01/08/2024
The oil is rising to the surface.
ttps://dailypresser.com/doug-g/documents-suggest-pelosi-and-fani-willis-coordinated-on-trump-probe/
Follow America’s fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices.
Judicial Watch has unveiled what it claims is evidence of direct coordination between Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s January 6 committee, raising serious questions about the impartiality of investigations targeting former President Donald Trump.
The documents were disclosed following a legal battle where Judicial Watch forced Fulton County to release withheld records. These communications, according to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, demonstrate a coordinated effort to undermine Trump and his allies.
The controversy emerged after the Superior Court in Fulton County, Georgia, ordered a payment of $21,578 in attorney’s fees to Judicial Watch. The fees stemmed from an open-records lawsuit seeking communications between Fani Willis, Special Counsel Jack Smith, and Pelosi’s January 6 committee.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton discussed the findings on Steve Bannon’s War Room. Bannon didn’t hold back, stating, “You now have evidence about Fani Willis and Nancy Pelosi colluding together on this vast criminal conspiracy against President Trump and other J6ers.”
Fitton detailed how the lawsuit forced the disclosure of documents after Fulton County repeatedly denied their existence. “They didn’t even bother to show up in court and answer a lawsuit,” he noted, adding that the county defaulted on the case. This failure to defend their position led to a court order mandating the release of the records.
Among the documents are communications that Judicial Watch claims demonstrate coordination between Willis’s investigation and Pelosi’s January 6 committee. These alleged connections are particularly significant given Trump’s indictment in Fulton County over his efforts to challenge the 2020 election results.
Fitton argued that the documents expose the political nature of the investigation. “We caught her,” he stated. “She finally had to fess up to having documents … and just last night, the court told her she has to give us $20,000 in attorney’s fees.”
The records reportedly include at least one letter from Fani Willis to Rep. Bennie Thompson, the chairman of the January 6 committee. This letter, Fitton suggests, highlights a collaborative effort to target Trump and his allies.
While Judicial Watch has achieved a significant victory in uncovering these records, Fitton emphasized that the fight for transparency isn’t over. “We’re still fighting for the full release of the records,” he said. He also accused Fulton County of deliberately obstructing the process by initially denying the existence of the documents.
The court-ordered payment of attorney’s fees underscores the gravity of the case. According to Fitton, “If you don’t show up in court and you’re a government agency, that’s kind of a big deal.”
The revelations have ignited a firestorm of criticism, particularly among conservatives, who view the findings as further evidence of political weaponization. Many argue that the alleged coordination between Willis and Pelosi undermines the legitimacy of the Fulton County investigation.
Critics contend that the investigations into Trump have been driven more by political motives than a genuine pursuit of justice. Fitton echoed these sentiments, calling the coordination “a political collusion targeting Trump and his supporters.”
The latest disclosures add to growing skepticism about the impartiality of government institutions. Conservatives have long accused the January 6 committee of operating as a partisan body, and these findings could bolster claims of bias in the Trump investigations.
The timing of Trump’s Fulton County indictment, coupled with the alleged involvement of figures like Pelosi, has fueled speculation that the investigations are part of a broader effort to derail his political career.
Judicial Watch’s findings are likely to intensify calls for accountability and transparency in government investigations. The organization continues to push for the full release of records, arguing that the public has a right to know the extent of the alleged coordination.
For now, the revelations serve as a rallying cry for Trump’s supporters, who view these investigations as politically motivated attacks. The court-ordered payment to Judicial Watch also signals a significant setback for Fulton County, potentially casting doubt on the credibility of Willis’s probe.
As the legal battles unfold, the broader implications of these findings remain to be seen. However, one thing is clear: the fight over transparency, fairness, and the rule of law is far from over.
This development will undoubtedly continue to be a focal point in the ongoing debates surrounding Trump’s legal challenges and the integrity of government institutions. Whether this leads to broader accountability or further polarization remains uncertain, but the stakes couldn’t be higher.
****
kommonsentsjane