KOMMONSENTSJANE – NPR CEO Katherine Maher Revealed To Be On Signal’s Board.

04/03/2025

The rest of the story.

What to know about Signal, the app used by Trump officials to text war plans – CBS News

ttps://newshill.org/npr-ceo-katherine-maher-revealed-to-be-on-signals-board/

March 28, 2025

NPR CEO Katherine Maher Revealed To Be On Signal’s Board

A bombshell connection between NPR CEO Katherine Maher and the encrypted messaging app Signal has sparked outrage as the “Signalgate” scandal continues to unfold. Could she have been behind some of the Signal scandal all along?

At a glance:

  • NPR CEO Katherine Maher serves as Board Chair of the Signal Foundation, maker of the app used in the “Signalgate” controversy
  • Signal was used for communications between top Trump administration officials, including VP J.D. Vance and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz
  • Maher recently faced tough questioning from conservative lawmakers at the Capitol, but her Signal connection was largely overlooked
  • Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo called the connection “fascinating” while Rep. Pat Fallon described it as an “odd coincidence”
  • NPR has acknowledged Maher’s role with Signal in disclosure notes, but the relationship remains largely uninvestigated

Controversial Connection Exposed

The Chief Executive of National Public Radio has been caught in a web of controversy as her leadership role at the Signal Foundation comes under scrutiny amid the growing “Signalgate” scandal. Katherine Maher, who became NPR’s CEO earlier this year, simultaneously serves as the Board Chair of the organization behind the encrypted messaging app used in leaked conversations between Trump administration officials.

Conservative lawmakers grilled Maher during a recent Capitol Hill appearance about her past liberal statements and NPR’s perceived bias, but surprisingly failed to address her Signal Foundation connection. The oversight has raised eyebrows among media watchdogs who question whether this significant conflict of interest is being deliberately ignored.

Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo highlighted this troubling connection during a recent broadcast, expressing disbelief at what appears to be more than coincidence. “What are the odds that Katherine Maher, the leftist NPR CEO, is on the board of Signal as well?” Bartiromo asked during an exchange with Texas Republican Rep. Pat Fallon.

Bartiromo drove the point home by adding: “I find it just fascinating that she’s on the board of Signal,” to which Fallon responded, “Yeah, that’s an awfully odd coincidence.” The exchange underscores growing concerns about potential behind-the-scenes coordination between leftist media figures and the tech platforms facilitating government communications.

NPR’s Disclosure and Ongoing Questions

NPR has acknowledged Maher’s position with the Signal Foundation in a disclosure note and panel discussion, but critics argue this minimal transparency falls far short. The public radio network, which receives taxpayer funding, has done little to investigate or explain the potential conflicts arising from their CEO’s dual role during a major controversy involving the very app her organization oversees.

Rep. Fallon described Maher as a “hard lefty” during his Fox Business appearance, pointing to her history of leftist statements that have outraged conservatives. While Fallon downplayed the significance of “Signalgate” itself, noting that National Security Advisor Mike Waltz had taken responsibility for the situation, the congressman’s comments highlight the partisan nature of NPR’s leadership.

Social media has exploded with reactions from conservatives questioning why Maher’s Signal connection received virtually no attention during her congressional testimony. Many users pointed out that while representatives thoroughly questioned her about NPR’s liberal bias, they completely missed the opportunity to address what could be a far more significant conflict related to the ongoing scandal.

The Broader Implications

The “Signalgate” controversy centers on leaked communications between key figures in President Trump’s administration, including Vice President J.D. Vance and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz. These encrypted conversations, conducted through the Signal app that Maher’s foundation oversees, have become a flashpoint in discussions about government transparency and potential deep state interference.

Legal proceedings related to the controversy continue to develop, with Judge James Boasberg now presiding over a lawsuit connected to the leaked communications. The involvement of a federal judge underscores the serious nature of the situation and raises further questions about how communications on the supposedly secure platform became public.

Maher’s past statements and political leanings have become increasingly relevant as her dual role attracts more attention. Critics argue that someone with pronounced liberal views controlling both a taxpayer-funded media organization and the foundation behind a controversial messaging platform represents a troubling concentration of power and potential avenue for bias to influence both journalism and secure government communications.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – The Democrats’ Broken Spoke – Lawfare.

04/03/2025

Democrats’ strategy is always illegal – they never operate under the Constitution or legally. The lady Senator is a former lawyer and knows better. That is why we have DOGE because the left always work against the system and never deal with facts/truth and have taken the country’s debt to an unbelievable height by hiding money in every department. At this point DOGE has found over 2 trillion dollars of hidden money under fictitious file names. Just think trillions of dollars.

This woman is putting shame to her name.

****

What is ‘lawfare’ and why is everyone talking about it? | Opinion – Deseret News

The rise of ‘lawfare’ and its implications

Published: June 30, 2024, 9:00 p.m. MDT

Share

Eliza Anderson, Deseret News

Jennifer Graham

By Jennifer Graham

Jennifer is the Ideas and Culture editor and author of the Right to the Point newsletter. She has more than 30 years of experience as a journalist and writes from Boston.

In the fall of 2001, in the aftermath of the Kosovo War, an Air Force colonel went to Harvard University and offered a provocative statement in an equally provocative paper that began: “Is lawfare turning warfare into unfair?”

Charles J. Dunlap Jr., who is now a general, didn’t know then that his presentation at the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy would popularize a word that would reemerge today in a vastly different context.

He originally described lawfare as “using law as a weapon of war,” but later expanded that definition to include not just the use of law, but the misuse of law, to achieve an objective. Now executive director of Duke Law School’s Center on Law, Ethics and National Security, Dunlap made clear in the paper that many people who promoted lawfare in military operations saw it as a good thing, “an ameliorator of the misery of war.”Report ad

That is hardly the case in the term’s popular use today.

Lawfare has emerged as a buzzword in politics, a shorter, catchier phrase — or perhaps a euphemism — for a practice that has been described as “weaponization of the law” in order to hobble or eliminate a political opponent. The legal cases against former President Donald Trump, and the charges brought against Hunter Biden, are the reasons that this formerly niche term is now in the running for 2024′s word of the year.

The attorney general of Missouri, Andrew Bailey, has announced plans to sue the state of New York for “unconstitutional lawfare” in the case against Trump. Utah Sen. Mike Lee is among GOP senators who have signed a letter vowing to block any appropriations bill that funds “partisan lawfare.” And per Fox News Digital, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan intends to offer an appropriations package that would “defund the lawfare activities” of state and federal prosecutors who lead “politically sensitive investigations.”

Meanwhile, Jordan Peterson recently wondered on X if the arrest of conservative activist Tommy Robinson in Canada was an act of lawfare. A Texas state representative is alleging lawfare against whistleblowers who said a hospital is providing gender treatment that violates state law. And The Federalist website has launched a feature called “This Week in Lawfare Land.”

For a term that was relatively obscure until recently, we are suddenly awash in lawfare.

@AGAndrewBailey

Censorship has evolved even since we filed Missouri v. Biden. We are pushing forward undeterred with this case. But we will also adapt to the ever-changing battlefield of unconstitutional Leftist lawfare. All legal options are on the table.

ttps://beardsofliberty.com/watch-ted-cruz-destroys-democrats-in-heated-senate-showdown/?email=robjoy87%40windstream.net&ptn=28&source=BEC2P&r=false

WATCH! Ted Cruz DESTROYS Democrats in Heated Senate Showdown!

The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing descended into chaos after Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) deliva blistering takedown of Democrats’ relentless lawfare against President Donald Trump, calling them out as “the party of murderers and r*pists” for their blatant disregard for the rule of law and their shameless exploitation of activist judges to sabotage the will of the American people.

Cruz didn’t hold back, exposing the Democrats’ undemocratic scheme to overturn the 2024 election results through nationwide injunctions issued by radical, left-wing judges. “Democrats today HATE Democracy,” Cruz declared. “Democrats today are angry at the voters for re-electing Donald Trump… And they engaged in lawfare to stop democracy from operating.”

The Texas senator hammered home the truth: Democrats, furious that their bogus indictments and lawfare failed to stop Trump’s re-election, are now weaponizing the judiciary to block his policies. “Now that their efforts to indict President Trump and stop voters from re-electing him have failed, they are going out to seek radical judges to shut down policies,” Cruz said. He further slammed Democrats for siding with illegal aliens and violent criminals over American citizens, pointing out that their radical agenda has led to a dismal 26% approval rating nationwide.

“U.S. law says there is no judicial review, but they (Democrats) found a judge that says ‘hey We, the Democrat Party, we are the party of illegal aliens,” Cruz continued. “We are the party of murderers and r*pists and gang members in your communities.

Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), visibly triggered by Cruz’s unflinching honesty, resorted to her usual gaslighting tactics. “We love democracy,” she claimed, before launching into a hypocritical tirade about Trump supposedly violating the Constitution—conveniently ignoring her own party’s flagrant abuse of the legal system.

Klobuchar then lost her temper, screeching, “And the only reason why there’s all these INJUNCTIONS is because (Trump’s) violating the Constitution!” Cruz fired back, exposing the Democrats’ forum-shopping strategy: “Why don’t you file them (lawsuits) in red districts? Why are Democrats seeking out left-wing loons…”

Klobuchar’s meltdown continued as she raged about Trump’s “Long live the king!” Truth Social post, proving once again that Democrats are more obsessed with attacking Trump than addressing the real issues facing Americans. “We do NOT live in a kingdom and Elon Musk is not his court jester!” she ranted, completely missing the point—while Cruz exposed the left’s desperation to undermine a duly elected president.

The liberal media, of course, will spin this as Cruz being “divisive” while ignoring the Democrats’ blatant lawfare and judicial activism. But the American people see through the charade. They know that President Trump is fighting against a corrupt system that seeks to destroy him at every turn—and patriots stand with him.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMMONSENTSJANE – Tarlov Should Be Asking a Democrat – Why Did You All Steal/Loot Fellow Democrats/Republicans Is The Real Picture Show???

04/03/2025

For your information:

KOMMONSENTSJANE – The Democrats’ Broken Spoke – Lawfare.

Posted on April 3, 2025 by kommonsentsjane

04/03/2025

Appeals Court Permits DOGE to Continue Downsizing USAID

ttps://givemefive.news/appeals-court-permits-doge-to-continue-downsizing-usaid/

04/02/2025

Jonathan Turley: Democrats are ‘shredding’ their own beliefs to push back against Elon Musk | Watch

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/jonathan-turley-democrats-are-shredding-their-own-beliefs-to-push-back-against-elon-musk/vi-AA1C8XR9?ocid=BingNewsSerp

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/jonathan-turley-democrats-are-shredding-their-own-beliefs-to-push-back-against-elon-musk/vi-AA1C8XR9?ocid=BingNewsSerp

Tarlov was asking the wrong person the wrong Question? Senator Booker stalked the floor for 24 hours about all sorts of stuff and even about DOGE; but, he didn’t mention anything about why/who DOGE is investigating . Meanwhile at the ranch, Senator Booker wasn’t he a part of the Democrat stealing/looting? That is the real story here! Someone needs to ask the question. This stealing and looting didn’t just start yesterday. The people need an answer – the Democrats are responsible for the need for DOGE. It is hard to see when people are still voting for Democrats after DOGE finding all of this corruption/looting? People just don’t understand the seriousness of what they did to our country. Maybe they will – AFTER THE FAT LADY SINGS and they have to suffer the consequences.

How can this be – why doesn’t Tarlov ask Senator Booker that question. We have to understand – we wouldn’t be conducting this intensive investigation (DOGE) if the Democrats hadn’t hidden all of this loot?

Why is she trying to blame DOGE – when Musk is just the advisor to the President/contractor who is in charge of the job? It doesn’t have anything to do with Tesla cars or space? She is not very smart to try to blame the wrong people or try to distract the voters.

****

Fox News host Jessica Tarlov confronted billionaire Elon Musk on Tuesday over his glaring conflicts of interest as an adviser for President Donald Trump.

“So you’ve been making cuts to a lot of the agencies that have open investigations and regulatory battles with your companies,” said “The Five” host of Musk’s push to purge the federal budget of wasteful spending with his so-called Department of Government Efficiency..

She continued, “At the same time you continue to get billions in government contracts. Tesla gets billions in subsidies. How do you explain that to the American people?”

Tarlov has previously called out the world’s richest man over his businesses’ ties to Washington as companies SpaceX and Tesla received at least $18 billion in federal contracts over the past decade, according to spending data detailed by ABC News.

At least 11 federal agencies impacted by firings under Trump’s second term have also led investigations, have pending lawsuits against, or imposed other actions against Musk’s companies, The New York Times found in February.

Musk, in his Fox News appearance, stumbled as he seemingly dodged Tarlov’s question by turning away from his companies to focus on DOGE.

“Well, everything that DOGE does is an open book so we’re, I think, the most transparent action — most transparent organization in government ever,” he claimed.

Related video: Cory Booker goes after Elon Musk (NowThis)

Again:

Jonathan Turley: Democrats are ‘shredding’ their own beliefs to push back against Elon Musk | Watch

NowThis

Cory Booker goes after Elon Musk.

View on Watch

He later added, “I am under such an extreme spotlight, so much scrutiny that it is literally impossible for me to get away with anything nefarious, obviously nor do I wish to.”

On Monday, Trump told reporters that Musk will leave the White House “at some point” to go back to his businesses.

****

Doesn’t this seem awkward for Senator Booker?

Related..

Again:.

Cory Booker goes after Elon Musk | Watch

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

KOMM0NSENTSJANE – ABSENTEEISM VOTING DOESN’T WORK – TOO CORRUPT. Just Common Sense – Jim!

04/2/2025

Just like “not showing up for work” doesn’t WORK. How many people in the Biden group had two or three other jobs at the same time they weren’t doing any work for Uncle Sam? The people of this country were scammed big time.

Slingshot News

‘What The Hell Is Wrong With You People?’: Jim McGovern Loses It On Chip Roy Over Proxy Voting

It’s why this floor exists and there have been countless…..

Slingshot News

‘What The Hell Is Wrong With You People?’: Jim McGovern Loses It On Chip Roy Over Proxy Voting.

View on Watch

Rep. Jim McGovern loses it on Rep. Chip Roy and House Republicans over their opposition to proxy voting.

That is okay if he gets upset – but, he doesn’t seem to be ashamed at all of the looting/stealing the left did. Has anyone asked a Democrat – WHY DID THEY COMMIT THE HEIST and the Democrats stole money from their own Democrats – now that is the tip of the iceberg? You would think that someone on MSNBC would ask a Democrat that question.

That is why they call it WORK – you have to be present and accounted for…no – ifs, ands, or buts.

kommonsentsjane

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment