12/31/2024
Humor?
Twenty-one times it took to find the right judge/jury to make some money?
In the pending E. Carroll trial, it was brought back that it was past the statute of limitations when it was brought back. The Adult Survivors Act, a New York law allowing sexual-assault victims to file civil suits beyond expired statutes of limitations, was passed while Carroll I was pending1245. At the time, the criminal statute of limitations on such accusations was five years3.
https://www.vulture.com/2019/06/les-moonves-sexual-assault-e-jean-carroll-accusation.html
ttps://www.vulture.com/2019/06/les-moonves-sexual-assault-e-jean-carroll-accusation.html
Was this more Democrat lawfare against President Trump to stop him? Twenty-one accusations and she “bingo-ed.” Time to call this the charade it is.
Wonder how much cash she raked in on those 21 times?
ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ex-federal-prosecutor-why-latest-ruling-in-trump-e-jean-carroll-case-is-a-good-sign/ar-AA1wJb3I?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=b8f520f6204c4817902217869b59ecb5&ei=33
© provided by AlterNet
After an appeals court upheld veteran journalist E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million judgement against Donald Trump on Monday — one day after the president-elect former floated the idea of retribution against the ex-advice columnist — ex-federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann explained why Trump is likely the one in danger.
“This is an interesting day,” the former FBI counsel told MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace during the latest episode of Deadline: White House.
“I think clearly what the former president and president-elect is doing is another shot across to send a message to those people who might sue him for wrongs,” Weissmann continued. “E. Jean Carroll obviously was the victim here, as found by not one but two juries that awarded her a sum of over 85 million dollars, and they found that she was sexually is assaulted.”
READ MORE: ‘Guardrails of the rule of law’: Why federal appeals court upheld Trump/Carroll abuse verdict
The former top prosecutor went on to explain why Trump’s appeal failed.
“And so, the claims against her by Donald Trump are unsupported by any facts, and in fact, are contrary to the jury verdicts and just legally, by the way, Donald Trump cannot re-litigate that,” Weissmann emphasizes. “He had an opportunity not once, but twice, he could have testified and didn’t, so this is a lot of fear mongering, but it is effective fear mongering, as we have seen in a variety of different contexts. It’s something to keep an eye on in terms of the courts.”
Weissmann continued, “Today’s decision is frankly quite a routine decision. There was not much of a legal issue here. The court issued an unusually long opinion, probably to make sure this case was bulletproof in terms of an appeal. It was issued per curiam — one judge wrote it. I think that also was an is the effect of Trump, so that no one judge was bearing the brunt of any repercussions. And it remains to be seen just whether the judicial system is going to hold up. But today is a good sign. It remains to be seen whether it is going to last for four more years of this.”
Watch the video below or at this link.
READ MORE: ‘Did he defame her again?’ Expert points out how Trump just risked new E. Jean Carroll charges?
*****
Just another travesty of justice4 by the Democrats/weaponized justice department.
What the Durham report revealed about the ‘Mainstream Press’ – YouTube
Andrew Weissmann Predicts ‘The former president will be prosecuted. ’ Weissmann, a former top prosecutor in the FAKE Russia investigation against President Trump/Durham Report. When will the Durham report be adjudicated – since the investigation was proved to be fake?
When/who will adjudicate the Durham report?
Andrew Weissmann Predicts ‘The former president will be prosecuted’ – YouTube
ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGHbs9m_Ozs
Just ad an ‘h’ to the above.
Where is the clorox clean up?
kommonsentsjane
kommonsentsjane 