump has paid more than $2 million in fees on the bond he secured to guarantee the judgment while he appeals, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The panel hearing the Trump appeal includes four judges appointed by Democratic governors and one Republican appointee, David Friedman, who is regarded as among the most conservative of the court’s 21 members. The court’s presiding justice, Renwick, also on the panel, is viewed as a stalwart liberal who has an institutional interest in seeking consensus and guarding the court’s reputation.

Write to Corinne Ramey at corinne.ramey@wsj.com

****

kommonsntsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Former AG William Barr Under President Trump Investigated Epstein’s Death. Now Congress Has Questions..

08/18/2025

CBS NEWS

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/william-barr-investigated-epstein-s-death-now-congress-has-questions/ar-AA1KIQU0?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=03d0834c9d2a4f2cbb605ef3a9b48420&ei=30

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/william-barr-investigated-epstein-s-death-now-congress-has-questions/ar-AA1KIQU0?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=03d0834c9d2a4f2cbb605ef3a9b48420&ei=30

Forensics expert analysis of Jeffrey Epstein jail video contradicts government’s claims.

(Click on view to watch video.)

View on Watch

In the hours after convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein died in a Manhattan detention cell, then-U.S. Attorney General William Barr pledged to intervene personally to lead the investigation into Epstein’s death. 

Among the first to arrive at the Metropolitan Correctional Center soon after Epstein’s death in August 2019 were members of Barr’s senior staff. The visit to the federal detention center by senior members of the attorney general’s staff was highly unusual, a source who was there at the time and witnessed the visit told CBS News. But so was the death in custody of such a controversial figure.Social Security Recipients Under $2,384/Mo Now Entitled To 12 "Kickbacks" (Tap f

One source didn’t recall ever seeing members of the attorney general’s senior staff investigate an inmate death in more than 20 years. Another source, involved in the investigation, said such senior visits were rare, and if they occurred, usually pertained to promoting correctional programs, not investigating inmate deaths.

Barr’s involvement extended to a personal review of the approximately 11 hours of jail surveillance footage from the night of Epstein’s death. He said in an interview with The Associated Press three months later that it showed no one had entered the area where Epstein was housed, and he concurred with the conclusion of the medical examiner: Epstein had died by suicide. 

Last month, after the FBI made that video public, an analysis by CBS News identified inconsistencies between Barr’s description of the video and what it actually showed — including whether it really proves no one else entered the cell block. 

Now, Barr is scheduled to appear on Monday on Capitol Hill, where he will be questioned behind closed doors by members of Congress conducting a review of the Epstein matter.

Sources familiar with the oversight committee’s plans tell CBS News they will be asking questions about Barr’s involvement in the death investigation. 

CBS News has reached out to Barr for comment.William Barr at the Justice Dept. in 2020 / Credit: Michael Reynolds/EPA/Bloomberg/Getty Images

William Barr at the Justice Dept. in 2020 / Credit: Michael Reynolds/EPA/Bloomberg/Getty Images

The deposition of Barr, who served two Republican presidents as U.S. attorney general, comes as Epstein’s 2019 death in federal custody has come under renewed, intense public and governmental scrutiny. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman James Comer, a Republican from Kentucky, issued several deposition subpoenas in August, including to Barr, former President Bill Clinton, former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and former FBI Director James Comey. San Antonio Here’s The Average Price of a 6-Hour Gutter Upgrade

Barr, a veteran of the George H.W. Bush administration who was serving his second stint as head of the Justice Department under President Trump at the time, said he was “appalled” when Epstein was found dead on Aug. 10, 2019, in his cell in the Metropolitan Correctional Center. 

Epstein was being held at the now temporarily shuttered federal detention center after being arrested on sex trafficking charges that could have carried a life sentence. His arrest came after years of questions surrounding an earlier controversial prosecutorial deal in Florida where he pleaded to state prostitution charges and a federal felony case was dropped. 

Scrutiny around that deal, and his subsequent death, has fueled years of suspicions and conspiracy theories. The furor also has enveloped Epstein’s vast network of powerful former friends, including Mr. Trump and former President Clinton, who have disavowed him and have not been accused of wrongdoing. 

Campaign promises to “declassify” files related to Epstein, made by Mr. Trump and his surrogates in 2024, have led to months of political headaches for the White House.

The release last month of what the Justice Department called “raw” surveillance video from near Epstein’s cell block, rather than settling questions about the night he died, raised new ones. The analysis by CBS News flagged multiple inconsistencies between the video and the 2023 report released by the Justice Department’s Inspector General on Epstein’s death. 

As Congress steps up its inquiry, Barr is the first person scheduled to be deposed by the committee. 

Barr has acknowledged what he called “a perfect storm of screw-ups” at the jail, but said his “personal review” of surveillance footage supported the conclusion that Epstein had died by suicide. 

As attorney general, Barr faced calls to recuse himself from Epstein’s criminal case because he had previously worked for a law firm, Kirkland and Ellis, that had represented Epstein. (Their paths also indirectly crossed decades earlier, in the early 1970s, when Epstein was hired to teach at an elite private school in New York City where Barr’s father was the headmaster.) 

Here is a look at some unanswered questions Barr may be asked based on a review of the 2023 DOJ inspector general’s report, documents released by the Bureau of Prisons, and the surveillance video. 

Questions for Barr about Jeffrey Epstein death investigation

Did the video Barr reviewed from MCC have a missing minute?

Before the supposedly “raw” surveillance video was released last month, showing about 11 hours of footage from the night Epstein died, Attorney General Pam Bondi told reporters that one minute right before midnight was missing was because “every night is reset, so every night should have the same missing minute,” from 11:59 p.m. to midnight.

That was later disputed by a government source familiar with the investigation in an interview with CBS News in July. Another high-level government source said the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons and the Department of Justice’s Office of Inspector General are in possession of full unedited copies of the video, and those copies do not have a missing minute. Why the FBI released the video with that small segment missing is unclear, and it is not known if anything notable occurred during that minute.

Does Barr still believe that “between the time Epstein was locked in his cell at 7:49 p.m. on the night of August 9 and the time he was discovered the next morning at 6:30 a.m., no one entered his tier”? 

Barr made that statement in 2019, but the CBS News video analysis indicates the view from the jail camera does not conclusively prove no one entered Epstein’s cell block. A staircase leading to Epstein’s cell block is almost entirely out of view from the camera, with just a small sliver of stairs visible. From the video released publicly, experts told CBS News it is impossible to determine whether anyone entered the jail unit and accessed the staircase without being captured on the recording.

Just before 10:40 p.m., the video shows a glimpse of an orange shape moving up the stairs leading to Epstein’s tier. The inspector general’s report said that it was a jail staffer bringing orange linens or inmate clothing up the stairs. Some video forensic experts who reviewed that footage at the request of CBS News said they were skeptical about that interpretation. They suggested the shape could be a person dressed in an orange prison jumpsuit climbing the stairs. Inmates were typically confined to their cells late at night.This image from the video — zoomed in and highlighted by CBS News – shows a partial view of something orange on the stairs leading to Jeffrey Epstein's cell tier.  / Credit: U.S. Bureau of Prisons

This image from the video — zoomed in and highlighted by CBS News – shows a partial view of something orange on the stairs leading to Jeffrey Epstein’s cell tier.  / Credit: U.S. Bureau of Prisons

What did the DOJ do to investigate theories other than suicide? 

No evidence has surfaced suggesting that anyone else was involved in Epstein’s death. He had been placed on suicide watch after an apparent attempt to hang himself a month before, and remained under heightened observation. However, there do remain significant unanswered questions about his death, some of which were raised in a “60 Minutes” report in 2020 looking at the medical evidence. Those included questions relating to the autopsy

A private autopsy commissioned by Epstein’s family, conducted alongside the official examination by the medical examiner, raised concerns about the angle of the ligature marks on his neck and the presence of broken neck bones, findings that suggested a level of force greater than typically associated with a hanging. The medical examiner disputed that, saying such fractures can occur in suicides.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Time For A Pause!

08/17/2025

Time to take a pause from the hate of the sick puppies.

ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNqup1xmk-o

A Child’s Last Wish Is to Meet Trump – What He Does for Her Family Changes Them Forever

The following is dedicated to all of those sick folks who are filled with hate for a man who is trying to fix the broken spokes in the American spirit.

****

Yourself to Blame
by Mayme White Miller

If things go bad for you

And make you a bit ashamed

Often you will find out that

You have yourself to blame

~

Swiftly we ran to mischief

And then the bad luck came

Why do we fault others?

We have ourselves to blame

~

Whatever happens to us,

Here is what we say

“Had it not been for so-and-so

Things wouldn’t have gone that way.”

~

And if you are short of friends,

I’ll tell you what to do

Make an examination,

You’ll find the faults in you…

~

You are the captain of your ship,

So agree with the same

If you travel downward

You have yourself to blame

****

MSNBC host curses on air, repeatedly attacks Trump during Putin summit | Fox News

ttps://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-host-explodes-live-air-over-putin-talks-rants-trump-doesnt-give-s-about-democracy?msockid=2af1f5ca0eae6a0012ece0830f8b6bda

A lady – she’s not.

KOMMONSENTSJANE – WHY ARE DEMOCRATS SO ANXIOUS TO DESTROY AMERICA?

Posted on April 12, 2018 by kommonsentsjane

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – President Trump Reveals 10 Striking Takeaways From Putin Summit.

-8/17/2025

Sean Hannity

ttps://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-reveals-10-striking-takeaways-from-putin-summit-hannity-interview?intcmp=fb_fnc&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook

Donald Trump

Trump reveals 10 striking takeaways from Putin summit in Hannity interview.

President Trump was tight-lipped after his high-stakes summit but offered some key insight with Sean Hannity.

 By Peter Pinedo Fox News

Published 

President Trump reveals whether another meeting is in the cards after Alaska summit with Putin

President Donald Trump discusses how his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin went and what’s next in peace negotiations and more in an exclusive interview on ‘Hannity.’

President Donald Trump was tight-lipped after his high-stakes summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday but offered some key insight into the meeting to Fox News’ Sean Hannity in an exclusive interview.

Here are the key takeaways from Trump’s highly anticipated meeting with the Russian leader as shared with Hannity. 

1. ‘No deal until there’s a deal’

Trump told Hannity that “as far as I’m concerned, there’s no deal until there’s a deal.” He noted, however, that “we did make a lot of progress.”

2. Putin ‘wants to see it done’

The president noted to Hannity that he believes Putin is not only open to peace but that he “wants to see it done.” 

TRUMP SAYS HE ‘WON’T BE HAPPY’ IF PUTIN DOES NOT AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE IN UKRAINE DURING ALASKA SUMMIT

Trump and Putin greet each other in Alaska

President Donald Trump shakes hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the tarmac after they arrived at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Aug. 15, 2025. (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

3. Not prepared to share what the sticking point was

Pressed by Hannity to share what the “one big issue you don’t agree on” that kept the leaders from walking away with a ceasefire deal, Trump declined to share. He said, “No, I’d rather not. I guess somebody’s going to go public with it, they’ll figure it out, but no, I don’t want to do that, I want to see if we can get it done.” 

4. Up to Zelenskyy and Europe

After taking such a major step as to physically meet with the Russian president, Trump said it is now “up to [Ukrainian] President [Volodymyr] Zelenskyy to get it done and maybe the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit.”

5. Trump open to trilateral meeting

The president said he would be open to attending a trilateral meeting with the presidents of Ukraine and Russia, saying, “If they’d like, I’ll be at that meeting. They’re going to set up a meeting now between President Zelenskyy and President Putin and myself, I guess, not that I want to be there, but I want to get it done.” 

He added, “I’ll be there.” 

PUTIN PRAISES TRUMP’S ‘SINCERE’ PEACE EFFORTS, SIGNALS POSSIBLE US-RUSSIA NUCLEAR DEAL

Putin and Trump

President Donald Trump meets with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin on Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

6. Meeting a ‘10’

Trump said he would rate the meeting a 10 out of 10, saying, “I think the meeting was a 10 in the sense that we got along great.” 

7. Russia respects America now

Asked what he thought finally brought Putin to the negotiating table, Trump answered, “I don’t want to say anything brought him, he’s a very smart guy, nothing brought him to the table, so to speak.” 

“I think he respects our country now, he didn’t respect it under Biden, I can tell you that, he had no respect for it.” 

8. No war if Trump was in office

Trump also commented that he “was so happy” that Putin shared his belief during their joint press conference that the Russia-Ukraine war would never have happened had he been in office at the time. 

ZELENSKYY NOT INVITED TO UPCOMING TRUMP, PUTIN TALKS — WHITE HOUSE SAYS THIS WAS THE REASON

Putin Meets Trump

Putin and Trump meet on the tarmac at Elmendorf Air Force Base in Alaska. (Reuters/Kevin Lamarque)

9. Advice to Zelenskyy

Without hesitating, Trump said his advice to Zelenskyy after Friday’s meeting with Putin would be “make a deal.” 

10. 2020 election rigged

Trump shared that Putin told him he believed the 2020 election was rigged because of the widespread mail-in voting, saying, “You can’t have a great democracy with mail-in voting.” 

Peter Pinedo is a politics writer for Fox News Digital.

****

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment