KOMMONSENTSJANE – Fani Willis got hit with one crushing defeat that ended her political career for good.

Posted on September 19, 2025 by kommonsentsjane

09/18/2025

Another lawfare/corruption case won by the President.

****

Fani Willis got hit with one crushing defeat that ended her political career for good

ttps://unmuzzlednews.com/fani-willis-got-hit-with-one-crushing-defeat-that-ended-her-political-career-for-good/?utm_source=decide&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=umn_3046777713&utm_term=&utm_content=240175

Fani Willis got hit with one crushing defeat that ended her political career for good

September 18, 2025

Joseph Sohm via Shutterstock

Fani Willis thought she could weaponize the justice system to take down Donald Trump.

She bet everything on a corrupt prosecution that blew up in her face.

And Fani Willis got hit with one crushing defeat that ended her political career for good.

Georgia’s Supreme Court slams the door on Fani Willis

The Georgia Supreme Court just delivered the final blow to one of the most corrupt prosecutions in American history.

Willis tried every trick in the book to salvage her bogus case against President Trump, but the state’s highest court wasn’t buying what she was selling.

The court flat-out refused to hear her appeal, which means she’s officially done prosecuting Trump and anyone else in this sham election interference case.¹

Here’s what really happened behind the scenes.

Willis got caught red-handed having an affair with Nathan Wade, the guy she handpicked as chief prosecutor in the Trump case.

Court testimony revealed that Willis and Wade were involved in a personal relationship while he was serving as the lead prosecutor she had appointed.²

The whole setup stunk to high heaven, and even Georgia’s liberal court system couldn’t ignore the obvious corruption.

Court exposes Willis for what she really is

Justice Andrew Pinson didn’t mince words when he wrote the majority opinion.

The guy basically said this kind of corruption is so obvious that it’s unlikely to happen again in future cases – which tells you everything you need to know about how badly Willis screwed up.³

“Thus, even if one believes that the Court of Appeals erred in reaching that decision, granting review to answer that question would be mere error correction, and this Court generally does not exercise our certiorari jurisdiction merely to correct errors that do not have some broader impact on Georgia law,” Pinson wrote.

Translation: This case was so corrupt it’s not even worth our time to review it.

But here’s the kicker – even one of the liberal justices saw right through Willis’s scheme.

Justice Carla Wong McMillian actually wanted to hear the case, but not to help Willis.

She wanted to make sure every lawyer in Georgia understands that this kind of corrupt behavior will get you disqualified.⁴

Republicans celebrate the end of Willis’s witch hunt

Georgia Republicans wasted no time celebrating the death of Willis’s political career.

U.S. Representative Mike Collins summed it up perfectly: “End the witch hunt.”⁵

Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones was even more direct about what just happened.

“The Supreme Court just shut Fani Willis down. Her political circus is over. She came after myself, President Trump and all of our conservative values, and has now lost – twice. Georgia deserves better than a DA who weaponizes the justice system for her own political gain,” Jones wrote on social media.⁶

And you know what? He’s absolutely right.

Willis didn’t lose once – she lost twice.

First, the Court of Appeals kicked her off the case, and now the Supreme Court refused to bail her out.

Look what this really means for corrupt prosecutors

Here’s what makes this victory so important.

The Georgia Supreme Court just sent a clear message that you can’t weaponize the justice system without facing consequences.

Willis thought she was untouchable because she was going after Trump, but even liberal judges have their limits when it comes to obvious conflicts of interest.

And when she got caught, she had the nerve to act like the victim.

And when she got caught, she had the nerve to act like the victim.

Willis told WSB-TV that she “disagreed” with the court’s decision, like anyone cares what she thinks at this point.⁸

Here’s why this victory matters for America

Look, this isn’t just about one corrupt prosecutor in Georgia.

This is about what happens when radical leftist District Attorneys think they can weaponize the justice system to take down their political enemies.

Willis thought she was untouchable because she was going after Trump.

She figured the media would cover for her, the Democrat establishment would protect her, and the courts would look the other way.

But here’s what she didn’t count on – even liberal judges have their limits when it comes to this kind of brazen corruption.

When you’re caught having an affair with your handpicked prosecutor while paying him with taxpayer money, that’s a bridge too far even for the most partisan court.

This sends a message to every corrupt prosecutor in America: You can’t weaponize the justice system without consequences.

Willis bet her entire career on taking down Trump, and she lost everything.

Her prosecution is dead, her reputation is destroyed, and her political career is over.

The woman who thought she was going to be the hero who brought down Trump is now just another cautionary tale about what happens when you put politics ahead of justice.

And that’s exactly what she deserves.

¹ Kim Jarrett, “Georgia’s top court declines to hear Fani Willis appeal,” The Center Square, September 16, 2025.

****

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Charlie Kirk’s death ‘intimidation’ by the left: Liz Truss….

Posted on September 18, 2025 by kommonsentsjane

Story by James Bickerton

09/18/2025

Related earlier – Why Charlie Kirk’s murder is a “tragic loss for our country- his ability to debate while maintaining civility is unmatched in anyone in our lifetime.”

All of you, the right and the left – can someone explain to me – what was accomplished by this killing? A young man who did the killing has lost all rights in living a life in FREEDOM by this act. And, then, his friends will lose respect from the public for their hate. Some of his friends will be investigated for perhaps being a part of the murder of Charlie Kirk.

Now – tell me about all of these folks who are cheering on about the murder of Charlie Kirk? Does it make you feel better to celebrate Charlie Kirk’s murder? What about Charlie Kirk’s mother/father/rest of the family – wife who doesn’t have a husband and and two children don’t have a dad – and how that alters their lives. The children who will grow up and not have a father? Then, all of his friends. The suffering all of the family is going through for the rest of their life and the amount of time that will be spent investigating the murder and all of those people who will now suffer and pay a toll.

Was it really worth it?

Freedom of speech – includes everyone not just the right or the left. In the U.S. that includes everyone.

Hate is a word that should not be celebrated because the outcome does not reap any rewards.

Therefore, all of you folks who are celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death and think his death is “better than sliced bread” as you celebrate – take a minute and “walk in Charlie Kirk’s wife/family’s shoes and the killer’s family” and see if you would still celebrate Charlie Kirk’s murder and walk in the killer’s shoes?

All of you have to understand – Charlie Kirk’s death does not stop his ideas and words from moving forward.

So all of you who want to celebrate Charlie Kirk’s murder – go ahead and see if your joy moves any mountains.

Is that stain on you is how you want to pass through life being remembered as “that person who hated Charlie Kirk and how you want to be called out as the person who hated Charlie Kirk?

That is how people will remember those people who “hated” Charlie Kirk – and celebrated the person who murdered Charlie Kirk.

Now, the question is – how does this person who murdered Charlie Kirk think about what he has done?

We now need to pray for the family and those who are filled with so much hate to help them through this useless act. There were no winners with this senseless murder.

****

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/charlie-kirk-s-death-intimidation-by-the-left-liz-truss/ar-AA1MPb0o?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=68cc2402b2074b33ab97712f030cc86b&ei=33

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/charlie-kirk-s-death-intimidation-by-the-left-liz-truss/ar-AA1MPb0o?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=68cc2402b2074b33ab97712f030cc86b&ei=33

Former British Prime Minister Liz Truss has told Newsweek the assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, who she met during his recent UK visit, was a “huge shock” and hit out at what she described as intimidation “on the extreme left.”

Truss also urged Oxford University to expel George Abaraonye, a student and incoming president of the prestigious Oxford Union, after he responded to the attack on Kirk by posting “Charlie Kirk got shot loool” on social media.

Why It Matters

The assassination of 31-year-old Kirk, co-founder of influential conservative group Turning Point USA, sparked condemnation from prominent Republican and Democratic politicians, though there was controversy after some posts celebrating or mocking his death went viral on social media.

Kirk was fatally shot in the neck on September 10 at the Utah Valley University campus while debating with students.

Tyler James Robinson, aged 22, has been charged with aggravated murder and has yet to enter a plea. Prosecutors have indicated they will seek the death penalty.

What To Know

Speaking to Newsweek, Truss said she met Kirk when he visited the UK this year, during which he addressed students at both the Oxford and Cambridge Unions in May.

She said: “I met Charlie Kirk when he was over in the UK earlier this year. He’s a fantastic guy. We were very keen to work with him on how we could help change Britain and Europe, learn the lessons of what he’d built in the US, reaching out to young people, talking about conservatism, talking about ideas, and what happened to him is just appalling.Many Investors Will Miss This Stock. You Can Own It Now.

“I think what has happened on the extreme left, basically using intimidation, even being prepared to assassinate somebody, shows how wrong, wrong they’ve gone, and how kind of anti civilizational they are.

“So, it was a huge shock. Huge shock. Somebody that, you know, I’d recently met, that we were all talking about just suddenly gone like that.”

Asked if political assassinations are “just a problem on the left” Truss said “if you look what happened to Trump, what happened to Charlie Kirk, we didn’t see that kind of threat to Biden or Kamala Harris. You know, this is deliberate intimidation and the celebration of his killing by people on the left has been absolutely shocking, including the president elect of the Oxford Union.”

Charlie Kirk's death 'intimidation' by the left: Liz Truss

Charlie Kirk’s death ‘intimidation’ by the left: Liz Truss© Newsweek/Luke John Smith

Following Kirk’s shooting Abaraonye, the incoming Oxford Union president who debated the conservative commentator during his appearance before the body in May, on Instagram wrote: “Charlie Kirk got shot loool.” Loool appears to be an extended version of lol, an abbreviation for “laugh out loud.”10,000+ Investors Already Own This Private Stock

According to British newspaper The Daily Telegraph in a private Whatsapp group for students Abaraonye also wrote: “Charlie Kirk got shot, let’s f****** go.”

Student publication The Tab reported Abaraonye later said he regretted acting “impulsively” adding his comments were “sharped by the context of Mr Kirk’s own rhetoric.”

Speaking to Newsweek an Oxford University spokesperson said: “The Oxford Union is independent of the University. We deplore comments appearing to endorse violence—they are unacceptable and entirely contrary to the values of our community.”

The Oxford Union, which is student run but not controlled by the university, said complaints regarding Abaraonye’s comments would be “addressed with the utmost seriousness.”

Truss was UK prime minister from September to October 2022, a period that covered the death of Queen Elizabeth II.

What People Are Saying

Speaking to Newsweek Truss said: “I want Britain to have its MAGA moment…we need the type of revolution that we’re seeing in the US, the MAGA, the independent media revolution, and now the Trump revolution, that is exactly what we need in Britain and Europe. Otherwise, we are in very, very serious trouble so I want to see that. I think that the uprising from the public is evident. Look at the protests outside migrant hotels. Look at the [September 13 in London] Unite the Kingdom rally. Look at the support for Reform. All of those things point to very, very unhappy public.”

In a statement Baroness Amos, the master of University College, Oxford, where Abaraonye studies, said: “Though Mr Abaraonye’s comments are abhorrent, they do not contravene the college’s policies on free speech, or any other relevant policy. Therefore, no disciplinary action will be taken.”

What Happens Next

The Trump administration has vowed to take action against individuals or groups it believes glorified or celebrated Kirk’s assassination, and such efforts are likely to continue in the coming weeks.

****

God Bless Charlie Kirk/his wife/children/and the family.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – “Biggest Fraud”: Patel’s Epic Takedown of Schiff in Senate Clash

Posted on September 17, 2025 by kommonsentsjane

9/17/2025

Thank you for putting Schiff in his place. Schiff and Gavin Newsom are a disgrace to society.

On Tuesday afternoon, a heated argument between lifelong political opponents Adam Schiff and Kash Patel escalated to a climax, resulting in a brief interruption of a continuing hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The altercation started when California Democrat Adam Schiff questioned FBI director James Patel about the decision to transfer Ghislaine Maxwell, a friend of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, to a less secure jail.

Schiff probed Patel further, asking whether he thought the American people were “stupid” enough to accept his explanation that the relocation of Maxwell was a decision made independently by the Bureau of Prisons, rather than a politically driven action by the White House.

“What I am doing is protecting this country… and combating the weaponization of intelligence by the likes of you,” Patel interrupted Schiff, his voice filled with determination. Regarding Russiangate, on January 6, we have repeatedly shown that you are unreliable. You have to be the most dishonest senator who has ever served in America’s capital.

He was further characterized by Patel as “a political buffoon at best.”

Schiff has been at odds with Comey ever since he oversaw the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election while serving as leader of the House Intelligence Committee. The investigation’s credibility was to be undermined by Patel, who was employed by the House Intelligence at the time.

Five years down the road, Schiff was a member of a select committee that looked into the assault on the Capitol on January 6, 2021; in the meantime, Patel was a lawyer for several rioters in prison.

Years later, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee used Patel’s reposting of a meme depicting him putting a chainsaw to Schiff’s head as evidence that he should not be confirmed to head the FBI. According to another photo that Democrats posted, Patel appears to be holding something, while Schiff’s face is positioned next to a catapult.

Earlier this year, Patel accused Schiff, while serving as leader of the Intelligence Committee, of plotting to release damaging material on President Trump. The allegations have been refuted by Schiff, via his spokeswoman.

The senior Democrat on the Judiciary panel, Sen. Dick Durbin, urged with chair Chuck Grassley to take command of the situation as the yelling continued on Tuesday. With a series of hammer blows, Grassley proclaimed, “Both of you be quiet.”

On Tuesday, during what was arguably the most contentious part of the questioning, Patel was asked a number of questions on his handling of the Epstein case and the investigation into the murder of conservative political analyst Charlie Kirk, among other subjects.

This, however, was only the day’s first heated exchange. Another entanglement that Patel had with Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) was when Booker informed the head of the FBI, “I think you’re not gonna be around long”—implying that Trump will betray him at some point.

As a result of the remark, another yelling match ensued, with Booker responding with the words “I’m not afraid of you” and Patel labeling Booker as “an embarrassment to your country.”

Schiff accused Patel of trying to “save his job” by appearing before Congress and said that Patel was “performing for an audience of one” in a social media post following the hearing’s completion. Also, the president’s nickname for Schiff, “Pencil Neck,” was praised by the White House for Patel’s pursuit of Schiff.

On Wednesday, Patel is scheduled to appear before the House Judiciary Committee.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – The Barr Bombshell: How His Words Shred Dems’ Epstein-Trump Narrative

Posted on September 17, 2025 by kommonsentsjane

09/17/2025

The Barr Bombshell: How His Words Shred Dems’ Epstein-Trump Narrative

ttps://headlinesforever.com/the-barr-bombshell-how-his-words-shred-dems-epstein-trump-narrative/

The Barr Bombshell: How His Words Shred Dems’ Epstein-Trump Narrative

On Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee made public a transcript of former Attorney General Bill Barr’s deposition, which, according to the Republican claims, shows that Barr was unaware of any incriminating connections between President Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. The transcript is about 120 pages long.

Even if the committee’s ranking Democrat said last month that the complete transcript did not exonerate Trump, this remains the case.

Several individuals and organizations have been subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee as part of their investigation of the Department of Justice’s handling of the Epstein case.

Barr is one of them; he told investigators that he and Trump discussed Epstein twice: once after the convicted sex offender’s suicide and another occasion he couldn’t pinpoint.

Barr further denied that Trump had any opinions on the DOJ’s Epstein investigation, nor did he offer directions or voice preferences regarding its handling, as seen in the transcript that HeadlinesForever Digital was able to get.

Barr stated he did not remember informing Trump that his name was on Epstein-related materials during a line of inquiry by Democratic Texas Representative Jasmine Crockett.

“I’m curious to know, in those conversations that you do recall with the president, do you recall ever informing him that he was in the Epstein files at all, number one?” The transcript states that Crockett inquired.

Well, I’m not sure what the “Epstein files” mean these days, Barr said in response. However, I must say that I refrained from engaging in such a discourse with him. Logs showing that he was using Epstein’s jet for commutes from, say, Miami to New York or New Jersey, or somewhere along those lines, became public knowledge at some time. That was not anything I remember talking about with him.

Crockett followed up, “And you have no direct knowledge of any of the young women or women that claimed that they had encounters with the president through Epstein, correct?”

There was no mention of proof to back up that assertion, Barr stated, as reported in the transcript.

Following the investigation, Barr informed the authorities that he thought any damaging information against Trump would have been revealed long ago if it had existed. He also hinted that the same would have been the case with former president Bill Clinton, who, similar to Trump, was reputedly acquainted with Epstein at one point.

If anyone in the government felt that someone was trying to hide something up, I think word would get out. I believe word would spread. To add insult to injury, “New York and the Southern District of New York are notorious for housing countless leaks pertaining to investigations,” as Barr pointed out.

“So, in your experience, you have no doubt that if SDNY prosecutors saw evidence of a crime, they would have followed that evidence to indictment and, if it led to a conviction, they would have followed the facts to the end,” a lawyer from the House Oversight Committee questioned. Does it seem reasonable to you?”

Barr stated that he would have expected similar actions, even from prominent figures.

“I also feel, you know, that, you know, they would’ve done the same for Clinton, I believe,” he pointed out.

It seems to me that this was all happening under Joe Biden’s presidency as well, and that if they had evidence, it would have been easy to use it against President Trump. My doubts about the existence of any proof stem from the fact that I was never given any information about it.

“It is possible that the SDNY did not inform me, you know, how deep they were in the investigation of particular individuals,” the ex-official said to the previous Trump administration. I wouldn’t be surprised by it.

“By the same token, I feel that my view of that office and the people involved would be that, if they had evidence establishing a crime, they would pursue it as such,” said Barr.

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, claimed that Barr’s comments did not absolve Trump of guilt, leading to partisan tensions following his appearance.

During his deposition with the committee yesterday, Attorney General Barr was unable to exonerate President Trump of any wrongdoing. In a statement dated August, Garcia argued that Chairman [James Comer, R-Ky.,] ought to make available the complete, unaltered transcript of his interview.

However, it seems from the transcript that Trump was not criminally connected to Epstein, at least according to Barr’s memory.

One of Barr’s two talks with Trump about Epstein occurred after she learned about the suicide, she claimed. I informed him about it and assured him that we would be researching it thoroughly, and I phoned him up and said, “You better brace for this” or something along those lines. The second one, I’m not sure if it occurred before, during, or after his suicide; I mean, it might have happened around the time of his arrest or afterwards, among the ongoing happenings.

It was common practice, according to the transcript, for current Attorney General Pam Bondi to notify Trump that his name was in the Epstein files in the last few months. Barr defended this action.

“I think that would normally be what the attorney general would do, you know, is to give the president a heads-up if something is going to happen like that, the release of documents that have his name in it and that will be, you know, a lot – there would be a lot of speculation about it,” he said.

Communicating with the chief executive about the impending release of his name is entirely standard practice. I don’t see any fundamental problem with it.

Barr admitted at one time that the FBI investigation had flaws, but he struggled to remember many details about the inquiry overall. The time the authorities spent searching in vain for Ghislaine Maxwell was characterized by him as “embarrassing.”

Barr also denied any involvement in the conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein’s death, even though the DOJ’s decision to shut the case earlier this year caused uproar.

“Absolutely,” he said when asked if the belief that Epstein committed suicide remained in his mind.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment